Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2303.13422

All this for one qubit? Bounds on local circuit cutting schemes

Simon C. Marshall, Tura, Jordi, Vedran Dunjko

Published Mar 23, 2023• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Small numbers of qubits are one of the primary constraints on the near-term deployment of advantageous quantum computing. To mitigate this constraint, techniques have been developed to break up a large quantum computation into smaller computations. While this work is sometimes called circuit knitting or divide and quantum we generically refer to it as circuit cutting (CC). Much of the existing work has focused on the development of more efficient circuit cutting schemes, leaving open questions on the limits of what theoretically optimal schemes can achieve. We develop bounds by breaking up possible approaches into two distinct regimes: the first, where the input state and measurement are fixed and known, and the second, which requires a given cutting to work for a complete basis of input states and measurements. For the first case, it is easy to see that bounds addressing the efficiency of any approaches to circuit cutting amount to resolving BPP$\stackrel{?}{=}$BQP. We therefore restrict ourselves to a simpler question, asking what \textit{locally-acting} circuit cutting schemes can achieve, a technical restriction which still includes all existing circuit cutting schemes. In our first case we show that the existence of a locally-acting circuit cutting scheme which could efficiently partition even a single qubit from the rest of a circuit would imply BPP$=$BQP. In our second case, we obtain more general results, showing inefficiency unconditionally. We also show that any (local or otherwise) circuit cutting scheme cannot function by only applying unital channels.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2303.13422

Related papers

Quantum Circuit Cutting: Complexity and Optimization

Yuval Idan, Eitan Zahavi, Elad Mentovich +2 more

The current noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era is characterized by substantial errors and noise, which limit the practical feasibility of deep, many-qubit circuits. To address these constraints, quantum circuit cutting has emerged as a promising tool. Recently, there has been significant research on methods for performing such cutting effectively. In this work, the duality between quantum circuits and classical graphs - specifically, directed acyclic graphs (dags) - is leveraged to analyze the complexity of finding an optimal circuit-cutting configuration that minimizes the number of cuts. After developing a rigorous graph-theoretic framework, the complexity of identifying cut locations that partition a given quantum circuit into smaller fragments is characterized. The corresponding graph-combinatorial task is then defined, and the resulting partition problem is shown to be NP-complete. Furthermore, even a simplified version of the problem, restricted to circuits composed only of one- and two-qubit gates, is shown to be NP-complete. Finally, based on these constraints, an algorithm grounded in satisfiability modulo theories (SMT) is proposed to find optimal cuts when the number of qubits per partition is bounded. This work therefore provides a complexity-theoretic characterization of cut placement and a practical solver for bounded-size decompositions.

quant-pharXiv:2604.23700•Apr 28, 2026•0 citations

Evaluating Quantum Wire Cutting for QAOA: Performance Benchmarks in Ideal and Noisy Environments

Michel Meulen, Niels M. P. Neumann, Jasper Verbree

Current quantum computers suffer from a limited number of qubits and high error rates, limiting practical applicability. Different techniques exist to mitigate these effects and run larger algorithms. In this work, we analyze one of these techniques called quantum circuit cutting. With circuit cutting, a quantum circuit is decomposed into smaller sub-circuits, each of which can be run on smaller quantum hardware. We compare the performance of quantum circuit cutting with different cutting strategies, and then apply circuit cutting to a QAOA algorithm. Using simulations, we first show that Randomized Clifford measurements outperform both Pauli and random unitary measurements. Second, we show that circuit cutting has trouble providing correct answers in noisy settings, especially as the number of circuits increases.

quant-pharXiv:2602.03482•Feb 4, 2026•0 citations

Optimal Partitioning of Quantum Circuits Using Gate Cuts and Wire Cuts

Sebastian Brandhofer, Ilia Polian, Kevin Krsulich

A limited number of qubits, high error rates, and limited qubit connectivity are major challenges for effective near-term quantum computations. Quantum circuit partitioning divides a quantum computation into classical postprocessing steps and a set of smaller-scale quantum computations that individually require fewer qubits, lower qubit connectivity, and typically incur less error. However, as partitioning generally increases the duration of a quantum computation exponentially in the required partitioning effort, it is crucial to select optimal partitioning points, so-called cuts, and to use optimal cut realizations. In this work, we develop the first optimal partitioning method relying on quantum circuit knitting for optimal cut realizations and an optimal selection of wire cuts and gate cuts that trades off ancilla qubit insertions for a decrease in quantum computing time. Using this combination, the developed method demonstrates a reduction in quantum computing runtime by 41% on average compared to previous quantum circuit partitioning methods. Furthermore, the qubit requirement of the evaluated quantum circuits was reduced by 40% on average for a runtime budget of one hour and a sampling frequency of 1 kHz. These results highlight the optimality gap of previous quantum circuit partitioning methods and the possible extension in the computational reach of near-term quantum computers.

