Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2405.00380 · Physical Review Letters

Multipath and Multiparticle Tests of Complex versus Hypercomplex Quantum Theory

Ece İpek Saruhan, Joachim von Zanthier, Marc-Oliver Pleinert

Published Feb 10, 2025• 3 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The axioms of quantum mechanics provide limited information regarding the structure of the Hilbert space, such as the underlying number system. The latter is generally regarded as complex, but generalizations of complex numbers, so-called hypercomplex numbers, cannot be ruled out in theory. Therefore, specialized experiments to test for hypercomplex quantum mechanics are needed. To date, experimental tests are limited to single-particle interference exploiting a closed phase relation in a three-path interferometer called the Peres test. The latter distinguishes complex quantum mechanics from quaternionic quantum mechanics. Here, we propose a general matrix formalism putting the Peres test on a solid mathematical ground. On this basis, we introduce multipath and multiparticle interference tests, which provide a direct probe for any dimension of the number system of quantum mechanics.

DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.134.060201

Related papers

Peres experiment using photons: No test for hypercomplex (quaternionic) quantum theories

Stephen L. Adler

Assuming the standard axioms for quaternionic quantum theory and a spatially localized scattering interaction, the $S$ matrix in quaternionic quantum theory is complex valued, not quaternionic. Using the standard connections between the $S$ matrix, the forward scattering amplitude for electromagnetic wave scattering, and the index of refraction, we show that the index of refraction is necessarily complex, not quaternionic. This implies that the recent optical experiment of Procopio et al. [Nat. Commun. 8, 15044 (2017)] based on the Peres proposal does not test for hypercomplex or quaternionic quantum effects arising within the standard Hilbert space framework. Such a test requires looking at near zone fields, not radiation zone fields.

arXiv:1604.04950•Physical Review A•Jun 19, 2017•13 citations

Proposed Test for Complex versus Quaternion Quantum Theory via Quantum Superdense Coding

Songsong Dai

While complex numbers form the foundational number system of quantum mechanics, the theoretical possibility of higher-dimensional hypercomplex alternatives persists. In this paper, we present a test protocol designed to distinguish between complex and quaternionic quantum mechanics. The protocol is founded upon the quantum superdense coding scheme and functions by detecting the presence of multiple distinct quantum phase gates. We also provide the corresponding quantum circuit required to perform this test.

•Apr 8, 2026•0 citations

Experimental Test of Hyper-Complex Quantum Theories

Lorenzo M. Procopio, Lee A. Rozema, Zi Jing Wong +5 more

In standard quantum mechanics, complex numbers are used to describe the wavefunction. Although complex numbers have proven sufficient to predict the results of existing experiments, there is no apparent theoretical reason to choose them over real numbers or generalizations of complex numbers, i.e. hyper-complex numbers. Experiments performed to date have proven that real numbers are insufficient, but whether or not hyper-complex numbers are required remains an open question. Quantum theories based on hyper-complex numbers are one example of a post-quantum theory, which must be put on a firm experimental foundation. Here we experimentally probe hyper-complex quantum theories, by studying one of their deviations from complex quantum theory: the non-commutativity of phases. We do so by passing single photons through a Sagnac interferometer containing two physically different phases, having refractive indices of opposite sign. By showing that the phases commute with high precision, we place limits on a particular prediction of hyper-complex quantum theories.

arXiv:1602.01624•Feb 4, 2016•3 citations

HYPERCOMPLEX QUANTUM MECHANICS

Lawrence Paul Horwitz

Abstract The fundamental axioms of the quantum theory do not explicitly identify the algebraic structure of the linear space for which orthogonal subspaces correspond to the propositions (equivalence classes of physical questions). The projective geometry of the weakly modular orthocomplemented lattice of propositions may be imbedded in a complex Hilbert space; this is the structure which has traditionally been used. This paper reviews some work which has been devoted to generalizing the target space of this imbedding to Hilbert modules of a more general type. In particular, detailed discussion is given of the simplest generalization of the complex Hilbert space, that of the quaternion Hilbert module.

