In quantum cryptography, there could be a new world, Microcrypt, where cryptography is possible but one-way functions (OWFs) do not exist. Although many fundamental primitives and useful applications have been found in Microcrypt, they lack ``OWFs-free'' concrete hardness assumptions on which they are based. In classical cryptography, many hardness assumptions on concrete mathematical problems have been introduced, such as the discrete logarithm (DL) problems or the decisional Diffie-Hellman (DDH) problems on concrete group structures related to finite fields or elliptic curves. They are then abstracted to generic hardness assumptions such as the DL and DDH assumptions over group actions. Finally, based on these generic assumptions, primitives and applications are constructed. The goal of the present paper is to introduce several abstracted generic hardness assumptions in Microcrypt, which could connect the concrete mathematical hardness assumptions with applications. Our assumptions are based on a quantum analogue of group actions. A group action is a tuple $(G,S,\star)$ of a group $G$, a set $S$, and an operation $\star:G\times S\to S$. We introduce a quantum analogue of group actions, which we call quantum group actions (QGAs), where $G$ is a set of unitary operators, $S$ is a set of states, and $\star$ is the application of a unitary on a state. By endowing QGAs with some reasonable hardness assumptions, we introduce a natural quantum analogue of the decisional Diffie-Hellman (DDH) assumption and pseudorandom group actions. Based on these assumptions, we construct classical-query pseudorandom function-like state generators (PRFSGs). Because classical group actions are instantiated with many concrete mathematical hardness assumptions, our QGAs could also have some concrete (even OWFs-free) instantiations.
In quantum cryptography, there could be a new world, Microcrypt, where cryptography is possible but one-way functions (OWFs) do not exist. Although many fundamental primitives and useful applications have been found in Microcrypt, they lack ``OWFs-free'' concrete hardness assumptions on which they are based. In classical cryptography, many hardness assumptions on concrete mathematical problems have been introduced, such as the discrete logarithm (DL) problems or the decisional Diffie-Hellman (DDH) problems on concrete group structures related to finite fields or elliptic curves. They are then abstracted to generic hardness assumptions such as the DL and DDH assumptions over group actions. Finally, based on these generic assumptions, primitives and applications are constructed. The goal of the present paper is to introduce several abstracted generic hardness assumptions in Microcrypt, which could connect the concrete mathematical hardness assumptions with applications. Our assumptions are based on a quantum analogue of group actions. A group action is a tuple (G,S,⋆) of a group G, a set S, and an operation ⋆:G×S→S. We introduce a quantum analogue of group actions, which we call quantum group actions (QGAs), where G is a set of unitary operators, S is a set of states, and ⋆ is the application of a unitary on a state. By endowing QGAs with some reasonable hardness assumptions, we introduce a natural quantum analogue of the decisional Diffie-Hellman (DDH) assumption and pseudorandom group actions. Based on these assumptions, we construct classical-query pseudorandom function-like state generators (PRFSGs). Because classical group actions are instantiated with many concrete mathematical hardness assumptions, our QGAs could also have some concrete (even OWFs-free) instantiations.
In quantum cryptography, there could be a new world, Microcrypt, where cryptography is possible but one-way functions (OWFs) do not exist. Many quantum analogues of OWFs and pseudorandom generators (PRGs) that are potentially weaker than OWFs have been introduced, and their useful applications have been demonstrated. However, Microcrypt still lacks enough foundations on which they are based compared with the classical cryptographic world. In classical cryptography, many hardness assumptions on concrete mathematical problems have been introduced, such as the discrete logarithm (DL) problems or the decisional Diffie-Hellman (DDH) problems on concrete group structures related to finite fields or elliptic curves. They are then abstracted to generic hardness assumptions such as the DL and DDH assumptions over group actions. Finally, based on these generic assumptions, primitives and applications are constructed. The goal of the present paper is to introduce several abstracted generic hardness assumptions in Microcrypt, which could connect concrete mathematical hardness assumptions with applications. Our assumptions are based on a quantum analogue of group actions. A group action is a tuple ( G , S , ⋆ ) of a group G , a set S , and an operation ⋆ : G × S → S . We introduce a quantum analogue of group actions, which we call quantum group actions (QGAs), where G is a subgroup of unitary operators, S is a set of states, and ⋆ is the application of a unitary on a state. By endowing QGAs with some reasonable hardness assumptions, we introduce a natural quantum analogue of the decisional Diffie-Hellman (DDH) assumption and pseudorandom group actions. As an application, we construct classical-query pseudorandom function-like state generators (PRFSGs) based on these assumptions. PRFSGs are a quantum analogue of pseudorandom functions (PRFs), and have many applications such as IND-CPA SKE, EUF-CMA MAC, and private-key quantum money schemes. We also show that those assumptions are implied by non-adaptive pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs). Because classical group actions are instantiated with many concrete mathematical hardness assumptions, our QGAs could also have concrete (even OWFs-free) instantiations. We provide some candidate instantiations based on random circuits and IQP circuits.
