arXiv:2305.12902

Unconditionally secure quantum bit commitment using modified double-slit and unstable particles

Chi-Yee Cheung

Published May 22, 2023• 0 citations

Abstract

We note that the proof of the no-go theorem of unconditionally secure quantum bit commitment is based on a model which is not universal. For protocols not described by the model, this theorem does not apply. Using unstable particles and a modified double-slit setup, we construct such a protocol and show that it is unconditionally secure. In this protocol, the committer transfers no quantum states to the receiver.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2305.12902

Related papers

Unconditionally Secure Quantum Bit Commitment Using Neutron Double-Slit Interference

Chi-Yee Cheung

Using a neutron double-slit setup, we construct a quantum bit commitment scheme in which time development of quantum states plays an essential role. Our scheme evades the widely accepted no-go theorem by the fact that it is neither possible to stop the time evolution of spreading wave packets, nor is it possible to evolve them backward in time. Moreover, for unstable particles such as neutrons, one cannot delay detecting their positions indefinitely, or they would disintegrate spontaneously and escape detection. We find that using non-stationary states instead of stationary ones, unconditionally secure quantum bit commitment is possible.

arXiv:0910.2645Oct 14, 20091 citation

Quantum Bit Commitment can be Unconditionally Secure

Chi-Yee Cheung

It is generally believed that unconditionally secure quantum bit commitment (QBC) is proven impossible by a "no-go theorem". We point out that the theorem only establishes the existence of a cheating unitary transformation in any QBC scheme secure against the receiver, but this fact alone is not sufficient to rule out unconditionally secure QBC as a matter of principle, because there exists no proof that the cheating unitary transformation must be known to the cheater in all possible cases. In this work, we show how to circumvent the "no-go theorem" and prove that unconditionally secure QBC is in fact possible.

arXiv:quant-ph/0112120Dec 20, 20012 citations

Unconditional security in quantum bit commitment

Horace P. Yuen

The commitment of bits between two mutually distrustful parties is a powerful cryptographic primitive with which many cryptographic objectives can be achieved. It is widely believed that unconditionally secure quantum bit commitment is impossible due to quantum entanglement cheating, which is codified in a general impossibility theorem. Gaps in the proof of this impossibility theorem are found. An unconditionally secure bit commitment protocol utilizing anonymous quantum states and the no-clone theorem is presented below with a full security proof.

arXiv:quant-ph/0106001Jun 1, 20010 citations

QUANTUM BIT COMMITMENT WITH SECRET PARAMETERS

Chi-Yee Cheung

The proof of the no-go theorem of unconditionally secure quantum bit commitment depends crucially on the assumption that Alice knows every detail of the protocol so that no secret parameters exist. In this paper we show that, for the perfectly concealing case, it is possible to establish the no-go theorem without making this assumption.

arXiv:quant-ph/0601206International Journal of Modern Physics BSep 30, 20079 citations

Unconditionally Secure Quantum Bit Commitment is Simply Possible

Arindam Mitra

It has been claimed that unconditionally secure quantum bit commitment is impossible. This claim has been widely accepted and is commonly referred to as the no-go theorem. The no-go theorem implicitly raises the question of whether quantum mechanics can be collectively verified with unconditional security against cheating. We demonstrate that by following an alternative quantum encoding scheme, unconditionally secure quantum bit commitment can, in fact, be achieved.

arXiv:physics/0007089Jul 28, 20001 citation

Why Quantum Bit Commitment And Ideal Quantum Coin Tossing Are Impossible

Hoi-kwong Lo, H. F. Chau

There had been well known claims of unconditionally secure quantum protocols for bit commitment. However, we, and independently Mayers, showed that all proposed quantum bit commitment schemes are, in principle, insecure because the sender, Alice, can almost always cheat successfully by using an Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) type of attack and delaying her measurements. One might wonder if secure quantum bit commitment protocols exist at all. We answer this question by showing that the same type of attack by Alice will, in principle, break any bit commitment scheme. The cheating strategy generally requires a quantum computer. We emphasize the generality of this ``no-go theorem'': Unconditionally secure bit commitment schemes based on quantum mechanics---fully quantum, classical or quantum but with measurements---are all ruled out by this result. Since bit commitment is a useful primitive for building up more sophisticated protocols such as zero-knowledge proofs, our results cast very serious doubt on the security of quantum cryptography in the so-called ``post-cold-war'' applications. We also show that ideal quantum coin tossing is impossible because of the EPR attack. This no-go theorem for ideal quantum coin tossing may help to shed some lights on the possibility of non-ideal protocols.

Jan 1, 1996172 citations