Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2303.03831 · Entropy

Models for Quantum Measurement of Particles with Higher Spin

Theo M. Nieuwenhuizen

Published Nov 29, 2022• 4 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The Curie–Weiss model for quantum measurement describes the dynamical measurement of a spin-12 by an apparatus consisting of an Ising magnet of many spins 12 coupled to a thermal phonon bath. To measure the z-component s=−l,−l+1,⋯,l of a spin l, a class of models is designed along the same lines, which involve 2l order parameters. As required for unbiased measurement, the Hamiltonian of the magnet, its entropy and the interaction Hamiltonian possess an invariance under the permutation s→s+1 mod 2l+1. The theory is worked out for the spin-1 case, where the thermodynamics is analyzed in detail, and, for spins 32,2,52, the thermodynamics and the invariance are presented.

DOI
10.3390/e24121746

Related papers

Dynamics of ideal quantum measurement of a spin 1 with a Curie-Weiss magnet

Theodorus Maria Nieuwenhuizen

Quantum measurement is a dynamical process of an apparatus coupled to a test system. Ideal measurement of the $z$-component of a spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ ($s_z=\pm\frac{1}{2}$) has been modeled by the Curie-Weiss model for quantum measurement. Recently, the model was generalized to higher spin and the thermodynamics was solved. Here the dynamics is considered. To this end, the dynamics for spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ case are cast in general notation. The dynamics of the measurement of the $z$-component of a spin-1 ($s_z=0,\pm 1$) are solved in detail and evaluated numerically. Energy costs of the measurement, which are macroscopic, are evaluated. Generalization to higher spin is straightforward.

quant-pharXiv:2603.07153•Frontiers in Quantum Science and Technology•Mar 10, 2026•0 citations

Curie-Weiss model of the quantum measurement process

ARMEN E. ALLAHVERDYAN, Roger Balian, Theo M. Nieuwenhuizen

A Hamiltonian model is solved, which satisfies all requirements for a realistic ideal quantum measurement. The system S is a spin-½, whose z -component is measured through coupling with an apparatus A = M + B, consisting of a magnet M formed by a set of N >> 1 spins with quartic infinite-range Ising interactions, and a phonon bath B at temperature T . Initially A is in a metastable paramagnetic phase. The process involves several time-scales. Without being much affected, A first acts on S, whose state collapses in a very brief time. The mechanism differs from the usual decoherence. Soon after its irreversibility is achieved. Finally, the field induced by S on M, which may take two opposite values with probabilities given by Born's rule, drives A into its up or down ferromagnetic phase. The overall final state involves the expected correlations between the result registered in M and the state of S. The measurement is thus accounted for by standard quantum-statistical mechanics and its specific features arise from the macroscopic size of the apparatus.

arXiv:cond-mat/0203460•Europhysics Letters (EPL)•Feb 1, 2003•54 citations

Phase Transitions and Quantum Measurements

ARMEN E. ALLAHVERDYAN

In a quantum measurement, a coupling g between the system S and the apparatus A triggers the establishment of correlations, which provide statistical information about S. Robust registration requires A to be macroscopic, and a dynamical symmetry breaking of A governed by S allows the absence of any bias. Phase transitions are thus a paradigm for quantum measurement apparatuses, with the order parameter as pointer variable. The coupling g behaves as the source of symmetry breaking. The exact solution of a model where S is a single spin and A a magnetic dot (consisting of N interacting spins and a phonon thermal bath) exhibits the reduction of the state as a relaxation process of the off‐diagonal elements of S + A, rapid due to the large size of N. The registration of the diagonal elements involves a slower relaxation from the initial paramagnetic state of A to either one of its ferromagnetic states. If g is too weak, the measurement fails due to a “Buridan’s ass” effect. The probability distribution for the magnetization then develops not one but two narrow peaks at the ferromagnetic values. During its evolution it goes through wide shapes extending between these values.

arXiv:quant-ph/0508162•AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2006•5 citations

Simultaneous measurement of two noncommuting quantum variables: Solution of a dynamical model

