Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2304.07884 · Entropy

Leakage Benchmarking for Universal Gate Sets

Bujiao Wu, Xiaoyang Wang, Xiao Yuan, Cupjin Huang, Jianxin Chen

Published Jan 13, 2024• 3 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Errors are common issues in quantum computing platforms, among which leakage is one of the most-challenging to address. This is because leakage, i.e., the loss of information stored in the computational subspace to undesired subspaces in a larger Hilbert space, is more difficult to detect and correct than errors that preserve the computational subspace. As a result, leakage presents a significant obstacle to the development of fault-tolerant quantum computation. In this paper, we propose an efficient and accurate benchmarking framework called leakage randomized benchmarking (LRB), for measuring leakage rates on multi-qubit quantum systems. Our approach is more insensitive to state preparation and measurement (SPAM) noise than existing leakage benchmarking protocols, requires fewer assumptions about the gate set itself, and can be used to benchmark multi-qubit leakages, which has not been achieved previously. We also extended the LRB protocol to an interleaved variant called interleaved LRB (iLRB), which can benchmark the average leakage rate of generic n-site quantum gates with reasonable noise assumptions. We demonstrate the iLRB protocol on benchmarking generic two-qubit gates realized using flux tuning and analyzed the behavior of iLRB under corresponding leakage models. Our numerical experiments showed good agreement with the theoretical estimations, indicating the feasibility of both the LRB and iLRB protocols.

DOI
10.3390/e26010071

Related papers

Leakage benchmarking with decohering subgroups in the presence of preparation and measurement errors

Shawn Geller, Tongyu Zhao, Alex Kwiatkowski +3 more

A common problem with physical qubits is that the state can leak outside the computational subspace. To characterize the problem, it is desirable to measure both the leakage probability and the fidelity of gates inside the computational subspace. Randomized benchmarking is a readily accessible method for estimating average gate fidelities and can be modified to account for leakage. However, in the presence of state preparation and measurement errors (SPAM) there are parameter degeneracies, and fidelities and leakage become underdetermined. We study the example of qudits with any number of leakage levels under the assumption of gate-independent noise. We show that randomized benchmarking sequences with leakage level decoherence can be analyzed as a Markov process with noisy classical preparations and measurements. This result generalizes to randomized benchmarking with random gates from an arbitrary group that contains a phase-decohering subgroup. We characterize the parameter degeneracy in inferring the Markov process, preparations and measurements. Based on this characterization we develop a measurement and inference method taking advantage of known conservative bounds on SPAM to constrain fidelity, leakage and other parameters of the Markov process, state preparations and measurements. As part of our study, we experimentally implemented the measurement method for a qubit defined on the one-excitation subspace of two transmons, for which there are two leakage levels. We determined confidence intervals accounting for parameter degeneracy for a number of performance parameters of the system. For leakage and fidelity, we compare these intervals to those obtained for several conventional methods for leakage benchmarking.

quant-pharXiv:2610.19304•Oct 15, 2026•0 citations

Easier randomizing gates provide more accurate fidelity estimation

Debankan Sannamoth, Kristine Boone, Arnaud Carignan-Dugas +4 more

Accurate benchmarking of quantum gates is crucial for understanding and enhancing the performance of quantum hardware. A standard method for this is interleaved benchmarking, a technique which estimates the error on an interleaved target gate by comparing cumulative error rates of randomized sequences implemented with the interleaved gate and without it. In this work, we show both numerically and experimentally that the standard approach of interleaved randomized benchmarking (IRB), which uses the multi-qubit Clifford group for randomization, can produce highly inaccurate and even physically impossible estimates for the error on the interleaved gate in the presence of coherent errors. Fortunately we also show that interleaved benchmarking performed with cycle benchmarking, which randomizes with single qubit Pauli gates, provides dramatically reduced systematic uncertainty relative to standard IRB, and further provides as host of additional benefits including data reusability. We support our conclusions with a theoretical framework for bounding systematic errors, extensive numerical results comparing a range of interleaved protocols under fixed resource costs, and experimental demonstrations on three quantum computing platforms.

quant-pharXiv:2512.24744•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Quantification and characterization of leakage errors

Christopher J. Wood, Jay Gambetta

We present a general framework for the quantification and characterization of leakage errors that result when a quantum system is encoded in the subspace of a larger system. To do this we introduce metrics for quantifying the coherent and incoherent properties of the resulting errors and we illustrate this framework with several examples relevant to superconducting qubits. In particular, we propose two quantities, the leakage and seepage rates, which together with average gate fidelity allow for characterizing the average performance of quantum gates in the presence of leakage and show how the randomized benchmarking protocol can be modified to enable the robust estimation of all three quantities for a Clifford gate set.

