Recently, several quantum benchmarking algorithms have been developed to characterize noisy quantum gates on today's quantum devices. A fundamental issue in benchmarking is that not everything about quantum noise is learnable due to the existence of gauge freedom, leaving open the question what information is learnable and what is not, which is unclear even for a single CNOT gate. Here we give a precise characterization of the learnability of Pauli noise channels attached to Clifford gates using graph theoretical tools. Our results reveal the optimality of cycle benchmarking in the sense that it can extract all learnable information about Pauli noise. We experimentally demonstrate noise characterization of IBM's CNOT gate up to 2 unlearnable degrees of freedom, for which we obtain bounds using physical constraints. In addition, we show that an attempt to extract unlearnable information by ignoring state preparation noise yields unphysical estimates, which is used to lower bound the state preparation noise.
Recently, several quantum benchmarking algorithms have been developed to characterize noisy quantum gates on today's quantum devices. A fundamental issue in benchmarking is that not everything about quantum noise is learnable due to the existence of gauge freedom, leaving open the question what information is learnable and what is not, which is unclear even for a single CNOT gate. Here we give a precise characterization of the learnability of Pauli noise channels attached to Clifford gates using graph theoretical tools. Our results reveal the optimality of cycle benchmarking in the sense that it can extract all learnable information about Pauli noise. We experimentally demonstrate noise characterization of IBM's CNOT gate up to 2 unlearnable degrees of freedom, for which we obtain bounds using physical constraints. In addition, we show that an attempt to extract unlearnable information by ignoring state preparation noise yields unphysical estimates, which is used to lower bound the state preparation noise.
Noise characterization of multi-qubit entangling Clifford operations is a key practical bottleneck for quantum error mitigation and for the calibration, validation, and optimization of quantum error-correction protocols, especially in the presence of state preparation and measurement (SPAM) errors. Although cycle benchmarking can isolate some Pauli error components, it cannot resolve the problem of coupled error parameters, which leads to unlearnable degrees of freedom even in simple noisy gates, not to mention general n-qubit Clifford gates. Here we introduce mid-circuit-measurement-based generalized cycle benchmarking, a framework that makes otherwise unidentifiable Pauli fidelities and non-Markovian noise learnable via repeated measurements and classical post-processing. Applying the deferred feed-forward principle to generalized cycle benchmarking, we show that an insertion of mid-circuit measurements can reverse Pauli cycles induced by a general Clifford gate. This fact enables us to reveal a Pauli-noise learnability condition for Clifford gates. Assuming sufficient state preparation quality, we numerically demonstrate the feasibility of characterizing the previously unlearnable noise components. We implement the protocol on superconducting quantum processing units and validate its effectiveness in disambiguating the coupled noise components, benchmarked against conventional tomography. Finally, we observe consistent measurement-induced bit-flip bias and non-Markovian correlations, which define a range of applicability for the Pauli noise model and the proposed noise-characterization protocol.
Understanding quantum noise is an essential step towards building practical quantum information processing systems. Pauli noise is a useful model that has been widely applied in quantum benchmarking, error mitigation, and error correction. Despite intensive study into Pauli noise learning, most existing works focus on learning Pauli channels associated with some specific gates rather than treating the gate set as a whole. A learning algorithm that is self-consistent, complete, and efficient at the same time has yet to be established. In this work, we study the task of , where a set of quantum gates, state preparation, and measurements all suffer from unknown Pauli noise channels with a customized noise ansatz. Using tools from algebraic graph theory, we analytically characterize the self-consistently learnable degrees of freedom for Pauli noise models with arbitrary linear ansatz, and design experiments to efficiently learn all the learnable information. Specifically, we show that all learnable information about the gate noise can be learned to relative precision, under mild assumptions on the noise ansatz. We then demonstrate the flexibility of our theory by applying it to concrete physically motivated ansatze (such as spatially local or quasi-local noise) and experimentally relevant gate sets (such as parallel CZ gates). These results not only enhance the theoretical understanding of quantum noise learning, but also provide a feasible recipe for characterizing existing and near-future quantum computing devices.
