Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2208.11797 · New Journal of Physics

Noise tailoring for robust amplitude estimation

Archismita Dalal, Amara Katabarwa

Published Jan 24, 2023• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Abstract A universal fault-tolerant quantum computer holds the promise to speed up computational problems that are otherwise intractable on classical computers; however, for the next decade or so, our access is restricted to noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) computers and, perhaps, early fault tolerant (EFT) quantum computers. This motivates the development of many near-term quantum algorithms including robust amplitude estimation (RAE), which is a quantum-enhanced algorithm for estimating expectation values. One obstacle to using RAE has been a paucity of ways of getting realistic error models incorporated into this algorithm. So far the impact of device noise on RAE is incorporated into one of its subroutines as an exponential decay model, which is unrealistic for NISQ devices and, maybe, for EFT devices; this hinders the performance of RAE. Rather than trying to explicitly model realistic noise effects, which may be infeasible, we circumvent this obstacle by tailoring device noise using randomized compiling to generate an effective noise model, whose impact on RAE closely resembles that of the exponential decay model. Using noisy simulations, we show that our noise-tailored RAE algorithm is able to regain improvements in both bias and precision that are expected for RAE. Additionally, on IBM’s quantum computer ibmq_belem our algorithm demonstrates advantage over the standard estimation technique in reducing bias. Thus, our work extends the feasibility of RAE on NISQ computers, consequently bringing us one step closer towards achieving quantum advantage using these devices.

DOI
10.1088/1367-2630/acb5bc

Related papers

Reducing runtime and error in VQE using deeper and noisier quantum circuits

Amara Katabarwa, Alexander A. Kunitsa, Borja Peropadre +1 more

The rapid development of noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices has raised the question of whether or not these devices will find commercial use. Unfortunately, a major shortcoming of many proposed NISQ-amenable algorithms, such as the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE), is coming into view: the algorithms require too many independent quantum measurements to solve practical problems in a reasonable amount of time. This motivates the central question of our work: how might we speed up such algorithms in spite of the impact of error on NISQ computations? We demonstrate on quantum hardware that the estimation of expectation values, a core subroutine of many quantum algorithms including VQE, can be improved in terms of precision and accuracy by using a technique we call Robust Amplitude Estimation. Consequently, this method reduces the runtime to achieve the same mean-squared error compared to the standard prepare-and-measure estimation method. The surprising result is that by using deeper, and therefore more error-prone, quantum circuits, we realize more accurate quantum computations in less time. As the quality of quantum devices improves, this method will provide a proportional reduction in estimation runtime. This technique may be used to speed up quantum computations into the regime of early fault-tolerant quantum computation and aid in the realization of quantum advantage.

arXiv:2110.10664•Oct 20, 2021•6 citations

Experimental demonstration of Robust Amplitude Estimation on near-term quantum devices for chemistry applications

Alexander A. Kunitsa, Nicole Bellonzi, Shangjie Guo +4 more

This study explores hardware implementation of Robust Amplitude Estimation (RAE) on IBM quantum devices, demonstrating its application in quantum chemistry for one- and two-qubit Hamiltonian systems. Known for potentially offering quadratic speedups over traditional methods in estimating expectation values, RAE is evaluated under realistic noisy conditions. Our experiments provide detailed insights into the practical challenges associated with RAE. We achieved a significant reduction in sampling requirements compared to direct measurement techniques. In estimating the ground state energy of the hydrogen molecule, the RAE implementation demonstrated two orders of magnitude better accuracy for the two-qubit experiments and achieved chemical accuracy. These findings reveal its potential to enhance computational efficiencies in quantum chemistry applications despite the inherent limitations posed by hardware noise. We also found that its performance can be adversely impacted by coherent error and device stability and does not always correlate with the average gate error. These results underscore the importance of adapting quantum computational methods to hardware specifics to realize their full potential in practical scenarios.

