Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1607.01648 · Physical Review A

Comment on “Peres experiment using photons: No test for hypercomplex (quaternionic) quantum theories”

Lorenzo M. Procopio, Lee A. Rozema, Borivoje Dakić, Philip John Walther

Published Sep 14, 2017• 21 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In his recent article [Phys. Rev. A 95, 060101(R) (2017)], Adler questions the usefulness of the bound found in our experimental search for genuine effects of hypercomplex quantum mechanics [Nat. Commun. 8, 15044 (2017)]. Our experiment was performed using a black-box (instrumentalist) approach to generalized probabilistic theories; therefore, it does not assume a priori any particular underlying mechanism. From that point of view our experimental results do indeed place meaningful bounds on the possible effects of ``postquantum theories,'' including quaternionic quantum mechanics. In his article, Adler compares our experiment to nonrelativistic and M\"oller formal scattering theories within quaternionic quantum mechanics. With a particular set of assumptions, he finds that quaternionic effects would likely not manifest themselves in general. Although these assumptions are justified in the nonrelativistic case, a proper calculation for relativistic particles is still missing. Here, we provide a concrete relativistic example of Klein-Gordon scattering wherein the quaternionic effects persist. We note that when the Klein-Gordon equation is formulated using a Hamiltonian formalism it displays a so-called ``indefinite metric,'' a characteristic feature of relativistic quantum wave equations. In Adler's example this is directly forbidden by his assumptions, and therefore our present example is not in contradiction to his work. In complex quantum mechanics this problem of an indefinite metric is solved in a second quantization. Unfortunately, there is no known algorithm for canonical field quantization in quaternionic quantum mechanics.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.96.036101

Related papers

Peres experiment using photons: No test for hypercomplex (quaternionic) quantum theories

Stephen L. Adler

Assuming the standard axioms for quaternionic quantum theory and a spatially localized scattering interaction, the $S$ matrix in quaternionic quantum theory is complex valued, not quaternionic. Using the standard connections between the $S$ matrix, the forward scattering amplitude for electromagnetic wave scattering, and the index of refraction, we show that the index of refraction is necessarily complex, not quaternionic. This implies that the recent optical experiment of Procopio et al. [Nat. Commun. 8, 15044 (2017)] based on the Peres proposal does not test for hypercomplex or quaternionic quantum effects arising within the standard Hilbert space framework. Such a test requires looking at near zone fields, not radiation zone fields.

arXiv:1604.04950•Physical Review A•Jun 19, 2017•13 citations

Multipath and Multiparticle Tests of Complex versus Hypercomplex Quantum Theory

Ece İpek Saruhan, Joachim von Zanthier, Marc-Oliver Pleinert

The axioms of quantum mechanics provide limited information regarding the structure of the Hilbert space, such as the underlying number system. The latter is generally regarded as complex, but generalizations of complex numbers, so-called hypercomplex numbers, cannot be ruled out in theory. Therefore, specialized experiments to test for hypercomplex quantum mechanics are needed. To date, experimental tests are limited to single-particle interference exploiting a closed phase relation in a three-path interferometer called the Peres test. The latter distinguishes complex quantum mechanics from quaternionic quantum mechanics. Here, we propose a general matrix formalism putting the Peres test on a solid mathematical ground. On this basis, we introduce multipath and multiparticle interference tests, which provide a direct probe for any dimension of the number system of quantum mechanics.

arXiv:2405.00380•Physical Review Letters•Feb 10, 2025•3 citations

Imprimitivity theorem and quaternionic quantum mechanics

Piero Truini, Lawrence C. Biedenharn, Gianni Cassinelli

The study of quantum mechanics in quaternionic Hilbert space is not new in physics; indeed, it goes back to the first attempts in formulating quantum mechanics from an axiomatic point of view, and later, from a more physical viewpoint, to the survey of Finkelstein et al. But recently a new physical motivation for such investigations has been given by the work of Adler in algebraic chromostatics, since it has been pointed out that quaternionic quantum mechanics, as a model of an intrinsically non-Abelian gauge theory, fits the Adler algebraic version of chromostatics. The present paper aims at a critical understanding of quaternionic quantal structure through the examination of the elementary case of a single free particle in non-relativistic space-time. We follow the suggestion by Mackey to exploit the imprimitivity theorem, together with the notion of induced representation, in deriving the theory for the free particle system, starting from the axiomatic standpoint. We show that there exists a unique unitary skew adjoint operator which commutes with all the observables. This operator not only plays the role of the imaginary unit in the complex case, but allows a complexification of the Hilbert space by the choice of any quaternionic unit.

