Abstract We present our new findings on how various fundamental interactions decisively shape quantum entanglement and the Bell measure within and beyond the quantum field theory (QFT). In QFT, parity symmetry plays a key role in determining entanglement. Parity-conserving interactions produce maximally entangled bipartite systems, while maximally parity-violating interactions result in disentangled bipartite systems, placing the Bell measure on the boundary between classical and quantum theories. By examining the relation between quantum entanglement and Bell measure, we find that clean signals for interactions beyond QFT may be obtained. We propose methods to test these potential signals. Furthermore, we highlight the previously overlooked influence of magnetic fields within detectors, which radically alters predictions for quantum entanglement and Bell nonlocality. This environmental effect induces spurious P and charge-parity (CP) violations, which has to be carefully accounted for to reveal the true P, CP, and Bell nonlocality effects.
Abstract We present our new findings on how various fundamental interactions decisively shape quantum entanglement and the Bell measure within and beyond the quantum field theory (QFT). In QFT, parity symmetry plays a key role in determining entanglement. Parity-conserving interactions produce maximally entangled bipartite systems, while maximally parity-violating interactions result in disentangled bipartite systems, placing the Bell measure on the boundary between classical and quantum theories. By examining the relation between quantum entanglement and Bell measure, we find that clean signals for interactions beyond QFT may be obtained. We propose methods to test these potential signals. Furthermore, we highlight the previously overlooked influence of magnetic fields within detectors, which radically alters predictions for quantum entanglement and Bell nonlocality. This environmental effect induces spurious P and charge-parity (CP) violations, which has to be carefully accounted for to reveal the true P, CP, and Bell nonlocality effects.
While all bipartite pure entangled states are known to generate correlations violating a Bell inequality, and are therefore nonlocal, the quantitative relation between pure state entanglement and nonlocality is poorly understood. In fact, some Bell inequalities are maximally violated by non-maximally entangled states and this phenomenon is also observed for other operational measures of nonlocality. In this work, we study a recently proposed measure of nonlocality defined as the probability that a pure state displays nonlocal correlations when subjected to random measurements. We first prove that this measure satisfies some natural properties for an operational measure of nonlocality. Then, we show that for pure states of two qubits the measure is monotonic with entanglement for all correlation two-outcome Bell inequalities: for all these inequalities, the more the state is entangled, the larger the probability to violate them when random measurements are performed. Finally, we extend our results to the multipartite setting.
Quantum nonlocality as a witness of entanglement plays a crucial role in various fields. Existing quantum monogamy relations rule out the possibility of simultaneous violations of any Bell inequalities with partial statistics generated from one Bell experiment on any multipartite entanglement or post-quantum source. In this article, we report an efficient method to construct a multipartite Bell test based on any Bell inequalities. We demonstrate that violating these monogamy relations can dynamically witness simultaneous Bell nonlocalities of partial systems. We conduct a tripartite experiment to verify quantum nonlocalities by violating a tripartite monogamy relation using a maximally entangled two-photon state.
Analytic formulas of Bell correlations are derived in terms of quantum probability statistics under the assumption of measuring outcome-independence and the Bell's inequalities (BIs) are extended to general bipartite-entanglement macroscopic quantum-states (MQS) of arbitrary spins. For a spin-½ entangled state we find analytically that the violations of BIs really resulted from the quantum nonlocal correlations. However, the BIs are always satisfied for the spin-1 entangled MQS. More generally the quantum nonlocality does not lead to the violation for the integer spins since the nonlocal interference effects cancel each other by the quantum statistical-average. Such a cancellation no longer exists for the half-integer spins due to the nontrivial Berry phase, and thus the violation of BIs is understood remarkably as an effect of geometric phase. Specifically, our generic observation of the spin-parity effect can be experimentally tested with the entangled photon-pairs.
