In the field of quantum information, classical optimizers play an important role. From experimentalists optimizing their physical devices to theorists exploring variational quantum algorithms, many aspects of quantum information require the use of a classical optimizer. For this reason, there are many papers that benchmark the effectiveness of different optimizers for specific variational quantum algorithm tasks and choices of parameterized algorithms. However, for researchers exploring new algorithms or physical devices, the insights from these studies don’t necessarily translate. To address this concern, we compare the performance of classical optimizers across a series of partially-randomized tasks to more broadly sample the space of variational quantum algorithm problems. We focus on local zeroth-order optimizers due to their generally favorable performance and query-efficiency on quantum systems. We discuss insights from these experiments that can help motivate future works to improve these optimizers for use on quantum systems.
In the field of quantum information, classical optimizers play an important role. From experimentalists optimizing their physical devices to theorists exploring variational quantum algorithms, many aspects of quantum information require the use of a classical optimizer. For this reason, there are many papers that benchmark the effectiveness of different optimizers for specific variational quantum algorithm tasks and choices of parameterized algorithms. However, for researchers exploring new algorithms or physical devices, the insights from these studies don’t necessarily translate. To address this concern, we compare the performance of classical optimizers across a series of partially-randomized tasks to more broadly sample the space of variational quantum algorithm problems. We focus on local zeroth-order optimizers due to their generally favorable performance and query-efficiency on quantum systems. We discuss insights from these experiments that can help motivate future works to improve these optimizers for use on quantum systems.
Exploring quantum applications of near-term quantum devices is a rapidly growing field of quantum information science with both theoretical and practical interests. A leading paradigm to establish such near-term quantum applications is variational quantum algorithms (VQAs). These algorithms use a classical optimizer to train a parameterized quantum circuit to accomplish certain tasks, where the circuits are usually randomly initialized. In this work, we prove that for a broad class of such random circuits, the variation range of the cost function via adjusting any local quantum gate within the circuit vanishes exponentially in the number of qubits with a high probability. This result can unify the restrictions on gradient-based and gradient-free optimizations in a natural manner and reveal extra harsh constraints on the training landscapes of VQAs. Hence a fundamental limitation on the trainability of VQAs is unraveled, indicating the essential mechanism of the optimization hardness in the Hilbert space with exponential dimension. We further showcase the validity of our results with numerical simulations of representative VQAs. We believe that these results would deepen our understanding of the scalability of VQAs and shed light on the search for near-term quantum applications with advantages.
Quantum state preparation involves preparing a target state from an initial system, a process integral to applications such as quantum machine learning and solving systems of linear equations. A qumode is a quantum-mechanical harmonic oscillator representing a continuous variable system. Recently, there has been a growing interest in qumodes due to advancements in the field and their potential applications. However there is a notable gap in the literature specifically addressing this area. This paper aims to bridge this gap by providing performance benchmarks of various optimizers used in state preparation with Variational Quantum Algorithms. We conducted extensive testing across multiple scenarios, including different target states, both ideal and sampling simulations, and varying numbers of basis gate layers. Our evaluations offer insights into the complexity of learning each type of target state and demonstrate that some optimizers perform better than others in this context. Notably, the Powell optimizer was found to be exceptionally robust against sampling errors, making it a preferred choice in scenarios prone to such inaccuracies. Additionally, the Simultaneous Perturbation Stochastic Approximation (SPSA) optimizer was distinguished for its efficiency and ability to handle increased parameter dimensionality effectively.
Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) offer a promising path toward using near-term quantum hardware for applications in academic and industrial research. These algorithms aim to find approximate solutions to quantum problems by optimizing a parametrized quantum circuit using a classical optimization algorithm. A successful VQA requires fast and reliable classical optimization algorithms. Understanding and optimizing how off-the-shelf optimization methods perform in this context is important for the future of the field. In this work, we study the performance of four commonly used gradient-free optimization methods [sequential least-squares quadratic programming, constrained optimization by linear approximations, the covariance matrix adaptation evolutionary strategy (CMA-ES), and the simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation (SPSA)] to find ground-state energies of a range of small chemistry and material science problems. We test a telescoping sampling scheme (where the accuracy of the cost-function estimate provided to the optimizer is increased as the optimization converges) for all methods, demonstrating mixed results across our range of optimizers and problems chosen. We further hyperparameter tune two of the four optimizers (CMA-ES and SPSA) across a large range of models and demonstrate that with appropriate hyperparameter tuning, CMA-ES is competitive with and sometimes outperforms SPSA (which is not observed in the absence of hyperparameter tuning). Finally, we investigate the ability of an optimizer to beat the ``sampling-noise floor'' given by the sampling noise of each cost-function estimate provided to the optimizer. Our results demonstrate the necessity for tailoring and hyperparameter tuning known optimization techniques for inherently noisy variational quantum algorithms and that the variational landscape that one finds in a VQA is highly problem and system dependent. This provides guidance for future implementations of these algorithms in experiments.
Variational quantum algorithms, and in particular variants of the variational quantum eigensolver, have been proposed as approaches to combinatorial optimization (CO) problems. With only shallow ansatz circuits, these methods are considered suitable for current noisy intermediate-scale quantum hardware. Yet, the resources required to train variational circuits often scale superpolynomially with problem size. In this study, we numerically investigate the practical implications of this scaling for CO problems, using Max-Cut and random QUBO instances as benchmarks. For a fixed computational budget, we compare the average performance of training shallow variational circuits, sampling with replacement, and greedy local search. We identify the minimum problem size at which the quantum algorithms consistently outperform random sampling, and for each size, we characterize their separation from greedy local search. Beyond average-case performance, we analyze correlations between algorithms across individual problem instances. These results strengthen the case for intuitive yet meaningful benchmarks of variational quantum algorithms for CO problems under realistic resource constraints.
This study systematically benchmarks classical optimization strategies for the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm when applied to Generalized Mean-Variance Problems under near-term Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum conditions. We evaluate Dual Annealing, Constrained Optimization by Linear Approximation, and the Powell Method across noiseless, sampling noise, and two thermal noise models. Our Cost Function Landscape Analysis revealed that the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm angle parameters γ were largely inactive in the noiseless regime. This insight motivated a parameter-filtered optimization approach, in which we focused the search space exclusively on the active β parameters. This filtering substantially improved parameter efficiency for fast optimizers like Constrained Optimization by Linear Approximation (reducing evaluations from 21 to 12 in the noiseless case) and enhanced robustness, demonstrating that leveraging structural insights is an effective architecture-aware noise mitigation strategy for Variational Quantum Algorithms.
In recent years, Variational Quantum Algorithms (VQAs) have emerged as a promising approach for solving optimization problems on quantum computers in the NISQ era. However, one limitation of VQAs is their reliance on fixed-structure circuits, which may not be taylored for specific problems or hardware configurations. A leading strategy to address this issue are Adaptative VQAs, which dynamically modify the circuit structure by adding and removing gates, and optimize their parameters during the training. Several Adaptative VQAs, based on heuristics such as circuit shallowness, entanglement capability and hardware compatibility, have already been proposed in the literature, but there is still lack of a systematic comparison between the different methods. In this paper, we aim to fill this gap by analyzing three Adaptative VQAs: Evolutionary Variational Quantum Eigensolver (EVQE), Variable Ansatz (VAns), already proposed in the literature, and Random Adapt-VQE (RA-VQE), a random approach we introduce as a baseline. In order to compare these algorithms to traditional VQAs, we also include the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) in our analysis. We apply these algorithms to QUBO problems and study their performance by examining the quality of the solutions found and the computational times required. Additionally, we investigate how the choice of the hyperparameters can impact the overall performance of the algorithms, highlighting the importance of selecting an appropriate methodology for hyperparameter tuning. Our analysis sets benchmarks for Adaptative VQAs designed for near-term quantum devices and provides valuable insights to guide future research in this area.