Our modern world is dependent on online communications and transactions. To ensure privacy in these digital actions, it is extremely common to use protocols such as the Diffie-Hellman key exchange scheme. Unfortunately, these systems have been shown to be vulnerable to attacks from a quantum adversary. This means that an overhaul of the field of cryptography is needed in order to anticipate and mitigate this threat.Over the past years, the community has begun to answer this call by proposing and analyzing new techniques that are conjectured to be quantum safe. One such example is the study of cryptographic group actions. These mappings mimic some of the structure from the Diffie-Hellman protocol,but abstract it enough so that new mathematical operations can be employed that avoid quantum attacks. Currently, the main examples of group actions come from isogenies, codes, and lattices.In order for a protocol to be used in the real-world we would hope for it to be secure, fast, and requiring little storage. This means that in these early stages of research and development of cryptographic group actions, it is essential to begin to answer some of the questions surrounding security and efficiency. This thesis contributes to this effort by focusing on these aspects across different group actions that have been proposed for use in the literature.It is certainly true that each individual group action needs its own study of security. When designers are trying to achieve some advanced functionalities in a protocol, they may sometimes alter the underlying security assumptions.Each time this is done, the new assumptions need their own careful study as well. In this thesis we consider four different variants of group action security assumptions spanning the isogeny, tensor, linear code, and matrix code group actions. We analyze their security by either offering concrete attacks or giving a polynomial time reduction to a more well-studied assumption. This helps to indicate whether a problem is appropriate for use in cryptography, and what parameters to use if so.In addition to security, this thesis is also inscribed in the effort to study the efficiency of group actions by including three works studying the isogeny group action and related subroutines. They span the core isogeny problem for oriented elliptic curves, evaluating isogenies from a kernel generator, and supersingularity testing. With an effort from the community to improve overall runtimes, we can hope to get closer to reasonable speeds for real-life use.By studying the security and efficiency of cryptographic group actions, this thesis shines light on group actions as a promising framework for post-quantum cryptographic solutions.
One-way puzzles (OWPuzzs) introduced by Khurana and Tomer [STOC 2024] are a natural quantum analogue of one-way functions (OWFs), and one of the most fundamental primitives in ''Microcrypt'' where OWFs do not exist but quantum cryptography is possible. OWPuzzs are implied by almost all quantum cryptographic primitives, and imply several important applications such as non-interactive commitments and multi-party computations. A significant goal in the field of quantum cryptography is to base OWPuzzs on plausible assumptions that will not imply OWFs. In this paper, we base OWPuzzs on hardness of non-collapsing measurements. To that end, we introduce a new complexity class, SampPDQP, which is a sampling version of the decision class PDQP introduced in [Aaronson, Bouland, Fitzsimons, and Lee, ITCS 2016]. We show that if SampPDQP is hard on average for quantum polynomial time, then OWPuzzs exist. SampPDQP is the class of sampling problems that can be solved by a classical polynomial-time algorithm that can make a single query to a non-collapsing measurement oracle, which is a ''magical'' oracle that can sample measurement results on quantum states without collapsing the states. Such non-collapsing measurements are highly unphysical operations that should be hard to realize in quantum polynomial-time. We also study upperbounds of the hardness of SampPDQP. We introduce a new primitive, distributional collision-resistant puzzles (dCRPuzzs), which are a natural quantum analogue of distributional collision-resistant hashing [Dubrov and Ishai, STOC 2006]. We show that dCRPuzzs imply average-case hardness of SampPDQP (and therefore OWPuzzs as well). We also show that two-message honest-statistically-hiding commitments with classical communication and one-shot signatures [Amos, Georgiou, Kiayias, Zhandry, STOC 2020] imply dCRPuzzs.
