We present Benchpress, a benchmarking suite for evaluating the performance and range of functionality of multiple quantum computing software development kits. This suite consists of a collection of over 1,000 tests measuring key performance metrics for a wide variety of operations on quantum circuits composed of up to 930 qubits and $${\mathcal{O}}(1{0}^{6})$$ two-qubit gates, as well as an execution framework for running the tests over multiple quantum software packages in a unified manner. Here we give a detailed overview of the benchmark suite and its methodology and generate representative results over seven different quantum software packages. The flexibility of the Benchpress framework enables benchmarking that not only keeps pace with quantum hardware improvements but also can preemptively gauge the quantum circuit processing costs of future device architectures. In this Resource, the authors present an open-source extensible benchmark tool, Benchpress, for evaluating the performance of mainstream quantum computing software. Benchpress was demonstrated to perform over 1,000 tests with up to 930 qubits to compare the performance of quantum software, providing insight into how to best use current programming stacks.
We present Benchpress, a benchmarking suite for evaluating the performance and range of functionality of multiple quantum computing software development kits. This suite consists of a collection of over 1,000 tests measuring key performance metrics for a wide variety of operations on quantum circuits composed of up to 930 qubits and O(106) two-qubit gates, as well as an execution framework for running the tests over multiple quantum software packages in a unified manner. Here we give a detailed overview of the benchmark suite and its methodology and generate representative results over seven different quantum software packages. The flexibility of the Benchpress framework enables benchmarking that not only keeps pace with quantum hardware improvements but also can preemptively gauge the quantum circuit processing costs of future device architectures. In this Resource, the authors present an open-source extensible benchmark tool, Benchpress, for evaluating the performance of mainstream quantum computing software. Benchpress was demonstrated to perform over 1,000 tests with up to 930 qubits to compare the performance of quantum software, providing insight into how to best use current programming stacks.
Quantum computers have the potential to provide an advantage over classical computers in a number of areas. Numerous metrics to benchmark the performance of quantum computers, ranging from their individual hardware components to entire applications, have been proposed over the years. Objective comparisons are further hampered in practice as different variations of the same metric are used, and the data disclosed together with a reported metric value is often not sufficient to reproduce the measurements. In this poster, we present our recent article, where we address these challenges by providing a review of metrics and benchmarks for quantum computers [1], including 1) a comprehensive collection of benchmarks allowing holistic comparisons of quantum computers, 2) a consistent format of the definitions across all metrics including a transparent description of the methodology and of the main assumptions and limitations, and 3) a reproducible approach by linking the metrics to open-source software used to evaluate them . We identify five areas where international standardization working groups could be established, namely: i) the identification and agreement on the categories of metrics that comprehensively benchmark device performance; ii) the identification and agreement on a set of well-established metrics that together comprehensively benchmark performance; iii) the identification of metrics specific to hardware platforms, including non-gate-based quantum computers; iv) inter-laboratory comparison studies to develop best practice guides for measurement methodology; and v) agreement on what data and software should be reported together with a metric value to ensure trust, transparency and reproducibility. We provide potential routes to advancing these areas. We expect that this work will accelerate the progress of quantum computing hardware towards quantum advantage. [1] D. Lall et al., A Review and Collection of Metrics and Benchmarks for Quantum Computers: Definitions, Methodologies and Software, arXiv:2502.06717.
Creating scalable, reliable, and well-motivated benchmarks for quantum computers is challenging: straightforward approaches to benchmarking suffer from exponential scaling, are insensitive to important errors, or use poorly-motivated performance metrics. Furthermore, curated benchmarking suites cannot include every interesting quantum circuit or algorithm, which necessitates a tool that enables the easy creation of new benchmarks. In this work, we introduce a software tool for creating scalable and reliable benchmarks that measure a well-motivated performance metric (process fidelity) from user-chosen quantum circuits and algorithms. Our software, called scarab, enables the creation of efficient and robust benchmarks even from circuits containing thousands or millions of qubits, by employing efficient fidelity estimation techniques, including mirror circuit fidelity estimation and subcircuit volumetric benchmarking. scarab provides a simple interface that enables the creation of reliable benchmarks by users who are not experts in the theory of quantum computer benchmarking or noise. We demonstrate the flexibility and power of scarab by using it to turn existing inefficient benchmarks into efficient benchmarks, to create benchmarks that interrogate hardware and algorithmic trade-offs in Hamiltonian simulation, to quantify the in-situ efficacy of approximate circuit compilation, and to create benchmarks that use subcircuits to measure progress towards executing a circuit of interest.
Quantum software tools for a wide variety of design tasks on and across different levels of abstraction are crucial in order to eventually realize useful quantum applications. This requires practical and relevant benchmarks for new software tools to be empirically evaluated and compared to the current state of the art. Although benchmarks for specific design tasks are commonly available, the demand for an overarching cross-level benchmark suite has not yet been fully met and there is no mutual consolidation in how quantum software tools are evaluated thus far. In this work, we propose the MQT Bench benchmark suite (as part of the Munich Quantum Toolkit , MQT) based on four core traits: (1) cross-level support for different abstraction levels, (2) accessibility via an easy-to-use web interface (https://www.cda.cit.tum.de/mqtbench/) and a Python package, (3) provision of a broad selection of benchmarks to facilitate generalizability, as well as (4) extendability to future algorithms, gate-sets, and hardware architectures. By comprising more than 70,000 benchmark circuits ranging from 2 to 130 qubits on four abstraction levels, MQT Bench presents a first step towards benchmarking different abstraction levels with a single benchmark suite to increase comparability, reproducibility, and transparency.
The fragmented landscape of quantum computer benchmarks, characterized by system-specific tools and inconsistent evaluation methodologies, hinders reliable cross-platform performance assessment. We introduce Metriq, an open-source collaborative platform for reproducible cross-platform quantum benchmarking that integrates benchmark definition and execution, data collection, and public presentation into a unified workflow. The Metriq benchmark suite spans both system-level metrics that characterize fundamental device properties such as entanglement quality, gate performance, and circuit speed, as well as application-inspired protocols that assess performance on quantum machine learning, optimization, and quantum simulation tasks. Benchmarks are chosen to scale with processor size, and the framework incorporates cost and resource estimation to support practical evaluation. Using Metriq, we collect and publicly release results from more than ten quantum computers across multiple hardware vendors, enabling systematic cross-platform comparison. The resulting curated dataset also reveals the practical strengths and limitations of individual benchmarks, creating a feedback loop that informs the ongoing refinement of the suite. To summarize performance across the benchmark suite, we introduce the Metriq Score, a composite index aggregating benchmark outcomes. We further present cross-benchmark analyses enabled by the shared dataset and their correlations with hardware calibration metrics. Through open development and data sharing, Metriq provides a practical foundation for reproducible benchmarking of quantum computers as hardware and benchmarking methods continue to evolve.
Reproducibility and comparability remain fundamental challenges in the empirical evaluation of Quantum Software Engineering (QSE) tools. These challenges arise from the intrinsic probabilistic behavior of quantum programs and the variability introduced by quantum hardware and simulator backends. While existing quantum benchmarks typically offer only static circuit definitions, they often leave researchers responsible for data generation and execution, hindering the creation of standardized and reproducible experiments. In this paper, we introduce QSimBench, a novel, open-source benchmark suite and accompanying Python library designed to address these limitations. QSimBench provides over 20 million precomputed shot-level execution traces:20,000measurements each, across14quantum algorithms, multiple circuit sizes (4−15qubits), and six Qiskit-based backends including both ideal and noise-injected simulations. Each configuration includes not only detailed measurement histories but also the original circuit in OpenQASM, the backend's noise model, and configuration metadata, ensuring full transparency and enabling in-depth analysis. QSimBench empowers researchers to conduct scalable, reproducible, and statistically rigorous evaluations of QSE tools, such as those for monitoring, orchestration, and statistical post-processing, without the need for expensive or difficult-to-reproduce quantum executions. The benchmark is distributed with a lightweight Python API that facilitates fast data retrieval, flexible sampling strategies, and seamless integration into experimental pipelines. QSimBench is publicly available, aiming to foster collaborative and reproducible research within the quantum software community.
Efficient compilation of quantum algorithms is vital in the era of Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices. While multiple open-source quantum compilation and circuit optimization frameworks are available, e.g. IBM Qiskit, CQC Tket, Google Cirq, Rigetti Quilc, PyZX, their relative performance is not always clear to a quantum programmer. The growth of complexity and diversity of quantum circuit compilation algorithms creates a demand for a dedicated tool for cross-benchmarking and profiling of inner workflow of the quantum compilation stack. We present an open-source software package, Arline Benchmarks, that is designed to perform automated benchmarking of quantum compilers with the focus on NISQ applications. The name "Arline" was given in honour of Arline Greenbaum Feynman, the first wife of Richard Feynman, the pioneer of quantum computing. We compared several quantum compilation frameworks based on a set of important metrics such as post-optimization gate counts, circuit depth, hardware-dependent circuit cost function, compiler run time etc. with a detailed analysis of metrics for each compilation stage. We performed a variety of compiler tests for random circuits and structured quantum algorithms (VQE, Trotter decomposition, Grover search, Option Pricing via Amplitude Estimation) for several popular quantum hardware architectures. Leveraging cross-platform functionality of Arline, we propose a concept of composite compilation pipeline that combines compiler-specific circuit optimization subroutines in a single compilation stack and finds an optimized sequence of compilation passes. By providing detailed insights into the compilation flow of quantum compilers, Arline Benchmarks offers a valuable toolkit for quantum computing researchers and software developers to gain additional insights into compilers' characteristics.