Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2412.09332 · Physical Review Research

Multilayer cycle benchmarking for high-accuracy error characterization

Alessio Calzona, Miha Papič, Pedro Figueroa–Romero, Adrian Auer

Published Dec 4, 2025• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Accurate noise characterization is essential for reliable quantum computation. Effective Pauli noise models have emerged as powerful tools, offering a detailed description of the error processes with a manageable number of parameters, which guarantees the scalability of the characterization procedure. However, a fundamental limitation in the learnability of Pauli eigenvalues impedes a full high-accuracy characterization of both general and effective Pauli noise models, thereby restricting, e.g., the performance of noise-aware error mitigation techniques. We introduce multilayer cycle benchmarking (MLCB), an enhanced characterization protocol that improves the learnability associated with effective Pauli noise models by jointly analyzing multiple layers of Clifford gates. We show a simple experimental implementation and demonstrate that, in realistic scenarios, MLCB can reduce unlearnable noise degrees of freedom by up to 75 % , improving the accuracy of sparse Pauli-Lindblad noise models and boosting the performance of error mitigation techniques like probabilistic error cancellation. Our results highlight MLCB as a scalable, practical tool for precise noise characterization and improved quantum computation.

DOI
10.1103/4hbl-hpl3

Related papers

Characterization of Unlearnable Noise with Mid-Circuit-Measurement-Based Cycle Benchmarking

M. H. Cheng, Stefano Mangini, V. Bartsch +4 more

Noise characterization of multi-qubit entangling Clifford operations is a key practical bottleneck for quantum error mitigation and for the calibration, validation, and optimization of quantum error-correction protocols, especially in the presence of state preparation and measurement (SPAM) errors. Although cycle benchmarking can isolate some Pauli error components, it cannot resolve the problem of coupled error parameters, which leads to unlearnable degrees of freedom even in simple noisy gates, not to mention general $n$-qubit Clifford gates. Here we introduce mid-circuit-measurement-based generalized cycle benchmarking, a framework that makes otherwise unidentifiable Pauli fidelities and non-Markovian noise learnable via repeated measurements and classical post-processing. Applying the deferred feed-forward principle to generalized cycle benchmarking, we show that an insertion of mid-circuit measurements can reverse Pauli cycles induced by a general Clifford gate. This fact enables us to reveal a Pauli-noise learnability condition for Clifford gates. Assuming sufficient state preparation quality, we numerically demonstrate the feasibility of characterizing the previously unlearnable noise components. We implement the protocol on superconducting quantum processing units and validate its effectiveness in disambiguating the coupled noise components, benchmarked against conventional tomography. Finally, we observe consistent measurement-induced bit-flip bias and non-Markovian correlations, which define a range of applicability for the Pauli noise model and the proposed noise-characterization protocol.

quant-pharXiv:2606.29638•Jun 30, 2026•0 citations

The learnability of Pauli noise

Senrui Chen, Yunchao Liu, Matthew Otten +3 more

Recently, several quantum benchmarking algorithms have been developed to characterize noisy quantum gates on today's quantum devices. A fundamental issue in benchmarking is that not everything about quantum noise is learnable due to the existence of gauge freedom, leaving open the question what information is learnable and what is not, which is unclear even for a single CNOT gate. Here we give a precise characterization of the learnability of Pauli noise channels attached to Clifford gates using graph theoretical tools. Our results reveal the optimality of cycle benchmarking in the sense that it can extract all learnable information about Pauli noise. We experimentally demonstrate noise characterization of IBM's CNOT gate up to 2 unlearnable degrees of freedom, for which we obtain bounds using physical constraints. In addition, we show that an attempt to extract unlearnable information by ignoring state preparation noise yields unphysical estimates, which is used to lower bound the state preparation noise.

arXiv:2206.06362•Nature Communications•Jan 4, 2023•42 citations

Characterization of coherent errors in gate layers with robustness to Pauli noise

Noah Kaufmann, Ivan Rojkov, Florentin Reiter

Characterization of quantum devices generates insights into their sources of disturbances. State-of-the-art characterization protocols often focus on incoherent noise and eliminate coherent errors when using Pauli or Clifford twirling techniques. This approach biases the structure of the effective noise and adds a circuit and sampling overhead. We motivate the extension of an incoherent local Pauli noise model to coherent errors and present a practical characterization protocol for an arbitrary gate layer. Notably, the coherent noise estimation is robust to Pauli noise. We demonstrate our protocol on a superconducting hardware platform and identify the leading coherent errors. To verify the characterized noise structure, we mitigate its coherent and incoherent components using a gate-level coherent noise mitigation scheme in conjunction with probabilistic error cancelation. The proposed characterization procedure opens up possibilities for device calibration, hardware development, and improvement of error mitigation and correction techniques.

