There has been a recent surge of interest within the field of quantum foundations regarding incorporating ideas from general relativity and quantum gravity. However, many quantum information tools remain agnostic to the underlying spacetime. For instance, whenever we draw a quantum circuit the effective spacetime imposed by the connectivity of the physical qubits which will realize this circuit is not taken into account. In this work, we aim to address this limitation by extending the framework of process theories to include a background spacetime structure. We introduce the notion of process implementations, i.e., decompositions of a process. A process is then embeddable if and only if one of its implementations can be embedded in such a way that all the component processes are localized and all wires follow timelike paths. While conceptually simple, checking for embeddability is generally computationally intractable. We therefore work towards simplifying this problem as much as possible, identifying a canonical subset of implementations that determine both the embeddability of a process and the causal structures distinguishable at least in some process theory. Notably, we discover countably infinite ''zigzag'' causal structures beyond those typically considered. While these can be ignored in classical theory, they seem to be essential in quantum theory, as the quantum CNOT gate can be implemented by all zigzag structures but not in a standard causal structure, except in the trivial undecomposed way. These zigzags could be significant for quantum causal modeling and the study of novel quantum resources.
There has been a recent surge of interest within the field of quantum foundations regarding incorporating ideas from general relativity and quantum gravity. However, many quantum information tools remain agnostic to the underlying spacetime. For instance, whenever we draw a quantum circuit the effective spacetime imposed by the connectivity of the physical qubits which will realize this circuit is not taken into account. In this work, we aim to address this limitation by extending the framework of process theories to include a background spacetime structure. We introduce the notion of process implementations, i.e., decompositions of a process. A process is then embeddable if and only if one of its implementations can be embedded in such a way that all the component processes are localized and all wires follow timelike paths. While conceptually simple, checking for embeddability is generally computationally intractable. We therefore work towards simplifying this problem as much as possible, identifying a canonical subset of implementations that determine both the embeddability of a process and the causal structures distinguishable at least in some process theory. Notably, we discover countably infinite ''zigzag'' causal structures beyond those typically considered. While these can be ignored in classical theory, they seem to be essential in quantum theory, as the quantum CNOT gate can be implemented by all zigzag structures but not in a standard causal structure, except in the trivial undecomposed way. These zigzags could be significant for quantum causal modeling and the study of novel quantum resources.
Process matrices are a framework to model causal relations in the absence of a well-defined acyclic causal order. The framework is very general and does not even assume the existence of a background spacetime. As a result, it is an open question how the framework should be interpreted physically and how and even if composition can be defined. On the other hand, so-called causal boxes define a framework that allows for arbitrary composition. In this work, we treat quantum circuits with quantum control of causal order (QC-QC), a subset of process matrices, which can be interpreted as generalized quantum circuits, and process box, a subset of causal boxes, which can be interpreted as processes. We analyze their state spaces and define a notion of operational equivalence between QC-QCs and process boxes based on this analysis. We then explicitly construct for each QC-QC an operationally equivalent process box. This allows us to define composition of QC-QCs in terms of composition of causal boxes which is well-defined. We further show that process boxes admit a unitary extension and conjecture that the background spacetime can be assumed to have a specific simple form. Based on this conjecture, we construct an operationally equivalent QC-QC for each process box. Our results indicate that the only class of processes that can be physically implemented in a fixed background spacetime are those that can be interpreted as quantum circuits with quantum controlled superpositions of orders. Further, they also reveal that the composability issue can be resolved by embedding processes in a spacetime structure. This in turn sheds light on the connection between physical realizability in a spacetime and composability.
Quantum theory challenges classical causal explanations for physical phenomena, calling for a quantum generalisation of causal structure. This thesis advances the study of causal decompositions, a research programme that aims to bridge two prominent, yet conceptually distinct types of structural assumption found across the quantum causality literature. The first is in terms of the global dependency relations between input and output systems of quantum transformations, which in the unitary case we shall refer to as causal structure; the second is in terms of the compositional structure of quantum circuits or networks. Concretely, a causal decomposition is a circuit representation of a unitary transformation in which no-influence relations that hold between its inputs and outputs are made manifest in the absence of paths through the circuit connecting them. Applications include translating between different quantum causal modelling frameworks; equipping a framework based on unitary causal structure with a local, bottom-up description via generalised autonomous causal mechanisms; and relating notions of compatibility between quantum transformations and relativistic causality. Whether causal decompositions always exist remains an open problem. The contributions of this thesis are threefold. First, we develop an order-theoretic account of circuit syntax and demonstrate that every circuit with a given input-output connectivity can be rewritten into a one of a canonical form given by the concept lattice construction from lattice theory. This systematises the search for causal decompositions by providing the shape of the quantum circuit one should look for. Second, we establish a combinatorial condition that fully characterises when causal decompositions into unitary quantum circuits exist without requiring the generalisation to routed quantum circuits prompted by earlier research. This solves a well-defined subproblem of the broader quest, and our proof, an interplay of order theory and operator algebra, lays a foundation for future extensions. Third, we detail the application to relativistic causality. Within a multipartite framework generalising existing literature, we emphasise that the mere lack of superluminal signalling through a quantum channel is not sufficient to conclude its realisability by dynamics that are locally consistent with relativity theory. We conjecture that, on the other hand, a lack of superluminal causal influences through its unitary dilations is sufficient—at least up to arbitrarily small errors. We demonstrate this in various special cases and show that the general statement reduces to the existence of a weak version of causal decompositions.
