Reliability is fundamental for developing large-scale quantum computers. Since the benefit of technological advancements to the qubit’s stability is saturating, algorithmic solutions, such as quantum error correction (QEC) codes, are needed to bridge the gap to reliable computation. Unfortunately, the deployment of the first quantum computers has identified faults induced by natural radiation as an additional threat to qubits reliability. The high sensitivity of qubits to radiation hinders the large-scale adoption of quantum computers, since the persistence and area-of-effect of the fault can potentially undermine the efficacy of the most advanced QEC. In this paper, we investigate the resilience of various implementations of state-of-the-art QEC codes to radiation-induced faults. We report data from over 400 million fault injections and correlate hardware faults with the logical error observed after decoding the code output, extrapolating physical-to-logical error rates. We compare the code’s radiation-induced logical error rate over the code distance, the number and role in the QEC of physical qubits, the underlying quantum computer topology, and particle energy spread in the chip. We show that, by simply selecting and tuning properly the surface code, thus without introducing any overhead, the probability of correcting a radiation-induced fault is increased by up to 10%. Finally, we provide indications and guidelines for the design of future QEC codes to further increase their effectiveness against radiation-induced events.
Reliability is fundamental for developing large-scale quantum computers. Since the benefit of technological advancements to the qubit’s stability is saturating, algorithmic solutions, such as quantum error correction (QEC) codes, are needed to bridge the gap to reliable computation. Unfortunately, the deployment of the first quantum computers has identified faults induced by natural radiation as an additional threat to qubits reliability. The high sensitivity of qubits to radiation hinders the large-scale adoption of quantum computers, since the persistence and area-of-effect of the fault can potentially undermine the efficacy of the most advanced QEC. In this paper, we investigate the resilience of various implementations of state-of-the-art QEC codes to radiation-induced faults. We report data from over 400 million fault injections and correlate hardware faults with the logical error observed after decoding the code output, extrapolating physical-to-logical error rates. We compare the code’s radiation-induced logical error rate over the code distance, the number and role in the QEC of physical qubits, the underlying quantum computer topology, and particle energy spread in the chip. We show that, by simply selecting and tuning properly the surface code, thus without introducing any overhead, the probability of correcting a radiation-induced fault is increased by up to 10%. Finally, we provide indications and guidelines for the design of future QEC codes to further increase their effectiveness against radiation-induced events.
ABSTRACT The quest for universal superconducting quantum computing is hindered by noise and errors. It has been proven that Quantum Error Correction (QEC) codes will lay at the foundation of fault‐tolerant quantum computing. However, cosmic‐ray‐induced correlated errors, the most detrimental events that can impact superconducting quantum computers, are yet to be efficiently tackled. In order to reach fault tolerance, we must also develop radiation aware methods to complement QEC. In this paper, the first algorithm to effectively exploit syndrome information for the efficient detection of radiation events in superconducting quantum devices at runtime is proposed. A thorough analysis of simulated Rotated Surface codes injecting over 11 million physics‐modeled radiation‐induced faults is performed. The properties of the X and Z check bases, the impact of code distance, and the decoder's time to solution constraints are considered. The technique detects of injected faults, regardless of the impact's position. Moreover, both the radiation impact center and the area affected are accurately identified, with an overhead lower than the decoding time. Additionally, the fault identification information is used to propose a radiation fault correction technique that improves of up to the output correctness compared to existing decoders.
Quantum computing is one of the most promising technology advances of the latest years. Qubits are highly sensitive to noise, which can make the output useless. Lately, it has been shown that superconducting qubits are extremely susceptible to external sources of faults, such as ionizing radiation. When adopted in large scale, radiation-induced errors are expected to become a serious challenge for qubits reliability. We propose an evaluation of the impact of transient faults in the execution of quantum circuits on superconducting chips. Inspired by the Architectural and Program Vulnerability Factors, widely used for classical computation, we propose the Quantum Vulnerability Factor (QVF) to measure the impact of qubit corruption on the circuit output. We model faults, and design a fault injector, based on the latest studies on real machines and radiation experiments. We report the finding of more than 388,000,000 fault injections, considering single and double faults, on three algorithms, identifying the faults and qubits that are more likely to impact the output. We give guidelines on how to map the qubits in real devices to reduce the output error and to reduce the probability of having a radiation-induced corruption modifying the output. Finally, we compare simulations with experiments on physical quantum computers.
