Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2312.15597

On the connection between weak measurement in quantum physics and analytic phase-retrieval in classical wave optics

Nobuharu Nakajima

Published Dec 25, 2023• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The physical interpretation of weak measurements has been the subject of much debate. It is known that anomalous phenomena and results that appear in weak measurements are essentially related to the phase of the quantum system being measured. Consideration of the phase is important to clarify its physical interpretation. In classical wave optics, there has long been studies on methods of measuring or retrieving the phase of a wave function. We here present that one of those methods, the analytic phase retrieval based on the properties of entire functions, has a close connection with weak measurements in quantum physics. We explain such a connection for two emblematic optical weak-measurements that have the same mathematical formalism as quantum systems: one is a system for weak measurements of polarized light displacement in a birefringent crystal, and the other is a system for the direct measurement of a wave function by weakly coupling it to a pointer. In those two systems, we show that the pre- and post-selection of polarized light provides a filtering effect similar to that utilized in the analytic phase retrieval.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2312.15597

Related papers

Connection between weak measurement in quantum physics and analytic phase retrieval in classical wave optics

Nobuharu Nakajima

Physics Letters A•Oct 9, 2024•2 citations

Geometric phases arising from strong measurements of weak values

C. Montenegro La Torre, M Jara, J P Marrou +1 more

Abstract Geometric phases and weak values (WVs) are two fundamental concepts that were originally introduced in the realm of quantum mechanics. In the course of time, it became clear that the two concepts apply in both the quantum domain and the classical domain. Moreover, the two concepts proved to be intimately connected with one another, as disclosed by Sjöqvist some years ago (Sjöqvist 2006 Phys. Lett. A 359 187). WVs were so named in reference to very weak couplings between a system’s observable, e.g. light polarization, and its measuring device, the ‘pointer’. However, the actual definition of WVs does not involve the system-pointer coupling strength. We have addressed the strong coupling regime both theoretically and experimentally, thereby obtaining geometric phases out of WVs. We report experimental results as a proof-of-concept, using classical light beams and single-shot images. Our approach applies without essential modifications also to single photons.

New Journal of Physics•Nov 26, 2024•0 citations

Weak value in the wave function of a measuring device

Kouji Nakamura

A simple formula to read out the weak value from the wave function of the measuring device after the postselection with the initial Gaussian profile is proposed. We apply this formula for the weak value to the classical experiment of the realization of the weak measurement by the optical polarization and obtain the weak value for any pre- and post-selections. This formula automatically includes the interference effect which is necessary to yields the weak value as an outcome of the weak measurement.

•May 26, 2010•0 citations

Weird Measurements

WJ Mullin

A weak measurement does not completely collapse the wave function into one of the components of a superposition. A subsequent projective measurement on the weakly measured wave function can result in an amplification of the result for the original weak measurement. This chapter illustrates the procedure by a measurement of the average trajectories taken by particles in the two-slit experiment, in which the local momentum of a photon is encoded into its polarization, by means of a birefringent calcite crystal. The particle trajectories show the interference pattern. A second experimental example finds the real part and the imaginary part of a particle’s complex wave function. The amplitude and phase of the wave function are expressed in terms of its real and imaginary parts.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Mar 16, 2017•0 citations

Weak measurement takes a simple form for cumulants

Graeme Mitchison

A weak measurement on a system is made by coupling a pointer weakly to the system and then measuring the position of the pointer. If the initial wave function for the pointer is real, the mean displacement of the pointer is proportional to the so-called weak value of the observable being measured. This gives an intuitively direct way of understanding weak measurement. However, if the initial pointer wave function takes complex values, the relationship between pointer displacement and weak value is not quite so simple, as pointed out recently by Jozsa [R. Jozsa, Phys. Rev. A 76, 044103 (2007)]. This is even more striking in the case of sequential weak measurements [G. Mitchison, R. Jozsa, and S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. A 76, 062105 (2007)]. These are carried out by coupling several pointers at different stages of the evolution of the system, and the relationship between the products of the measured pointer positions and the sequential weak values can become extremely complicated for an arbitrary initial pointer wave function. Surprisingly, all this complication vanishes when one calculates the cumulants of pointer positions. These are directly proportional to the cumulants of sequential weak values. This suggests that cumulants have a fundamental physical significance for weak measurement.

