Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2405.10697 · The European Physical Journal D

The non-adiabatic sub-geometric phase and its application on quantum transition

Zheng-Chuan Wang

Published Apr 1, 2025• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1140/epjd/s10053-025-00986-z

Related papers

Dynamics of the geometric phase in the adiabatic limit of a quench induced quantum phase transition

Banasri Basu

arXiv:0908.3299•Physics Letters A•Jan 7, 2010•7 citations

Explaining the Geometric Phase and Adiabatic Evolution of a Quantum System

Ijaz Durrani

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Deviation from Berry’s adiabatic geometric phase in a Xe131 nuclear gyroscope

Stephan Appelt, Gerhard Wäckerle, M. Mehring

The concept of geometric phase is demonstrated in a nuclear gyroscope using $^{131}\mathrm{Xe}$ nuclear spins (I=3/2) as sensors for quantum-phase accumulation. By spatial rotation sub-Hertz splittings due to geometric phases are resolved in nuclear-quadrupole spectra. Deviations from Berry's adiabatic geometric phase appear in the regime of nonadiabatic rotation. The observed frequency splittings are no longer linear in the rotational frequency, as expected from adiabatic rotations, and all possible transitions, namely, six in this partially degenerate spin-3/3 system, are observed experimentally.

Physical Review Letters•Jun 20, 1994•56 citations

Geometric phases and hidden gauge symmetry

Kazuo Fujikawa

The second quantized approach to geometric phases is reviewed. The second quantization generally induces a hidden local (time-dependent) gauge symmetry. This gauge symmetry defines the parallel transport and holonomy, and thus it controls all the known geometric phases, either adiabatic or non-adiabatic, in a unified manner. The transitional region from the adiabatic to non-adiabatic phases is thus analyzed in a quantitative way. It is then shown that the topology of the adiabatic Berry's phase is trivial in a precise sense and also the adiabatic phase is rather fragile against the non-adiabatic deformation. In this formulation, the notion such as the projective Hilbert space does not appear.

arXiv:0910.0396•Oct 2, 2009•1 citation

Non-adiabatic non-abelian geometric phase

J. Anandan

Physics Letters A•Nov 1, 1988•317 citations

Degenerate eigensubspace in a triangle-level system and its geometric quantum control

Yan-Xiong Du, Bao-Jie Liu, Qing-Xian Lv +3 more

The non-Abelian geometric phases appear only in a degenerate subspace and the most familiar model with such a subspace is the $N$-pod system. Here we propose an alternative system to realize a non-Abelian gauge structure. We demonstrate that a three-level system with a triangular form can have two degenerate eigenstates which can induce non-Abelian geometric phases, and notably they are the lowest eigenstates of the system. As an application of the degenerate subspace, we propose an experimentally feasible scheme to realize a universal set of quantum gates based on the adiabatic non-Abelian geometric phases. To shorten the evolution time constrained by the adiabatic condition, the shortcut to adiabaticity is adopted to speed up the adiabatic geometric quantum gates. The combination of the intrinsic geometric characteristic and shortcut to adiabaticity makes the quantum operations fast and robust against certain control errors.

Physical Review A•Jul 27, 2017•16 citations
The concept of geometric phase is demonstrated in a nuclear gyroscope using 131Xe^{131}\mathrm{Xe}131Xe nuclear spins (I=3/2) as sensors for quantum-phase accumulation. By spatial rotation sub-Hertz splittings due to geometric phases are resolved in nuclear-quadrupole spectra. Deviations from Berry's adiabatic geometric phase appear in the regime of nonadiabatic rotation. The observed frequency splittings are no longer linear in the rotational frequency, as expected from adiabatic rotations, and all possible transitions, namely, six in this partially degenerate spin-3/3 system, are observed experimentally.
The second quantized approach to geometric phases is reviewed. The second quantization generally induces a hidden local (time-dependent) gauge symmetry. This gauge symmetry defines the parallel transport and holonomy, and thus it controls all the known geometric phases, either adiabatic or non-adiabatic, in a unified manner. The transitional region from the adiabatic to non-adiabatic phases is thus analyzed in a quantitative way. It is then shown that the topology of the adiabatic Berry's phase is trivial in a precise sense and also the adiabatic phase is rather fragile against the non-adiabatic deformation. In this formulation, the notion such as the projective Hilbert space does not appear.
The non-Abelian geometric phases appear only in a degenerate subspace and the most familiar model with such a subspace is the NNN-pod system. Here we propose an alternative system to realize a non-Abelian gauge structure. We demonstrate that a three-level system with a triangular form can have two degenerate eigenstates which can induce non-Abelian geometric phases, and notably they are the lowest eigenstates of the system. As an application of the degenerate subspace, we propose an experimentally feasible scheme to realize a universal set of quantum gates based on the adiabatic non-Abelian geometric phases. To shorten the evolution time constrained by the adiabatic condition, the shortcut to adiabaticity is adopted to speed up the adiabatic geometric quantum gates. The combination of the intrinsic geometric characteristic and shortcut to adiabaticity makes the quantum operations fast and robust against certain control errors.