arXiv:1704.03081•Physical Review A•Mar 8, 2018•177 citations

Randomized benchmarking with leakage errors

Yi‐Hsiang Chen, Charles H. Baldwin

Leakage errors are unwanted transfer of population outside of a defined computational subspace and they occur in almost every platform for quantum computing. While prevalent, leakage is often overlooked when measuring and reporting the fidelity of quantum gates with standard methods. In fact, when leakage is substantial it can cause a large overestimation of fidelity from the typical method used to measure fidelity, randomized benchmarking. We provide several methods for properly estimating fidelity in the presence of leakage errors that are applicable in different error regimes with carefully chosen sequence lengths. Then, we numerically demonstrate the methods for two-qubit randomized benchmarking, which often have the largest errors. Finally, we reanalyze previously shared data from Quantinuum systems with some of the methods provided.

arXiv:2502.00154•Physical Review Research•Sep 16, 2025•6 citations

Character Randomized Benchmarking for Non-Multiplicity-Free Groups With Applications to Subspace, Leakage, and Matchgate Randomized Benchmarking

Jahan Claes, Eleanor Gilbert Rieffel, Zhihui Wang

Randomized benchmarking (RB) is a powerful method for determining the error rate of experimental quantum gates.Traditional RB, however, is restricted to gatesets, such as the Clifford group, that form a unitary 2-design.The recently introduced character RB can benchmark more general gates using techniques from representation theory; up to now, however, this method has only been applied to "multiplicity-free" groups, a mathematical restriction on these groups.In this paper, we extend the original character RB derivation to explicitly treat non-multiplicity-free groups, and derive several applications.First, we derive a rigorous version of the recently introduced subspace RB, which seeks to characterize a set of one-and two-qubit gates that are symmetric under SWAP.Second, we develop a new leakage RB protocol that applies to more general groups of gates.Finally, we derive a scalable RB protocol for the matchgate group, a group that like the Clifford group is nonuniversal but becomes universal with the addition of one additional gate.This example provides one of the few examples of a scalable non-Clifford RB protocol.In all three cases, compared to existing theories, our method requires similar resources, but either provides a more accurate estimate of gate fidelity, or applies to a more general group of gates.In conclusion, we discuss the potential, and challenges, of using non-multiplicity-free character RB to develop new classes of scalable RB protocols and methods of characterizing specific gates.

arXiv:2011.00007•PRX Quantum•Mar 25, 2021•25 citations

Subspace Leakage Error Randomized Benchmarking of Mølmer-Sørensen Gates

R. T. Sutherland, A. C. Hughes, J. P. Marceaux +3 more

We demonstrate a new technique that adapts single-qubit randomized benchmarking to two-qubit Mølmer-Sørensen gates. We use the controllable gate phase to generate Cliffords that act on a two-state subspace, enabling benchmarking of two-qubit gates without single-qubit operations. In addition to quantifying the gate infidelity, the protocol provides valuable information about the type of error by distinguishing between those that conserve the two-state subspace and those that result in leakage out of it. We demonstrate the protocol for calibrating and validating all-electronic maximally entangling gates in a trapped-ion quantum computer, achieving a two-qubit gate error of $2.6 (2)\times10^{-4}$.