To successfully perform quantum computations, it is often necessary to first accurately characterize the noise in the underlying hardware. However, it is well known that fundamental limitations prevent the unique identification of the noise model. This raises the question of whether these limitations impact the ability to predict noisy dynamics and mitigate errors. Here, we show, both theoretically and experimentally, that when learnable parameters are self-consistently characterized, the (gauge) degrees of freedom do not impact predictions of noisy dynamics or error mitigation. We use the recently introduced framework of gate set Pauli noise learning to efficiently and self-consistently characterize and mitigate noise of a complete gate set, including state preparation, measurements, single-qubit gates and multi-qubit entangling Clifford gates. We validate our approach through experiments with up to 92 qubits and show that, while the gauge choice does not affect error-mitigated observables, optimizing it reduces sampling overhead.
Characterizing noise in quantum circuits is fundamentally limited by gauge degrees of freedom; certain parameters, such as the individual contributions of state preparation and measurement (SPAM) errors, are in principle unlearnable from any experiment within the gate set. Here, we show that the physical structure of realistic noise processes imposes approximate symmetry constraints on the Pauli fidelities of gate noise channels. These symmetries relate the fidelity of a Pauli P and its gate-conjugate UgPUg†, and can be used to fix the gauge using only knowledge of the error type and not its magnitude. Using Lindbladian perturbation theory, we analyze a broad class of Clifford gates, including ZZπ/2, CZ, CNOT, iSWAP, and SWAP, and demonstrate that coherent errors do not induce first-order asymmetry, while only a restricted set of predominantly off-diagonal dissipative errors can break the symmetry at first order, for which we derive simple selection rules. Notably, common single-qubit noise sources such as T1-relaxation and T2φ-pure-dephasing can only cause asymmetry at second order. Leveraging these symmetries to fix the gauge enables systematic identification of SPAM errors, simplifying error characterization and mitigation. We validate our results numerically and experimentally on IBM Kingston.
Understanding what can be learned from experiments is central to scientific progress. In this work, we use a learning-theoretic perspective to study the task of learning physical operations in a quantum machine when all operations (state preparation, dynamics, and measurement) are a priori unknown. We prove that, without any prior knowledge, if one can explore the full quantum state space by composing the operations, then every operation can be learned. When one cannot explore the full state space but all operations are approximately known and noise in Clifford gates is gate-independent, we find an efficient algorithm for learning all operations up to a single unlearnable parameter characterizing the fidelity of the initial state. For learning a noise channel on Clifford gates to a fixed accuracy, our algorithm uses quadratically fewer experiments than previously known protocols. Under more general conditions, the true description of the noise can be unlearnable; for example, we prove that no benchmarking protocol can learn gate-dependent Pauli noise on Clifford+T gates even under perfect state preparation and measurement. Despite not being able to learn the noise, we show that a noisy quantum computer that performs entangled measurements on multiple copies of an unknown state can yield a large advantage in learning properties of the state compared to a noiseless device that measures individual copies and then processes the measurement data using a classical computer. Concretely, we prove that noisy quantum computers with two-qubit gate error rate ε can achieve a learning task using N copies of the state, while NΩ(1/ε) copies are required classically.
Characterizing errors in quantum circuits is essential for device calibration, yet detecting rare error events requires a large number of samples. This challenge is particularly severe in calibrating fault-tolerant, error-corrected circuits, where logical error probabilities are suppressed to higher order relative to physical noise and are therefore difficult to calibrate through direct logical measurements. Recently, Wagner et al. [PRL 130, 200601 (2023)] showed that, for phenomenological Pauli noise models, the logical channel can instead be inferred from syndrome measurement data generated during error correction. Here, we extend this framework to realistic circuit-level noise models. From a unified code-theoretic perspective and spacetime code formalism, we derive necessary and sufficient conditions for learning the logical channel from syndrome data alone and explicitly characterize the learnable degrees of freedom of circuit-level Pauli faults. Using Fourier analysis and compressed sensing, we develop efficient estimators with provable guarantees on sample complexity and computational cost. We further present an end-to-end protocol and demonstrate its performance on several syndrome-extraction circuits, achieving orders-of-magnitude sample-complexity savings over direct logical benchmarking. Our results establish syndrome-based learning as a practical approach to characterizing the logical channel in fault-tolerant quantum devices.