Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0908.3299 · Physics Letters A

Dynamics of the geometric phase in the adiabatic limit of a quench induced quantum phase transition

Banasri Basu

Published Jan 7, 2010• 7 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.physleta.2009.12.072

Related papers

The geometric phase and the dynamics of quantum phase transition induced by a linear quench

Banasri Basu, P Bandyopadhyay

We have analysed here the role of geometric phase in the dynamical mechanism of quantum phase transition in the transverse Ising model. We have investigated the system when it is driven at a fixed rate characterized by a quench time τ q across the critical point from a paramagnetic to ferromagnetic phase. Our argument is based on the fact that the spin fluctuation occurring during the critical slowing down causes a random fluctuation in the ground-state geometric phase at the critical regime. The correlation function of the random geometric phase determines the excitation probability of the quasiparticles, which are excited during the transition from the inital paramagnetic to the ferromagnetic phase. This helps us to evaluate the number density of the kinks formed during the transition, which is found to scale as . In addition, we have also estimated the spin–spin correlation at criticality.

arXiv:1006.5814•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Aug 12, 2010•3 citations

Fate of dynamical quantum phase transitions from sudden to slow quench limit

Anonymous, Fuxiang Li

Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Jul 13, 2026•0 citations

Consistency between adiabatic and non-adiabatic geometric phases for non-self-adjoint Hamiltonians

David Viennot, Arnaud Leclerc, Georges Jolicard +1 more

We show that the adiabatic approximation for non-self-adjoint Hamiltonians seems to induce two non-equal expressions for the geometric phase. The first one is related to the spectral projector involved in the adiabatic theorem, and the other one is the adiabatic limit of the non-adiabatic geometric phase. This apparent inconsistency is resolved by observing that the difference between the two expressions is compensated by a small deviation in the dynamical phases.

arXiv:2206.06748•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Jul 26, 2012•6 citations

Quantum phases and dynamics of geometric phase in a quantum spin chain under linear quench

S. Sarkar, B. Basu

arXiv:1108.3406•The European Physical Journal B•Dec 1, 2012•1 citation

Universal anomaly of dynamics at phase transition points induced by Pancharatnam-Berry phase

Jia-Yuan Zhang, Xia Yin, Ming-Yu liu +3 more

Abstract Dynamical anomalies are often observed near both the continuous and first-order phase transition points. We propose that the universal anomalies could originate from the geometric phase effects. A Pancharatnam-Berry phase is accumulated continuously in quantum states with the variation of tuning parameters. Phase transitions are supposed to induce an abrupt shift of the geometric phase. In our multi-level quantum model, the quantum interference induced by the geometric phase could prolong or shorten the relaxation times of excited states at phase transition points, which agrees with the experiments, models under sudden quenches and our semi-classical model. Furthermore, we find that by setting a phase shift of π, the excited state could be decoupled from the ground state by quantum cancellation so that the relaxation time even could diverge to infinity. Our work introduces the geometric phase to the study of conventional phase transitions as well as quantum phase transition, and could substantially extend the dephasing time of qubits for quantum computing.

arXiv:2209.14519•Physica Scripta•Apr 3, 2023•2 citations

The non-adiabatic sub-geometric phase and its application on quantum transition

Zheng-Chuan Wang

arXiv:2405.10697•The European Physical Journal D•Apr 1, 2025•0 citations
We have analysed here the role of geometric phase in the dynamical mechanism of quantum phase transition in the transverse Ising model. We have investigated the system when it is driven at a fixed rate characterized by a quench time τ q across the critical point from a paramagnetic to ferromagnetic phase. Our argument is based on the fact that the spin fluctuation occurring during the critical slowing down causes a random fluctuation in the ground-state geometric phase at the critical regime. The correlation function of the random geometric phase determines the excitation probability of the quasiparticles, which are excited during the transition from the inital paramagnetic to the ferromagnetic phase. This helps us to evaluate the number density of the kinks formed during the transition, which is found to scale as . In addition, we have also estimated the spin–spin correlation at criticality.
Abstract Dynamical anomalies are often observed near both the continuous and first-order phase transition points. We propose that the universal anomalies could originate from the geometric phase effects. A Pancharatnam-Berry phase is accumulated continuously in quantum states with the variation of tuning parameters. Phase transitions are supposed to induce an abrupt shift of the geometric phase. In our multi-level quantum model, the quantum interference induced by the geometric phase could prolong or shorten the relaxation times of excited states at phase transition points, which agrees with the experiments, models under sudden quenches and our semi-classical model. Furthermore, we find that by setting a phase shift of π, the excited state could be decoupled from the ground state by quantum cancellation so that the relaxation time even could diverge to infinity. Our work introduces the geometric phase to the study of conventional phase transitions as well as quantum phase transition, and could substantially extend the dephasing time of qubits for quantum computing.