Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2210.01890 · Optical Trapping and Optical Micromanipulation

Linear and angular momenta of photons in the context of "which path" experiments of quantum mechanics

Masud Mansuripur

Published Oct 3, 2022• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In optical experiments involving a single photon that takes alternative paths through an optical system and ultimately interferes with itself (e.g., Young's double-slit experiment, Mach-Zehnder interferometer, Sagnac interferometer), there exist fundamental connections between the linear and angular momenta of the photon on the one hand, and the ability of an observer to determine the photon's path through the system on the other hand. This paper examines the arguments that relate the photon momenta (through the Heisenberg uncertainty principle) to the "which path" (German: welcher Weg) question at the heart of quantum mechanics. We show that the linear momenta imparted to apertures or mirrors, or the angular momenta picked up by strategically placed wave-plates in a system, could lead to an identification of the photon's path only at the expense of destroying the corresponding interference effects. We also describe a thought experiment involving the scattering of a circularly-polarized photon from a pair of small particles kept at a fixed distance from one another. The exchange of angular momentum between the photon and the scattering particle in this instance appears to provide the "which path" information that must, of necessity, wipe out the corresponding interference fringes, although the fringe-wipe-out mechanism does not seem to involve the uncertainty principle in any obvious way.

DOI
10.1117/12.2632866

Related papers

Taking the quantum eraser to the abstract world

Isaac M. Nape, Bienvenu I. Ndagano, Andrew Forbes

Youngs double slit experiment is one of the most celebrated achievements in quantum and classical optics; it provides experimental proof of the wave-particle duality of light. When the paths of the double slit are marked with orthogonal polarizations, the path information is revealed and no interference pattern is observed. However, the path information can be erased with a complimentary analysis of the polarization. Here we use hybrid entanglement between photons carrying orbital angular momentum and polarization to show that, just as in Young's experiment, the paths (OAM) marked with polarization do not lead to interference. However, when introducing the eraser (polarizer) which projects the polarization of one of the entangled photons onto a complementary polarization basis, the OAM (paths) are allowed to interfere, leading to the formation of azimuthal fringes whose frequency is proportional to the OAM content carried by the photon.

Quantum Communications and Quantum Imaging•Aug 30, 2017•0 citations

Which Way?

Hu Zhan

I report the result of a which-way experiment based on Young's double-slit experiment. It reveals which slit photons go through while retaining the (self) interference of all the photons collected. The idea is to image the slits using a lens with a narrow aperture and scan across the area where the interference fringes would be. The aperture is wide enough to separate the slits in the images, i.e., telling which way. The illumination pattern over the pupil is reconstructed from the series of slit intensities. The result matches the double-slit interference pattern well. As such, the photon's wave-like and particle-like behaviors are observed simultaneously in a straightforward and thus unambiguous way. The implication is far reaching. For one, it presses hard, at least philosophically, for a consolidated wave-and-particle description of quantum objects, because we can no longer dismiss such a challenge on the basis that the two behaviors do not manifest at the same time. A bold proposal is to forgo the concept of particles. Then, Heisenberg's uncertainty principle would be purely a consequence of waves without being ordained upon particles.

arXiv:1604.01481•Apr 6, 2016•0 citations

Quantum Optical Discussion of Uncertainty and Complementarity in a Mach-Zehnder Interferometer

Doron ludwin, Y. Ben-Aryeh, A. Mann

We discuss complementarity and uncertainty in a gedanken Which-Way (Welcher-Weg) experiment in a Mach-Zehnder interferometer. Although a Welcher-Weg measurement can be performed with only a negligible amount of momentum change in the detector itself, the change in the interference pattern must correspond to a change in the momentum distribution of the particle. Entanglement between the Mach-Zehnder interferometer and the Welcher-Weg measurement introduces orthogonality that disables the interference of the particle, but simultaneously, it also generates a momentum transfer between the particle and other parts of the whole entangled system (including macroscopic parts). This analysis can be related to the Delayed Choice interpretation. We show where the momentum change takes place and we conclude that entanglement is the key to understand how complementarity (i.e. Which Way versus interference) and the position-momentum uncertainty relation are interwoven.

