Abstract Philosophers have claimed that: (a) Born–Oppenheimer approximation methods for solving molecular Schrödinger equations violate the Heisenberg uncertainty relations; therefore, (b) ‘quantum chemistry’ is not fully quantum; and (c) therefore chemistry does not reduce to physics. This paper analyses the reasoning behind Born–Oppenheimer methods and shows that they are internally consistent and fully quantum mechanical, contrary to (a)–(c). Our analysis addresses important issues of mathematical rigour, physical idealization, reduction, and classicality in the quantum theory of molecules, and we propose an agenda for the philosophy of quantum chemistry more grounded in scientific practice.
Abstract Philosophers have claimed that: (a) Born–Oppenheimer approximation methods for solving molecular Schrödinger equations violate the Heisenberg uncertainty relations; therefore, (b) ‘quantum chemistry’ is not fully quantum; and (c) therefore chemistry does not reduce to physics. This paper analyses the reasoning behind Born–Oppenheimer methods and shows that they are internally consistent and fully quantum mechanical, contrary to (a)–(c). Our analysis addresses important issues of mathematical rigour, physical idealization, reduction, and classicality in the quantum theory of molecules, and we propose an agenda for the philosophy of quantum chemistry more grounded in scientific practice.
Quantum chemistry is the branch of chemistry whose primary focus is the application of quantum mechanics to chemical systems at the molecular level. Precisely due to its peculiar position between chemistry and physics, in the last times it has begun to engage the interest of the philosophers of chemistry. Nevertheless, in this philosophical field, quantum chemistry has been studied mainly from a historical viewpoint or from a perspective interested on methodological issues. By contrast, the question that will guide this article is: what kind of ontic items are those studied by quantum chemistry? In order to develop the argumentation, first the relevance of the ontological questions will be addressed. Then, it will be considered in what measure the Born-Oppenheimer approximation and the quantum-chemistry concept of electron fit in the quantum theoretical context. Finally, some issues about what quantum chemistry refers to will be discussed.
The Schrödinger equation is the cornerstone of quantum mechanics and is used to determine the energy levels of the hydrogen atom. However, in the teaching of Quantum Chemistry, many students tend to regard the solutions of the Schrödinger equation as purely mathematical results without fully understanding the physical origin of quantum energy levels. In this paper, an approximate model of the hydrogen atom is first developed based on the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and the Coulomb potential. This model is then used to derive the Bohr radius and the ground-state energy by minimizing the total energy function. Subsequently, the time-independent Schrödinger equation is formulated and solved by the method of separation of variables in spherical coordinates to obtain the exact energy spectrum of the hydrogen atom. The results demonstrate that both the approximate model and the exact solution predict the same ground-state energy, E1 = −13.6 eV, while the Schrödinger equation further generalizes this result to the quantized energy spectrum, En = −13.6/n2. These findings indicate that the solutions of the Schrödinger equation are not "miraculous" mathematical outcomes but rather the inevitable consequences of the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics. This approach provides a clearer physical interpretation of quantum energy levels and offers significant pedagogical value for the teaching of Quantum Chemistry.
Abstract Chemistry is about the atom and molecule, motion of which follows quantum mechanics established 100 years ago by Werner Heisenberg, inspired by a number of milestone findings including Max Planck’s first quanta concept for black body radiation, Albert Einstein’s photon concept for photoelectric effect and oscillator quanta for heat capacity of solid, and Niels Bohr’s quantum model for atomic structure. Independently, inspired by Louis de Broglie’s particle-wave duality, Erwin Schrödinger established wave mechanics, which is shown to be equivalent to Heisenberg’s mechanics by Paul Dirac. The latter further established the relativistic quantum mechanics, and then claimed that the underlying physical laws necessary for the mathematical theory of a large part of physics and the whole of chemistry are thus completely known, and the difficulty is only that the exact application of these laws lead to equations much too complicated to be soluble. In the occasion of celebrating The International Year of Quantum Science and Technology (IYQ 2025, quantum2025.org), we will present a heuristic review of the development of quantum theory and its application to chemistry, namely, quantum chemistry (QC). Then, we will discuss some of the current challenges and the future developments, especially on the quantum computing for quantum chemistry (QCQC).
