Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2407.19232 · The European Physical Journal B

Orbital antiferromagnetic currents in a frustrated fermionic ladder

Shota Garuchava, G. I. Japaridze, Alexander Nersesyan

Published Sep 1, 2024• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1140/epjb/s10051-024-00777-2

Related papers

Spectrum, Lifshitz transitions and orbital current in frustrated fermionic ladders with a uniform flux

Bachana Beradze, Alexander Nersesyan

arXiv:2210.16814•The European Physical Journal B•Jan 1, 2023•10 citations

Spinless fermions versus spin waves in describing antiferromagnetic Heisenberg ladders

宏光 堀, Shoji Yamamoto

Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials•Jan 25, 2004•0 citations

Orbital currents in a generalized Hubbard ladder

John Ove Fjærestad

APS•Mar 1, 2004•0 citations

Theory of Spin Correlations in Antiferromagnetic Spin Ladders

Alexei M. Tsvelik

APS•Mar 1, 1997•0 citations

Phase diagram of the frustrated spin ladder

Toshiya Hikihara, Oleg A. Starykh

We revisit the phase diagram of the frustrated spin-1/2 ladder with two competing interchain antiferromagnetic exchanges, rung coupling ${J}_{\ensuremath{\perp}}$ and diagonal coupling ${J}_{\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}}$. We suggest, based on the accurate renormalization-group analysis of the low-energy Hamiltonian of the ladder, that marginal interchain current-current interaction plays central role in destabilizing previously predicted intermediate columnar dimer phase in the vicinity of classical degeneracy line ${J}_{\ensuremath{\perp}}=2{J}_{\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}}$. Following this insight we then suggest that changing these competing interchain exchanges from the previously considered antiferromagnetic to the ferromagnetic ones eliminates the issue of the marginal interactions altogether and dramatically expands the region of stability of the columnar dimer phase. This analytical prediction is convincingly confirmed by the numerical density-matrix renormalization-group and exact-diagonalization calculations as well as by the perturbative calculation in the strong rung-coupling limit. The phase diagram for ferromagnetic ${J}_{\ensuremath{\perp}}$ and ${J}_{\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}}$ is determined.

arXiv:0912.4589•Physical Review B•Feb 25, 2010•47 citations

Generalized antiferromagnetic Heisenberg spin ladders

Yan-Chr Tsai, Chin‐Kun Hu

Physica B Condensed Matter•Oct 1, 2001•3 citations
We revisit the phase diagram of the frustrated spin-1/2 ladder with two competing interchain antiferromagnetic exchanges, rung coupling ${J}_{\ensuremath{\perp}}$ and diagonal coupling ${J}_{\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}}$. We suggest, based on the accurate renormalization-group analysis of the low-energy Hamiltonian of the ladder, that marginal interchain current-current interaction plays central role in destabilizing previously predicted intermediate columnar dimer phase in the vicinity of classical degeneracy line ${J}_{\ensuremath{\perp}}=2{J}_{\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}}$. Following this insight we then suggest that changing these competing interchain exchanges from the previously considered antiferromagnetic to the ferromagnetic ones eliminates the issue of the marginal interactions altogether and dramatically expands the region of stability of the columnar dimer phase. This analytical prediction is convincingly confirmed by the numerical density-matrix renormalization-group and exact-diagonalization calculations as well as by the perturbative calculation in the strong rung-coupling limit. The phase diagram for ferromagnetic ${J}_{\ensuremath{\perp}}$ and ${J}_{\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}}$ is determined.