arXiv:quant-ph/0008096•Aug 23, 2000•0 citations

Quantum Optics and Informatics

Davıd L. Andrews, David S. Bradshaw

3.1 Interference of a Single Photon The kinds of study originally conducted by Thomas Young - in particular, the celebrated "double slit" experiment that we briefly examined in Chapter 1 (see Fig. 1) - provide a capacity to reveal far more than the wave nature of light, important as that is. True enough, the observed characteristic fringe pattern, when monochromatic light passes through two closely spaced slits onto a screen, appears to be simply explicable on the basis of waves from each slit undergoing constructive and destructive interference at different positions on the screen. Yet, astonishingly, these patterns of interference are still exhibited when individual photons of a low-intensity input beam reach the screen one at a time, showing that it cannot in fact be a matter of different photons having to interfere with each other. Indeed, Dirac enunciated the general principle that photons can never directly interact with each other. The double slit and other such experiments indicate that each photon interacts in a delocalized, wave-like manner with both slits at the same time. Successive experiments build interference patterns that conform to an exact mathematical distribution formula, but the position at which an individual photon is detected in any particular instance cannot be predicted; this is a quintessential illustration of quantum uncertainty. Using the path integral approach of quantum theory, the phenomenon is more accurately represented by introducing a summation over all possible routes between the source and the screen on which the pattern appears, signifying an entire "lifetime" for each photon involved in the experiment. This relates to the fact that the actual trajectory is unknown without an observation, and thus we only obtain the probabilities of the photon striking the screen at different positions and times; all trajectories (potentialities) must be considered in a superposition. Each route is considered equally probable, and the variation in phase produces quantum interference. The differences in phase of each trajectory, at varying positions on the screen, generates the fringe pattern. An intriguing variation on this experiment involves "marking" the photons so that the actual route of each photon to the screen is known. Remarkably, in such a case, the fringe patterns do not appear because quantum interference cannot occur. A consequence of the observation of the photon route is an effect that, in other quantum mechanical connections, is known as a collapse of the wavefunction. However, it is possible for the fringe patterns to reappear when information on the route of the photons is lost; this is known as a quantum eraser.

SPIE eBooks•Aug 1, 2018•0 citations

Proposal for a QND which-path measurement using photons

S. Yang, M. G. Raymer

A scheme is proposed for experimentally achieving the famous two-slit gedanken experiment using photons. A particle’s quantum pathways can interfere to produce fringes in the probability for the particle to be found at some location. If the path taken by the particle is experimentally determined, the complementarity principle says that the fringes must disappear. To carry out this experiment with photons is difficult because normally the act of determining a photon’s location destroys it. We propose to overcome this by putting a type-II optical parametric amplifier (OPA) in each arm of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer and observing fringes at the output. An OPA responds to an input photon by increasing its probability to produce a pair of photons, one having polarization orthogonal to the input photon.

Annual Meeting Optical Society of America•Jan 1, 1991•0 citations

Revisiting self-interference in double-slit experiments

S. Kim, Byoung Seung HAM

Over the past several decades, single photon-based path interference in double-slit experiment has been well demonstrated for the particle nature of photons satisfying complementarity theory, where the quantum mechanical interpretation of the single photon interference fringe is given by Born rule for complex amplitudes in measurements. Unlike most conventional methods using entangled photon pairs, here, a classical coherent light source is directly applied for the proof of the same self-interference phenomenon. Instead of double slits, we use a Mach-Zehnder interferometer as usual, where the resulting self-interference fringe of coherent single photons is exactly the same as that of the coherent photon ensemble of the laser, demonstrating that the classical coherence based on the wave nature is rooted in the single photon self-interference. This unexpected result seems to contradict our common understanding of decoherence phenomena caused by multi-wave interference among bandwidth distributed photons in coherence optics.

