Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2411.02329

Probabilistic Parallels in the Classical Limit of Quantum Mechanical Models

Raghunathan Ramakrishnan

Published Nov 4, 2024• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

At large quantum numbers, the probability densities for particle-in-a-box or simple harmonic oscillator converge to the classical result upon coarse-graining the quantum mechanical probability densities by introducing a finite resolution in the measurement of the particle's position. This resolution in the position can be related to the resolution of the secondary total angular momentum quantum number ($m$) when interpreting the probabilistic outcomes of the Stern--Gerlach-type thought experiments for large values of the angular momentum quantum numbers ($j$).

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2411.02329

Related papers

Where is an object before you look at it

Marcello Cini, Maurizio Serva

According to the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics (QM), no meaning can be assigned to the statement that a particle has a precise value of any one of the variables describing its physical propertes before having interacted with a suitable measuring instrument. On the other hand, it is well known that QM tends to classical statistical mechanics (CSM) when a suitable classical limit is performed. One may ask therefore how is it that in this limit, the statement, meaningless in QM, that a given variable has always a precise value independently of having been measured, gradually becomes meaningful. In other words, one may ask how can it be that QM, which is a theory describing the intrinsically probabilistic properties of a quantum object, becomes a statistical theory describing a probabilistic knowledge of intrinsically well determined properties of classical objects.

•Jun 1, 1989•0 citations

Introductory Quantum Mechanics

Rodney C. Greenhow

Part 1: the need for the quantum mechanics quantization of radiation the special theory of relativity wave-particle duality the nature of matter waves the uncertainty principle the Bohr atom. Part 2 Schrodinger's equation: the postulates of quantum mechanics the wave equation the wave equation in three dimensions the time-independent Schrodinger equation stationary states normalisation probability flux physical constraints on the wave-function wave packets Gaussian wave-packets and the uncertainty principle. Part 3 One-dimensional potential wells: potential wells the one-dimensional infinite square well discussion of infinite square-well results eigenvalue equations the finite square well finite square well eigenfunctions the control of the wave-function by the wave equation numerical integration of Schrodinger's equation continuum solutions of the square-well potential interpretation of unbound-particle wave functions the double potential well the quantum bouncer electric fields and the tilted well the harmonic oscillator - introduction the quantum oscillator discussion of harmonic oscillator eigenvalues and eigenfunctions the classical probability density more potential wells. Part 4 Schrodinger's equation in three dimensions: particle in a three dimensional box degeneracy Schrodingers equation in spherical polar coordinates - the hydrogen atom normalisation. Part 5 Formal development of quantum mechanics: eigenvalues equations, operators and measurements the momentum operator, eigenvalues and eigenfunctions the position operator and its eigenfunctions Hermitian operators orthogonality of eigenfunctions the expansion postulate example - the b-decay of tritium expectation values compatibility of observables - commutators non-commuting operators time-dependence of expectation values - Ehrenfest's theorem abstract operators - the parity operator, matrix mechanics. Part 6 Angular momentum: angular momentum operators angular momentum commutators angular momentum eigenvalues and eigenfunctions interpretation of angular momentum eigenvalues interpretation of angular momentum eigenfunctions the Stern-Gerlach apparatus and electron spin spin operators - the Pauli Spin matrices the Zeeman effect measurements in quantum mechanics. Part 7 Spherically symmetric potential wells: the rigid rotator the radial equation the hydrogen atom and hydrogen like ions the isotropic harmonic oscillator molecular vibrations - the Morse potential the spherical square well general properties of spherically symmetric potential wells. (Part contents)

•Jan 1, 1990•15 citations

Stern–Gerlach measurements with arbitrary spin: Quantum combs

Kurt Schönhammer

As in quantum mechanics the operators of different Cartesian components of the angular momentum do not commute these observables cannot simultaneously have sharp values. In this paper we present a simple method to calculate the probability distributions for the measurements of angular momentum components other than ĵz in eigenstates of ĵz with an arbitrary value of j, where ℏ2j(j+1) is the eigenvalue of ĵ2. Surprisingly this method is not found in textbooks, where usually the case j=12 is presented in discussions of Stern–Gerlach experiments. For larger values of j, the probability distributions have a comb-like structure. A detailed discussion of the quasiclassical limit j≫1 is presented for the measurement of ĵx. It yields rather surprising results.

