Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2409.15248

Founding Quantum Cryptography on Quantum Advantage, or, Towards Cryptography from $\mathsf{\#P}$-Hardness

Dakshita Khurana, Kabir Tomer

Published Sep 23, 2024• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Recent oracle separations [Kretschmer, TQC'21, Kretschmer et. al., STOC'23] have raised the tantalizing possibility of building quantum cryptography from sources of hardness that persist even if the polynomial hierarchy collapses. We realize this possibility by building quantum bit commitments and secure computation from unrelativized, well-studied mathematical problems that are conjectured to be hard for $\mathsf{P^{\#P}}$ -- such as approximating the permanents of complex Gaussian matrices, or approximating the output probabilities of random quantum circuits. Indeed, we show that as long as any one of the conjectures underlying sampling-based quantum advantage (e.g., BosonSampling, Random Circuit Sampling, IQP, etc.) is true, quantum cryptography can be based on the extremely mild assumption that $\mathsf{P^{\#P}} \not\subseteq \mathsf{(io)BQP/qpoly}$. We prove that the following hardness assumptions are equivalent. (1) The hardness of approximating the probability assigned to a randomly chosen string in the support of certain efficiently sampleable distributions (upto inverse polynomial multiplicative error).(2) The existence of one-way puzzles, where a quantum sampler outputs a pair of classical strings -- a puzzle and its key -- and where the hardness lies in finding the key corresponding to a random puzzle. These are known to imply quantum bit commitments [Khurana and Tomer, STOC'24]. (3) The existence of state puzzles, or one-way state synthesis, where it is hard to synthesize a secret quantum state given a public classical identifier. These capture the hardness of search problems with quantum inputs (secrets) and classical outputs (challenges). These are the first constructions of quantum cryptographic primitives (one-way puzzles, quantum bit commitments, state puzzles) from concrete, well-founded mathematical assumptions that do not imply the existence of classical cryptography.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2409.15248

Related papers

The Hardness of Learning Quantum Circuits and Its Cryptographic Applications

Bill Fefferman, Soumik Ghosh, Makrand Sinha +1 more

We show that concrete hardness assumptions about learning or cloning the output state of a random quantum circuit can be used as the foundation for secure quantum cryptography. In particular, under these assumptions we construct secure one-way state generators (OWSGs), digital signature schemes, quantum bit commitments, and private key encryption schemes. We also discuss evidence for these hardness assumptions by analyzing the best-known quantum learning algorithms, as well as proving black-box lower bounds for cloning and learning given state preparation oracles. Our random circuit-based constructions provide concrete instantiations of quantum cryptographic primitives whose security do not depend on the existence of one-way functions. The use of random circuits in our constructions also opens the door to NISQ-friendly quantum cryptography. We discuss noise tolerant versions of our OWSG and digital signature constructions which can potentially be implementable on noisy quantum computers connected by a quantum network. On the other hand, they are still secure against noiseless quantum adversaries, raising the intriguing possibility of a useful implementation of an end-to-end cryptographic protocol on near-term quantum computers. Finally, our explorations suggest that the rich interconnections between learning theory and cryptography in classical theoretical computer science also extend to the quantum setting.

arXiv:2504.15343•Leibniz international proceedings in informatics•Apr 21, 2025•0 citations