We present an account of idealization in quantum mechanics from the perspective of the semantic approach to theories. Using the notions of “partial structures” and “partial isomorphism” we reject the dichotomy between the “theoretical” and the “phenomenological” defended by Cartwright, for example, and defend a unitary account of theories and models which offers a framework for understanding how the models of quantum mechanics relate to systems in the world. As a case study we take the calculation of atomic structure by means of the self-consistent field approach and our general conclusion is that, contrary to the claims of recent commentators, the models of quantum chemistry count as “quantum mechanical” on the twin grounds that they can be related via partial isomorphisms to models satisfying Schrödinger's equation and that they incorporate Pauli's Exclusion Principle.
Abstract The classical concept of molecular structure (namely, a set of atoms with a well‐defined geometrical arrangement in space) originated well before the advent of quantum theory, and, contrary to widespread views, these two conceptual schemes (classical molecular structure and quantum theory) are not easy to reconcile. We begin with a preliminary discussion of molecular structure in terms of space and time correlations in the framework of quantum theory. Then we summarize the salient features of some critical views raised‐during recent years (essentially by Woolley) concerning the concept of molecular structure. The essential claim of this viewpoint is that “molecular structure” is not an intrinsic attribute of an isolated molecule, and appears rather as an effect of the environment (other molecules? vacuum electromagnetic field, according to quantum electrodynamics?). Afterwards, we discuss these issues in detail: we show that it is necessary to distinguish between a “quantum” or “potential” structure (which may be deduced in a straightforward way from the quantum treatment of the molecule), and the “classical” molecular structure (according to which the molecule is considered as a set of rotating and vibrating material points, corresponding to the atoms); we briefly discuss some aspects of the Born–Oppenheimer approximation. From our discussion, we deduce that the “classical structure” concept is indeed non‐trivial from a purely quantum‐mechanical point of view; in actual fact, it is related to the problem of the “classical limit” of quantum mechanics, and it appears that, at the present time, none of these classical concepts and behaviours is convincingly derivable from a strict quantum mechanical basis. Finally, we consider these same problems from the point of view of stochastic electrodynamics (SED), which is one of the stochastic models for microphysics proposed so far as a possible alternative or extension of usual quantum theory. In the framework of such a theory, the “classical limit” and, in particular, the “classical molecular structure” no longer poses a problem, but aside from these satisfactory qualitative aspects, several quantitative failures of SED prevent us from accepting it, at least in its present state, as a genuine physical alternative to quantum theory. We therefore conclude that “classical molecular structure”, and classical concepts in general, remain an open problem in the framework of present‐day quantum physics.
This textbook introduces the reader to quantum theory and quantum chemistry. The textbook is meant for 2 nd – 3 rd year bachelor students of chemistry or physics, but also for students of related disciplines like materials science, pharmacy, and bioinformatics. At first, quantum theory is introduced, starting with experimental results that made it inevitable to go beyond classical physics. Subsequently, the Schrödinger equation is discussed in some detail. Some few examples for which the Schrödinger equation can be solved exactly are treated with special emphasis on relating the results to real systems and interpreting the mathematical results in terms of experimental observations. Ultimately, approximate methods are presented that are used when applying quantum theory in the field of quantum chemistry for the study of real systems like atoms, molecules, and crystals. Both the foundations for the different methods and a broader range of examples of their applications are presented. The textbook assumes no prior knowledge in quantum theory. Moreover, special emphasis is put on interpreting the mathematical results and less on an exact mathematical derivations of those. Finally, each chapter closes with a number of questions and exercises that help in focusing on the main results of the chapter. Many of the exercises include answers.