•Jan 1, 1995•11 citations

Comment on “Peres experiment using photons: No test for hypercomplex (quaternionic) quantum theories”

Lorenzo M. Procopio, Lee A. Rozema, Borivoje Dakić +1 more

In his recent article [Phys. Rev. A 95, 060101(R) (2017)], Adler questions the usefulness of the bound found in our experimental search for genuine effects of hypercomplex quantum mechanics [Nat. Commun. 8, 15044 (2017)]. Our experiment was performed using a black-box (instrumentalist) approach to generalized probabilistic theories; therefore, it does not assume a priori any particular underlying mechanism. From that point of view our experimental results do indeed place meaningful bounds on the possible effects of ``postquantum theories,'' including quaternionic quantum mechanics. In his article, Adler compares our experiment to nonrelativistic and M\"oller formal scattering theories within quaternionic quantum mechanics. With a particular set of assumptions, he finds that quaternionic effects would likely not manifest themselves in general. Although these assumptions are justified in the nonrelativistic case, a proper calculation for relativistic particles is still missing. Here, we provide a concrete relativistic example of Klein-Gordon scattering wherein the quaternionic effects persist. We note that when the Klein-Gordon equation is formulated using a Hamiltonian formalism it displays a so-called ``indefinite metric,'' a characteristic feature of relativistic quantum wave equations. In Adler's example this is directly forbidden by his assumptions, and therefore our present example is not in contradiction to his work. In complex quantum mechanics this problem of an indefinite metric is solved in a second quantization. Unfortunately, there is no known algorithm for canonical field quantization in quaternionic quantum mechanics.

arXiv:1607.01648•Physical Review A•Sep 14, 2017•21 citations

Obtaining tight bounds on higher-order interferences with a 5-path interferometer

Thomas Kauten, Robert Keil, Thomas Kaufmann +3 more

Within the established theoretical framework of quantum mechanics, interference always occurs between pairs of paths through an interferometer.Higher order interferences with multiple constituents are excluded by Born's rule and can only exist in generalized probabilistic theories.Thus, high-precision experiments searching for such higher order interferences are a powerful method to distinguish between quantum mechanics and more general theories.Here, we perform such a test in an optical multi-path interferometer, which avoids crucial systematic errors, has access to the entire phase space and is more stable than previous experiments.Our results are in accordance with quantum mechanics and rule out the existence of higher order interference terms in optical interferometry to an extent that is more than four orders of magnitude smaller than the expected pairwise interference, refining previous bounds by two orders of magnitude.