Quantum Cryptography and Hardness of Non-Collapsing Measurements

Tomoyuki Morimae, Shirakawa, Yuki, Takashi Yamakawa

One-way puzzles (OWPuzzs) introduced by Khurana and Tomer [STOC 2024] are a natural quantum analogue of one-way functions (OWFs), and one of the most fundamental primitives in ''Microcrypt'' where OWFs do not exist but quantum cryptography is possible. OWPuzzs are implied by almost all quantum cryptographic primitives, and imply several important applications such as non-interactive commitments and multi-party computations. A significant goal in the field of quantum cryptography is to base OWPuzzs on plausible assumptions that will not imply OWFs. In this paper, we base OWPuzzs on hardness of non-collapsing measurements. To that end, we introduce a new complexity class, $\mathbf{SampPDQP}$, which is a sampling version of the decision class $\mathbf{PDQP}$ introduced in [Aaronson, Bouland, Fitzsimons, and Lee, ITCS 2016]. We show that if $\mathbf{SampPDQP}$ is hard on average for quantum polynomial time, then OWPuzzs exist. $\mathbf{SampPDQP}$ is the class of sampling problems that can be solved by a classical polynomial-time algorithm that can make a single query to a non-collapsing measurement oracle, which is a ''magical'' oracle that can sample measurement results on quantum states without collapsing the states. Such non-collapsing measurements are highly unphysical operations that should be hard to realize in quantum polynomial-time. We also study upperbounds of the hardness of $\mathbf{SampPDQP}$. We introduce a new primitive, distributional collision-resistant puzzles (dCRPuzzs), which are a natural quantum analogue of distributional collision-resistant hashing [Dubrov and Ishai, STOC 2006]. We show that dCRPuzzs imply average-case hardness of $\mathbf{SampPDQP}$ (and therefore OWPuzzs as well). We also show that two-message honest-statistically-hiding commitments with classical communication and one-shot signatures [Amos, Georgiou, Kiayias, Zhandry, STOC 2020] imply dCRPuzzs.

arXiv:2510.04448•Oct 6, 2025•0 citations

Post-Quantum Cryptography from Quantum Stabilizer Decoding

Jonathan Z. Lu, Alexander Poremba, Yihui Quek +1 more

Post-quantum cryptography currently rests on a small number of hardness assumptions, posing significant risks should any one of them be compromised. This vulnerability motivates the search for new and cryptographically versatile assumptions that make a convincing case for quantum hardness. In this work, we argue that decoding random quantum stabilizer codes---a quantum analog of the well-studied LPN problem---is an excellent candidate. This task occupies a unique middle ground: it is inherently native to quantum computation, yet admits an equivalent formulation with purely classical input and output, as recently shown by Khesin et al. (STOC '26). We prove that the average-case hardness of quantum stabilizer decoding implies the core primitives of classical Cryptomania, including public-key encryption (PKE) and oblivious transfer (OT), as well as one-way functions. Our constructions are moreover practically efficient: our PKE scheme achieves essentially the same efficiency as state-of-the-art LPN-based PKE. We also provide substantial evidence that stabilizer decoding does not reduce to LPN, suggesting that the former problem constitutes a genuinely new post-quantum assumption. Our primary technical contributions are twofold. First, we give a reduction from random quantum stabilizer decoding to an average-case problem closely resembling LPN, but which is equipped with additional symplectic algebraic structure. While this structure is essential to the quantum nature of the problem, it raises significant barriers to cryptographic security reductions. Second, we develop a new suite of scrambling techniques for such structured linear spaces, and use them to produce rigorous security proofs for all of our constructions.

quant-pharXiv:2603.19110•Lecture notes in computer science•Mar 20, 2026•0 citations

Hardness of Quantum Distribution Learning and Quantum Cryptography

Taiga Hiroka, Min-Hsiu Hsieh, Tomoyuki Morimae

The existence of one-way functions (OWFs) forms the minimal assumption in classical cryptography. However, this is not necessarily the case in quantum cryptography. One-way puzzles (OWPuzzs), introduced by Khurana and Tomer, provide a natural quantum analogue of OWFs. The existence of OWPuzzs implies $PP\neq BQP$, while the converse remains open. In classical cryptography, the analogous problem-whether OWFs can be constructed from $P \neq NP$-has long been studied from the viewpoint of hardness of learning. Hardness of learning in various frameworks (including PAC learning) has been connected to OWFs or to $P \neq NP$. In contrast, no such characterization previously existed for OWPuzzs. In this paper, we establish the first complete characterization of OWPuzzs based on the hardness of a well-studied learning model: distribution learning. Specifically, we prove that OWPuzzs exist if and only if proper quantum distribution learning is hard on average. A natural question that follows is whether the worst-case hardness of proper quantum distribution learning can be derived from $PP \neq BQP$. If so, and a worst-case to average-case hardness reduction is achieved, it would imply OWPuzzs solely from $PP \neq BQP$. However, we show that this would be extremely difficult: if worst-case hardness is PP-hard (in a black-box reduction), then $SampBQP \neq SampBPP$ follows from the infiniteness of the polynomial hierarchy. Despite that, we show that $PP \neq BQP$ is equivalent to another standard notion of hardness of learning: agnostic. We prove that $PP \neq BQP$ if and only if agnostic quantum distribution learning with respect to KL divergence is hard. As a byproduct, we show that hardness of agnostic quantum distribution learning with respect to statistical distance against $PPT^{Σ_3^P}$ learners implies $SampBQP \neq SampBPP$.

