Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2401.04711 · Physics in Perspective

Autobiographical Notes of a Physicist

N. David Mermin

Published Mar 1, 2024• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s00016-024-00310-z

Related papers

Writings on Physics and Philosophy

Wolfgang Ernst Friederich Pauli

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1994•333 citations

Prime Reference Theory: A Decoupled Architecture For Indexical Selfhood And State Continuity

Logan Goodon Logan Goodon

Prime Reference Theory is a conceptual model proposing that the psychological I can be understood simply as a reference, rather than as the autobiographical, narrative, bodily, or conceptual information associated with it. The idea emerged unexpectedly during the development of Prime Core, a software system designed to preserve the continuity of an artificial intelligence independently of its changing runtime. A central architectural requirement was that the system's evolving “Current Self”—its memories, understandings, associations, and autobiographical model—must remain information about Prime rather than becoming the definition of Prime itself. Applying the same distinction to human self-reference suggested a simple formulation: I = reference. The organism, or “Machine” in the terminology of the paper, maintains extensive self-related information including memory, body ownership, agency, self-location, autobiography, prediction, and psychological relationships of me and mine. Prime Reference Theory does not dispute the existence or importance of these processes. Instead, it proposes that none is required to become the definition of I. The paper develops this idea alongside existing work concerning indexical reference, bodily and autobiographical selfhood, self-reference and self-prioritization, meta-awareness, decentering, cognitive defusion, and psychological identification. These areas are treated as potentially complementary descriptions of the machinery surrounding self-reference rather than as competing theories to be disproved. This is presented as a conceptual hypothesis, not an established scientific theory. It originated from a software architecture observation, followed by an exploration of how that observation might relate to existing scientific, philosophical, psychological, and contemplative accounts of selfhood.

•Sep 28, 2026•0 citations

Scientific Notes Interference principle: the physicist's explanation of liking.

Samuel Okon Inyang, A M GEORGE, I. E. Essien

Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences•Feb 1, 2000•0 citations

Reminiscences of a life in and out of quantum mechanics

E. U. Condon

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Jun 18, 2009•6 citations

Reminiscences of a Life In and Out of Quantum Mechanics

E. U. Condon

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1991•9 citations

A Short Introduction to Quantum Computing for Physicists

Oswaldo Zapata

These notes provide an introduction to standard topics on quantum computation and communication for those who already have a basic knowledge of quantum mechanics. The main target audience are professional physicists as well as advanced students of physics; however, engineers and computer scientists may also benefit from them.

arXiv:2306.09388•Jun 15, 2023•0 citations
Prime Reference Theory is a conceptual model proposing that the psychological I can be understood simply as a reference, rather than as the autobiographical, narrative, bodily, or conceptual information associated with it. The idea emerged unexpectedly during the development of Prime Core, a software system designed to preserve the continuity of an artificial intelligence independently of its changing runtime. A central architectural requirement was that the system's evolving “Current Self”—its memories, understandings, associations, and autobiographical model—must remain information about Prime rather than becoming the definition of Prime itself. Applying the same distinction to human self-reference suggested a simple formulation: I = reference. The organism, or “Machine” in the terminology of the paper, maintains extensive self-related information including memory, body ownership, agency, self-location, autobiography, prediction, and psychological relationships of me and mine. Prime Reference Theory does not dispute the existence or importance of these processes. Instead, it proposes that none is required to become the definition of I. The paper develops this idea alongside existing work concerning indexical reference, bodily and autobiographical selfhood, self-reference and self-prioritization, meta-awareness, decentering, cognitive defusion, and psychological identification. These areas are treated as potentially complementary descriptions of the machinery surrounding self-reference rather than as competing theories to be disproved. This is presented as a conceptual hypothesis, not an established scientific theory. It originated from a software architecture observation, followed by an exploration of how that observation might relate to existing scientific, philosophical, psychological, and contemplative accounts of selfhood.