In general relativity, `causal structure' refers to the partial order on space-time points (or regions) that encodes time-like relationships. Recently, quantum information and quantum foundations saw the emergence of a `causality principle'. In the form used in this paper, which we call `process terminality', it states that when the output of a process is discarded, then the process itself may as well be discarded. While causal structure and process terminality at first seem to be entirely different notions, they become equivalent when making explicit what the partial order actually encodes, that is, that an event in the past can influence one in its future, but not vice-versa. The framework in which we establish this equivalence is that of process theories. We show how several previous results are instances of this result and comment on how this framework could provide an ideal, minimal canvas for crafting theories of quantum gravity.
The problem of time in quantum gravity is often presented as a consequence of applying quantum theory to general relativity. These notes adopt a broader perspective. We first examine how time enters classical mechanics, relativity, quantum theory, and quantum field theory, distinguishing three principal aspects: causal order, temporal duration, and the present. This analysis shows that the conceptual difficulties associated with time do not arise only when gravity is quantised. Tensions between causal structure, clocks, observables, and measurement are already present in the theories from which quantum gravity is constructed. We then survey responses to the problem of time across the principal approaches to quantum gravity. These include canonical and Wheeler-DeWitt quantisation, path-integral and histories formulations, perturbative and background-dependent approaches, causal sets, and twistor theory. The programmes are compared according to whether they retain an external time, render time problematic through quantisation, or incorporate causal or temporal structure into their foundations. Particular emphasis is placed on questions arising from quantum foundations and relativistic quantum information. We conclude by examining linearised gravity and weak-gravity quantum systems. This regime shows that the problem of time is not confined to Planck-scale physics, but arises already in attempts to provide a predictive and operationally meaningful quantum description of spacetime near flat geometry.
Quantum mechanics has achieved unparalleled success as an operational theory, describing a wide range of experiments to remarkable accuracy. However, the physical foundations on which it rests remain as puzzling as they were a century ago, and a concise statement of the physical principles that underlie quantum mechanics is still outstanding. One promising approach holds that these principles should be formulated in terms of information, since many of the counter-intuitive effects in quantum theory concern questions such as what one can know about a quantum system and how the information encoded therein can be processed and distributed between parties. Another challenging feature of quantum theory is its incompatibility with the other cornerstone of modern physics, general relativity. In order to reconcile the two, one must identify and retain only the essential concepts and principles of each theory, and in the case of general relativity, causality has been identified as such a concept. This raises the question of how our classical understanding of causality must change when quantum theory is taken into account. In order to address these questions about information, knowledge and causality, I turn to the framework of causal models. In classical statistics, causal models explain the relations among a set of variables in terms of causal influences, which makes them a powerful tool for structuring our knowledge about complex systems and developing strategies for interacting with them. More importantly, the framework provides the conceptual underpinnings and mathematical methods for addressing questions about causation, information and knowledge in a rigorous manner. In this thesis, I develop a version of the classical causal models framework that is compatible with quantum theory and explore its physical implications. \n \n \nA first step is to define quantum versions of fundamental elements such as variables, conditionals and belief propagation rules. This allows one to consider the question of what one can come to know about a quantum variable from the point of view of causal modelling. The conditionals relating quantum variables are found to have a richer structure than their classical counterparts, which can be exploited for the task of discerning causal relations given limited data -- a central problem in classical causal modelling. The mathematical properties of quantum conditionals also establish a correspondence between various classes of two-party correlations, such as bound and distillable entanglement, and the types of causal structures that can give rise to them, which may become a useful tool for entanglement theory and quantum information processing. In the context of open quantum systems dynamics, quantum causal models provide a clear physical explanation of not completely positive maps and, more broadly, of non-Markovian quantum dynamics. Finally, I consider the possibility of non-classical effects in the way that different causal mechanisms are combined -- that is, non-classical causal structures. For the simple case of two causally ordered variables, I propose indicators that witness different classes of combinations of causal mechanisms, including a non-classical mixture, and describe an experiment realizing examples of the different classes. \n \n \nAs these results illustrate, the framework of quantum causal models provides both greater conceptual clarity and a comprehensive mathematical formalism for studying a diverse set of problems, ranging from foundational questions to applications in open systems dynamics and the exploration of non-classical causal structures, which are likely to feature in a future theory of quantum gravity. The material presented in this thesis is intended as a foundation and inspiration for further applications of quantum causal models.
This paper explores the fundamental nature of spacetime from the perspective of emergent causal structures, rooted in quantum mechanical principles. We propose a theoretical framework that treats spacetime not as a pre-existing background, but as a collective phenomenon arising from the interaction of quantum causal relations. By analyzing the constraints of causality and quantum coherence, we derive key implications for the emergence of classical spacetime geometry and the limits of local realism. Our results suggest a new way to bridge quantum mechanics and gravitational theory, providing a foundation for future studies in quantum gravity and spacetime physics.