arXiv:1508.03253•New Journal of Physics•Feb 1, 2017•59 citations
The axioms of quantum mechanics provide limited information regarding the structure of the Hilbert space, such as the underlying number system. The latter is generally regarded as complex, but generalizations of complex numbers, so-called hypercomplex numbers, cannot be ruled out in theory. Therefore, specialized experiments to test for hypercomplex quantum mechanics are needed. To date, experimental tests are limited to single-particle interference exploiting a closed phase relation in a three-path interferometer called the Peres test. The latter distinguishes complex quantum mechanics from quaternionic quantum mechanics. Here, we propose a general matrix formalism putting the Peres test on a solid mathematical ground. On this basis, we introduce multipath and multiparticle interference tests, which provide a direct probe for any dimension of the number system of quantum mechanics.
Assuming the standard axioms for quaternionic quantum theory and a spatially localized scattering interaction, the SSS matrix in quaternionic quantum theory is complex valued, not quaternionic. Using the standard connections between the SSS matrix, the forward scattering amplitude for electromagnetic wave scattering, and the index of refraction, we show that the index of refraction is necessarily complex, not quaternionic. This implies that the recent optical experiment of Procopio et al. [Nat. Commun. 8, 15044 (2017)] based on the Peres proposal does not test for hypercomplex or quaternionic quantum effects arising within the standard Hilbert space framework. Such a test requires looking at near zone fields, not radiation zone fields.
While complex numbers form the foundational number system of quantum mechanics, the theoretical possibility of higher-dimensional hypercomplex alternatives persists. In this paper, we present a test protocol designed to distinguish between complex and quaternionic quantum mechanics. The protocol is founded upon the quantum superdense coding scheme and functions by detecting the presence of multiple distinct quantum phase gates. We also provide the corresponding quantum circuit required to perform this test.
In standard quantum mechanics, complex numbers are used to describe the wavefunction. Although complex numbers have proven sufficient to predict the results of existing experiments, there is no apparent theoretical reason to choose them over real numbers or generalizations of complex numbers, i.e. hyper-complex numbers. Experiments performed to date have proven that real numbers are insufficient, but whether or not hyper-complex numbers are required remains an open question. Quantum theories based on hyper-complex numbers are one example of a post-quantum theory, which must be put on a firm experimental foundation. Here we experimentally probe hyper-complex quantum theories, by studying one of their deviations from complex quantum theory: the non-commutativity of phases. We do so by passing single photons through a Sagnac interferometer containing two physically different phases, having refractive indices of opposite sign. By showing that the phases commute with high precision, we place limits on a particular prediction of hyper-complex quantum theories.
Abstract The fundamental axioms of the quantum theory do not explicitly identify the algebraic structure of the linear space for which orthogonal subspaces correspond to the propositions (equivalence classes of physical questions). The projective geometry of the weakly modular orthocomplemented lattice of propositions may be imbedded in a complex Hilbert space; this is the structure which has traditionally been used. This paper reviews some work which has been devoted to generalizing the target space of this imbedding to Hilbert modules of a more general type. In particular, detailed discussion is given of the simplest generalization of the complex Hilbert space, that of the quaternion Hilbert module.
In his recent article [Phys. Rev. A 95, 060101(R) (2017)], Adler questions the usefulness of the bound found in our experimental search for genuine effects of hypercomplex quantum mechanics [Nat. Commun. 8, 15044 (2017)]. Our experiment was performed using a black-box (instrumentalist) approach to generalized probabilistic theories; therefore, it does not assume a priori any particular underlying mechanism. From that point of view our experimental results do indeed place meaningful bounds on the possible effects of ``postquantum theories,'' including quaternionic quantum mechanics. In his article, Adler compares our experiment to nonrelativistic and M\"oller formal scattering theories within quaternionic quantum mechanics. With a particular set of assumptions, he finds that quaternionic effects would likely not manifest themselves in general. Although these assumptions are justified in the nonrelativistic case, a proper calculation for relativistic particles is still missing. Here, we provide a concrete relativistic example of Klein-Gordon scattering wherein the quaternionic effects persist. We note that when the Klein-Gordon equation is formulated using a Hamiltonian formalism it displays a so-called ``indefinite metric,'' a characteristic feature of relativistic quantum wave equations. In Adler's example this is directly forbidden by his assumptions, and therefore our present example is not in contradiction to his work. In complex quantum mechanics this problem of an indefinite metric is solved in a second quantization. Unfortunately, there is no known algorithm for canonical field quantization in quaternionic quantum mechanics.
Within the established theoretical framework of quantum mechanics, interference always occurs between pairs of paths through an interferometer.Higher order interferences with multiple constituents are excluded by Born's rule and can only exist in generalized probabilistic theories.Thus, high-precision experiments searching for such higher order interferences are a powerful method to distinguish between quantum mechanics and more general theories.Here, we perform such a test in an optical multi-path interferometer, which avoids crucial systematic errors, has access to the entire phase space and is more stable than previous experiments.Our results are in accordance with quantum mechanics and rule out the existence of higher order interference terms in optical interferometry to an extent that is more than four orders of magnitude smaller than the expected pairwise interference, refining previous bounds by two orders of magnitude.