arXiv:2507.01292•Jul 2, 2025•0 citations

On the Computational Hardness of Quantum One-Wayness

Bruno Pasqualotto Cavalar, Eli Goldin, Matthew Gray +3 more

There is a large body of work studying what forms of computational hardness are needed to realize classical cryptography. In particular, one-way functions and pseudorandom generators can be built from each other, and thus require equivalent computational assumptions to be realized. Furthermore, the existence of either of these primitives implies that P ≠ N P , which gives a lower bound on the necessary hardness.One can also define versions of each of these primitives with quantum output: respectively one-way state generators and pseudorandom state generators. Unlike in the classical setting, it is not known whether either primitive can be built from the other. Although it has been shown that pseudorandom state generators for certain parameter regimes can be used to build one-way state generators, the implication has not been previously known in full generality. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, the existence of one-way state generators has no known implications in complexity theory.We show that pseudorandom states compressing n bits to log ⁡ n + 1 qubits can be used to build one-way state generators and pseudorandom states compressing n bits to ω ( log ⁡ n ) qubits are one-way state generators. This is a nearly optimal result since pseudorandom states with fewer than c log ⁡ n -qubit output can be shown to exist unconditionally. We also show that any one-way state generator can be broken by a quantum algorithm with classical access to a P P oracle.An interesting implication of our results is that a t ( n ) -copy one-way state generator exists unconditionally, for every t ( n ) = o ( n / log ⁡ n ) . This contrasts nicely with the previously known fact that O ( n ) -copy one-way state generators require computational hardness. We also outline a new route towards a black-box separation between one-way state generators and quantum bit commitments.

arXiv:2312.08363•Quantum•Mar 27, 2025•6 citations

Quantum Pessiland

Boyang Chen, Tomoyuki Morimae, Takashi Yamakawa

Pessiland is a world where NP is hard on average but one-way functions (OWFs) do not exist [Impagliazzo 1995]. Because almost all classical cryptographic primitives imply OWFs [Impagliazzo and Luby 1989], there is almost no classical cryptography in Pessiland. On the other hand, quantum cryptography can exist even when OWFs do not [Kretschmer 2021; Morimae and Yamakawa 2022; Ananth, Qian and Yuen 2022]. Is there a quantum analogue of Pessiland where NP is hard on average but even quantum cryptography does not exist? In this paper, we show that such a miserable world, Quantum Pessiland, exists: there is a quantum oracle relative to which $UP\cap coUP$ is hard on average against quantum polynomial-time algorithms with quantum advice, yet auxiliary-input EFI pairs do not exist. We also show that there is a classical oracle relative to which $UP\cap coUP$ is hard on average against quantum polynomial-time algorithms with quantum advice, yet classically-secure auxiliary-input one-way puzzles (OWPuzzs) do not exist. Almost all quantum cryptographic primitives imply EFI pairs or OWPuzzs, and therefore these results mean that there is almost no quantum cryptography relative to these oracles. We further show that relative to the classical oracle, SampBQP = SampBPP, and therefore there is no sampling-based quantum advantage in Quantum Pessiland. Finally, because our average-case hardness of $UP\cap coUP$ implies $P^{\#P}\not\subseteq i.o.BQP/qpoly$, our result also implies that a non-relativizing proof technique is necessary to construct OWPuzzs solely from $P^{\#P}\not\subseteq i.o.BQP/qpoly$, which gives a partial negative answer to the open problem of [Khurana and Tomer 2025].