arXiv:2308.09567•IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering•Dec 26, 2023•30 citations

Optimal Two-Qubit Gate-Cutting Cost and Measures of Nonlocality

Michael Hart

Circuit cutting enables quantum computations to be decomposed into smaller subcircuits at the cost of additional sampling overhead. Gate-cutting provides one such approach by replacing nonlocal gates with quasiprobability decompositions of local operations. Starting from the known optimal two-qubit gate-cutting formula, we derive complete sharp lower and upper envelopes relating the quasiprobability extent $γ$ to five established descriptors: entangling power, gate typicality, operator entanglement, Schmidt strength, and maximum product-input concurrence. We recast $γ$ as a Rényi-$1/2$ functional of the operator-Schmidt spectrum and show how the physical constraints on two-qubit spectra sharpen generic entropy bounds and select a small set of recurring extremal Cartan families. None of the five descriptors generically determines $γ$ alone, but each imposes exact constraints, revealing how substantially the optimal gate-cutting cost can vary between gates with similar nonlocal characteristics.

quant-pharXiv:2609.30141•Sep 25, 2026•0 citations

A Hardware-Aware Gate Cutting Framework for Practical Quantum Circuit Knitting

Xiangyu Ren, Mengyu Zhang, Antonio Barbalace

Circuit knitting emerges as a promising technique to overcome the limitation of the few physical qubits in near-term quantum hardware by cutting large quantum circuits into smaller subcircuits. Recent research in this area has been primarily oriented towards reducing subcircuit sampling overhead. Unfortunately, these works neglect hardware information during circuit cutting, thus posing significant challenges to the follow on stages. In fact, direct compilation and execution of these partitioned subcircuits yields low-fidelity results, highlighting the need for a more holistic optimization strategy.

arXiv:2409.03870•Oct 27, 2024•12 citations

Optimal Wire Cutting With Classical Communication

Lukas Brenner, Christophe Piveteau, David Sutter

Circuit knitting is the process of partitioning large quantum circuits into smaller subcircuits such that the result of the original circuits can be deduced by only running the subcircuits. Such techniques will be crucial for near-term and early fault-tolerant quantum computers, as the limited number of qubits is likely to be a major bottleneck for demonstrating quantum advantage. One typically distinguishes between gate cuts and wire cuts when partitioning a circuit. The cost for any circuit knitting approach scales exponentially in the number of cuts. One possibility to realize a cut is via the quasiprobability simulation technique. In fact, we argue that all existing rigorous circuit knitting techniques can be understood in this framework. Furthermore, we characterize the optimal overhead for wire cuts where the subcircuits can exchange classical information or not. We show that the optimal cost for cuttingnwires without and with classical communication between the subcircuits scales asO(16n) andO(4n), respectively.