Motivated by the recent proposal for the quantification of the Bell nonlocality [Phys. Rev. A 92, 030101(R) (2015)], we provide an extensive analysis of this concept, namely, the volume of violation. This new measure of nonlocality has been proposed to deliver an evidence that the anomaly between maximally entangled states and states that maximally violate a Bell inequality is caused by the method, which has been applied to quantify nonlocality and the anomaly disappears when the volume of violation in used. We prove that such conclusion is not true for all bipartite quantum systems with dimension $d\ensuremath{\bigotimes}d$. In fact, if one assumes the same condition as in Phys. Rev. A 92, 030101(R) (2015), it is limited to $d\ensuremath{\le}7$. Furthermore, we discuss several type of local measurements and their influence on the quantification of nonlocality by mean of volume of violation. In particular, we propose a set of local observers that significantly enhance the volume of violation, which may have important meaning in a real-world application. Finally, we present a comparison between the volume of violation and the maximal violation of a Bell inequality.
It is one of the most remarkable features of quantum physics that measurements on spatially separated systems cannot always be described by a locally causal theory. In such a theory, the outcomes of local measurements are determined in advance solely by some unknown (or hidden) variables and the choice of local measurements. Correlations that are allowed within the framework of a locally causal theory are termed classical. Typically, the fact that quantum mechanics does not always result in classical correlations is revealed by the violation of Bell inequalities, which are constraints that have to be satisfied by any classical correlations. It has been known for a long time that entanglement is necessary to demonstrate nonclassical correlations, and hence a Bell inequality violation. However, since some entangled quantum states are known to admit explicit locally causal models, the exact role of entanglement in Bell inequality violation has remained obscure. This thesis provides both a comprehensive review on these issues as well as a report on new discoveries made to clarify the relationship between entanglement and Bell inequality violation. In particular, within the framework of a standard Bell experiment, i.e., a Bell inequality test that is directly performed on a single copy of a quantum state r, we have derived two algorithms to determine, respectively, a lower bound and an upper bound on the strength of correlations that r can offer for any given Bell inequality. Both of these algorithms make use convex optimization techniques in the form of a semidefinite program. By examples, we show that these algorithms can often be used in tandem, in conjunction with convexity arguments, to determine if a quantum state can offer nonclassical correlations and hence violates a given Bell inequality. On the other hand, since a standard Bell experiment typically involves measurements over many copies of the quantum systems, we have also investigated the possibility of enhancing the strength of nonclassical correlation by, instead, performing collective measurements on multiple copies of the quantum systems. Our findings show that even without postselection, such joint measurements may also lead to stronger nonclassical correlations, and hence a better Bell inequality violation. Meanwhile, previous studies have indicated that entangled state admitting locally causal models may still lead to observable nonclassical correlations if, prior to a standard Bell experiment, the state is subjected to some appropriate local preprocessing. This phenomenon of hidden nonlocality was discovered more than a decade ago, but to date, it is still not known if all entangled states can demonstrate nonclassical correlations through these more sophisticated Bell experiments. A key result in this thesis then consists of showing that for all bipartite entangled states, observable nonclassical correlations, in the form of a Bell-CHSH inequality violation, can indeed be derived if we allow both local preprocessing and the usage of shared ancillary state which by itself does not violate the Bell-CHSH inequality. This establishes a kind of equivalence between bipartite entanglement and states that cannot be simulated by classical correlations. In summary, for a standard Bell experiment where no local preprocessing on a quantum state r is allowed, we have provided two algorithms that can be used in tandem to determine if r can be simulated by a locally causal theory, whereas in the scenario where local preprocessing is allowed, we have demonstrated that bipartite entangled states are precisely those which cannot always be simulated classically.
Bell’s inequalities (BIs) derived in terms of quantum probability statistics are extended to general bipartite-entangled states of arbitrary spins with parallel polarization. The original formula of Bell for the two-spin singlet is slightly modified in the parallel configuration, while the inequality formulated by Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt (CHSH) remains unchanged. The violation of BIs indeed resulted from the quantum nonlocal correlation for spin-[Formula: see text] case. However, the inequalities are always satisfied for the spin-1 entangled states regardless of parallel or antiparallel polarizations of two spins. The spin parity effect originally demonstrated with the antiparallel spin-polarizations (Z. Song, J.-Q. Liang and L.-F. Wei, Mod. Phys. Lett. B 28 (2013) 145004) still exists for the parallel case. The quantum nonlocality does not lead to the violation for integer spins due to the cancellation of nonlocal interference effects by the quantum statistical average. Again, the violation of BIs seems to be a result of the measurement-induced nontrivial Berry phase (BP) for half-integer spins.