We have investigated instability of a superconducting quantum computer by continuously monitoring the qubit output. We found that qubits exhibit a step-like change in the error rates. This change is repeatedly observed, and each step persists for several minutes. By analyzing the correlation between the increased errors and anomalous variance of the output, we demonstrate quantum error mitigation based on post-selection. We have reduced the errors from 5.4% to 1.6% in a Bell state measurement and from 17.5% to 12.0% in a quantum volume circuit. Numerical analysis on the proposed method was also conducted.
We have investigated instability of a superconducting quantum computer by continuously monitoring the qubit output. We found that qubits exhibit a step-like change in the error rates. This change is repeatedly observed, and each step persists for several minutes. By analyzing the correlation between the increased errors and anomalous variance of the output, we demonstrate quantum error mitigation based on post-selection. We have reduced the errors from 5.4% to 1.6% in a Bell state measurement and from 17.5% to 12.0% in a quantum volume circuit. Numerical analysis on the proposed method was also conducted.
We have investigated temporal fluctuation of superconducting qubits via the time-resolved measurement for an IBM Quantum system. We found that the qubit error rate abruptly changes during specific time intervals. Each high error state persists for several tens of seconds and exhibits an on-off behavior. The observed temporal instability can be attributed to qubit transitions induced by a measurement stimulus. Resonant transition between fluctuating dressed states of the qubits coupled with high-frequency resonators can be responsible for the error-rate change.
Pre-fault tolerant quantum computers have already demonstrated the ability to estimate observable values accurately, at a scale beyond brute-force classical computation. This has been enabled by error mitigation techniques that often rely on a representative model of the device noise. However, learning and maintaining these models is complicated by fluctuations in the noise over unpredictable time scales, for instance, arising from resonant interactions between superconducting qubits and defect two-level systems (TLS). Such interactions affect the stability and uniformity of device performance as a whole, but also affect the noise model accuracy, leading to incorrect observable estimation. Here, we experimentally demonstrate that tuning of the qubit-TLS interactions helps reduce noise instabilities and consequently enables more reliable error-mitigation performance. These experiments provide a controlled platform for studying the performance of error mitigation in the presence of quasi-static noise. We anticipate that the capabilities introduced here will be crucial for the exploration of quantum applications on solid-state processors at non-trivial scales. Interactions between qubits and defect-related two-level systems in superconducting qubit devices are a major source of noise fluctuations that hinder error-mitigation performance. Here, the authors experimentally show that modulating this interaction can reduce noise fluctuation and improve error mitigation performance.
Quantum devices in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era are highly susceptible to different types of quantum noise, which directly impact the reliability of experimental results. This work provides a characterization of error behavior arising from quantum noises on IBM's superconducting quantum processor, offering practical insights for algorithm design, benchmarking, and error-mitigation strategies on a real superconducting quantum processor in the NISQ era. The study begins with the measurement of the basis state, without applying any gate, to quantify state-preparation and measurement (SPAM) errors. Additionally, the errors are further quantified due to the application of single-qubit Pauli-X, two-qubit CNOT gate and other multi-qubit Controlled-X gates. Each circuit was executed with 1024 shots, and the percentage error between the expected and observed outputs was computed. The results show that the single-qubit Pauli-X gate exhibits relatively low errors in comparison with the two-qubit CNOT gate, whereas other multi-qubit Controlled-X gates lead to significantly higher deviations. This work also analyzes the noise effect of a fourqubit Controlled-X gate being implemented using a three-qubit Controlled-X gate with an extra auxiliary qubit, and the result shows a significant reduction in the error rate.
Errors in superconducting qubits that are correlated in time and space can pose problems for quantum error correction codes. Radiation from cosmic and terrestrial sources can increase the quasiparticle (QP) density in a superconducting qubit device, resulting in an increased rate of QPs tunneling across proximal Josephson junctions (JJs) and causing correlated errors. Mechanical vibrations, such as those induced by the pulse tube (PT) in a dry dilution refrigerator, are also a known source of correlated errors. We measure two types of errors in the same device, linking the first to ionizing radiation and the second to PT operation. We present a method for distinguishing these two types of errors by their temporal, spatial, and frequency domain features, enabling physically motivated error-mitigation strategies. We also present accelerometer data to study the correlation between PT-induced vibrations and the errors. We measure arrays of transmon qubits where the difference in superconducting gap across the JJ is less than the qubit energy, as well as those where the gap is greater than the qubit energy, which has been shown to mitigate radiation-induced errors. The rate of both types of errors is reduced in these latter devices, suggesting that gap engineering is also protective against PT-induced errors.
A long-standing challenge in quantum computing is developing technologies to overcome the inevitable noise in qubits. To enable meaningful applications in the early stages of fault-tolerant quantum computing, devising methods to suppress post-correction logical failures is becoming increasingly crucial. In this work, we propose and experimentally demonstrate the application of zero-noise extrapolation, a practical quantum error mitigation technique, to error correction circuits on superconducting processors. By amplifying the noise on physical qubits, the circuits yield outcomes that exhibit a predictable dependence on noise strength, following a polynomial function determined by the code distance. This property enables the effective application of polynomial extrapolation to mitigate logical errors. Our experiments demonstrate a universal reduction in logical errors across various quantum circuits, including fault-tolerant circuits of repetition and surface codes. We observe a favorable performance in multi-round error correction circuits, indicating that this method remains effective when the circuit depth increases. These results advance the frontier of quantum error suppression technologies, opening a practical way to achieve reliable quantum computing in the early fault-tolerant era. Quantum error mitigation refers to techniques that reduce, rather than correct, errors in quantum computing. Here the authors demonstrate zero-noise extrapolation applied to quantum error correction circuits on superconducting processors, effectively reducing logical errors and advancing early fault-tolerant quantum computing.
All computing devices, including quantum computers, must exhibit that for a given input, an output is produced in accordance with the program. The outputs generated by quantum computers that fulfill these requirements are not temporally correlated, however. In a quantum-computing device comprising solid-state qubits such as superconducting qubits, any operation to rest the qubits to their initial state faces a practical problem. We applied a statistical analysis to a collection of random numbers output from a 20-qubit superconducting-qubit cloud quantum computer using the simplest random number generation scheme. The analysis indicates temporal correlation in the output of some sequences obtained from the 20 qubits. This temporal correlation is not related to the relaxation time of each qubit. We conclude that the correlation could be a result of a systematic error.