Quantum annealing can efficiently obtain solutions to combinatorial optimization problems. Size-reduction methods are used to treat large-scale combinatorial optimization problems that cannot be input directly into a quantum annealer because of its size limitation. Various size-reduction methods using fixing spins have been proposed as quantum-classical hybrid methods to obtain solutions. However, the high performance of these hybrid methods is yet to be clearly elucidated. In this study, we adopted a parameterized fixing spins method to verify the effects of fixing spins. The results revealed that setting the appropriate number of spins of the subproblem is crucial for obtaining a satisfactory solution, and the energy gap expansion is confirmed after fixing spins.
Quantum annealing can efficiently obtain solutions to combinatorial optimization problems. Size-reduction methods are used to treat large-scale combinatorial optimization problems that cannot be input directly into a quantum annealer because of its size limitation. Various size-reduction methods using fixing spins have been proposed as quantum-classical hybrid methods to obtain solutions. However, the high performance of these hybrid methods is yet to be clearly elucidated. In this study, we adopted a parameterized fixing spins method to verify the effects of fixing spins. The results revealed that setting the appropriate number of spins of the subproblem is crucial for obtaining a satisfactory solution, and the energy gap expansion is confirmed after fixing spins.
Quantum annealing is a promising algorithm for solving combinatorial optimization problems. However, various hardware restrictions significantly impede its efficient performance. Size-reduction methods provide an effective approach to addressing large-scale problems but often introduce additional difficulties. A notable hardware restriction is that quantum annealing can handle only a limited number of decision variables, compared to the size of the problem. Moreover, when employing size-reduction methods, the interactions and local magnetic fields in the Ising model — used to represent the combinatorial optimization problem — can become excessively large, making them difficult to implement on hardware. Although prior studies suggest that energy rescaling impacts the performance of quantum annealing, its interplay with size-reduction methods remains unexplored. This study examines the relationship between fixing spins, a promising size-reduction method, and the effects of energy rescaling. Numerical simulations and experiments conducted on a quantum annealer demonstrate that the fixing spins method enhances quantum annealing performance while preserving the spin-chain embedding for a homogeneous, fully connected ferromagnetic Ising model.
To enhance the performance of quantum annealing machines, several methods have been proposed to reduce the number of spins by fixing spin values through preprocessing. We proposed a hybrid optimization method that combines a simulated annealing (SA)-based non-quantum-type Ising machine with a quantum annealing machine. However, its applicability remains unclear. Therefore, we evaluated the performance of the hybrid method on large-size Ising models and analyzed its characteristics. The results indicate that the hybrid method improves upon solutions obtained by the preprocessing SA, even if the Ising models cannot be embedded in the quantum annealing machine. We analyzed the method from three perspectives: preprocessing, spin-fixed sub-Ising model generation method, and the accuracy of the quantum annealing machine. From the viewpoint of the minimum energy gap, we found that solving the sub-Ising model with a quantum annealing machine results in a higher solution accuracy than solving the original Ising model. Additionally, we demonstrated that the number of fixed spins and the accuracy of the quantum annealing machine affect the dependency of the solution accuracy on the sub-Ising model size.
Quantum annealing (QA) has the potential to significantly improve solution quality and reduce time complexity in solving combinatorial optimization problems compared to classical optimization methods. However, due to the limited number of qubits and their connectivity, the QA hardware did not show such an advantage over classical methods in past benchmarking studies. Recent advancements in QA with more than 5000 qubits, enhanced qubit connectivity, and the hybrid architecture promise to realize the quantum advantage. Here, we use a quantum annealer with state-of-the-art techniques and benchmark its performance against classical solvers. To compare their performance, we solve over 50 optimization problem instances represented by large and dense Hamiltonian matrices using quantum and classical solvers. The results demonstrate that a state-of-the-art quantum solver has higher accuracy (~0.013%) and a significantly faster problem-solving time (~6561×) than the best classical solver. Our results highlight the advantages of leveraging QA over classical counterparts, particularly in hybrid configurations, for achieving high accuracy and substantially reduced problem solving time in large-scale real-world optimization problems.
A combinatorial optimization problem is the problem of minimizing the energy function among many combinations of variables, which is often difficult to solve with conventional classical computers. Recently, Ising machines, including quantum annealers, have gained attention as a promising architecture for efficiently solving combinatorial optimization problems. Among various methods for solving such problems using Ising machines, one prominent approach is the three-stage annealing method. The approach effectively solves a combinatorial optimization problem, utilizing an initial solution, but it performs the annealing process only once. Repeating the annealing process several times may enhance the solution more efficiently. In this paper, we propose a novel hybrid iterative annealing method that consists of an initial process using a classical computer, an annealing process using a quantum annealer, and a correction process/selection process using a classical computer. The proposed method repeats the annealing process and the correction process/selection process until the solution is sufficiently converged. In the experimental evaluations through the two types of typical combinatorial optimization problems, the proposed method shows improvements by up to 50.5% compared to the three-stage annealing method.
Ising machines have the potential to realize fast and highly accurate solvers for combinatorial optimization problems. They are classified based on their internal algorithms. Examples include simulated-annealing-based Ising machines (non-quantum-type Ising machines) and quantum-annealing-based Ising machines (quantum annealers). Herein we propose a hybrid optimization method, which utilizes the advantages of both types. In this hybrid optimization method, the preprocessing step is performed by solving the non-quantum-annealing Ising machine multiple times. Then sub-Ising models with a reduced size by spin fixing are solved using a quantum annealer. The performance of the hybrid optimization method is evaluated via simulations using Simulated Annealing (SA) as a non-quantum-type Ising machine and D-Wave Advantage as a quantum annealer. Additionally, we investigate the parameter dependence of the proposed hybrid optimization method. The hybrid optimization method outperforms the preprocessing SA and the quantum annealing machine alone in fully connected random Ising models.
A combinatorial optimization problem is the problem of minimizing the energy function among many combinations of variables, which is often difficult to solve with conventional classical computers. Recently, Ising machines, including quantum annealers, have gained attention as a promising architecture for efficiently solving combinatorial optimization problems. Among various methods for solving such problems using Ising machines, one prominent approach is the three-stage annealing method. The approach effectively solves a combinatorial optimization problem, utilizing an initial solution, but it performs the annealing process only once. Repeating the annealing process several times may enhance the solution more efficiently. In this paper, we propose a novel hybrid iterative annealing method that consists of an initial process using a classical computer, an annealing process using a quantum annealer, and a correction process/selection process using a classical computer. The proposed method repeats the annealing process and the correction process/selection process until the solution is sufficiently converged. In the experimental evaluations through the three types of typical combinatorial optimization problems, the proposed method shows improvements by up to 54.0% compared to the three-stage annealing method.