Radiation impacts are a current challenge with computing on superconducting-based quantum devices because they can lead to widespread correlated errors across the device. Such errors can be problematic for quantum error correction (QEC) codes, which are generally designed to correct independent errors. To address this, we have developed a computational model to simulate the effects of radiation impacts on QEC performance. This is achieved by building from recently developed models of quasiparticle density, mapping radiation-induced qubit error rates onto a quantum error channel and simulation of a simple surface code. We also provide a performance metric to quantify the resilience of a QEC code to radiation impacts. Additionally, we sweep various parameters of chip design to test mitigation strategies for improved QEC performance. Our model approach is holistic, allowing for modular performance testing of error mitigation strategies and chip and code designs.
Current quantum processors are fragile, noisy and fairly limited in both quantity and quality with tens of qubits and physical error rates of around 10^-3. To realize practical quantum applications, however, error rates need to be below 10^-15 across millions of qubits. To bridge this gap and fully harness the potential of quantum computers, quantum error correction (QEC) is essential. QEC codes are designed to protect quantum information by redundantly encoding it onto multiple physical qubits. This encoding allows for the detection and correction of local errors affecting individual qubits, e.g., through stabilizer measurements. Importantly, if the physical error rates are below a specific threshold, QEC codes can exponentially suppress logical error rates by increasing the number of physical qubits involved. This is essential for achieving fault-tolerant computations, which are key to unlocking the full potential of quantum computers. The work presented in this thesis focuses on the implementation and optimization of small-scale QEC experiments using the surface code and flux-tunable superconducting qubits (Transmons). It addresses several key challenges: enhancing two-qubit gate fidelity in Surface-4 (Chapter 2), implementing an error-detection code with Surface-7 (Chapter 3), automating the calibration and benchmarking of the building blocks in Surface-17 (Chapter 4), reducing leakage into higher excited states with leakage reduction units (Chapter 5), assessing and enhancing the performance of logical qubits (Chapters 7 and 8).
The struggle of the hour in quantum computing research is achieving effective suppression of the error mechanisms induced by the interaction of external radiation with superconducting quantum devices. Despite the rapid advancements in quantum error correction (QEC) of recent years, radiation-induced faults are yet to be fully addressed. These events are known to be the cause of simultaneous correlated defects in qubits that lie onto a single substrate, ultimately jeopardising QEC code effectiveness.
In this paper, we propose to selectively combine substrate-level phonon barriers and QEC interleaving via a planar-mesh tiling algorithm, TETRIS-Q, reaching efficient and effective suppression of radiation events. Our cross-layer solution comes at no extra cost in terms of QEC code execution or decoding time. We model and simulate radiation-induced transient faults over a plethora of barrier and QEC interleaving configurations. Through more than 51 million quantum circuit simulations, we show peak logical error reductions of more than 99.8%, together with an 80% reduction of the observable transient duration with permeable barriers. We find that sparser tiling can reach comparable performance to single qubit tiling, prompting cost reductions of upwards of 87% in barrier tracing. By leveraging independent QEC code interleaving, we measure up to one order of magnitude average logical error rate reductions without the use of permeable barriers, and up to three orders of magnitude with the joint usage of barriers.
Abstract Practical quantum computing will require error rates well below those achievable with physical qubits. Quantum error correction 1,2 offers a path to algorithmically relevant error rates by encoding logical qubits within many physical qubits, for which increasing the number of physical qubits enhances protection against physical errors. However, introducing more qubits also increases the number of error sources, so the density of errors must be sufficiently low for logical performance to improve with increasing code size. Here we report the measurement of logical qubit performance scaling across several code sizes, and demonstrate that our system of superconducting qubits has sufficient performance to overcome the additional errors from increasing qubit number. We find that our distance-5 surface code logical qubit modestly outperforms an ensemble of distance-3 logical qubits on average, in terms of both logical error probability over 25 cycles and logical error per cycle ((2.914 ± 0.016)% compared to (3.028 ± 0.023)%). To investigate damaging, low-probability error sources, we run a distance-25 repetition code and observe a 1.7 × 10 −6 logical error per cycle floor set by a single high-energy event (1.6 × 10 −7 excluding this event). We accurately model our experiment, extracting error budgets that highlight the biggest challenges for future systems. These results mark an experimental demonstration in which quantum error correction begins to improve performance with increasing qubit number, illuminating the path to reaching the logical error rates required for computation.