arXiv:0710.5113•Physical Review A•May 2, 2008•12 citations

Weak measurements in quantum mechanics

Lajos Diósi

The article recapitulates the concept of weak measurement in its broader sense encapsulating the trade between asymptotically weak measurement precision and asymptotically large measurement statistics. Essential applications in time-continuous measurement and in postselected measurement are presented both in classical and in quantum contexts. We discuss the anomalous quantum weak value in postselected measurement. We concentrate on the general mathematical and physical aspects of weak measurements and we do not expand on their interpretation. Particular applications, even most familiar ones, are not subject of the article which was written for Elsevier's Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics.

arXiv:quant-ph/0505075•May 10, 2005•9 citations
The physical interpretation of weak measurements has been the subject of much debate. It is known that anomalous phenomena and results that appear in weak measurements are essentially related to the phase of the quantum system being measured. Consideration of the phase is important to clarify its physical interpretation. In classical wave optics, there has long been studies on methods of measuring or retrieving the phase of a wave function. We here present that one of those methods, the analytic phase retrieval based on the properties of entire functions, has a close connection with weak measurements in quantum physics. We explain such a connection for two emblematic optical weak-measurements that have the same mathematical formalism as quantum systems: one is a system for weak measurements of polarized light displacement in a birefringent crystal, and the other is a system for the direct measurement of a wave function by weakly coupling it to a pointer. In those two systems, we show that the pre- and post-selection of polarized light provides a filtering effect similar to that utilized in the analytic phase retrieval.
Abstract Geometric phases and weak values (WVs) are two fundamental concepts that were originally introduced in the realm of quantum mechanics. In the course of time, it became clear that the two concepts apply in both the quantum domain and the classical domain. Moreover, the two concepts proved to be intimately connected with one another, as disclosed by Sjöqvist some years ago (Sjöqvist 2006 Phys. Lett. A 359 187). WVs were so named in reference to very weak couplings between a system’s observable, e.g. light polarization, and its measuring device, the ‘pointer’. However, the actual definition of WVs does not involve the system-pointer coupling strength. We have addressed the strong coupling regime both theoretically and experimentally, thereby obtaining geometric phases out of WVs. We report experimental results as a proof-of-concept, using classical light beams and single-shot images. Our approach applies without essential modifications also to single photons.
A simple formula to read out the weak value from the wave function of the measuring device after the postselection with the initial Gaussian profile is proposed. We apply this formula for the weak value to the classical experiment of the realization of the weak measurement by the optical polarization and obtain the weak value for any pre- and post-selections. This formula automatically includes the interference effect which is necessary to yields the weak value as an outcome of the weak measurement.
A weak measurement does not completely collapse the wave function into one of the components of a superposition. A subsequent projective measurement on the weakly measured wave function can result in an amplification of the result for the original weak measurement. This chapter illustrates the procedure by a measurement of the average trajectories taken by particles in the two-slit experiment, in which the local momentum of a photon is encoded into its polarization, by means of a birefringent calcite crystal. The particle trajectories show the interference pattern. A second experimental example finds the real part and the imaginary part of a particle’s complex wave function. The amplitude and phase of the wave function are expressed in terms of its real and imaginary parts.
A weak measurement on a system is made by coupling a pointer weakly to the system and then measuring the position of the pointer. If the initial wave function for the pointer is real, the mean displacement of the pointer is proportional to the so-called weak value of the observable being measured. This gives an intuitively direct way of understanding weak measurement. However, if the initial pointer wave function takes complex values, the relationship between pointer displacement and weak value is not quite so simple, as pointed out recently by Jozsa [R. Jozsa, Phys. Rev. A 76, 044103 (2007)]. This is even more striking in the case of sequential weak measurements [G. Mitchison, R. Jozsa, and S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. A 76, 062105 (2007)]. These are carried out by coupling several pointers at different stages of the evolution of the system, and the relationship between the products of the measured pointer positions and the sequential weak values can become extremely complicated for an arbitrary initial pointer wave function. Surprisingly, all this complication vanishes when one calculates the cumulants of pointer positions. These are directly proportional to the cumulants of sequential weak values. This suggests that cumulants have a fundamental physical significance for weak measurement.
The article recapitulates the concept of weak measurement in its broader sense encapsulating the trade between asymptotically weak measurement precision and asymptotically large measurement statistics. Essential applications in time-continuous measurement and in postselected measurement are presented both in classical and in quantum contexts. We discuss the anomalous quantum weak value in postselected measurement. We concentrate on the general mathematical and physical aspects of weak measurements and we do not expand on their interpretation. Particular applications, even most familiar ones, are not subject of the article which was written for Elsevier's Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics.