Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2502.00154 · Physical Review Research

Randomized benchmarking with leakage errors

Yi‐Hsiang Chen, Charles H. Baldwin

Published Sep 16, 2025• 6 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Leakage errors are unwanted transfer of population outside of a defined computational subspace and they occur in almost every platform for quantum computing. While prevalent, leakage is often overlooked when measuring and reporting the fidelity of quantum gates with standard methods. In fact, when leakage is substantial it can cause a large overestimation of fidelity from the typical method used to measure fidelity, randomized benchmarking. We provide several methods for properly estimating fidelity in the presence of leakage errors that are applicable in different error regimes with carefully chosen sequence lengths. Then, we numerically demonstrate the methods for two-qubit randomized benchmarking, which often have the largest errors. Finally, we reanalyze previously shared data from Quantinuum systems with some of the methods provided.

DOI
10.1103/j8sz-6ws9

Related papers

Complete randomized benchmarking protocol accounting for leakage errors

Tobias Chasseur, Frank K. Wilhelm

Randomized benchmarking allows one to efficiently and scalably characterize the average error of a unitary 2-design such as the Clifford group $\mathcal{C}$ on a physical candidate for quantum computation, as long as there are no noncomputational leakage levels in the system. We investigate the effect of leakage errors on randomized benchmarking induced from an additional level per physical qubit and provide a modified protocol that allows us to derive reliable estimates for the error per gate in their presence. We assess the variance of the sequence fidelity corresponding to the number of random sequences needed for valid fidelity estimation. Our protocol allows for gate-dependent error channels without being restricted to perturbations. We show that our protocol is compatible with interleaved randomized benchmarking and expand to benchmarking of arbitrary gates. This setting is relevant for superconducting transmon qubits, among other systems.

arXiv:1505.00580•Physical Review A•Oct 30, 2015•38 citations

Leakage benchmarking with decohering subgroups in the presence of preparation and measurement errors

Shawn Geller, Tongyu Zhao, Alex Kwiatkowski +3 more

A common problem with physical qubits is that the state can leak outside the computational subspace. To characterize the problem, it is desirable to measure both the leakage probability and the fidelity of gates inside the computational subspace. Randomized benchmarking is a readily accessible method for estimating average gate fidelities and can be modified to account for leakage. However, in the presence of state preparation and measurement errors (SPAM) there are parameter degeneracies, and fidelities and leakage become underdetermined. We study the example of qudits with any number of leakage levels under the assumption of gate-independent noise. We show that randomized benchmarking sequences with leakage level decoherence can be analyzed as a Markov process with noisy classical preparations and measurements. This result generalizes to randomized benchmarking with random gates from an arbitrary group that contains a phase-decohering subgroup. We characterize the parameter degeneracy in inferring the Markov process, preparations and measurements. Based on this characterization we develop a measurement and inference method taking advantage of known conservative bounds on SPAM to constrain fidelity, leakage and other parameters of the Markov process, state preparations and measurements. As part of our study, we experimentally implemented the measurement method for a qubit defined on the one-excitation subspace of two transmons, for which there are two leakage levels. We determined confidence intervals accounting for parameter degeneracy for a number of performance parameters of the system. For leakage and fidelity, we compare these intervals to those obtained for several conventional methods for leakage benchmarking.

quant-pharXiv:2610.19304•Oct 15, 2026•0 citations

Leakage Benchmarking for Universal Gate Sets

Bujiao Wu, Xiaoyang Wang, Xiao Yuan +2 more

Errors are common issues in quantum computing platforms, among which leakage is one of the most-challenging to address. This is because leakage, i.e., the loss of information stored in the computational subspace to undesired subspaces in a larger Hilbert space, is more difficult to detect and correct than errors that preserve the computational subspace. As a result, leakage presents a significant obstacle to the development of fault-tolerant quantum computation. In this paper, we propose an efficient and accurate benchmarking framework called leakage randomized benchmarking (LRB), for measuring leakage rates on multi-qubit quantum systems. Our approach is more insensitive to state preparation and measurement (SPAM) noise than existing leakage benchmarking protocols, requires fewer assumptions about the gate set itself, and can be used to benchmark multi-qubit leakages, which has not been achieved previously. We also extended the LRB protocol to an interleaved variant called interleaved LRB (iLRB), which can benchmark the average leakage rate of generic n-site quantum gates with reasonable noise assumptions. We demonstrate the iLRB protocol on benchmarking generic two-qubit gates realized using flux tuning and analyzed the behavior of iLRB under corresponding leakage models. Our numerical experiments showed good agreement with the theoretical estimations, indicating the feasibility of both the LRB and iLRB protocols.

arXiv:2304.07884•Entropy•Jan 13, 2024•3 citations

Quantification and characterization of leakage errors

Christopher J. Wood, Jay Gambetta

We present a general framework for the quantification and characterization of leakage errors that result when a quantum system is encoded in the subspace of a larger system. To do this we introduce metrics for quantifying the coherent and incoherent properties of the resulting errors and we illustrate this framework with several examples relevant to superconducting qubits. In particular, we propose two quantities, the leakage and seepage rates, which together with average gate fidelity allow for characterizing the average performance of quantum gates in the presence of leakage and show how the randomized benchmarking protocol can be modified to enable the robust estimation of all three quantities for a Clifford gate set.

arXiv:1704.03081•Physical Review A•Mar 8, 2018•177 citations

Robust characterization of leakage errors

Joel J. Wallman, Marie Barnhill, Joseph Emerson

Leakage errors arise when the quantum state leaks out of some subspace of interest, for example, the two-level subspace of a multi-level system defining a computational `qubit' or the logical code space defined by some quantum error-correcting code or decoherence-free subspace. Leakage errors pose a distinct challenge to quantum control relative to the more well-studied decoherence errors and can be a limiting factor to achieving fault-tolerant quantum computation. Here we present scalable and robust randomized benchmarking protocols for quickly estimating the rates of both coherent and incoherent leakage, allowing for practical minimization of the leakage rate by varying over control methods. We illustrate the reliability of the protocol through numerical simulations with physically-relevant error models.

arXiv:1412.4126•New Journal of Physics•Apr 15, 2016•65 citations

Easier randomizing gates provide more accurate fidelity estimation

Debankan Sannamoth, Kristine Boone, Arnaud Carignan-Dugas +4 more

Accurate benchmarking of quantum gates is crucial for understanding and enhancing the performance of quantum hardware. A standard method for this is interleaved benchmarking, a technique which estimates the error on an interleaved target gate by comparing cumulative error rates of randomized sequences implemented with the interleaved gate and without it. In this work, we show both numerically and experimentally that the standard approach of interleaved randomized benchmarking (IRB), which uses the multi-qubit Clifford group for randomization, can produce highly inaccurate and even physically impossible estimates for the error on the interleaved gate in the presence of coherent errors. Fortunately we also show that interleaved benchmarking performed with cycle benchmarking, which randomizes with single qubit Pauli gates, provides dramatically reduced systematic uncertainty relative to standard IRB, and further provides as host of additional benefits including data reusability. We support our conclusions with a theoretical framework for bounding systematic errors, extensive numerical results comparing a range of interleaved protocols under fixed resource costs, and experimental demonstrations on three quantum computing platforms.