American Journal of Physics•Jan 1, 2000•4 citations

The quantum mechanical Hilbert space formalism and the quantum mechanical probability space of the outcomes of measurements

Mioara Mugur-Schächter

Springer eBooks•Apr 6, 2008•2 citations

Is Quantum Mechanics a Probabilistic Theory?

Peter Mittelstaedt

Boston studies in the philosophy of science•Jan 1, 1997•3 citations

A Century Ago the Stern–Gerlach Experiment Ruled Unequivocally in Favor of Quantum Mechanics

Břetislav Friedrich

Abstract In 1921, Otto Stern conceived the idea for an experiment that would decide between a classical and a quantum description of atomic behavior, as epitomized by the Bohr–Sommerfeld–Debye model of the atom. This model entailed not only the quantization of the magnitude of the orbital electronic angular momentum but also of the projection of the angular momentum on an external magnetic field – the so‐called space quantization. Stern recognized that space quantization would have observable consequences: namely, that the magnetic dipole moment due to the orbital angular momentum would be space quantized as well, taking two opposite values for atoms whose only unpaired electron has just one quantum of orbital angular momentum. When acted upon by a suitable inhomogeneous magnetic field, a beam of such atoms would be split into two beams consisting of deflected atoms with opposite projections of the orbital angular momentum on the magnetic field. In contradistinction, if atoms behaved classically, the atomic beam would only broaden along the field gradient and have maximum intensity at zero deflection, i. e., where there would be a minimum or no intensity for a beam split due to space quantization. Stern anticipated that, although simple in principle, the experiment would be difficult to carry out – and invited Walther Gerlach to team up with him. Gerlach's realism and experimental skills together with his sometimes stubborn determination to make things work proved invaluable for the success of the Stern–Gerlach experiment (SGE). After a long struggle, Gerlach finally saw, on 8 February 1922, the splitting of a beam of silver atoms in a magnetic field. The absence of the concept of electron spin confused and confounded the interpretation of the SGE, as the silver atoms were, in fact, in a 2S state, with zero orbital and spin angular momentum. However, a key quantum feature whose existence the SGE was designed to test – namely space quantization of electronic angular momentum – was robust enough to transpire independent of whether the electronic angular momentum was orbital or due to spin. The SGE entails other key aspects of quantum mechanics such as quantum measurement, state preparation, coherence, and entanglement. Confronted with the outcome of the SGE, Stern noted: “I still have objections to the idea of beauty of quantum mechanics. But she is correct.”