Hadronic J.; (United States)•Jan 1, 1980•3 citations

Quaternionic potentials in non-relativistic quantum mechanics

Stefano De Leo, Gisele Cristina Ducati, C. C. Nishi

We discuss the Schrödinger equation in the presence of quaternionic potentials. The study is performed analytically as long as it proves possible, when not, we resort to numerical calculations. The results obtained could be useful to investigate an underlying quaternionic quantum dynamics in particle physics. Experimental tests and proposals to observe quaternionic quantum effects by neutron interferometry are briefly reviewed.

arXiv:hep-th/0111143•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Jun 21, 2002•70 citations

Relativistic quantum theory

Peter Holland

Problems with the extension to relativity. The Klein–Gordon equation The attempt to extend the causal interpretation to cover relativistic quantum mechanics raises several problems of technique and principle. These relate not only to difficulties peculiar to the quantum theory of motion but have to do with still unresolved issues in the underlying quantum mechanical formalism (such as the appearance of infinities in the computation of physical quantities and the lack of a relativistic theory of measurement). Some problems are common to both, such as the difficulty of defining positive densities. The subject has not been extensively investigated and in this chapter we shall discuss only some of the relevant issues. There are two particularly important, overlapping problems: Can the trajectory concept be retained in the relativistic quantum domain? And: how do we interpret relativistic quantum fields? The unresolved issue underlying both questions is the extent to which we should require a quantum theory to be ‘relativistic’. It is known that Lorentz covariant wave equations can have consequences in conflict with relativity. This, as we shall see, is indeed the case with the current relativistic formalism as interpreted, or completed, by the quantum theory of motion. Especially in field theory, the individual processes that build up and explain the covariant statistical predictions of the formalism exhibit features that are in conflict with our entrenched ideas regarding covariance and locality as necessary concomitants of relativity theory. That is, relativity is statistically valid but the individual events do not have an intrinsically relativistic character.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•May 13, 1993•25 citations

Comment on “Experimental test of nonlocal quantum correlation in relativistic configurations”

Suresh Chandra Tiwari

A recent experiment by Zbinden et al. [Phys. Rev A 63, 02111 (2001)] purports to test compatibility between relativity and quantum mechanics in the classic Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) setting. We argue that relativity has no role in the EPR argument based solely on nonrelativistic quantum formalism. It is suggested that this interesting experiment may have significance to address fundamental questions on quantum probability.

