Abstract A difficulty in quantum logic is the well-known arbitrariness in choosing a binary operation for conditional among three principal candidates called the Sasaki, the contrapositive Sasaki, and the relevance conditional, mainly chosen from syntactical grounds. A fundamental problem remains to clarify their semantical differences manifest in operational concepts in quantum theory. Here, we attempt such an analysis through quantum set theory, developing models of quantum set theory built upon quantum logics with those three conditionals, each of which defines different quantum logical truth-value assignment for set theoretical statements. We show that each of them satisfies the transfer principle to determine the truth values of theorems of the ZFC set theory and defines the internal reals bijectively corresponding to the observables of the quantum system under consideration. Then, the truth values of their equality relations are identical irrespective of the chosen conditionals. Interestingly, however, their order relations exhibit a strong dependence on the specific conditional employed, while the order relation attains full truth value if and only if Olson’s spectral order relation holds. We further characterize the order relation in terms of experimentally accessible relations for outcomes of successive projective measurements of the corresponding observables, showing that each choice has its own operational meaning with symmetry between the Sasaki and the contrapositive Sasaki conditionals, in contrast to the majority view that favors the Sasaki conditional. Our findings reveal that quantum set theory yields empirically testable predictions concerning state-dependent binary relations between quantum observables, thereby extending Born’s probabilistic interpretation from propositions to relations.
Abstract A difficulty in quantum logic is the well-known arbitrariness in choosing a binary operation for conditional among three principal candidates called the Sasaki, the contrapositive Sasaki, and the relevance conditional, mainly chosen from syntactical grounds. A fundamental problem remains to clarify their semantical differences manifest in operational concepts in quantum theory. Here, we attempt such an analysis through quantum set theory, developing models of quantum set theory built upon quantum logics with those three conditionals, each of which defines different quantum logical truth-value assignment for set theoretical statements. We show that each of them satisfies the transfer principle to determine the truth values of theorems of the ZFC set theory and defines the internal reals bijectively corresponding to the observables of the quantum system under consideration. Then, the truth values of their equality relations are identical irrespective of the chosen conditionals. Interestingly, however, their order relations exhibit a strong dependence on the specific conditional employed, while the order relation attains full truth value if and only if Olson’s spectral order relation holds. We further characterize the order relation in terms of experimentally accessible relations for outcomes of successive projective measurements of the corresponding observables, showing that each choice has its own operational meaning with symmetry between the Sasaki and the contrapositive Sasaki conditionals, in contrast to the majority view that favors the Sasaki conditional. Our findings reveal that quantum set theory yields empirically testable predictions concerning state-dependent binary relations between quantum observables, thereby extending Born’s probabilistic interpretation from propositions to relations.
In quantum logic there is well-known arbitrariness in choosing a binary operation for conditional. Currently, we have at least three candidates, called the Sasaki conditional, the contrapositive Sasaki conditional, and the relevance conditional. A fundamental problem is to show how the form of the conditional follows from an analysis of operational concepts in quantum theory. Here, we attempt such an analysis through quantum set theory (QST). In this paper, we develop quantum set theory based on quantum logics with those three conditionals, each of which defines different quantum logical truth value assignment. We show that those three models satisfy the transfer principle of the same form to determine the quantum logical truth values of theorems of the ZFC set theory. We also show that the reals in the model and the truth values of their equality are the same for those models. Interestingly, however, the order relation between quantum reals significantly depends on the underlying conditionals. We characterize the operational meanings of those order relations in terms of joint probability obtained by the successive projective measurements of arbitrary two observables. Those characterizations clearly show their individual features and will play a fundamental role in future applications to quantum physics.
Abstract Quantum logic has no canonical implication connective, and polynomial candidates differ in the inferential principles they satisfy. We study a relational strict implication in quantum modal logic and interpret it through the modal accessibility relation. On reflexive modal frames, a formula formed with this connective is valid exactly when its antecedent semantically entails its consequent. The connective therefore internalizes semantic consequence. The forcing condition links modal accessibility to non-orthogonality. Consequently, any formula whose principal connective is this strict implication has the same truth value throughout each component determined by non-orthogonality. The truth set of each such formula therefore belongs to the Boolean algebra of unions of these components. We also establish further semantic laws and analyze quantum disjunction, contraposition, and nested implications.