arXiv:2307.08741•Physical Review Applied•Mar 7, 2025•5 citations

Pauli Noise Learning for Mid-Circuit Measurements

Jordan Hines, Timothy J Proctor

Current benchmarks for midcircuit measurements (MCMs) are limited in scalability or the types of error they can quantify, necessitating new techniques for quantifying MCM performance. Here, we introduce a theory for learning stochastic Pauli noise in MCMs and use it to create MCM cycle benchmarking, a scalable method for benchmarking MCMs. MCM cycle benchmarking extracts detailed information about the rates of errors in randomly compiled layers of MCMs and Clifford gates, and we demonstrate how its results can be used to quantify correlated errors during MCMs on current quantum hardware. Our method can be integrated with existing Pauli noise learning techniques to scalably characterize the errors in wide classes of circuits containing MCMs.

arXiv:2406.09299•Physical Review Letters•Jan 16, 2025•11 citations

Development and experimental implementation of noise characterisation techniques on a superconducting quantum processor

Nelson M. M. Fernández, Francesco Grieco, Hetta Vappula +6 more

Noise characterisation not only enables error mitigation but also provides valuable information about the intrinsic performance of a quantum device, identifying dominant error contributions and bounding noise stability well beyond the aggregated calibration data. Deploying such methods on a specific hardware topology must combine efficiency and accuracy, assess noise stability, and validate the reconstructed noise model. Here we develop and implement these methods on a superconducting processor with square-lattice topology. First, we revise the cycle-benchmarking protocol and reduce the bias arising from unlearnable degrees of freedom via a regularised cost function. Second, we extend a previously developed tensor-network tomography method to match the device layout and show how its accuracy can be improved by repeated layer execution. Both methods allow approximate sublayer noise models to be extracted from parent ones. Using noise characterisation as a tool, we map the noise structure, track drift, and validate the adequacy of the learnt noise models against experimentally observed noisy estimations in benchmark physical and chemistry circuits. These results inform further improvements in the underlying technology and provide estimates of the size of noise-mitigated circuits that the device can support.

quant-pharXiv:2610.18000•Oct 14, 2026•0 citations

Disambiguating Pauli Noise in Quantum Computers

Edward H. Chen, Senrui Chen, Laurin E. Fischer +7 more

To successfully perform quantum computations, it is often necessary to first accurately characterize the noise in the underlying hardware. However, it is well known that fundamental limitations prevent the unique identification of the noise model. This raises the question of whether these limitations impact the ability to predict noisy dynamics and mitigate errors. Here, we show, both theoretically and experimentally, that when learnable parameters are self-consistently characterized, the (gauge) degrees of freedom do not impact predictions of noisy dynamics or error mitigation. We use the recently introduced framework of gate set Pauli noise learning to efficiently and self-consistently characterize and mitigate noise of a complete gate set, including state preparation, measurements, single-qubit gates and multi-qubit entangling Clifford gates. We validate our approach through experiments with up to 92 qubits and show that, while the gauge choice does not affect error-mitigated observables, optimizing it reduces sampling overhead.