A key challenge in quantum cryptography is to build quantum one-wayness and pseudorandomness without the use of (quantum computable) one-way functions. So far, this has turned out to be a difficult task, with only a few proposed candidates that are not directly built from one-way functions. Even within these few proposed candidates, we have lacked the techniques to analyze when proposed constructions may inadvertently yield one-way functions.
In this work, we introduce efficient NP-aided shadow tomography of quantum states. We prove that collections of {\em computable} pure states can be learned via efficient NP-aided shadow tomography, where we say that a state is computable if the amplitude and phase on any computational basis term can be classically efficiently computed given the description of an efficient preparation circuit for the state. We also give new algorithms for NP-aided learning of unitaries given polynomially many queries to the unitary.
By building on this, we show that many existing architectures for PRS and PRU, including some that were explicitly introduced for the purposes of avoiding one-way functions (e.g., Hamiltonian Phase States, Bostanci et. al., TQC 2025), actually do imply the existence of one-way functions or imply \(\NP\) hardness. We hope that these no-go results will inform future investigations into building PRS and PRUs from assumptions that are plausibly outside the complexity class NP.
We show that concrete hardness assumptions about learning or cloning the output state of a random quantum circuit can be used as the foundation for secure quantum cryptography. In particular, under these assumptions we construct secure one-way state generators (OWSGs), digital signature schemes, quantum bit commitments, and private key encryption schemes. We also discuss evidence for these hardness assumptions by analyzing the best-known quantum learning algorithms, as well as proving black-box lower bounds for cloning and learning given state preparation oracles. Our random circuit-based constructions provide concrete instantiations of quantum cryptographic primitives whose security do not depend on the existence of one-way functions. The use of random circuits in our constructions also opens the door to NISQ-friendly quantum cryptography. We discuss noise tolerant versions of our OWSG and digital signature constructions which can potentially be implementable on noisy quantum computers connected by a quantum network. On the other hand, they are still secure against noiseless quantum adversaries, raising the intriguing possibility of a useful implementation of an end-to-end cryptographic protocol on near-term quantum computers. Finally, our explorations suggest that the rich interconnections between learning theory and cryptography in classical theoretical computer science also extend to the quantum setting.
From Worst-Case Hardness of NP to Quantum Cryptography via Quantum Indistinguishability Obfuscation
Indistinguishability obfuscation (iO) has emerged as a powerful cryptographic primitive with many implications. While classical iO, combined with the infinitely-often worst-case hardness of NP, is known to imply one-way functions (OWFs) and a range of advanced cryptographic primitives, the cryptographic implications of quantum iO remain poorly understood. In this work, we initiate a study of the power of quantum iO. We define several natural variants of quantum iO, distinguished by whether the obfuscation algorithm, evaluation algorithm, and description of obfuscated program are classical or quantum. For each variant, we identify quantum cryptographic primitives that can be constructed under the assumption of quantum iO and the infinitely-often quantum worst-case hardness of NP (i.e., NP⊆i.o.BQP). In particular, we construct pseudorandom unitaries, QCCC quantum public-key encryption and (QCCC) quantum symmetric-key encryption, and several primitives implied by them such as one-way state generators, (efficiently-verifiable) one-way puzzles, and EFI pairs, etc. While our main focus is on quantum iO, even in the classical setting, our techniques yield a new and arguably simpler construction of OWFs from classical (imperfect) iO and the infinitely-often worst-case hardness of NP.