This paper aims at studying the spin once again. The departure point is thus the Stern and Gerlach experimental results that can be described in a coherent way in the frame of quantum mechanics only. Instead, the relativistic mechanics point of view is proposed here following the work presented in a previous article about rigid body rotation. Indeed, a careful study of the horizon of this relativistic rigid body rotation appears to be invariant from any observation angle in full agreement with the spin property.
This paper aims at studying the spin once again. The departure point is thus the Stern and Gerlach experimental results that can be described in a coherent way in the frame of quantum mechanics only. Instead, the relativistic mechanics point of view is proposed here following the work presented in a previous article about rigid body rotation. Indeed, a careful study of the horizon of this relativistic rigid body rotation appears to be invariant from any observation angle in full agreement with the spin property.
The spin is the prime example of a qubit. Encoding and decoding information in the spin qubit is operationally well defined through the Stern-Gerlach setup in the nonrelativistic (i.e., low velocity) limit. However, an operational definition of the spin in the relativistic regime is missing. The origin of this difficulty lies in the fact that, on the one hand, the spin gets entangled with the momentum in Lorentz-boosted reference frames, and on the other hand, for a particle moving in a superposition of velocities, it is impossible to "jump" to its rest frame, where spin is unambiguously defined. Here, we find a quantum reference frame transformation corresponding to a "superposition of Lorentz boosts," allowing us to transform to the rest frame of a particle that is in a superposition of relativistic momenta with respect to the laboratory frame. This enables us to first move to the particle's rest frame, define the spin measurements there (via the Stern-Gerlach experimental procedure), and then move back to the laboratory frame. In this way, we find a set of "relativistic Stern-Gerlach measurements" in the laboratory frame, and a set of observables satisfying the spin su(2) algebra. This operational procedure offers a concrete way of testing the relativistic features of the spin, and opens up the possibility of devising quantum information protocols for spin in the special-relativistic regime.
We have studied a relativistically covariant Stern-Gerlach (SG) experiment for a relativistic spin and a Dirac spin. We have obtained the relativistic spin in an arbitrary frame by using the classical spin dipole tensor, which gives the covariant spin dipole interactions, and the relation between a spin and a spin magnetic dipole moment. The relativistic spin is shown to have problems to become a proper spin operator for a massive relativistic particle because of two reasons. First, the relativistic spin three-vector operators cannot satisfy the spin algebra. Second, the SG experiment for the relativistic particle provides a paradox between two observers in the particle rest frame and the laboratory frame, in which the particle is moving. We have shown that the paradox in the SG experiment is resolved by the Dirac spin, which is covariantly defined by a Lorentz transformation in the Dirac spinor representation. The Dirac spin three-vector operators satisfy the spin algebra. It is shown that the SG experiment for the Dirac spin in the inertial frame, where there is only magnetic field, can determine the spin without the information of the momentum of the particle. This shows that the reduced spin density matrix for the Dirac particle can be well-defined by integrating out the momentum degrees of freedom.
L'objet de cet article est la determination de la fonction d'onde d'un systeme physique soumis a une mesure c'est-a-dire la determination du module et de la phase de cette fonction. Pour determiner l'etat de spin d'une particule, on propose ici une version de l'ezperience de Stern-Gerlach utilisant un champ magnetique inhomogene et faible. On montre que ce modele correspond a une mesure quantique de type non-canonique et on etablit la comparaison avec l'experience classique de Stern-Gerlach. Enfin on discute la possibilite d'une mesure de l'etat de spin sans reduction lorsque l'etat ne change pas pendant la mesure.
A type of mechanics will be presented that possesses some distinctive properties. On the one hand, its physical description & rules of operation are readily comprehensible & intuitively clear. On the other, it fully satisfies all observable predictions of non-relativistic quantum mechanics. Within it, particles exist at points in space, follow continuous, piecewise differentiable paths, and their linear momentum is equal to their mass times their velocity along their path. Yet the probabilities for position and momentum, conditioned on the state of the particle's environment, follow the rules of quantum theory. Indeed, all observable consequences of quantum theory are satisfied; particles can be entangled, have intrinsic spin, this spin is not local to the particle, particle identity can effect probabilities, and so forth. All the rules of quantum mechanics are obeyed, and all arise in a straightforward fashion. After this is established, connections will be drawn out between this type of mechanics and other types of quantum worlds; those that obey Bohmian mechanics, stochastic mechanics, the many worlds interpretation, and physical collapse. In the final section, a relativistic version of the mechanics will be presented.
Classical dynamics of rigid bodies The difficulties in formulating the theory of spin ½ systems outlined at the end of the last chapter may be avoided if we start from a classical theory of rotation in which the translational and orientational coordinates enter on a symmetrical footing, and pass to the quantum theory via the standard canonical quantization procedure. The result is not simply the Pauli theory written in a different matrix representation but a more general physical theory which explicitly incorporates in the wave equation the extended character of the bodies considered, through moment-of-inertia-dependent terms. As expected, the spin ½ character of the wave is manifested through the dependence of the body motion on the total quantum state via quantum potential and torque terms. Spin is not usually approached from this angle in basic quantum mechanics texts so it is worthwhile to build up the theory from scratch (for a more rigorous treatment see Normand (1980) and for further details: Bopp & Haag (1950), Rosen (1951, 1984), van Winter (1954), Dankel (1970), Holland (1988a, b)). We begin by reviewing some basic results in the classical canonical theory of rigid body motion. Our treatment is confined to a rigid homogeneous sphere with moment of inertia I about any axis passing through its centre, where the centre of mass is located. The sphere carries a rigid charge and a magnetic moment. By Chasle's theorem an arbitrary displacement of a rigid body is composed of a translation together with a rotation about a line fixed in the body.