The thesis investigates the possibility of a classical semantics for quantum propositional structures. A classical semantics is defined as a set of mappings each of which is (i) bivalent, i.e., the value 1 (true) or 0 (false) is assigned to each proposition, and (ii) truth-functional, i.e., the logical operations are preserved. In addition, this set must be "full", i.e., any pair of distinct propositions is assigned different values by some mapping in the set. When the propositions make assertions about the properties of classical or of quantum systems, the mappings should also be (iii) "state-induced", i.e., values assigned by the semantics should accord with values assigned by classical or by quantum mechanics. In classical propositional logic, (equivalence classes of) propositions form a Boolean algebra, and each semantic mapping assigns the value 1 to the members of a certain subset of the algebra, namely, an ultrafilter, and assigns 0 to the members of the dual ultraideal, where the union of these two subsets is the entire algebra. The propositional structures of classical mechanics are likewise Boolean algebras, so one can straightforwardly provide a classical semantics, which also satisfies (iii). However, quantum propositional structures are non-Boolean, so it is an open question whether a semantics satisfying (i), (ii) and (iii) can be provided. Von Neumann first proposed (1932) that the algebraic structures of the subspaces (or projectors) of Hilbert space be regarded as the pro-positional structures PQM of quantum mechanics. These structures have been formalized in two ways: as orthomodular lattices which have the binary operations "and", "or", defined among all elements, compatible [symbol omitted] and incompatible [symbol omitted]; and as partial-Boolean algebras which have the binary operations defined among only compatible elements. In the thesis, two basic senses in which these structures are non-Boolean are discriminated. And two notions of truth-functionality are distinguished: truth-functionality [symbols omitted] applicable to the PQM lattices; and truth-functionality [symbol omitted] applicable to both the lattices and partial-Boolean algebras. Then it is shown how the lattice definitions of "and", "or", among incompatibles rule out a bivalent, truth-functional [symbols omitted] semantics for any lattice containing incompatible, elements. In contrast, the Gleason and Kochen-Specker proofs of the impossibility of hidden-variables for quantum mechanics show the impossibility of a bivalent, truth-functional [symbol omitted] semantics for three-or-higher dimensional Hilbert space structures; and the presence of incompatible elements is necessary but is not sufficient to rule out such a semantics. As for (iii), each quantum state-induced expectation-function on a PQM truth-functionally assigns 1 and 0 values to the elements in a ultrafilter and dual ultraideal of PQM³ where, in general the union of an ultrafilter and its dual ultraideal is smaller than the entire structure. Thus it is argued that each expectation-function is the quantum analog of a classical semantic mapping, even though the domain where each expectation-function is bivalent and truth-functional is usually a non-Boolean substructure of PQM. The final portion of the thesis surveys proposals for the introduction of hidden variables into quantum mechanics, proofs of the impossibility of such hidden-variable proposals, and criticisms of these impossibility proofs. And arguments in favour of the partial-Boolean algebra, rather than the orthomodular lattice, formalization of the quantum propositional structures are reviewed.
In quantum logic, i.e., within the structure of the Hilbert lattice imposed on all closed linear subspaces of a Hilbert space, the assignment of truth values to quantum propositions (i.e., experimentally verifiable propositions relating to a quantum system) is unambiguously determined by the state of the system. So, if only pure states of the system are considered, can a probability measure mapping the probability space for truth values to the unit interval be assigned to quantum propositions? In other words, is a probability concept contingent or emergent in the logic of quantum propositions? Until this question is answered, the cause of probabilities in quantum theory cannot be completely understood. In the present paper it is shown that the interaction of the quantum system with its environment causes the irreducible randomness in the relation between quantum propositions and truth values.
The notion of equality between two observables will play many important roles in foundations of quantum theory. However, the standard probabilistic interpretation based on the conventional Born formula does not give the probability of equality between two arbitrary observables, since the Born formula gives the probability distribution only for a commuting family of observables. In this paper, quantum set theory developed by Takeuti and the present author is used to systematically extend the standard probabilistic interpretation of quantum theory to define the probability of equality between two arbitrary observables in an arbitrary state. We apply this new interpretation to quantum measurement theory, and establish a logical basis for the difference between simultaneous measurability and simultaneous determinateness.
We study the spectral sign implication for quantum logic, defined by the nonnegative spectral projection of the operator obtained by subtracting the antecedent projection from the consequent projection. The construction agrees with classical material implication on commuting projections and compares arbitrary pairs of projections through the spectral structure of their difference. It satisfies Hardegree's four minimal implicative conditions, his law of contraposition, and a falsity condition. It differs from the standard polynomial implications in that its value need not belong to the ortholattice generated by its arguments. Within a uniform class of Borel constructions for pairs of projections, the operations satisfying entailment, contraposition, and the falsity condition correspond exactly to measurable choices of spectral branch. In the continuous subclass, these three conditions determine the spectral sign implication uniquely. In finite dimensions, the operation is also the largest among the acceptance projections of optimal projective tests for Helstrom discrimination between subspace states with priors proportional to rank. These results connect quantum implication with the operator theory of two projections and binary quantum discrimination.