•Apr 16, 2021•1 citation
In optical experiments involving a single photon that takes alternative paths through an optical system and ultimately interferes with itself (e.g., Young's double-slit experiment, Mach-Zehnder interferometer, Sagnac interferometer), there exist fundamental connections between the linear and angular momenta of the photon on the one hand, and the ability of an observer to determine the photon's path through the system on the other hand. This paper examines the arguments that relate the photon momenta (through the Heisenberg uncertainty principle) to the "which path" (German: welcher Weg) question at the heart of quantum mechanics. We show that the linear momenta imparted to apertures or mirrors, or the angular momenta picked up by strategically placed wave-plates in a system, could lead to an identification of the photon's path only at the expense of destroying the corresponding interference effects. We also describe a thought experiment involving the scattering of a circularly-polarized photon from a pair of small particles kept at a fixed distance from one another. The exchange of angular momentum between the photon and the scattering particle in this instance appears to provide the "which path" information that must, of necessity, wipe out the corresponding interference fringes, although the fringe-wipe-out mechanism does not seem to involve the uncertainty principle in any obvious way.
Youngs double slit experiment is one of the most celebrated achievements in quantum and classical optics; it provides experimental proof of the wave-particle duality of light. When the paths of the double slit are marked with orthogonal polarizations, the path information is revealed and no interference pattern is observed. However, the path information can be erased with a complimentary analysis of the polarization. Here we use hybrid entanglement between photons carrying orbital angular momentum and polarization to show that, just as in Young's experiment, the paths (OAM) marked with polarization do not lead to interference. However, when introducing the eraser (polarizer) which projects the polarization of one of the entangled photons onto a complementary polarization basis, the OAM (paths) are allowed to interfere, leading to the formation of azimuthal fringes whose frequency is proportional to the OAM content carried by the photon.
I report the result of a which-way experiment based on Young's double-slit experiment. It reveals which slit photons go through while retaining the (self) interference of all the photons collected. The idea is to image the slits using a lens with a narrow aperture and scan across the area where the interference fringes would be. The aperture is wide enough to separate the slits in the images, i.e., telling which way. The illumination pattern over the pupil is reconstructed from the series of slit intensities. The result matches the double-slit interference pattern well. As such, the photon's wave-like and particle-like behaviors are observed simultaneously in a straightforward and thus unambiguous way. The implication is far reaching. For one, it presses hard, at least philosophically, for a consolidated wave-and-particle description of quantum objects, because we can no longer dismiss such a challenge on the basis that the two behaviors do not manifest at the same time. A bold proposal is to forgo the concept of particles. Then, Heisenberg's uncertainty principle would be purely a consequence of waves without being ordained upon particles.
We discuss complementarity and uncertainty in a gedanken Which-Way (Welcher-Weg) experiment in a Mach-Zehnder interferometer. Although a Welcher-Weg measurement can be performed with only a negligible amount of momentum change in the detector itself, the change in the interference pattern must correspond to a change in the momentum distribution of the particle. Entanglement between the Mach-Zehnder interferometer and the Welcher-Weg measurement introduces orthogonality that disables the interference of the particle, but simultaneously, it also generates a momentum transfer between the particle and other parts of the whole entangled system (including macroscopic parts). This analysis can be related to the Delayed Choice interpretation. We show where the momentum change takes place and we conclude that entanglement is the key to understand how complementarity (i.e. Which Way versus interference) and the position-momentum uncertainty relation are interwoven.
3.1 Interference of a Single Photon The kinds of study originally conducted by Thomas Young - in particular, the celebrated "double slit" experiment that we briefly examined in Chapter 1 (see Fig. 1) - provide a capacity to reveal far more than the wave nature of light, important as that is. True enough, the observed characteristic fringe pattern, when monochromatic light passes through two closely spaced slits onto a screen, appears to be simply explicable on the basis of waves from each slit undergoing constructive and destructive interference at different positions on the screen. Yet, astonishingly, these patterns of interference are still exhibited when individual photons of a low-intensity input beam reach the screen one at a time, showing that it cannot in fact be a matter of different photons having to interfere with each other. Indeed, Dirac enunciated the general principle that photons can never directly interact with each other. The double slit and other such experiments indicate that each photon interacts in a delocalized, wave-like manner with both slits at the same time. Successive experiments build interference patterns that conform to an exact mathematical distribution formula, but the position at which an individual photon is detected in any particular instance cannot be predicted; this is a quintessential illustration of quantum uncertainty. Using the path integral approach of quantum theory, the phenomenon is more accurately represented by introducing a summation over all possible routes between the source and the screen on which the pattern appears, signifying an entire "lifetime" for each photon involved in the experiment. This relates to the fact that the actual trajectory is unknown without an observation, and thus we only obtain the probabilities of the photon striking the screen at different positions and times; all trajectories (potentialities) must be considered in a superposition. Each route is considered equally probable, and the variation in phase produces quantum interference. The differences in phase of each trajectory, at varying positions on the screen, generates the fringe pattern. An intriguing variation on this experiment involves "marking" the photons so that the actual route of each photon to the screen is known. Remarkably, in such a case, the fringe patterns do not appear because quantum interference cannot occur. A consequence of the observation of the photon route is an effect that, in other quantum mechanical connections, is known as a collapse of the wavefunction. However, it is possible for the fringe patterns to reappear when information on the route of the photons is lost; this is known as a quantum eraser.
A scheme is proposed for experimentally achieving the famous two-slit gedanken experiment using photons. A particle’s quantum pathways can interfere to produce fringes in the probability for the particle to be found at some location. If the path taken by the particle is experimentally determined, the complementarity principle says that the fringes must disappear. To carry out this experiment with photons is difficult because normally the act of determining a photon’s location destroys it. We propose to overcome this by putting a type-II optical parametric amplifier (OPA) in each arm of a Mach-Zehnder interferometer and observing fringes at the output. An OPA responds to an input photon by increasing its probability to produce a pair of photons, one having polarization orthogonal to the input photon.
Over the past several decades, single photon-based path interference in double-slit experiment has been well demonstrated for the particle nature of photons satisfying complementarity theory, where the quantum mechanical interpretation of the single photon interference fringe is given by Born rule for complex amplitudes in measurements. Unlike most conventional methods using entangled photon pairs, here, a classical coherent light source is directly applied for the proof of the same self-interference phenomenon. Instead of double slits, we use a Mach-Zehnder interferometer as usual, where the resulting self-interference fringe of coherent single photons is exactly the same as that of the coherent photon ensemble of the laser, demonstrating that the classical coherence based on the wave nature is rooted in the single photon self-interference. This unexpected result seems to contradict our common understanding of decoherence phenomena caused by multi-wave interference among bandwidth distributed photons in coherence optics.