arXiv:2302.03366•IEEE Transactions on Information Theory•Aug 20, 2025•21 citations
Small numbers of qubits are one of the primary constraints on the near-term deployment of advantageous quantum computing. To mitigate this constraint, techniques have been developed to break up a large quantum computation into smaller computations. While this work is sometimes called circuit knitting or divide and quantum we generically refer to it as circuit cutting (CC). Much of the existing work has focused on the development of more efficient circuit cutting schemes, leaving open questions on the limits of what theoretically optimal schemes can achieve. We develop bounds by breaking up possible approaches into two distinct regimes: the first, where the input state and measurement are fixed and known, and the second, which requires a given cutting to work for a complete basis of input states and measurements. For the first case, it is easy to see that bounds addressing the efficiency of any approaches to circuit cutting amount to resolving BPP=?\stackrel{?}{=}=?BQP. We therefore restrict ourselves to a simpler question, asking what \textit{locally-acting} circuit cutting schemes can achieve, a technical restriction which still includes all existing circuit cutting schemes. In our first case we show that the existence of a locally-acting circuit cutting scheme which could efficiently partition even a single qubit from the rest of a circuit would imply BPP===BQP. In our second case, we obtain more general results, showing inefficiency unconditionally. We also show that any (local or otherwise) circuit cutting scheme cannot function by only applying unital channels.
The current noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era is characterized by substantial errors and noise, which limit the practical feasibility of deep, many-qubit circuits. To address these constraints, quantum circuit cutting has emerged as a promising tool. Recently, there has been significant research on methods for performing such cutting effectively. In this work, the duality between quantum circuits and classical graphs - specifically, directed acyclic graphs (dags) - is leveraged to analyze the complexity of finding an optimal circuit-cutting configuration that minimizes the number of cuts. After developing a rigorous graph-theoretic framework, the complexity of identifying cut locations that partition a given quantum circuit into smaller fragments is characterized. The corresponding graph-combinatorial task is then defined, and the resulting partition problem is shown to be NP-complete. Furthermore, even a simplified version of the problem, restricted to circuits composed only of one- and two-qubit gates, is shown to be NP-complete. Finally, based on these constraints, an algorithm grounded in satisfiability modulo theories (SMT) is proposed to find optimal cuts when the number of qubits per partition is bounded. This work therefore provides a complexity-theoretic characterization of cut placement and a practical solver for bounded-size decompositions.
Current quantum computers suffer from a limited number of qubits and high error rates, limiting practical applicability. Different techniques exist to mitigate these effects and run larger algorithms. In this work, we analyze one of these techniques called quantum circuit cutting. With circuit cutting, a quantum circuit is decomposed into smaller sub-circuits, each of which can be run on smaller quantum hardware. We compare the performance of quantum circuit cutting with different cutting strategies, and then apply circuit cutting to a QAOA algorithm. Using simulations, we first show that Randomized Clifford measurements outperform both Pauli and random unitary measurements. Second, we show that circuit cutting has trouble providing correct answers in noisy settings, especially as the number of circuits increases.
A limited number of qubits, high error rates, and limited qubit connectivity are major challenges for effective near-term quantum computations. Quantum circuit partitioning divides a quantum computation into classical postprocessing steps and a set of smaller-scale quantum computations that individually require fewer qubits, lower qubit connectivity, and typically incur less error. However, as partitioning generally increases the duration of a quantum computation exponentially in the required partitioning effort, it is crucial to select optimal partitioning points, so-called cuts, and to use optimal cut realizations. In this work, we develop the first optimal partitioning method relying on quantum circuit knitting for optimal cut realizations and an optimal selection of wire cuts and gate cuts that trades off ancilla qubit insertions for a decrease in quantum computing time. Using this combination, the developed method demonstrates a reduction in quantum computing runtime by 41% on average compared to previous quantum circuit partitioning methods. Furthermore, the qubit requirement of the evaluated quantum circuits was reduced by 40% on average for a runtime budget of one hour and a sampling frequency of 1 kHz. These results highlight the optimality gap of previous quantum circuit partitioning methods and the possible extension in the computational reach of near-term quantum computers.
Circuit cutting enables quantum computations to be decomposed into smaller subcircuits at the cost of additional sampling overhead. Gate-cutting provides one such approach by replacing nonlocal gates with quasiprobability decompositions of local operations. Starting from the known optimal two-qubit gate-cutting formula, we derive complete sharp lower and upper envelopes relating the quasiprobability extent γγγ to five established descriptors: entangling power, gate typicality, operator entanglement, Schmidt strength, and maximum product-input concurrence. We recast γγγ as a Rényi-1/21/21/2 functional of the operator-Schmidt spectrum and show how the physical constraints on two-qubit spectra sharpen generic entropy bounds and select a small set of recurring extremal Cartan families. None of the five descriptors generically determines γγγ alone, but each imposes exact constraints, revealing how substantially the optimal gate-cutting cost can vary between gates with similar nonlocal characteristics.
Circuit knitting emerges as a promising technique to overcome the limitation of the few physical qubits in near-term quantum hardware by cutting large quantum circuits into smaller subcircuits. Recent research in this area has been primarily oriented towards reducing subcircuit sampling overhead. Unfortunately, these works neglect hardware information during circuit cutting, thus posing significant challenges to the follow on stages. In fact, direct compilation and execution of these partitioned subcircuits yields low-fidelity results, highlighting the need for a more holistic optimization strategy.
Circuit knitting is the process of partitioning large quantum circuits into smaller subcircuits such that the result of the original circuits can be deduced by only running the subcircuits. Such techniques will be crucial for near-term and early fault-tolerant quantum computers, as the limited number of qubits is likely to be a major bottleneck for demonstrating quantum advantage. One typically distinguishes between gate cuts and wire cuts when partitioning a circuit. The cost for any circuit knitting approach scales exponentially in the number of cuts. One possibility to realize a cut is via the quasiprobability simulation technique. In fact, we argue that all existing rigorous circuit knitting techniques can be understood in this framework. Furthermore, we characterize the optimal overhead for wire cuts where the subcircuits can exchange classical information or not. We show that the optimal cost for cuttingnwires without and with classical communication between the subcircuits scales asO(16n) andO(4n), respectively.