arXiv:2505.22629•PRX Quantum•Jul 9, 2026•0 citations
Accurate noise characterization is essential for reliable quantum computation. Effective Pauli noise models have emerged as powerful tools, offering a detailed description of the error processes with a manageable number of parameters, which guarantees the scalability of the characterization procedure. However, a fundamental limitation in the learnability of Pauli eigenvalues impedes a full high-accuracy characterization of both general and effective Pauli noise models, thereby restricting, e.g., the performance of noise-aware error mitigation techniques. We introduce multilayer cycle benchmarking (MLCB), an enhanced characterization protocol that improves the learnability associated with effective Pauli noise models by jointly analyzing multiple layers of Clifford gates. We show a simple experimental implementation and demonstrate that, in realistic scenarios, MLCB can reduce unlearnable noise degrees of freedom by up to 75 % , improving the accuracy of sparse Pauli-Lindblad noise models and boosting the performance of error mitigation techniques like probabilistic error cancellation. Our results highlight MLCB as a scalable, practical tool for precise noise characterization and improved quantum computation.
Noise characterization of multi-qubit entangling Clifford operations is a key practical bottleneck for quantum error mitigation and for the calibration, validation, and optimization of quantum error-correction protocols, especially in the presence of state preparation and measurement (SPAM) errors. Although cycle benchmarking can isolate some Pauli error components, it cannot resolve the problem of coupled error parameters, which leads to unlearnable degrees of freedom even in simple noisy gates, not to mention general nnn-qubit Clifford gates. Here we introduce mid-circuit-measurement-based generalized cycle benchmarking, a framework that makes otherwise unidentifiable Pauli fidelities and non-Markovian noise learnable via repeated measurements and classical post-processing. Applying the deferred feed-forward principle to generalized cycle benchmarking, we show that an insertion of mid-circuit measurements can reverse Pauli cycles induced by a general Clifford gate. This fact enables us to reveal a Pauli-noise learnability condition for Clifford gates. Assuming sufficient state preparation quality, we numerically demonstrate the feasibility of characterizing the previously unlearnable noise components. We implement the protocol on superconducting quantum processing units and validate its effectiveness in disambiguating the coupled noise components, benchmarked against conventional tomography. Finally, we observe consistent measurement-induced bit-flip bias and non-Markovian correlations, which define a range of applicability for the Pauli noise model and the proposed noise-characterization protocol.
Recently, several quantum benchmarking algorithms have been developed to characterize noisy quantum gates on today's quantum devices. A fundamental issue in benchmarking is that not everything about quantum noise is learnable due to the existence of gauge freedom, leaving open the question what information is learnable and what is not, which is unclear even for a single CNOT gate. Here we give a precise characterization of the learnability of Pauli noise channels attached to Clifford gates using graph theoretical tools. Our results reveal the optimality of cycle benchmarking in the sense that it can extract all learnable information about Pauli noise. We experimentally demonstrate noise characterization of IBM's CNOT gate up to 2 unlearnable degrees of freedom, for which we obtain bounds using physical constraints. In addition, we show that an attempt to extract unlearnable information by ignoring state preparation noise yields unphysical estimates, which is used to lower bound the state preparation noise.
Characterization of quantum devices generates insights into their sources of disturbances. State-of-the-art characterization protocols often focus on incoherent noise and eliminate coherent errors when using Pauli or Clifford twirling techniques. This approach biases the structure of the effective noise and adds a circuit and sampling overhead. We motivate the extension of an incoherent local Pauli noise model to coherent errors and present a practical characterization protocol for an arbitrary gate layer. Notably, the coherent noise estimation is robust to Pauli noise. We demonstrate our protocol on a superconducting hardware platform and identify the leading coherent errors. To verify the characterized noise structure, we mitigate its coherent and incoherent components using a gate-level coherent noise mitigation scheme in conjunction with probabilistic error cancelation. The proposed characterization procedure opens up possibilities for device calibration, hardware development, and improvement of error mitigation and correction techniques.
Current benchmarks for midcircuit measurements (MCMs) are limited in scalability or the types of error they can quantify, necessitating new techniques for quantifying MCM performance. Here, we introduce a theory for learning stochastic Pauli noise in MCMs and use it to create MCM cycle benchmarking, a scalable method for benchmarking MCMs. MCM cycle benchmarking extracts detailed information about the rates of errors in randomly compiled layers of MCMs and Clifford gates, and we demonstrate how its results can be used to quantify correlated errors during MCMs on current quantum hardware. Our method can be integrated with existing Pauli noise learning techniques to scalably characterize the errors in wide classes of circuits containing MCMs.
Noise characterisation not only enables error mitigation but also provides valuable information about the intrinsic performance of a quantum device, identifying dominant error contributions and bounding noise stability well beyond the aggregated calibration data. Deploying such methods on a specific hardware topology must combine efficiency and accuracy, assess noise stability, and validate the reconstructed noise model. Here we develop and implement these methods on a superconducting processor with square-lattice topology. First, we revise the cycle-benchmarking protocol and reduce the bias arising from unlearnable degrees of freedom via a regularised cost function. Second, we extend a previously developed tensor-network tomography method to match the device layout and show how its accuracy can be improved by repeated layer execution. Both methods allow approximate sublayer noise models to be extracted from parent ones. Using noise characterisation as a tool, we map the noise structure, track drift, and validate the adequacy of the learnt noise models against experimentally observed noisy estimations in benchmark physical and chemistry circuits. These results inform further improvements in the underlying technology and provide estimates of the size of noise-mitigated circuits that the device can support.
To successfully perform quantum computations, it is often necessary to first accurately characterize the noise in the underlying hardware. However, it is well known that fundamental limitations prevent the unique identification of the noise model. This raises the question of whether these limitations impact the ability to predict noisy dynamics and mitigate errors. Here, we show, both theoretically and experimentally, that when learnable parameters are self-consistently characterized, the (gauge) degrees of freedom do not impact predictions of noisy dynamics or error mitigation. We use the recently introduced framework of gate set Pauli noise learning to efficiently and self-consistently characterize and mitigate noise of a complete gate set, including state preparation, measurements, single-qubit gates and multi-qubit entangling Clifford gates. We validate our approach through experiments with up to 92 qubits and show that, while the gauge choice does not affect error-mitigated observables, optimizing it reduces sampling overhead.