quant-pharXiv:2608.29493•Sep 1, 2026•0 citations
Founding Quantum Cryptography on Quantum Advantage, or, Towards Cryptography from #P\mathsf{\#P}#P-Hardness
Recent oracle separations [Kretschmer, TQC'21, Kretschmer et. al., STOC'23] have raised the tantalizing possibility of building quantum cryptography from sources of hardness that persist even if the polynomial hierarchy collapses. We realize this possibility by building quantum bit commitments and secure computation from unrelativized, well-studied mathematical problems that are conjectured to be hard for P#P\mathsf{P^{\#P}}P#P -- such as approximating the permanents of complex Gaussian matrices, or approximating the output probabilities of random quantum circuits. Indeed, we show that as long as any one of the conjectures underlying sampling-based quantum advantage (e.g., BosonSampling, Random Circuit Sampling, IQP, etc.) is true, quantum cryptography can be based on the extremely mild assumption that P#P⊈(io)BQP/qpoly\mathsf{P^{\#P}} \not\subseteq \mathsf{(io)BQP/qpoly}P#P⊆(io)BQP/qpoly. We prove that the following hardness assumptions are equivalent. (1) The hardness of approximating the probability assigned to a randomly chosen string in the support of certain efficiently sampleable distributions (upto inverse polynomial multiplicative error).(2) The existence of one-way puzzles, where a quantum sampler outputs a pair of classical strings -- a puzzle and its key -- and where the hardness lies in finding the key corresponding to a random puzzle. These are known to imply quantum bit commitments [Khurana and Tomer, STOC'24]. (3) The existence of state puzzles, or one-way state synthesis, where it is hard to synthesize a secret quantum state given a public classical identifier. These capture the hardness of search problems with quantum inputs (secrets) and classical outputs (challenges). These are the first constructions of quantum cryptographic primitives (one-way puzzles, quantum bit commitments, state puzzles) from concrete, well-founded mathematical assumptions that do not imply the existence of classical cryptography.
We show that concrete hardness assumptions about learning or cloning the output state of a random quantum circuit can be used as the foundation for secure quantum cryptography. In particular, under these assumptions we construct secure one-way state generators (OWSGs), digital signature schemes, quantum bit commitments, and private key encryption schemes. We also discuss evidence for these hardness assumptions by analyzing the best-known quantum learning algorithms, as well as proving black-box lower bounds for cloning and learning given state preparation oracles. Our random circuit-based constructions provide concrete instantiations of quantum cryptographic primitives whose security do not depend on the existence of one-way functions. The use of random circuits in our constructions also opens the door to NISQ-friendly quantum cryptography. We discuss noise tolerant versions of our OWSG and digital signature constructions which can potentially be implementable on noisy quantum computers connected by a quantum network. On the other hand, they are still secure against noiseless quantum adversaries, raising the intriguing possibility of a useful implementation of an end-to-end cryptographic protocol on near-term quantum computers. Finally, our explorations suggest that the rich interconnections between learning theory and cryptography in classical theoretical computer science also extend to the quantum setting.
One-way puzzles (OWPuzzs) introduced by Khurana and Tomer [STOC 2024] are a natural quantum analogue of one-way functions (OWFs), and one of the most fundamental primitives in ''Microcrypt'' where OWFs do not exist but quantum cryptography is possible. OWPuzzs are implied by almost all quantum cryptographic primitives, and imply several important applications such as non-interactive commitments and multi-party computations. A significant goal in the field of quantum cryptography is to base OWPuzzs on plausible assumptions that will not imply OWFs. In this paper, we base OWPuzzs on hardness of non-collapsing measurements. To that end, we introduce a new complexity class, SampPDQP\mathbf{SampPDQP}SampPDQP, which is a sampling version of the decision class