arXiv:2307.15813

Comment on Hess et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 130}, 207001 (2023)

A.V. Antipov, Cole, W., K. Kalashnikov, Karimi, F., Roman M. Lutchyn, Chetan Nayak, Dmitry I. Pikulin, Georg W. Winkler

Published Jul 28, 2023• 0 citations

Abstract

In this comment, we show that the model introduced in Hess et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 130}, 207001 (2023) fails the topological gap protocol (TGP) (Pikulin et al., arXiv:2103.12217 and M. Aghaee et al., Phys. Rev. B 107, 245424 (2023)). In addition, we discuss this model in the broader context of how the TGP has been benchmarked.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2307.15813

Related papers

Reply to Comment on "Contextuality in bosonic bunching"

Paweł Kurzyński, Akihito Soeda, Jayne E. Thompson +1 more

This is a reply to arXiv:1409.7513 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 138901 (2014)].

arXiv:1409.8025Sep 29, 20140 citations

Vacchini Replies:

Bassano Vacchini

This is the reply to a Comment by R. F. O'Connell (Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 028901) on a paper written by the author (B. Vacchini, ``Completely positive quantum dissipation'', Phys.Rev.Lett. 84 (2000) 1374, arXiv:quant-ph/0002094).

arXiv:quant-ph/0107046Physical Review LettersJun 20, 200116 citations

Comment on "How to Observe Coherent Electron Dynamics Directly" [H. J. Suominen and A. Kirrander, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 043002 (2014)]

Robin Santra, Gopal Dixit, Jan Malte Slowik

This is a comment on "How to Observe Coherent Electron Dynamics Directly" [H. J. Suominen and A. Kirrander, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 043002 (2014)].

arXiv:1408.1354Aug 5, 20140 citations

Reply to Antipov et al., Microsoft Quantum: "Comment on Hess et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 207001 (2023)"

Henry F. Legg, Hess, Richard, Daniel Loss +1 more

In this Reply we respond to the comment by Antipov et al. from Microsoft Quantum on Hess et al., PRL 130, 207001 (2023). Antipov et al. reported only a single simulation and claimed it did not pass the Microsoft Quantum topological gap protocol (TGP). They have provided no parameters or data for this simulation (despite request). Regardless, in this reply we demonstrate that the trivial bulk gap reopening mechanism outlined in Hess et al., in combination with trivial ZBPs, passes the TGP and therefore can result in TGP false positives.

arXiv:2308.10669Aug 21, 20230 citations

Reply to Comment on "Stripes and the t-J Model"

C. Stephen Hellberg, Efstratios Manousakis

This is a Reply to the Comment of S.R. White and D.J. Scalapino [cond-mat/9907243] on our recent paper ``Stripes and the t-J Model'' [Physical Review Letters 83, 132 (1999) and cond-mat/9812022].

arXiv:cond-mat/9910142Oct 9, 19990 citations

Why the "classical" explanation of weak values by Ferrie and Combes does not work: a comment on Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 120404 (2014)

Holger Friedrich Hofmann, M. Iinuma, Yutaka Shikano

In Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 120404 (2014) [arXiv:1403.2362], Ferrie and Combes claim that weak values could be a statistical artifact caused by correlations between the disturbance and the post-selection condition imposed on the output. In this comment, we show that the disturbance caused by a weak measurement is sufficiently low to definitely rule out the model proposed by Ferrie and Combes.

arXiv:1410.7126Oct 27, 20142 citations