arXiv:2410.00686•Oct 1, 2024•1 citation

Noise Resilience and the Quantum-Classical Boundary for NISQ Devices

Yalla Jnan Devi Satya Prasad

As quantum processors move into the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era, the central question is no longer whether a quantum algorithm is asymptotically faster than its classical counterpart, but whether it can retain a meaningful speedup under realistic noise, compilation, and measurement constraints. This work develops a quantitative framework for characterizing the noise resilience of quantum advantage. We introduce the advantage robustness function RA(ε), which measures how the asymptotic and concrete performance of an algorithm A degrades with physical error rate ε, and we compute it analytically or numerically for twelve representative algorithm families, including Grover search, amplitude estimation, phase estimation, HHL, VQE/QAOA, Hamiltonian simulation, and sampling algorithms. For each class, we derive critical noise thresholds and depth limits beyond which classical algorithms regain supremacy, explicitly incorporating realistic connectivity and compilation overheads. We show that algorithms based on coherent amplitude amplification are more fragile to coherent errors than depolarizing noise, while variational algorithms display a tradeoff between expressivity and robustness. By combining these algorithm-specific robustness curves with current and projected hardware error rates for superconducting, trapped-ion, neutralatom, and photonic platforms, we map out a phase diagram of practical quantum advantage that links problem size, noise rate, and algorithm type. Our analysis identifies promising near-term application windows in risk analytics, small-molecule chemistry, and structured optimization, and also delineates regions where no advantage is realistic, providing valuable guidance for both algorithm designers and hardware architects.

•Dec 18, 2025•0 citations

The Quantum Amplitude Estimation Algorithms on Near-Term Devices: A Practical Guide

Marco Maronese, Massimiliano Incudini, Luca Asproni +1 more

The Quantum Amplitude Estimation (QAE) algorithm is a major quantum algorithm designed to achieve a quadratic speed-up. Until fault-tolerant quantum computing is achieved, being competitive over classical Monte Carlo (MC) remains elusive. Alternative methods have been developed so as to require fewer resources while maintaining an advantageous theoretical scaling. We compared the standard QAE algorithm with two Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ)-friendly versions of QAE on a numerical integration task, with the Monte Carlo technique of Metropolis–Hastings as a classical benchmark. The algorithms were evaluated in terms of the estimation error as a function of the number of samples, computational time, and length of the quantum circuits required by the solutions, respectively. The effectiveness of the two QAE alternatives was tested on an 11-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer in order to verify which solution can first provide a speed-up in the integral estimation problems. We concluded that an alternative approach is preferable with respect to employing the phase estimation routine. Indeed, the Maximum Likelihood estimation guaranteed the best trade-off between the length of the quantum circuits and the precision in the integral estimation, as well as greater resistance to noise.

Quantum Reports•Dec 24, 2023•7 citations

Reducing the cost of energy estimation in the variational quantum eigensolver algorithm with robust amplitude estimation

Johnson, Peter D., Alexander A. Kunitsa, Jérôme F. Gonthier +5 more

Quantum chemistry and materials is one of the most promising applications of quantum computing. Yet much work is still to be done in matching industry-relevant problems in these areas with quantum algorithms that can solve them. Most previous efforts have carried out resource estimations for quantum algorithms run on large-scale fault-tolerant architectures, which include the quantum phase estimation algorithm. In contrast, few have assessed the performance of near-term quantum algorithms, which include the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) algorithm. Recently, a large-scale benchmark study [Gonthier et al. 2020] found evidence that the performance of the variational quantum eigensolver for a set of industry-relevant molecules may be too inefficient to be of practical use. This motivates the need for developing and assessing methods that improve the efficiency of VQE. In this work, we predict the runtime of the energy estimation subroutine of VQE when using robust amplitude estimation (RAE) to estimate Pauli expectation values. Under conservative assumptions, our resource estimation predicts that RAE can reduce the runtime over the standard estimation method in VQE by one to two orders of magnitude. Despite this improvement, we find that the runtimes are still too large to be practical. These findings motivate two complementary efforts towards quantum advantage: 1) the investigation of more efficient near-term methods for ground state energy estimation and 2) the development of problem instances that are of industrial value and classically challenging, but better suited to quantum computation.

