Physical systems are usually assumed to evolve relative to an external time parameter, which is problematic because in quantum theory that parameter is not a physical observable. Page and Wootters (1984) solved this by proposing that the Universe is in a stationary state, eliminating the need for the external time parameter. Instead, their model contains an isolated subsystem, a clock, with which other subsystems are entangled, making the latter appear to evolve relative to different states of the clock. While this resolves the problem of the time parameter, the assumption that the clock is isolated prevents it from being measured, as this requires an interaction with another system. We prove that the clock can be measured while preserving the core features of the Page-Wootters construction. We also discuss clock synchronization.
Physical systems are usually assumed to evolve relative to an external time parameter, which is problematic because in quantum theory that parameter is not a physical observable. Page and Wootters (1984) solved this by proposing that the Universe is in a stationary state, eliminating the need for the external time parameter. Instead, their model contains an isolated subsystem, a clock, with which other subsystems are entangled, making the latter appear to evolve relative to different states of the clock. While this resolves the problem of the time parameter, the assumption that the clock is isolated prevents it from being measured, as this requires an interaction with another system. We prove that the clock can be measured while preserving the core features of the Page-Wootters construction. We also discuss clock synchronization.
In quantum theory it is possible to explain time, and dynamics, in terms of entanglement. This is the timeless approach to time, which assumes that the universe is in a stationary state, where two noninteracting subsystems, the ``clock'' and the ``rest,'' are entangled. As a consequence, by choosing a suitable observable of the clock, the relative state of the rest of the universe evolves unitarily with respect to the variable labeling the clock observable's eigenstates, which is then interpreted as time. This model for an ``evolution without evolution'' (Page and Wootters, 1983), albeit elegant, has never been developed further, because it was criticized for generating severe ambiguities in the dynamics of the rest of the universe. In this paper we show that there are no such ambiguities; we also update the model, making it amenable to possible new applications.
In timeless formulations of quantum theory, the Page-Wootters proposal (PW) recovers time and dynamics as relative clock-and-world states. By interpreting the total timeless system as a clock entangled with the world, the states having a definite clock reading appear to recover the temporal states of the world as relative states, and dynamics emerges. But an entangled state admits infinitely many decompositions as a superposition of product states, each decomposition corresponding to a different but equally valid time operator of the same clock system. Different valid choices of the time operator for the same clock system lead to different physical histories, where the world states in a history are superpositions of the world states from another history. Fixing one operator as "the" clock time would import the temporal meaning that the Page-Wootters proposal is meant to explain in the first place. Therefore, the interpretation of PW that the world state is passively conditioned on the clock state cannot hold. The timeless state is resolved into time-dependent states by the intrinsic pointer observables of the world, without having to outsource the role of the time operator to a separate clock. Fortunately, the formalism of PW remains valid, provided that it is interpreted in terms of intrinsic pointer observables of the world itself.
In quantum theory, the concept of time rests on shaky ground. One way to address this problem is to remove the usual background time parameter as a primitive entity and explain its emergence via correlations between physical systems. This approach was adopted by Page and Wootters [Phys. Rev. D 27, 2885 (1983)], who showed how time can emerge in a stationary quantum universe from the correlations between two of its subsystems, one of them acting as a clock for the other. In this work, I study the robustness of the Page-Wootters construction across different pictures, states of the universe, and clock interactions, clarifying the role and the nature of the correlations between the subsystems of the universe. I start by showing how to formulate the Page-Wootters construction in the Heisenberg picture via a unitary change of basis. I consider both pure and mixed states of the universe and extend the analysis to include interactions between the clock and the other subsystem of the universe. The study reveals what kind of correlations are necessary for the construction to work. Interestingly, entanglement is not required as long as there are no interactions with the clock. The study also shows that these interactions can lead to a nonunitary evolution for some mixed states of the universe. In a simple two-level system, this aspect becomes relevant at scales where one would expect strong relativistic effects. At these scales, I also observe an inversion in the system's direction of time.
In quantum theory, physical systems are usually assumed to evolve relative to a c-number time. This c-number time is unphysical and has turned out to be unnecessary for explaining dynamics: in the timeless approach to quantum theory developed by Page & Wootters 1983 Phys. Rev. D 27 , 2885. ( doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.27.2885 ), subsystems of a stationary universe can instead evolve relative to a ‘clock', which is a quantum system with a q-number time observable. Page & Wootters formulated their construction in the Schrödinger picture, which left open the possibility that the c-number time still plays an explanatory role in the Heisenberg picture. I formulate their construction in the Heisenberg picture and demonstrate how to eliminate c-number time from that picture, too. When the Page–Wootters construction is formulated in the Heisenberg picture, the descriptors of physical systems are functions of the clock's q-number time, and derivatives with respect to this q-number time can be defined in terms of the clock's algebra of observables, which results in a calculus for q-numbers.
In previous years several theoretical papers discussed if time can be an emergent property deriving from quantum correlations. Here, to provide insight into how this phenomenon can occur, we present an experiment that illustrates Page and Wootters' mechanism of ``static'' time [D. N. Page and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. D 27, 2885 (1983)], and Gambini et al. for subsequent refinements [R. Gambini et al., Phys. Rev. D 79, 041501(R) (2009)]. A static, entangled state between a clock system and the rest of the universe is perceived as evolving by internal observers that test the correlations between the two subsystems. We implement this mechanism using an entangled state of the polarization of two photons, one of which is used as a clock to gauge the evolution of the second: An ``internal'' observer that becomes correlated with the clock photon sees the other system evolve, while an ``external'' observer that only observes global properties of the two photons can prove it is static.
Time in quantum mechanics is peculiar: it is an observable that cannot be associated to an Hermitian operator. As a consequence it is impossible to explain dynamics in an isolated system without invoking an external classical clock, a fact that becomes particularly problematic in the context of quantum gravity. An unconventional solution was pioneered by Page and Wootters (PaW) in 1983. PaW showed that dynamics can be an emergent property of the entanglement between two subsystems of a static Universe. In this work we first investigate the possibility to introduce in this framework a Hermitian time operator complement of a clock Hamiltonian having an equally-spaced energy spectrum. An Hermitian operator complement of such Hamiltonian was introduced by Pegg in 1998, who named it "Age". We show here that Age, when introduced in the PaW context, can be interpreted as a proper Hermitian time operator conjugate to a "good" clock Hamiltonian. We therefore show that, still following Pegg's formalism, it is possible to introduce in the PaW framework bounded clock Hamiltonians with an unequally-spaced energy spectrum with rational energy ratios. In this case time is described by a POVM and we demonstrate that Pegg's POVM states provide a consistent dynamical evolution of the system even if they are not orthogonal, and therefore partially un-distinguishables.