Quantum steering is a kind of bipartite quantum correlations where one party's measurement remotely alters the state of another party. In an adversarial scenario, there could be a hidden variable introducing a bias in the choice of measurement settings of the parties. However, observers without access to the hidden variable are unaware of this bias. The main focus of this work is to analyze quantum steering without assuming that the parties freely choose their measurement settings. For this, we introduce the measurement-dependent (MD-)steering scenario where the measurement settings chosen by the parties are biased by an adversary. In such a scenario, we present a class of inequalities to test for MD-steerable correlations. Further, we discuss the implications of violating such inequalities in certifying randomness from quantum extremal behaviors. We also assume that an adversary might prepare an assemblage as a mixture of MD-steerable and MD-unsteerable assemblages and provide a bound on the measurement dependence for the observed correlation to remain MD-steerable.
Quantum steering is a kind of bipartite quantum correlations where one party's measurement remotely alters the state of another party. In an adversarial scenario, there could be a hidden variable introducing a bias in the choice of measurement settings of the parties. However, observers without access to the hidden variable are unaware of this bias. The main focus of this work is to analyze quantum steering without assuming that the parties freely choose their measurement settings. For this, we introduce the measurement-dependent (MD-)steering scenario where the measurement settings chosen by the parties are biased by an adversary. In such a scenario, we present a class of inequalities to test for MD-steerable correlations. Further, we discuss the implications of violating such inequalities in certifying randomness from quantum extremal behaviors. We also assume that an adversary might prepare an assemblage as a mixture of MD-steerable and MD-unsteerable assemblages and provide a bound on the measurement dependence for the observed correlation to remain MD-steerable.
Quantum steering captures the ability of one party, through local measurements on a shared entangled state, to affect the conditional states held by distant parties in a way that admits no local explanation. Its device-independent (DI) quantification -- requiring no characterization of any state or measurement -- has been developed in the bipartite setting, notably through the framework of assemblage moment matrices (AMMs) [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 240401 (2016)], but has remained largely unexplored beyond it. Here, we extend the AMM framework to tripartite steering, covering both the scenario in which two parties jointly steer a third one (2-steer-1) and that in which a single party steers the remaining two (1-steer-2). For each scheme, we construct a semidefinite program that, from the observed correlations -- or merely from the violation of a Bell inequality -- yields lower bounds on the steering robustness of the underlying assemblage. As a by-product, our bounds also certify, in a DI manner, the incompatibility of the measurements performed by the steering parties.
Quantum steering, as a manifestation of nonlocal quantum correlations, plays a crucial role in enabling various quantum information processing tasks. However, practical implementations are often hindered by significant challenges arising from imperfect or untrusted measurement devices. This study investigates the impact of measurement inaccuracies on quantum steering, with a particular focus on errors in the untrusted party's measurement devices. We first analyze how such errors affect the evaluation of steering inequalities, and then derive bipartite steering inequalities based on correlation matrices under imperfect measurements.
Our findings show that even small measurement errors can significantly compromise the certification of quantum steerability, an effect that becomes particularly pronounced as the system dimension increases. Furthermore, by extending the proposed steering inequality to a modified tripartite scenario via correlation matrices, we demonstrate that the influence of measurement imperfections is far more severe in multipartite quantum steering than in the bipartite case. Our results underscore the critical need to account for measurement imperfections in experimental quantum steering and provide a theoretical framework for characterizing and mitigating these effects in high-dimensional quantum systems.
Quantum steering is an asymmetric form of quantum nonlocality where one can detect whether a measurement on one system can steer or change another distant system. It is well-known that there are quantum states that are entangled but unsteerable in the standard quantum steering scenario. Consequently, a long-standing open problem in this regard is whether the steerability of every entangled state can be activated in some way. In this work, we consider quantum networks and focus on the swap-steering scenario without inputs and find linear witnesses of network steerability corresponding to any negative partial transpose (NPT) bipartite state and a large class of bipartite states that violate the computable cross-norm (CCN) criterion. Furthermore, by considering that the trusted party can perform tomography of the incoming subsystems, we construct linear inequalities to witness swap-steerability of every bipartite entangled state. Consequently, for every bipartite entangled state one can now observe a form of quantum steering.
The existence of quantum correlations that allow one party to steer the quantum state of another party is a counterintuitive quantum effect that was described at the beginning of the past century. Steering occurs if entanglement can be proven even though the description of the measurements on one party is not known, while the other side is characterized. We introduce the concept of steering maps, which allow us to unlock sophisticated techniques that were developed in regular entanglement detection and to use them for certifying steerability. As an application, we show that this allows us to go beyond even the canonical steering scenario; it enables a generalized dimension-bounded steering where one only assumes the Hilbert space dimension on the characterized side, with no description of the measurements. Surprisingly, this does not weaken the detection strength of very symmetric scenarios that have recently been carried out in experiments.
Quantum steering captures the ability of one party, Alice, to control through quantum correlations the state at a distant location, Bob, with superior ability than allowed by a local hidden state model. Verifying the presence of quantum steering has implications for the operation of quantum communication with limited trust, and its connection to the metrological power of the quantum state has been recently proved. This link is established by means of the violation of a Cramér–Rao bound holding for non-steerable states: its direct assessment would then require operation in the asymptotic regime of a large number of repetitions. Here, we build on previous work to account explicitly for the use of a limited number of resources and put this modified approach to test in a quantum optics experiment. The imperfections in the apparatus demand an adaptation of the original test in the multiparameter setting. Our results provide guidelines to apply such a metrological approach to the validation of quantum channels.
Quantum steering, also called Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering, is the intriguing phenomenon associated with the ability of spatially separated observers to steer---by means of local measurements---the set of conditional quantum states accessible by a distant party. In the light of quantum information, all steerable quantum states are known to be resources for quantum information processing tasks. Here, via a quantity dubbed steering fraction, we derive a simple, but general criterion that allows one to identify quantum states that can exhibit quantum steering (without having to optimize over the measurements performed by each party), thus making an important step towards the characterization of steerable quantum states. The criterion, in turn, also provides upper bounds on the largest steering-inequality violation achievable by arbitrary finite-dimensional maximally entangled states. For the quantification of steerability, we prove that a strengthened version of the steering fraction is a convex steering monotone and demonstrate how it is related to two other steering monotones, namely, steerable weight and steering robustness. Using these tools, we further demonstrate the superactivation of steerability for a well-known family of entangled quantum states, i.e., we show how the steerability of certain entangled, but unsteerable quantum states can be recovered by allowing joint measurements on multiple copies of the same state. In particular, our approach allows one to explicitly construct a steering inequality to manifest this phenomenon. Finally, we prove that there exist examples of quantum states (including some which are unsteerable under projective measurements) whose steering-inequality violation can be arbitrarily amplified by allowing joint measurements on as little as three copies of the same state. For completeness, we also demonstrate how the largest steering-inequality violation can be used to bound the largest Bell-inequality violation and derive, analogously, a simple sufficient condition for Bell nonlocality from the latter.