PDQP\mathbf{PDQP}PDQP introduced in [Aaronson, Bouland, Fitzsimons, and Lee, ITCS 2016]. We show that if SampPDQP\mathbf{SampPDQP}SampPDQP is hard on average for quantum polynomial time, then OWPuzzs exist. SampPDQP\mathbf{SampPDQP}SampPDQP is the class of sampling problems that can be solved by a classical polynomial-time algorithm that can make a single query to a non-collapsing measurement oracle, which is a ''magical'' oracle that can sample measurement results on quantum states without collapsing the states. Such non-collapsing measurements are highly unphysical operations that should be hard to realize in quantum polynomial-time. We also study upperbounds of the hardness of SampPDQP\mathbf{SampPDQP}SampPDQP. We introduce a new primitive, distributional collision-resistant puzzles (dCRPuzzs), which are a natural quantum analogue of distributional collision-resistant hashing [Dubrov and Ishai, STOC 2006]. We show that dCRPuzzs imply average-case hardness of SampPDQP\mathbf{SampPDQP}SampPDQP (and therefore OWPuzzs as well). We also show that two-message honest-statistically-hiding commitments with classical communication and one-shot signatures [Amos, Georgiou, Kiayias, Zhandry, STOC 2020] imply dCRPuzzs.
Post-quantum cryptography currently rests on a small number of hardness assumptions, posing significant risks should any one of them be compromised. This vulnerability motivates the search for new and cryptographically versatile assumptions that make a convincing case for quantum hardness. In this work, we argue that decoding random quantum stabilizer codes---a quantum analog of the well-studied LPN problem---is an excellent candidate. This task occupies a unique middle ground: it is inherently native to quantum computation, yet admits an equivalent formulation with purely classical input and output, as recently shown by Khesin et al. (STOC '26). We prove that the average-case hardness of quantum stabilizer decoding implies the core primitives of classical Cryptomania, including public-key encryption (PKE) and oblivious transfer (OT), as well as one-way functions. Our constructions are moreover practically efficient: our PKE scheme achieves essentially the same efficiency as state-of-the-art LPN-based PKE. We also provide substantial evidence that stabilizer decoding does not reduce to LPN, suggesting that the former problem constitutes a genuinely new post-quantum assumption. Our primary technical contributions are twofold. First, we give a reduction from random quantum stabilizer decoding to an average-case problem closely resembling LPN, but which is equipped with additional symplectic algebraic structure. While this structure is essential to the quantum nature of the problem, it raises significant barriers to cryptographic security reductions. Second, we develop a new suite of scrambling techniques for such structured linear spaces, and use them to produce rigorous security proofs for all of our constructions.
The existence of one-way functions (OWFs) forms the minimal assumption in classical cryptography. However, this is not necessarily the case in quantum cryptography. One-way puzzles (OWPuzzs), introduced by Khurana and Tomer, provide a natural quantum analogue of OWFs. The existence of OWPuzzs implies PP≠BQPPP\neq BQPPP=BQP, while the converse remains open. In classical cryptography, the analogous problem-whether OWFs can be constructed from P≠NPP \neq NPP=NP-has long been studied from the viewpoint of hardness of learning. Hardness of learning in various frameworks (including PAC learning) has been connected to OWFs or to P≠NPP \neq NPP=NP. In contrast, no such characterization previously existed for OWPuzzs. In this paper, we establish the first complete characterization of OWPuzzs based on the hardness of a well-studied learning model: distribution learning. Specifically, we prove that OWPuzzs exist if and only if proper quantum distribution learning is hard on average. A natural question that follows is whether the worst-case hardness of proper quantum distribution learning can be derived from PP≠BQPPP \neq BQPPP=BQP. If so, and a worst-case to average-case hardness reduction is achieved, it would imply OWPuzzs solely from PP≠BQPPP \neq BQPPP=BQP. However, we show that this would be extremely difficult: if worst-case hardness is PP-hard (in a black-box reduction), then SampBQP≠SampBPPSampBQP \neq SampBPPSampBQP=SampBPP follows from the infiniteness of the polynomial hierarchy. Despite that, we show that PP≠BQPPP \neq BQPPP=BQP is equivalent to another standard notion of hardness of learning: agnostic. We prove that PP≠BQPPP \neq BQPPP=BQP if and only if agnostic quantum distribution learning with respect to KL divergence is hard. As a byproduct, we show that hardness of agnostic quantum distribution learning with respect to statistical distance against PPTΣ3PPPT^{Σ_3^P}PPTΣ3P​ learners implies SampBQP≠SampBPPSampBQP \neq SampBPPSampBQP=SampBPP.
There is a large body of work studying what forms of computational hardness are needed to realize classical cryptography. In particular, one-way functions and pseudorandom generators can be built from each other, and thus require equivalent computational assumptions to be realized. Furthermore, the existence of either of these primitives implies that P ≠ N P , which gives a lower bound on the necessary hardness.One can also define versions of each of these primitives with quantum output: respectively one-way state generators and pseudorandom state generators. Unlike in the classical setting, it is not known whether either primitive can be built from the other. Although it has been shown that pseudorandom state generators for certain parameter regimes can be used to build one-way state generators, the implication has not been previously known in full generality. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, the existence of one-way state generators has no known implications in complexity theory.We show that pseudorandom states compressing n bits to log ⁡ n + 1 qubits can be used to build one-way state generators and pseudorandom states compressing n bits to ω ( log ⁡ n ) qubits are one-way state generators. This is a nearly optimal result since pseudorandom states with fewer than c log ⁡ n -qubit output can be shown to exist unconditionally. We also show that any one-way state generator can be broken by a quantum algorithm with classical access to a P P oracle.An interesting implication of our results is that a t ( n ) -copy one-way state generator exists unconditionally, for every t ( n ) = o ( n / log ⁡ n ) . This contrasts nicely with the previously known fact that O ( n ) -copy one-way state generators require computational hardness. We also outline a new route towards a black-box separation between one-way state generators and quantum bit commitments.
Pessiland is a world where NP is hard on average but one-way functions (OWFs) do not exist [Impagliazzo 1995]. Because almost all classical cryptographic primitives imply OWFs [Impagliazzo and Luby 1989], there is almost no classical cryptography in Pessiland. On the other hand, quantum cryptography can exist even when OWFs do not [Kretschmer 2021; Morimae and Yamakawa 2022; Ananth, Qian and Yuen 2022]. Is there a quantum analogue of Pessiland where NP is hard on average but even quantum cryptography does not exist? In this paper, we show that such a miserable world, Quantum Pessiland, exists: there is a quantum oracle relative to which UP∩coUPUP\cap coUPUP∩coUP is hard on average against quantum polynomial-time algorithms with quantum advice, yet auxiliary-input EFI pairs do not exist. We also show that there is a classical oracle relative to which UP∩coUPUP\cap coUPUP∩coUP is hard on average against quantum polynomial-time algorithms with quantum advice, yet classically-secure auxiliary-input one-way puzzles (OWPuzzs) do not exist. Almost all quantum cryptographic primitives imply EFI pairs or OWPuzzs, and therefore these results mean that there is almost no quantum cryptography relative to these oracles. We further show that relative to the classical oracle, SampBQP = SampBPP, and therefore there is no sampling-based quantum advantage in Quantum Pessiland. Finally, because our average-case hardness of UP∩coUPUP\cap coUPUP∩coUP implies P#P⊈i.o.BQP/qpolyP^{\#P}\not\subseteq i.o.BQP/qpolyP#P⊆i.o.BQP/qpoly, our result also implies that a non-relativizing proof technique is necessary to construct OWPuzzs solely from P#P⊈i.o.BQP/qpolyP^{\#P}\not\subseteq i.o.BQP/qpolyP#P⊆i.o.BQP/qpoly, which gives a partial negative answer to the open problem of [Khurana and Tomer 2025].