This paper furthers existing evidence that quantum computers are capable of computations beyond classical computers. Specifically, we strengthen the collapse of the polynomial hierarchy to the second level if: (i) Quantum computers with postselection are as powerful as classical computers with postselection ($\mathsf{PostBQP=PostBPP}$), (ii) any one of several quantum sampling experiments ($\mathsf{BosonSampling}$, $\mathsf{IQP}$, $\mathsf{DQC1}$) can be approximately performed by a classical computer (contingent on existing assumptions). This last result implies that if any of these experiment's hardness conjectures hold, then quantum computers can implement functions classical computers cannot ($\mathsf{FBQP\neq FBPP}$) unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses to its 2nd level. These results are an improvement over previous work which either achieved a collapse to the third level or were concerned with exact sampling, a physically impractical case. The workhorse of these results is a new technical complexity-theoretic result which we believe could have value beyond quantum computation. In particular, we prove that if there exists an equivalence between problems solvable with an exact counting oracle and problems solvable with an approximate counting oracle, then the polynomial hierarchy collapses to its second level, indeed to $\mathsf{ZPP^{NP}}$.
This paper furthers existing evidence that quantum computers are capable of computations beyond classical computers. Specifically, we strengthen the collapse of the polynomial hierarchy to the second level if: (i) Quantum computers with postselection are as powerful as classical computers with postselection (PostBQP=PostBPP), (ii) any one of several quantum sampling experiments (BosonSampling, IQP, DQC1) can be approximately performed by a classical computer (contingent on existing assumptions). This last result implies that if any of these experiment's hardness conjectures hold, then quantum computers can implement functions classical computers cannot (FBQP=FBPP) unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses to its 2nd level. These results are an improvement over previous work which either achieved a collapse to the third level or were concerned with exact sampling, a physically impractical case. The workhorse of these results is a new technical complexity-theoretic result which we believe could have value beyond quantum computation. In particular, we prove that if there exists an equivalence between problems solvable with an exact counting oracle and problems solvable with an approximate counting oracle, then the polynomial hierarchy collapses to its second level, indeed to ZPPNP.
This paper furthers existing evidence that quantum computers are capable of computations beyond classical computers. Specifically, we strengthen the collapse of the polynomial hierarchy to the second level if: (i) Quantum computers with postselection are as powerful as classical computers with postselection (PostBQP = PostBPP), (ii) any one of several quantum sampling experiments (BosonSampling, IQP, DQC1) can be approximately performed by a classical computer (contingent on existing assumptions). This last result implies that if any of these experiment’s hardness conjectures hold, then quantum computers can implement functions classical computers cannot (FBQP≠ FBPP) unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses to its 2nd level. These results are an improvement over previous work which either achieved a collapse to the third level or were concerned with exact sampling, a physically impractical case. The workhorse of these results is a new technical complexity-theoretic result which we believe could have value beyond quantum computation. In particular, we prove that if there exists an equivalence between problems solvable with an exact counting oracle and problems solvable with an approximate counting oracle, then the polynomial hierarchy collapses to its second level, indeed to ZPP^NP.
Motivated by the recent experimental demonstrations of quantum supremacy, proving the hardness of the output of random quantum circuits is an imperative near term goal. We prove under the complexity theoretical assumption of the non-collapse of the polynomial hierarchy that approximating the output probabilities of random quantum circuits to within exp(−Ω(mlogm)) additive error is hard for any classical computer, where m is the number of gates in the quantum computation. More precisely, we show that the above problem is #P-hard under BPPNP reduction. In the recent experiments, the quantum circuit has n-qubits and the architecture is a two-dimensional grid of size n×n. Indeed for constant depth circuits approximating the output probabilities to within 2−Ω(nlogn) is hard. For circuits of depth logn or n for which the anti-concentration property holds, approximating the output probabilities to within 2−Ω(nlog2n) and 2−Ω(n3/2logn) is hard respectively. We made an effort to find the best proofs and proved these results from first principles, which do not use the standard techniques such as the Berlekamp--Welch algorithm, the usual Paturi's lemma, and Rakhmanov's result.