arXiv:2510.09508•Oct 10, 2025•0 citations
Errors are common issues in quantum computing platforms, among which leakage is one of the most-challenging to address. This is because leakage, i.e., the loss of information stored in the computational subspace to undesired subspaces in a larger Hilbert space, is more difficult to detect and correct than errors that preserve the computational subspace. As a result, leakage presents a significant obstacle to the development of fault-tolerant quantum computation. In this paper, we propose an efficient and accurate benchmarking framework called leakage randomized benchmarking (LRB), for measuring leakage rates on multi-qubit quantum systems. Our approach is more insensitive to state preparation and measurement (SPAM) noise than existing leakage benchmarking protocols, requires fewer assumptions about the gate set itself, and can be used to benchmark multi-qubit leakages, which has not been achieved previously. We also extended the LRB protocol to an interleaved variant called interleaved LRB (iLRB), which can benchmark the average leakage rate of generic n-site quantum gates with reasonable noise assumptions. We demonstrate the iLRB protocol on benchmarking generic two-qubit gates realized using flux tuning and analyzed the behavior of iLRB under corresponding leakage models. Our numerical experiments showed good agreement with the theoretical estimations, indicating the feasibility of both the LRB and iLRB protocols.
A common problem with physical qubits is that the state can leak outside the computational subspace. To characterize the problem, it is desirable to measure both the leakage probability and the fidelity of gates inside the computational subspace. Randomized benchmarking is a readily accessible method for estimating average gate fidelities and can be modified to account for leakage. However, in the presence of state preparation and measurement errors (SPAM) there are parameter degeneracies, and fidelities and leakage become underdetermined. We study the example of qudits with any number of leakage levels under the assumption of gate-independent noise. We show that randomized benchmarking sequences with leakage level decoherence can be analyzed as a Markov process with noisy classical preparations and measurements. This result generalizes to randomized benchmarking with random gates from an arbitrary group that contains a phase-decohering subgroup. We characterize the parameter degeneracy in inferring the Markov process, preparations and measurements. Based on this characterization we develop a measurement and inference method taking advantage of known conservative bounds on SPAM to constrain fidelity, leakage and other parameters of the Markov process, state preparations and measurements. As part of our study, we experimentally implemented the measurement method for a qubit defined on the one-excitation subspace of two transmons, for which there are two leakage levels. We determined confidence intervals accounting for parameter degeneracy for a number of performance parameters of the system. For leakage and fidelity, we compare these intervals to those obtained for several conventional methods for leakage benchmarking.
Accurate benchmarking of quantum gates is crucial for understanding and enhancing the performance of quantum hardware. A standard method for this is interleaved benchmarking, a technique which estimates the error on an interleaved target gate by comparing cumulative error rates of randomized sequences implemented with the interleaved gate and without it. In this work, we show both numerically and experimentally that the standard approach of interleaved randomized benchmarking (IRB), which uses the multi-qubit Clifford group for randomization, can produce highly inaccurate and even physically impossible estimates for the error on the interleaved gate in the presence of coherent errors. Fortunately we also show that interleaved benchmarking performed with cycle benchmarking, which randomizes with single qubit Pauli gates, provides dramatically reduced systematic uncertainty relative to standard IRB, and further provides as host of additional benefits including data reusability. We support our conclusions with a theoretical framework for bounding systematic errors, extensive numerical results comparing a range of interleaved protocols under fixed resource costs, and experimental demonstrations on three quantum computing platforms.
We present a general framework for the quantification and characterization of leakage errors that result when a quantum system is encoded in the subspace of a larger system. To do this we introduce metrics for quantifying the coherent and incoherent properties of the resulting errors and we illustrate this framework with several examples relevant to superconducting qubits. In particular, we propose two quantities, the leakage and seepage rates, which together with average gate fidelity allow for characterizing the average performance of quantum gates in the presence of leakage and show how the randomized benchmarking protocol can be modified to enable the robust estimation of all three quantities for a Clifford gate set.
Leakage errors are unwanted transfer of population outside of a defined computational subspace and they occur in almost every platform for quantum computing. While prevalent, leakage is often overlooked when measuring and reporting the fidelity of quantum gates with standard methods. In fact, when leakage is substantial it can cause a large overestimation of fidelity from the typical method used to measure fidelity, randomized benchmarking. We provide several methods for properly estimating fidelity in the presence of leakage errors that are applicable in different error regimes with carefully chosen sequence lengths. Then, we numerically demonstrate the methods for two-qubit randomized benchmarking, which often have the largest errors. Finally, we reanalyze previously shared data from Quantinuum systems with some of the methods provided.
Randomized benchmarking (RB) is a powerful method for determining the error rate of experimental quantum gates.Traditional RB, however, is restricted to gatesets, such as the Clifford group, that form a unitary 2-design.The recently introduced character RB can benchmark more general gates using techniques from representation theory; up to now, however, this method has only been applied to "multiplicity-free" groups, a mathematical restriction on these groups.In this paper, we extend the original character RB derivation to explicitly treat non-multiplicity-free groups, and derive several applications.First, we derive a rigorous version of the recently introduced subspace RB, which seeks to characterize a set of one-and two-qubit gates that are symmetric under SWAP.Second, we develop a new leakage RB protocol that applies to more general groups of gates.Finally, we derive a scalable RB protocol for the matchgate group, a group that like the Clifford group is nonuniversal but becomes universal with the addition of one additional gate.This example provides one of the few examples of a scalable non-Clifford RB protocol.In all three cases, compared to existing theories, our method requires similar resources, but either provides a more accurate estimate of gate fidelity, or applies to a more general group of gates.In conclusion, we discuss the potential, and challenges, of using non-multiplicity-free character RB to develop new classes of scalable RB protocols and methods of characterizing specific gates.
We demonstrate a new technique that adapts single-qubit randomized benchmarking to two-qubit Mølmer-Sørensen gates. We use the controllable gate phase to generate Cliffords that act on a two-state subspace, enabling benchmarking of two-qubit gates without single-qubit operations. In addition to quantifying the gate infidelity, the protocol provides valuable information about the type of error by distinguishing between those that conserve the two-state subspace and those that result in leakage out of it. We demonstrate the protocol for calibrating and validating all-electronic maximally entangling gates in a trapped-ion quantum computer, achieving a two-qubit gate error of 2.6(2)×10−42.6 (2)\times10^{-4}2.6(2)×10−4.