Martí Perarnau-Llobet, Theo M. Nieuwenhuizen

The possibility of performing simultaneous measurements in quantum mechanics is investigated in the context of the Curie-Weiss model for a projective measurement. Concretely, we consider a spin--$\frac{1}{2}$ system simultaneously interacting with two magnets, which act as measuring apparatuses of two different spin components. We work out the dynamics of this process and determine the final state of the measuring apparatuses, from which we can find the probabilities of the four possible outcomes of the measurements. The measurement is found to be nonideal, as (i) the joint statistics do not coincide with the one obtained by separately measuring each spin component, and (ii) the density matrix of the spin does not collapse in either of the measured observables. However, we give an operational interpretation of the process as a generalized quantum measurement, and show that it is fully informative: The expected value of the measured spin components can be found with arbitrary precision for sufficiently many runs of the experiment.

arXiv:1611.07937•Physical Review A•May 30, 2017•20 citations

THE QUANTUM MEASUREMENT PROCESS: LESSONS FROM AN EXACTLY SOLVABLE MODEL

ARMEN E. ALLAHVERDYAN, Roger Balian, Theo M. Nieuwenhuizen

The measurement of a spin-$\half$ is modeled by coupling it to an apparatus, that consists of an Ising magnetic dot coupled to a phonon bath. Features of quantum measurements are derived from the dynamical solution of the measurement, regarded as a process of quantum statistical mechanics. Schrödinger cat terms involving both the system and the apparatus, die out very quickly, while the registration is a process taking the apparatus from its initially metastable state to one of its stable final states. The occurrence of Born probabilities can be inferred at the macroscopic level, by looking at the pointer alone. Apparent non-unitary behavior of the measurement process is explained by the arisal of small many particle correlations, that characterize relaxation.

arXiv:quant-ph/0702135•Beyond the Quantum•Sep 1, 2007•8 citations

The quantum measurement process in an exactly solvable model

ARMEN E. ALLAHVERDYAN

An exactly solvable model for a quantum measurement is discussed which is governed by hamiltonian quantum dynamics. The z‐component ŝz of a spin −12 is measured with an apparatus, which itself consists of magnet coupled to a bath. The initial state of the magnet is a metastable paramagnet, while the bath starts in a thermal, gibbsian state. Conditions are such that the act of measurement drives the magnet in the up or down ferromagnetic state according to the sign of sz of the tested spin. The quantum measurement goes in two steps. On a timescale 1/N the off‐diagonal elements of the spin’s density matrix vanish due to a unitary evolution of the tested spin and the N apparatus spins; on a larger but still short timescale this is made definite by the bath. Then the system is in a ‘classical’ state, having a diagonal density matrix. The registration of that state is a quantum process which can already be understood from classical statistical mechanics. The von Neumann collapse and the Born rule are derived rather than postulated.