It is not known whether a classical polynomial-time verifier can verify arbitrary polynomial-time quantum computations with an efficient quantum honest prover without computational assumptions. We show that, relative to a classical oracle, such verification is possible for a language beyond the polynomial hierarchy that is decided exactly in quantum polynomial time. The protocol is public-coin, with perfect completeness and soundness error at most 1/4. To our knowledge, no language with such a proof system was previously proved to lie outside AM relative to an oracle.
For every unbounded polynomial-time computable function, the oracle can be chosen so that the message count and the oracle query counts of the quantum algorithm, verifier, and honest prover are bounded by this function of the input length. The message count is optimal up to a constant factor, since for a suitable oracle every interactive proof system for the language uses at least a constant fraction of the messages of our protocol on infinitely many lengths, with a constant depending on its verifier.
The language is a variant of recursive Fourier sampling in which code tables encode secrets that address data tables. The tables are evaluated recursively, and the oracle stores only the leaves. The quantum algorithm recovers every secret exactly, and the verifier checks the prover's secrets recursively against random code entries. The recursion restricts the input in a correlated way, as the same secret fixes the code bits and chooses the free coordinate, so Håstad's switching lemma does not apply. We prove a switching theorem for these restrictions, which may be of independent interest. For instances of sufficient height, no constant-depth circuit of size 2poly(n) changes its output with probability above 2−Ω(n) when the answer of a random instance is flipped by changing a single leaf.
The polynomial-time hierarchy (PH) has proven to be a powerful tool for providing separations in computational complexity theory (modulo standard conjectures such as PH do not collapse). Here, we study whether two quantum generalizations of PH can similarly prove separations in the quantum setting. The first generalization, QCPH , uses classical proofs, and the second, QPH , uses quantum proofs. For the former, we show quantum variants of the Karp-Lipton theorem and Toda's theorem. For the latter, we place its third level, QΣ3 , into NEXP using the ellipsoid method for efficiently solving semidefinite programs. These results yield two implications for QMA(2) , the variant of Quantum Merlin-Arthur ( QMA ) with two unentangled proofs, a complexity class whose characterization has proven difficult. First, if QCPH=QPH (i.e., alternating quantifiers are sufficiently powerful so as to make classical and quantum proofs ``equivalent''), then QMA(2) is in the counting hierarchy (specifically, in Ppppp ). Second, because QMA(2)⊆QΣ3 , QMA(2) is strictly contained in NEXP unless QMA(2)=QΣ3 (i.e., alternating quantifiers do not help in the presence of ``unentanglement'').
We prove under the complexity theoretical assumption of the non-collapse of the polynomial hierarchy that estimating the output probabilities of random quantum circuits to within exp(−Ω(mlogm)) additive error is hard for any classical computer, where m is the number of gates in the quantum computation. More precisely, we show that the above problem is #P-hard under BPPNP reduction. In the recent experiments, the quantum circuit has n−qubits and the architecture is a two-dimensional grid of size n×n. Indeed for constant depth circuits estimating the output probabilities to within 2−Ω(nlogn) is hard, and for circuits of depth n, for which the anti-concentration property holds, estimating the output probabilities to within 2−Ω(n3/2logn) is hard. We prove these results from first principles and do not use the standard techniques such as the Berlekamp--Welch algorithm, the usual Paturi's lemma, and Rakhmanov's result.
We study the quantum-classical polynomial hierarchy, QCPH, which is the class of languages solvable by a constant number of alternating classical quantifiers followed by a quantum verifier. Our main result is that QCPH is infinite relative to a random oracle (previously, this was not even known relative to any oracle). We further prove that higher levels of PH are not contained in lower levels of QCPH relative to a random oracle; this is a strengthening of the somewhat recent result that PH is infinite relative to a random oracle (Rossman, Servedio, and Tan 2016). The oracle separation requires lower bounding a certain type of low-depth alternating circuit with some quantum gates. To establish this, we give a new switching lemma for quantum algorithms which may be of independent interest. Our lemma says that for any d, if we apply a random restriction to a function f with quantum query complexity Q(f)≤n1/3, the restricted function becomes exponentially close (in terms of d) to a depth-d decision tree. Our switching lemma works even in a "worst-case" sense, in that only the indices to be restricted are random; the values they are restricted to are chosen adversarially. Moreover, the switching lemma also works for polynomial degree in place of quantum query complexity.