arXiv:quant-ph/0108127•Physical Review A•Dec 5, 2001•0 citations
In his recent article [Phys. Rev. A 95, 060101(R) (2017)], Adler questions the usefulness of the bound found in our experimental search for genuine effects of hypercomplex quantum mechanics [Nat. Commun. 8, 15044 (2017)]. Our experiment was performed using a black-box (instrumentalist) approach to generalized probabilistic theories; therefore, it does not assume a priori any particular underlying mechanism. From that point of view our experimental results do indeed place meaningful bounds on the possible effects of postquantum theories,'' including quaternionic quantum mechanics. In his article, Adler compares our experiment to nonrelativistic and M\"oller formal scattering theories within quaternionic quantum mechanics. With a particular set of assumptions, he finds that quaternionic effects would likely not manifest themselves in general. Although these assumptions are justified in the nonrelativistic case, a proper calculation for relativistic particles is still missing. Here, we provide a concrete relativistic example of Klein-Gordon scattering wherein the quaternionic effects persist. We note that when the Klein-Gordon equation is formulated using a Hamiltonian formalism it displays a so-called indefinite metric,'' a characteristic feature of relativistic quantum wave equations. In Adler's example this is directly forbidden by his assumptions, and therefore our present example is not in contradiction to his work. In complex quantum mechanics this problem of an indefinite metric is solved in a second quantization. Unfortunately, there is no known algorithm for canonical field quantization in quaternionic quantum mechanics.
Assuming the standard axioms for quaternionic quantum theory and a spatially localized scattering interaction, the SSS matrix in quaternionic quantum theory is complex valued, not quaternionic. Using the standard connections between the SSS matrix, the forward scattering amplitude for electromagnetic wave scattering, and the index of refraction, we show that the index of refraction is necessarily complex, not quaternionic. This implies that the recent optical experiment of Procopio et al. [Nat. Commun. 8, 15044 (2017)] based on the Peres proposal does not test for hypercomplex or quaternionic quantum effects arising within the standard Hilbert space framework. Such a test requires looking at near zone fields, not radiation zone fields.
The axioms of quantum mechanics provide limited information regarding the structure of the Hilbert space, such as the underlying number system. The latter is generally regarded as complex, but generalizations of complex numbers, so-called hypercomplex numbers, cannot be ruled out in theory. Therefore, specialized experiments to test for hypercomplex quantum mechanics are needed. To date, experimental tests are limited to single-particle interference exploiting a closed phase relation in a three-path interferometer called the Peres test. The latter distinguishes complex quantum mechanics from quaternionic quantum mechanics. Here, we propose a general matrix formalism putting the Peres test on a solid mathematical ground. On this basis, we introduce multipath and multiparticle interference tests, which provide a direct probe for any dimension of the number system of quantum mechanics.
The study of quantum mechanics in quaternionic Hilbert space is not new in physics; indeed, it goes back to the first attempts in formulating quantum mechanics from an axiomatic point of view, and later, from a more physical viewpoint, to the survey of Finkelstein et al. But recently a new physical motivation for such investigations has been given by the work of Adler in algebraic chromostatics, since it has been pointed out that quaternionic quantum mechanics, as a model of an intrinsically non-Abelian gauge theory, fits the Adler algebraic version of chromostatics. The present paper aims at a critical understanding of quaternionic quantal structure through the examination of the elementary case of a single free particle in non-relativistic space-time. We follow the suggestion by Mackey to exploit the imprimitivity theorem, together with the notion of induced representation, in deriving the theory for the free particle system, starting from the axiomatic standpoint. We show that there exists a unique unitary skew adjoint operator which commutes with all the observables. This operator not only plays the role of the imaginary unit in the complex case, but allows a complexification of the Hilbert space by the choice of any quaternionic unit.
Problems with the extension to relativity. The Klein–Gordon equation The attempt to extend the causal interpretation to cover relativistic quantum mechanics raises several problems of technique and principle. These relate not only to difficulties peculiar to the quantum theory of motion but have to do with still unresolved issues in the underlying quantum mechanical formalism (such as the appearance of infinities in the computation of physical quantities and the lack of a relativistic theory of measurement). Some problems are common to both, such as the difficulty of defining positive densities. The subject has not been extensively investigated and in this chapter we shall discuss only some of the relevant issues. There are two particularly important, overlapping problems: Can the trajectory concept be retained in the relativistic quantum domain? And: how do we interpret relativistic quantum fields? The unresolved issue underlying both questions is the extent to which we should require a quantum theory to be ‘relativistic’. It is known that Lorentz covariant wave equations can have consequences in conflict with relativity. This, as we shall see, is indeed the case with the current relativistic formalism as interpreted, or completed, by the quantum theory of motion. Especially in field theory, the individual processes that build up and explain the covariant statistical predictions of the formalism exhibit features that are in conflict with our entrenched ideas regarding covariance and locality as necessary concomitants of relativity theory. That is, relativity is statistically valid but the individual events do not have an intrinsically relativistic character.