arXiv:cond-mat/0408316•AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2005•16 citations
The Curie–Weiss model for quantum measurement describes the dynamical measurement of a spin-12 by an apparatus consisting of an Ising magnet of many spins 12 coupled to a thermal phonon bath. To measure the z-component s=−l,−l+1,⋯,l of a spin l, a class of models is designed along the same lines, which involve 2l order parameters. As required for unbiased measurement, the Hamiltonian of the magnet, its entropy and the interaction Hamiltonian possess an invariance under the permutation s→s+1 mod 2l+1. The theory is worked out for the spin-1 case, where the thermodynamics is analyzed in detail, and, for spins 32,2,52, the thermodynamics and the invariance are presented.
Quantum measurement is a dynamical process of an apparatus coupled to a test system. Ideal measurement of the zzz-component of a spin-12\frac{1}{2}21​ (sz=±12s_z=\pm\frac{1}{2}sz​=±21​) has been modeled by the Curie-Weiss model for quantum measurement. Recently, the model was generalized to higher spin and the thermodynamics was solved. Here the dynamics is considered. To this end, the dynamics for spin-12\frac{1}{2}21​ case are cast in general notation. The dynamics of the measurement of the zzz-component of a spin-1 (sz=0,±1s_z=0,\pm 1sz​=0,±1) are solved in detail and evaluated numerically. Energy costs of the measurement, which are macroscopic, are evaluated. Generalization to higher spin is straightforward.
A Hamiltonian model is solved, which satisfies all requirements for a realistic ideal quantum measurement. The system S is a spin-½, whose z -component is measured through coupling with an apparatus A = M + B, consisting of a magnet M formed by a set of N >> 1 spins with quartic infinite-range Ising interactions, and a phonon bath B at temperature T . Initially A is in a metastable paramagnetic phase. The process involves several time-scales. Without being much affected, A first acts on S, whose state collapses in a very brief time. The mechanism differs from the usual decoherence. Soon after its irreversibility is achieved. Finally, the field induced by S on M, which may take two opposite values with probabilities given by Born's rule, drives A into its up or down ferromagnetic phase. The overall final state involves the expected correlations between the result registered in M and the state of S. The measurement is thus accounted for by standard quantum-statistical mechanics and its specific features arise from the macroscopic size of the apparatus.
In a quantum measurement, a coupling g between the system S and the apparatus A triggers the establishment of correlations, which provide statistical information about S. Robust registration requires A to be macroscopic, and a dynamical symmetry breaking of A governed by S allows the absence of any bias. Phase transitions are thus a paradigm for quantum measurement apparatuses, with the order parameter as pointer variable. The coupling g behaves as the source of symmetry breaking. The exact solution of a model where S is a single spin and A a magnetic dot (consisting of N interacting spins and a phonon thermal bath) exhibits the reduction of the state as a relaxation process of the off‐diagonal elements of S + A, rapid due to the large size of N. The registration of the diagonal elements involves a slower relaxation from the initial paramagnetic state of A to either one of its ferromagnetic states. If g is too weak, the measurement fails due to a “Buridan’s ass” effect. The probability distribution for the magnetization then develops not one but two narrow peaks at the ferromagnetic values. During its evolution it goes through wide shapes extending between these values.
The possibility of performing simultaneous measurements in quantum mechanics is investigated in the context of the Curie-Weiss model for a projective measurement. Concretely, we consider a spin--12\frac{1}{2}21​ system simultaneously interacting with two magnets, which act as measuring apparatuses of two different spin components. We work out the dynamics of this process and determine the final state of the measuring apparatuses, from which we can find the probabilities of the four possible outcomes of the measurements. The measurement is found to be nonideal, as (i) the joint statistics do not coincide with the one obtained by separately measuring each spin component, and (ii) the density matrix of the spin does not collapse in either of the measured observables. However, we give an operational interpretation of the process as a generalized quantum measurement, and show that it is fully informative: The expected value of the measured spin components can be found with arbitrary precision for sufficiently many runs of the experiment.
The measurement of a spin-$\half$ is modeled by coupling it to an apparatus, that consists of an Ising magnetic dot coupled to a phonon bath. Features of quantum measurements are derived from the dynamical solution of the measurement, regarded as a process of quantum statistical mechanics. Schrödinger cat terms involving both the system and the apparatus, die out very quickly, while the registration is a process taking the apparatus from its initially metastable state to one of its stable final states. The occurrence of Born probabilities can be inferred at the macroscopic level, by looking at the pointer alone. Apparent non-unitary behavior of the measurement process is explained by the arisal of small many particle correlations, that characterize relaxation.
An exactly solvable model for a quantum measurement is discussed which is governed by hamiltonian quantum dynamics. The z‐component ŝz of a spin −12 is measured with an apparatus, which itself consists of magnet coupled to a bath. The initial state of the magnet is a metastable paramagnet, while the bath starts in a thermal, gibbsian state. Conditions are such that the act of measurement drives the magnet in the up or down ferromagnetic state according to the sign of sz of the tested spin. The quantum measurement goes in two steps. On a timescale 1/N the off‐diagonal elements of the spin’s density matrix vanish due to a unitary evolution of the tested spin and the N apparatus spins; on a larger but still short timescale this is made definite by the bath. Then the system is in a ‘classical’ state, having a diagonal density matrix. The registration of that state is a quantum process which can already be understood from classical statistical mechanics. The von Neumann collapse and the Born rule are derived rather than postulated.