Israel Journal of Chemistry•Jun 28, 2023•6 citations
At large quantum numbers, the probability densities for particle-in-a-box or simple harmonic oscillator converge to the classical result upon coarse-graining the quantum mechanical probability densities by introducing a finite resolution in the measurement of the particle's position. This resolution in the position can be related to the resolution of the secondary total angular momentum quantum number (mmm) when interpreting the probabilistic outcomes of the Stern--Gerlach-type thought experiments for large values of the angular momentum quantum numbers (jjj).
According to the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics (QM), no meaning can be assigned to the statement that a particle has a precise value of any one of the variables describing its physical propertes before having interacted with a suitable measuring instrument. On the other hand, it is well known that QM tends to classical statistical mechanics (CSM) when a suitable classical limit is performed. One may ask therefore how is it that in this limit, the statement, meaningless in QM, that a given variable has always a precise value independently of having been measured, gradually becomes meaningful. In other words, one may ask how can it be that QM, which is a theory describing the intrinsically probabilistic properties of a quantum object, becomes a statistical theory describing a probabilistic knowledge of intrinsically well determined properties of classical objects.
Part 1: the need for the quantum mechanics quantization of radiation the special theory of relativity wave-particle duality the nature of matter waves the uncertainty principle the Bohr atom. Part 2 Schrodinger's equation: the postulates of quantum mechanics the wave equation the wave equation in three dimensions the time-independent Schrodinger equation stationary states normalisation probability flux physical constraints on the wave-function wave packets Gaussian wave-packets and the uncertainty principle. Part 3 One-dimensional potential wells: potential wells the one-dimensional infinite square well discussion of infinite square-well results eigenvalue equations the finite square well finite square well eigenfunctions the control of the wave-function by the wave equation numerical integration of Schrodinger's equation continuum solutions of the square-well potential interpretation of unbound-particle wave functions the double potential well the quantum bouncer electric fields and the tilted well the harmonic oscillator - introduction the quantum oscillator discussion of harmonic oscillator eigenvalues and eigenfunctions the classical probability density more potential wells. Part 4 Schrodinger's equation in three dimensions: particle in a three dimensional box degeneracy Schrodingers equation in spherical polar coordinates - the hydrogen atom normalisation. Part 5 Formal development of quantum mechanics: eigenvalues equations, operators and measurements the momentum operator, eigenvalues and eigenfunctions the position operator and its eigenfunctions Hermitian operators orthogonality of eigenfunctions the expansion postulate example - the b-decay of tritium expectation values compatibility of observables - commutators non-commuting operators time-dependence of expectation values - Ehrenfest's theorem abstract operators - the parity operator, matrix mechanics. Part 6 Angular momentum: angular momentum operators angular momentum commutators angular momentum eigenvalues and eigenfunctions interpretation of angular momentum eigenvalues interpretation of angular momentum eigenfunctions the Stern-Gerlach apparatus and electron spin spin operators - the Pauli Spin matrices the Zeeman effect measurements in quantum mechanics. Part 7 Spherically symmetric potential wells: the rigid rotator the radial equation the hydrogen atom and hydrogen like ions the isotropic harmonic oscillator molecular vibrations - the Morse potential the spherical square well general properties of spherically symmetric potential wells. (Part contents)
As in quantum mechanics the operators of different Cartesian components of the angular momentum do not commute these observables cannot simultaneously have sharp values. In this paper we present a simple method to calculate the probability distributions for the measurements of angular momentum components other than ĵz in eigenstates of ĵz with an arbitrary value of j, where ℏ2j(j+1) is the eigenvalue of ĵ2. Surprisingly this method is not found in textbooks, where usually the case j=12 is presented in discussions of Stern–Gerlach experiments. For larger values of j, the probability distributions have a comb-like structure. A detailed discussion of the quasiclassical limit j≫1 is presented for the measurement of ĵx. It yields rather surprising results.
Abstract In 1921, Otto Stern conceived the idea for an experiment that would decide between a classical and a quantum description of atomic behavior, as epitomized by the Bohr–Sommerfeld–Debye model of the atom. This model entailed not only the quantization of the magnitude of the orbital electronic angular momentum but also of the projection of the angular momentum on an external magnetic field – the so‐called space quantization. Stern recognized that space quantization would have observable consequences: namely, that the magnetic dipole moment due to the orbital angular momentum would be space quantized as well, taking two opposite values for atoms whose only unpaired electron has just one quantum of orbital angular momentum. When acted upon by a suitable inhomogeneous magnetic field, a beam of such atoms would be split into two beams consisting of deflected atoms with opposite projections of the orbital angular momentum on the magnetic field. In contradistinction, if atoms behaved classically, the atomic beam would only broaden along the field gradient and have maximum intensity at zero deflection, i. e., where there would be a minimum or no intensity for a beam split due to space quantization. Stern anticipated that, although simple in principle, the experiment would be difficult to carry out – and invited Walther Gerlach to team up with him. Gerlach's realism and experimental skills together with his sometimes stubborn determination to make things work proved invaluable for the success of the Stern–Gerlach experiment (SGE). After a long struggle, Gerlach finally saw, on 8 February 1922, the splitting of a beam of silver atoms in a magnetic field. The absence of the concept of electron spin confused and confounded the interpretation of the SGE, as the silver atoms were, in fact, in a 2S state, with zero orbital and spin angular momentum. However, a key quantum feature whose existence the SGE was designed to test – namely space quantization of electronic angular momentum – was robust enough to transpire independent of whether the electronic angular momentum was orbital or due to spin. The SGE entails other key aspects of quantum mechanics such as quantum measurement, state preparation, coherence, and entanglement. Confronted with the outcome of the SGE, Stern noted: “I still have objections to the idea of beauty of quantum mechanics. But she is correct.”