quant-pharXiv:2512.24744•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations
Leakage errors are unwanted transfer of population outside of a defined computational subspace and they occur in almost every platform for quantum computing. While prevalent, leakage is often overlooked when measuring and reporting the fidelity of quantum gates with standard methods. In fact, when leakage is substantial it can cause a large overestimation of fidelity from the typical method used to measure fidelity, randomized benchmarking. We provide several methods for properly estimating fidelity in the presence of leakage errors that are applicable in different error regimes with carefully chosen sequence lengths. Then, we numerically demonstrate the methods for two-qubit randomized benchmarking, which often have the largest errors. Finally, we reanalyze previously shared data from Quantinuum systems with some of the methods provided.
Randomized benchmarking allows one to efficiently and scalably characterize the average error of a unitary 2-design such as the Clifford group C\mathcal{C}C on a physical candidate for quantum computation, as long as there are no noncomputational leakage levels in the system. We investigate the effect of leakage errors on randomized benchmarking induced from an additional level per physical qubit and provide a modified protocol that allows us to derive reliable estimates for the error per gate in their presence. We assess the variance of the sequence fidelity corresponding to the number of random sequences needed for valid fidelity estimation. Our protocol allows for gate-dependent error channels without being restricted to perturbations. We show that our protocol is compatible with interleaved randomized benchmarking and expand to benchmarking of arbitrary gates. This setting is relevant for superconducting transmon qubits, among other systems.
A common problem with physical qubits is that the state can leak outside the computational subspace. To characterize the problem, it is desirable to measure both the leakage probability and the fidelity of gates inside the computational subspace. Randomized benchmarking is a readily accessible method for estimating average gate fidelities and can be modified to account for leakage. However, in the presence of state preparation and measurement errors (SPAM) there are parameter degeneracies, and fidelities and leakage become underdetermined. We study the example of qudits with any number of leakage levels under the assumption of gate-independent noise. We show that randomized benchmarking sequences with leakage level decoherence can be analyzed as a Markov process with noisy classical preparations and measurements. This result generalizes to randomized benchmarking with random gates from an arbitrary group that contains a phase-decohering subgroup. We characterize the parameter degeneracy in inferring the Markov process, preparations and measurements. Based on this characterization we develop a measurement and inference method taking advantage of known conservative bounds on SPAM to constrain fidelity, leakage and other parameters of the Markov process, state preparations and measurements. As part of our study, we experimentally implemented the measurement method for a qubit defined on the one-excitation subspace of two transmons, for which there are two leakage levels. We determined confidence intervals accounting for parameter degeneracy for a number of performance parameters of the system. For leakage and fidelity, we compare these intervals to those obtained for several conventional methods for leakage benchmarking.
Errors are common issues in quantum computing platforms, among which leakage is one of the most-challenging to address. This is because leakage, i.e., the loss of information stored in the computational subspace to undesired subspaces in a larger Hilbert space, is more difficult to detect and correct than errors that preserve the computational subspace. As a result, leakage presents a significant obstacle to the development of fault-tolerant quantum computation. In this paper, we propose an efficient and accurate benchmarking framework called leakage randomized benchmarking (LRB), for measuring leakage rates on multi-qubit quantum systems. Our approach is more insensitive to state preparation and measurement (SPAM) noise than existing leakage benchmarking protocols, requires fewer assumptions about the gate set itself, and can be used to benchmark multi-qubit leakages, which has not been achieved previously. We also extended the LRB protocol to an interleaved variant called interleaved LRB (iLRB), which can benchmark the average leakage rate of generic n-site quantum gates with reasonable noise assumptions. We demonstrate the iLRB protocol on benchmarking generic two-qubit gates realized using flux tuning and analyzed the behavior of iLRB under corresponding leakage models. Our numerical experiments showed good agreement with the theoretical estimations, indicating the feasibility of both the LRB and iLRB protocols.
We present a general framework for the quantification and characterization of leakage errors that result when a quantum system is encoded in the subspace of a larger system. To do this we introduce metrics for quantifying the coherent and incoherent properties of the resulting errors and we illustrate this framework with several examples relevant to superconducting qubits. In particular, we propose two quantities, the leakage and seepage rates, which together with average gate fidelity allow for characterizing the average performance of quantum gates in the presence of leakage and show how the randomized benchmarking protocol can be modified to enable the robust estimation of all three quantities for a Clifford gate set.
Leakage errors arise when the quantum state leaks out of some subspace of interest, for example, the two-level subspace of a multi-level system defining a computational `qubit' or the logical code space defined by some quantum error-correcting code or decoherence-free subspace. Leakage errors pose a distinct challenge to quantum control relative to the more well-studied decoherence errors and can be a limiting factor to achieving fault-tolerant quantum computation. Here we present scalable and robust randomized benchmarking protocols for quickly estimating the rates of both coherent and incoherent leakage, allowing for practical minimization of the leakage rate by varying over control methods. We illustrate the reliability of the protocol through numerical simulations with physically-relevant error models.
Accurate benchmarking of quantum gates is crucial for understanding and enhancing the performance of quantum hardware. A standard method for this is interleaved benchmarking, a technique which estimates the error on an interleaved target gate by comparing cumulative error rates of randomized sequences implemented with the interleaved gate and without it. In this work, we show both numerically and experimentally that the standard approach of interleaved randomized benchmarking (IRB), which uses the multi-qubit Clifford group for randomization, can produce highly inaccurate and even physically impossible estimates for the error on the interleaved gate in the presence of coherent errors. Fortunately we also show that interleaved benchmarking performed with cycle benchmarking, which randomizes with single qubit Pauli gates, provides dramatically reduced systematic uncertainty relative to standard IRB, and further provides as host of additional benefits including data reusability. We support our conclusions with a theoretical framework for bounding systematic errors, extensive numerical results comparing a range of interleaved protocols under fixed resource costs, and experimental demonstrations on three quantum computing platforms.