Quantum state preparation involves preparing a target state from an initial system, a process integral to applications such as quantum machine learning and solving systems of linear equations. A qumode is a quantum-mechanical harmonic oscillator representing a continuous variable system. Recently, there has been a growing interest in qumodes due to advancements in the field and their potential applications. However there is a notable gap in the literature specifically addressing this area. This paper aims to bridge this gap by providing performance benchmarks of various optimizers used in state preparation with Variational Quantum Algorithms. We conducted extensive testing across multiple scenarios, including different target states, both ideal and sampling simulations, and varying numbers of basis gate layers. Our evaluations offer insights into the complexity of learning each type of target state and demonstrate that some optimizers perform better than others in this context. Notably, the Powell optimizer was found to be exceptionally robust against sampling errors, making it a preferred choice in scenarios prone to such inaccuracies. Additionally, the Simultaneous Perturbation Stochastic Approximation (SPSA) optimizer was distinguished for its efficiency and ability to handle increased parameter dimensionality effectively.
Quantum state preparation involves preparing a target state from an initial system, a process integral to applications such as quantum machine learning and solving systems of linear equations. A qumode is a quantum-mechanical harmonic oscillator representing a continuous variable system. Recently, there has been a growing interest in qumodes due to advancements in the field and their potential applications. However there is a notable gap in the literature specifically addressing this area. This paper aims to bridge this gap by providing performance benchmarks of various optimizers used in state preparation with Variational Quantum Algorithms. We conducted extensive testing across multiple scenarios, including different target states, both ideal and sampling simulations, and varying numbers of basis gate layers. Our evaluations offer insights into the complexity of learning each type of target state and demonstrate that some optimizers perform better than others in this context. Notably, the Powell optimizer was found to be exceptionally robust against sampling errors, making it a preferred choice in scenarios prone to such inaccuracies. Additionally, the Simultaneous Perturbation Stochastic Approximation (SPSA) optimizer was distinguished for its efficiency and ability to handle increased parameter dimensionality effectively.
Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) offer a promising path toward using near-term quantum hardware for applications in academic and industrial research. These algorithms aim to find approximate solutions to quantum problems by optimizing a parametrized quantum circuit using a classical optimization algorithm. A successful VQA requires fast and reliable classical optimization algorithms. Understanding and optimizing how off-the-shelf optimization methods perform in this context is important for the future of the field. In this work, we study the performance of four commonly used gradient-free optimization methods [sequential least-squares quadratic programming, constrained optimization by linear approximations, the covariance matrix adaptation evolutionary strategy (CMA-ES), and the simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation (SPSA)] to find ground-state energies of a range of small chemistry and material science problems. We test a telescoping sampling scheme (where the accuracy of the cost-function estimate provided to the optimizer is increased as the optimization converges) for all methods, demonstrating mixed results across our range of optimizers and problems chosen. We further hyperparameter tune two of the four optimizers (CMA-ES and SPSA) across a large range of models and demonstrate that with appropriate hyperparameter tuning, CMA-ES is competitive with and sometimes outperforms SPSA (which is not observed in the absence of hyperparameter tuning). Finally, we investigate the ability of an optimizer to beat the ``sampling-noise floor'' given by the sampling noise of each cost-function estimate provided to the optimizer. Our results demonstrate the necessity for tailoring and hyperparameter tuning known optimization techniques for inherently noisy variational quantum algorithms and that the variational landscape that one finds in a VQA is highly problem and system dependent. This provides guidance for future implementations of these algorithms in experiments.
Classical optimizers play a crucial role in determining the accuracy and convergence of variational quantum algorithms; leading algorithms use a near-term quantum computer to solve the ground state properties of molecules, simulate dynamics of different quantum systems, and so on. In the literature, many optimizers, each having its own architecture, have been employed expediently for different applications. In this work, we consider a few popular and efficacious optimizers and assess their performance in variational quantum algorithms for applications in quantum chemistry in a realistic noisy setting. We benchmark the optimizers with critical analysis based on quantum simulations of simple molecules, such as hydrogen, lithium hydride, beryllium hydride, water, and hydrogen fluoride. The errors in the ground state energy, dissociation energy, and dipole moment are the parameters used as yardsticks. All the simulations were carried out with an ideal quantum circuit simulator, a noisy quantum circuit simulator, and finally a noisy simulator with noise embedded from the IBM Cairo quantum device to understand the performance of the classical optimizers in ideal and realistic quantum environments. We used the standard unitary coupled cluster ansatz for simulations, and the number of qubits varied from two starting from the hydrogen molecule to ten qubits in hydrogen fluoride. Based on the performance of these optimizers in the ideal quantum circuits, the conjugate gradient, limited-memory Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno bound, and sequential least squares programming optimizers are found to be the best-performing gradient-based optimizers. While constrained optimization by linear approximation (COBYLA) and Powell's conjugate direction algorithm for unconstrained optimization (POWELL) perform most efficiently among the gradient-free methods, in noisy quantum circuit conditions, simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation, POWELL, and COBYLA are among the best-performing optimizers.
Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) have attracted a lot of attention from the quantum computing community for the last few years. Their hybrid quantum-classical nature with relatively shallow quantum circuits makes them a promising platform for demonstrating the capabilities of noisy intermediate scale quantum (NISQ) devices. Although the classical machine learning community focuses on gradient-based parameter optimization, finding near-exact gradients for variational quantum circuits (VQCs) with the parameter-shift rule introduces a large sampling overhead. Therefore, gradient-free optimizers have gained popularity in quantum machine learning circles. Among the most promising candidates is the simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation (SPSA) algorithm, due to its low computational cost and inherent noise resilience. We introduce a novel approach that uses the approximated gradient from SPSA in combination with state-of-the-art gradient-based classical optimizers. We demonstrate numerically that this out-performs both standard SPSA and the parameter-shift rule in terms of convergence rate and absolute error in simple regression tasks. The improvement of our novel approach over SPSA with stochastic gradient descent (SGD) is even amplified when shot- and hardware-noise are taken into account. We also demonstrate that error mitigation does not significantly affect our results.
In this study, we investigated the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) application for the Ising model as a testbed model, in which we thoroughly delved into several optimizers, both classical and quantum, and analyzed the extent to which each of these methods would offer a benefit. We then investigated a new combinatorial optimization scheme, termed QN-SPSA+PSR, in which the Fubini-Study metric is approximated within the Quantum Natural Gradient (QN) framework, with its inner gradient estimated by the Simultaneous Perturbation Stochastic Approximation (SPSA), while the outer gradient of the cost function is evaluated exactly by the Parameter-Shift Rule (PSR). The QN-SPSA+PSR method integrates the QN-SPSA computational efficiency with the precise gradient computation of the PSR, improving the stability of QN-SPSA-based and convergence speed per parameter update while maintaining low computational consumption. Our results provide a potential performance improvement in the VQAs' optimization subroutine, even in Quantum Machine Learning's optimization section, and enhance viable paths toward efficient quantum simulations on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum Computing (NISQ) devices. Additionally, we also conducted a detailed study of quantum circuit ansatz structures in order to find the one that would work best with the Ising model and NISQ, in which we utilized the properties of the investigated model.
In recent years, Variational Quantum Algorithms (VQAs) have emerged as a promising approach for solving optimization problems on quantum computers in the NISQ era. However, one limitation of VQAs is their reliance on fixed-structure circuits, which may not be taylored for specific problems or hardware configurations. A leading strategy to address this issue are Adaptative VQAs, which dynamically modify the circuit structure by adding and removing gates, and optimize their parameters during the training. Several Adaptative VQAs, based on heuristics such as circuit shallowness, entanglement capability and hardware compatibility, have already been proposed in the literature, but there is still lack of a systematic comparison between the different methods. In this paper, we aim to fill this gap by analyzing three Adaptative VQAs: Evolutionary Variational Quantum Eigensolver (EVQE), Variable Ansatz (VAns), already proposed in the literature, and Random Adapt-VQE (RA-VQE), a random approach we introduce as a baseline. In order to compare these algorithms to traditional VQAs, we also include the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) in our analysis. We apply these algorithms to QUBO problems and study their performance by examining the quality of the solutions found and the computational times required. Additionally, we investigate how the choice of the hyperparameters can impact the overall performance of the algorithms, highlighting the importance of selecting an appropriate methodology for hyperparameter tuning. Our analysis sets benchmarks for Adaptative VQAs designed for near-term quantum devices and provides valuable insights to guide future research in this area.
We simulate the effects of different types of noise in state preparation circuits of variational quantum algorithms. We first use a variational quantum eigensolver to find the ground state of a Hamiltonian in the presence of noise and adopt two quality measures in addition to the energy, namely, fidelity and concurrence. We then extend the task to the one of constructing, with a layered quantum circuit ansatz, a set of general random target states. We determine the optimal circuit depth for different types and levels of noise, and observe that the variational algorithms mitigate the effects of noise by adapting the optimized parameters. We find that the inclusion of redundant parameterized gates makes the quantum circuits more resilient to noise. For such overparameterized circuits, different sets of parameters can result in the same final state in the noiseless case, which we denote as parameter degeneracy. Numerically, we show that this degeneracy can be lifted in the presence of noise, with some states being significantly more resilient to noise than others. We also show that the average deviation from the target state is linear in the noise level, as long as this is small compared to a circuit-dependent threshold. In this region, the deviation is well described by a stochastic model. Above the threshold, the optimization can converge to states with largely different physical properties from the true target state, so for practical applications it is critical to ensure that noise levels are below this threshold.