Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2502.09704

Iterative quantum optimisation with a warm-started quantum state

Haomu Yuan, Songqinghao Yang, C. H. W. Barnes

Published Feb 13, 2025• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We provide a method to prepare a warm-started quantum state from measurements with an iterative framework to enhance the quantum approximate optimisation algorithm (QAOA). The numerical simulations show the method can effectively address the "stuck issue" of the standard QAOA using a single-string warm-started initial state described in [Cain et al., 2023]. When applied to the $3$-regular MaxCut problem, our approach achieves an improved approximation ratio, with a lower bound that iteratively converges toward the best classical algorithms for $p=1$ standard QAOA. Additionally, in the context of the discrete global minimal variance portfolio (DGMVP) model, simulations reveal a more favourable scaling of identifying the global minimal compared to the QAOA standalone, the single-string warm-started QAOA and a classical constrained sampling approach.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2502.09704

Related papers

Quantum optimisation algorithms and their applications

Haomu Yuan

This thesis is devoted to four modern quantum optimisation algorithms and their applications. In the first chapter, we provide a complete Quantum Approximate Optimisation Algorithm (QAOA) pipeline for the discrete global minimum-variance portfolio (DGMVP) problem. We introduce an ansatz with efficient initial-state preparation, new hard mixing operators satisfying the constraints of the DGMVP problem, and scalable cost operators utilising binary encoding of the qubits. Benchmarking the method with the most effective optimisation strategies---dual annealing and unfrozen layerwise optimisation---indicates a scaling advantage over classical methods in finding the global optimum of the DGMVP problem. In the second chapter, we show an end-to-end quantum/quantum-inspired Goemans-Williamson semidefinite programming (SDP) method for relaxing Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimisation (QUBO) problems and extracting their rounding energy. Our method identifies a class of QUBO instances that is effectively solvable in polylogarithmic time relative to the problem dimension, under the assumptions of Pauli sparsification of the QUBO cost matrix, reducibility of the diagonal constraints, and efficient evaluation of the corresponding Gibbs-state expectation values. Further, we identify the commuting 1D Hamiltonian and the Kronecker graph as practically important instances. Our numerical experiments show that our method solves the SDP and QUBO with up to $2^{50}$ variables for 1D Hamiltonian instances and achieves results competitive with the best classical solver for Kronecker graphs, giving strong evidence of the power of our algorithm. In the third chapter, we improve the current QAOA method with an iterative warm-start initial-state preparation method. We implement the $t$-th order statistic state as the warm-start initial state generated from each QAOA optimisation loop. We achieve an improved approximation ratio when solving the 3-regular MaxCut problem, and find that the worst-case approximation ratio converges to that of the best classical algorithm for $p=1$ QAOA. Additionally, our method achieves more favourable scaling than standalone QAOA, single-string warm-started QAOA, and a classical constrained-sampling approach when solving the DGMVP problem. In the fourth chapter, we provide a hard-constrained Grover adaptive search (GAS) method for fixed-sum quadratic binary optimisation problems, and an extension of the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) framework for fixed-sum quartic binary optimisation. Our method guarantees at least a quadratic speed-up over the classical method, and exponentially reduces the gate count for solving fixed-sum binary optimisation when compared with the soft-constrained GAS in the fault-tolerant quantum computing regime. In summary, our contributions include efficient algorithms and novel frameworks that substantially improve performance and broaden the applicability of these quantum optimisation methods. The proposed methods exhibit favourable scaling behaviour and indicate potential quantum advantages in solving challenging optimisation problems, thereby motivating further research at the interface of quantum computing and optimisation.

•Jan 22, 2026•0 citations

Constrained Quantum Optimization via Iterative Warm-Start XY-Mixers

David Bucher, Maximilian Janetschek, Michael Poppel +3 more

The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a leading hybrid heuristic for combinatorial optimization, but efficiently handling hard constraints remains a significant challenge. XY-mixers successfully confine quantum state evolution to a feasible subspace, such as the Hamming-weight-1 sector for one-hot constraints. On the contrary, warm-starting biases the search toward promising regions based on preliminary solutions. Combining these two techniques requires maintaining the essential alignment between the initial state and the mixer Hamiltonian to preserve convergence guarantees. Previous work demonstrated warm-starting with XY-mixers via a biased initial state, but relying only on standard mixer Hamiltonians. Consequently, the initial state is no longer a ground state of the mixer. In this work, we overcome these limitations by formulating a warm-started XY-mixer Hamiltonian for one-hot constraints and proving its ground-state properties. Furthermore, we provide a shallow circuit implementation suitable for NISQ implementations. We embed the warm-starting into a classical heuristic that iteratively updates the bias based on previous samples, called Iterative Warm-Starting (IWS). Extensive numerical simulations on Max-$k$-Cut and Traveling Salesperson Problem instances demonstrate that IWS-QAOA significantly accelerates the solution-finding process, increasing the probability of sampling optimal solutions by orders of magnitude compared to standard XY-QAOA. Finally, we validate our approach on the ibm_boston QPU using hardware-tailored 144-qubit problem instances. By coupling IWS-QAOA with a greedy steepest-descent post-processing strategy to repair infeasible measurements caused by hardware noise, we successfully identify optimal solutions on actual quantum devices.

quant-pharXiv:2604.02083•New Journal of Physics•Apr 3, 2026•0 citations

Regularized Warm-Started Quantum Approximate Optimization and Conditions for Surpassing Classical Solvers on the Max-Cut Problem

Zichang He, Anuj Apte, Brandon Augustino +4 more

Demonstrating quantum heuristics that outperform strong classical solvers on large-scale optimization remains an open challenge. Here we introduce Regularized Warm-Started QAOA (RWS-QAOA), which initializes qubits by minimizing expected energy with a regularizer that penalizes near-bitstring states, preventing QAOA from stalling. We further propose a protocol that yields fixed, instance-independent parameters, enabling RWS-QAOA to operate as a non-variational algorithm in which the quantum circuit parameters are fixed and only a classical warm starting step is instance-dependent. We evaluate RWS-QAOA on the Max-Cut problem for random regular graphs, where this protocol yields a constant-depth quantum circuit, across three complementary settings. First, on Quantinuum's trapped-ion processor, RWS-QAOA outperforms the classical algorithms with the best provable guarantees for Max-Cut on $3$-regular graphs, namely Goemans-Williamson and Halperin-Livnat-Zwick, on $96$-node instances. Second, tensor-network simulations on graphs with up to $N{=}10{,}000$ nodes show that depth-$6$ RWS-QAOA, achieving an average cut fraction of $0.9167$, surpasses the best classical heuristics under matched restrictions (no local-search post-processing and no iterative refinement). Third, we remove these restrictions and benchmark against the strongest unrestricted classical heuristics, including an optimized parallel Burer-Monteiro solver that improves upon the MQLib implementation. Even against this stronger baseline, we project that surface-code RWS-QAOA reaches a quantum-classical runtime crossover below $0.2$ seconds on $3{,}000$-node graphs with fewer than $1.3$ million physical qubits. Our results show that constant-depth quantum circuits combined with a classical warm start have a credible potential to surpass classical solvers on the Max-Cut problem when executed on future quantum computers.

quant-pharXiv:2603.10191•Mar 12, 2026•0 citations

Warm-starting quantum optimization

Daniel J. Egger, Jakub Mareček, Stefan Woerner

There is an increasing interest in quantum algorithms for problems of integer programming and combinatorial optimization. Classical solvers for such problems employ relaxations, which replace binary variables with continuous ones, for instance in the form of higher-dimensional matrix-valued problems (semidefinite programming). Under the Unique Games Conjecture, these relaxations often provide the best performance ratios available classically in polynomial time. Here, we discuss how to warm-start quantum optimization with an initial state corresponding to the solution of a relaxation of a combinatorial optimization problem and how to analyze properties of the associated quantum algorithms. In particular, this allows the quantum algorithm to inherit the performance guarantees of the classical algorithm. We illustrate this in the context of portfolio optimization, where our results indicate that warm-starting the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is particularly beneficial at low depth. Likewise, Recursive QAOA for MAXCUT problems shows a systematic increase in the size of the obtained cut for fully connected graphs with random weights, when Goemans-Williamson randomized rounding is utilized in a warm start. It is straightforward to apply the same ideas to other randomized-rounding schemes and optimization problems.

arXiv:2009.10095•Quantum•Jun 17, 2021•269 citations

A hybrid quantum-classical approach to warm-starting optimization

Vanessa Dehn, Thomas Wellens

The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a promising candidate for solving combinatorial optimization problems more efficiently than classical computers. Recent studies have shown that warm-starting the standard algorithm improves the performance. In this paper we compare the performance of standard QAOA with that of warm-start QAOA in the context of portfolio optimization and investigate the warm-start approach for different problem instances. In particular, we analyze the extent to which the improved performance of warm-start QAOA is due to quantum effects, and show that the results can be reproduced or even surpassed by a purely classical preprocessing of the original problem followed by standard QAOA.

arXiv:2309.13961•Quantum Computing, Communication, and Simulation•Mar 12, 2024•0 citations

Warm-start adaptive-bias quantum approximate optimization algorithm

Yunlong Yu, Xiang‐Bin Wang, Nic Shannon +1 more

In the search for quantum advantage in real--world problems, one promising avenue is to use a quantum algorithm to improve on the solution found using an efficient classical algorithm. The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is particularly well adapted for such a "warm start" approach, and can be combined with the powerful classical Goemans-Williamson (GW) algorithms based on semi-definite programming. Nonetheless, the best way to leverage the power of the QAOA remains an open question. Here we propose a general model that describes a class of QAOA variants, and use it to explore routes to quantum advantages in a canonical optimization problem, MaxCut. For these algorithms we derive analytic expectation values of the cost Hamiltonian for the MaxCut problem in the level-1 case. Using these analytic results we obtain reliable averages over many instances for fairly large numbers of qubits. We find that the warm start adaptive-bias QAOA (WS-ab-QAOA) initialized by the GW algorithm outperforms previously proposed warm start variants on problems with $40$ to $180$ qubits. To assess whether a quantum advantage exists with this algorithm, we did numerical simulations with up to $1000$ qubits to see whether the level-1 WS-ab-QAOA can improve the GW solution for 3-regular graphs. In fact the improvement in the $1000$-qubit case even in level 1 can only be matched by the GW algorithm after about $10^{5.5}$ random projections performed after the semi-definite program stage. This work gives evidence that the final stage of optimization after an efficient classical algorithm has produced an approximate solution may be a place where quantum advantages can be realized.

arXiv:2503.20048•Physical Review A•Jul 14, 2025•4 citations
We provide a method to prepare a warm-started quantum state from measurements with an iterative framework to enhance the quantum approximate optimisation algorithm (QAOA). The numerical simulations show the method can effectively address the "stuck issue" of the standard QAOA using a single-string warm-started initial state described in [Cain et al., 2023]. When applied to the 333-regular MaxCut problem, our approach achieves an improved approximation ratio, with a lower bound that iteratively converges toward the best classical algorithms for p=1p=1p=1 standard QAOA. Additionally, in the context of the discrete global minimal variance portfolio (DGMVP) model, simulations reveal a more favourable scaling of identifying the global minimal compared to the QAOA standalone, the single-string warm-started QAOA and a classical constrained sampling approach.
This thesis is devoted to four modern quantum optimisation algorithms and their applications. In the first chapter, we provide a complete Quantum Approximate Optimisation Algorithm (QAOA) pipeline for the discrete global minimum-variance portfolio (DGMVP) problem. We introduce an ansatz with efficient initial-state preparation, new hard mixing operators satisfying the constraints of the DGMVP problem, and scalable cost operators utilising binary encoding of the qubits. Benchmarking the method with the most effective optimisation strategies---dual annealing and unfrozen layerwise optimisation---indicates a scaling advantage over classical methods in finding the global optimum of the DGMVP problem. In the second chapter, we show an end-to-end quantum/quantum-inspired Goemans-Williamson semidefinite programming (SDP) method for relaxing Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimisation (QUBO) problems and extracting their rounding energy. Our method identifies a class of QUBO instances that is effectively solvable in polylogarithmic time relative to the problem dimension, under the assumptions of Pauli sparsification of the QUBO cost matrix, reducibility of the diagonal constraints, and efficient evaluation of the corresponding Gibbs-state expectation values. Further, we identify the commuting 1D Hamiltonian and the Kronecker graph as practically important instances. Our numerical experiments show that our method solves the SDP and QUBO with up to 2502^{50}250 variables for 1D Hamiltonian instances and achieves results competitive with the best classical solver for Kronecker graphs, giving strong evidence of the power of our algorithm. In the third chapter, we improve the current QAOA method with an iterative warm-start initial-state preparation method. We implement the ttt-th order statistic state as the warm-start initial state generated from each QAOA optimisation loop. We achieve an improved approximation ratio when solving the 3-regular MaxCut problem, and find that the worst-case approximation ratio converges to that of the best classical algorithm for p=1p=1p=1 QAOA. Additionally, our method achieves more favourable scaling than standalone QAOA, single-string warm-started QAOA, and a classical constrained-sampling approach when solving the DGMVP problem. In the fourth chapter, we provide a hard-constrained Grover adaptive search (GAS) method for fixed-sum quadratic binary optimisation problems, and an extension of the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) framework for fixed-sum quartic binary optimisation. Our method guarantees at least a quadratic speed-up over the classical method, and exponentially reduces the gate count for solving fixed-sum binary optimisation when compared with the soft-constrained GAS in the fault-tolerant quantum computing regime. In summary, our contributions include efficient algorithms and novel frameworks that substantially improve performance and broaden the applicability of these quantum optimisation methods. The proposed methods exhibit favourable scaling behaviour and indicate potential quantum advantages in solving challenging optimisation problems, thereby motivating further research at the interface of quantum computing and optimisation.
The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a leading hybrid heuristic for combinatorial optimization, but efficiently handling hard constraints remains a significant challenge. XY-mixers successfully confine quantum state evolution to a feasible subspace, such as the Hamming-weight-1 sector for one-hot constraints. On the contrary, warm-starting biases the search toward promising regions based on preliminary solutions. Combining these two techniques requires maintaining the essential alignment between the initial state and the mixer Hamiltonian to preserve convergence guarantees. Previous work demonstrated warm-starting with XY-mixers via a biased initial state, but relying only on standard mixer Hamiltonians. Consequently, the initial state is no longer a ground state of the mixer. In this work, we overcome these limitations by formulating a warm-started XY-mixer Hamiltonian for one-hot constraints and proving its ground-state properties. Furthermore, we provide a shallow circuit implementation suitable for NISQ implementations. We embed the warm-starting into a classical heuristic that iteratively updates the bias based on previous samples, called Iterative Warm-Starting (IWS). Extensive numerical simulations on Max-kkk-Cut and Traveling Salesperson Problem instances demonstrate that IWS-QAOA significantly accelerates the solution-finding process, increasing the probability of sampling optimal solutions by orders of magnitude compared to standard XY-QAOA. Finally, we validate our approach on the ibm_boston QPU using hardware-tailored 144-qubit problem instances. By coupling IWS-QAOA with a greedy steepest-descent post-processing strategy to repair infeasible measurements caused by hardware noise, we successfully identify optimal solutions on actual quantum devices.
Demonstrating quantum heuristics that outperform strong classical solvers on large-scale optimization remains an open challenge. Here we introduce Regularized Warm-Started QAOA (RWS-QAOA), which initializes qubits by minimizing expected energy with a regularizer that penalizes near-bitstring states, preventing QAOA from stalling. We further propose a protocol that yields fixed, instance-independent parameters, enabling RWS-QAOA to operate as a non-variational algorithm in which the quantum circuit parameters are fixed and only a classical warm starting step is instance-dependent. We evaluate RWS-QAOA on the Max-Cut problem for random regular graphs, where this protocol yields a constant-depth quantum circuit, across three complementary settings. First, on Quantinuum's trapped-ion processor, RWS-QAOA outperforms the classical algorithms with the best provable guarantees for Max-Cut on 333-regular graphs, namely Goemans-Williamson and Halperin-Livnat-Zwick, on 969696-node instances. Second, tensor-network simulations on graphs with up to N=10,000N{=}10{,}000N=10,000 nodes show that depth-666 RWS-QAOA, achieving an average cut fraction of 0.91670.91670.9167, surpasses the best classical heuristics under matched restrictions (no local-search post-processing and no iterative refinement). Third, we remove these restrictions and benchmark against the strongest unrestricted classical heuristics, including an optimized parallel Burer-Monteiro solver that improves upon the MQLib implementation. Even against this stronger baseline, we project that surface-code RWS-QAOA reaches a quantum-classical runtime crossover below 0.20.20.2 seconds on 3,0003{,}0003,000-node graphs with fewer than 1.31.31.3 million physical qubits. Our results show that constant-depth quantum circuits combined with a classical warm start have a credible potential to surpass classical solvers on the Max-Cut problem when executed on future quantum computers.
There is an increasing interest in quantum algorithms for problems of integer programming and combinatorial optimization. Classical solvers for such problems employ relaxations, which replace binary variables with continuous ones, for instance in the form of higher-dimensional matrix-valued problems (semidefinite programming). Under the Unique Games Conjecture, these relaxations often provide the best performance ratios available classically in polynomial time. Here, we discuss how to warm-start quantum optimization with an initial state corresponding to the solution of a relaxation of a combinatorial optimization problem and how to analyze properties of the associated quantum algorithms. In particular, this allows the quantum algorithm to inherit the performance guarantees of the classical algorithm. We illustrate this in the context of portfolio optimization, where our results indicate that warm-starting the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is particularly beneficial at low depth. Likewise, Recursive QAOA for MAXCUT problems shows a systematic increase in the size of the obtained cut for fully connected graphs with random weights, when Goemans-Williamson randomized rounding is utilized in a warm start. It is straightforward to apply the same ideas to other randomized-rounding schemes and optimization problems.
The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a promising candidate for solving combinatorial optimization problems more efficiently than classical computers. Recent studies have shown that warm-starting the standard algorithm improves the performance. In this paper we compare the performance of standard QAOA with that of warm-start QAOA in the context of portfolio optimization and investigate the warm-start approach for different problem instances. In particular, we analyze the extent to which the improved performance of warm-start QAOA is due to quantum effects, and show that the results can be reproduced or even surpassed by a purely classical preprocessing of the original problem followed by standard QAOA.
In the search for quantum advantage in real--world problems, one promising avenue is to use a quantum algorithm to improve on the solution found using an efficient classical algorithm. The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is particularly well adapted for such a "warm start" approach, and can be combined with the powerful classical Goemans-Williamson (GW) algorithms based on semi-definite programming. Nonetheless, the best way to leverage the power of the QAOA remains an open question. Here we propose a general model that describes a class of QAOA variants, and use it to explore routes to quantum advantages in a canonical optimization problem, MaxCut. For these algorithms we derive analytic expectation values of the cost Hamiltonian for the MaxCut problem in the level-1 case. Using these analytic results we obtain reliable averages over many instances for fairly large numbers of qubits. We find that the warm start adaptive-bias QAOA (WS-ab-QAOA) initialized by the GW algorithm outperforms previously proposed warm start variants on problems with 404040 to 180180180 qubits. To assess whether a quantum advantage exists with this algorithm, we did numerical simulations with up to 100010001000 qubits to see whether the level-1 WS-ab-QAOA can improve the GW solution for 3-regular graphs. In fact the improvement in the 100010001000-qubit case even in level 1 can only be matched by the GW algorithm after about 105.510^{5.5}105.5 random projections performed after the semi-definite program stage. This work gives evidence that the final stage of optimization after an efficient classical algorithm has produced an approximate solution may be a place where quantum advantages can be realized.