arXiv:2203.07275•Mar 14, 2022•12 citations

Quantum Amplitude Estimation in the Presence of Noise

Brown, Eric G., Oktay Göktaş, W. K. Tham

Quantum Amplitude Estimation (QAE) -- a technique by which the amplitude of a given quantum state can be estimated with quadratically fewer queries than by standard sampling -- is a key sub-routine in several important quantum algorithms, including Grover search and Quantum Monte-Carlo methods. An obstacle to implementing QAE in near-term noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices has been the need to perform Quantum Phase Estimation (QPE) -- a costly procedure -- as a sub-routine. This impediment was lifted with various QPE-free methods of QAE, wherein Grover queries of varying depths / powers (often according to a "schedule") are followed immediately by measurements and classical post-processing techniques like maximum likelihood estimation (MLE). Existing analyses as to the optimality of various query schedules in these QPE-free QAE schemes have hitherto assumed noise-free systems. In this work, we analyse QPE-free QAE under common noise models that may afflict NISQ devices and report on the optimality of various query schedules in the noisy regime. We demonstrate that, given an accurate noise characterization of one's system, one must choose a schedule that balances the trade-off between the greater ideal performance achieved by higher-depth circuits, and the correspondingly greater accumulation of noise-induced error.

arXiv:2006.14145•Jun 25, 2020•11 citations
Abstract A universal fault-tolerant quantum computer holds the promise to speed up computational problems that are otherwise intractable on classical computers; however, for the next decade or so, our access is restricted to noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) computers and, perhaps, early fault tolerant (EFT) quantum computers. This motivates the development of many near-term quantum algorithms including robust amplitude estimation (RAE), which is a quantum-enhanced algorithm for estimating expectation values. One obstacle to using RAE has been a paucity of ways of getting realistic error models incorporated into this algorithm. So far the impact of device noise on RAE is incorporated into one of its subroutines as an exponential decay model, which is unrealistic for NISQ devices and, maybe, for EFT devices; this hinders the performance of RAE. Rather than trying to explicitly model realistic noise effects, which may be infeasible, we circumvent this obstacle by tailoring device noise using randomized compiling to generate an effective noise model, whose impact on RAE closely resembles that of the exponential decay model. Using noisy simulations, we show that our noise-tailored RAE algorithm is able to regain improvements in both bias and precision that are expected for RAE. Additionally, on IBM’s quantum computer ibmq_belem our algorithm demonstrates advantage over the standard estimation technique in reducing bias. Thus, our work extends the feasibility of RAE on NISQ computers, consequently bringing us one step closer towards achieving quantum advantage using these devices.
The rapid development of noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices has raised the question of whether or not these devices will find commercial use. Unfortunately, a major shortcoming of many proposed NISQ-amenable algorithms, such as the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE), is coming into view: the algorithms require too many independent quantum measurements to solve practical problems in a reasonable amount of time. This motivates the central question of our work: how might we speed up such algorithms in spite of the impact of error on NISQ computations? We demonstrate on quantum hardware that the estimation of expectation values, a core subroutine of many quantum algorithms including VQE, can be improved in terms of precision and accuracy by using a technique we call Robust Amplitude Estimation. Consequently, this method reduces the runtime to achieve the same mean-squared error compared to the standard prepare-and-measure estimation method. The surprising result is that by using deeper, and therefore more error-prone, quantum circuits, we realize more accurate quantum computations in less time. As the quality of quantum devices improves, this method will provide a proportional reduction in estimation runtime. This technique may be used to speed up quantum computations into the regime of early fault-tolerant quantum computation and aid in the realization of quantum advantage.
This study explores hardware implementation of Robust Amplitude Estimation (RAE) on IBM quantum devices, demonstrating its application in quantum chemistry for one- and two-qubit Hamiltonian systems. Known for potentially offering quadratic speedups over traditional methods in estimating expectation values, RAE is evaluated under realistic noisy conditions. Our experiments provide detailed insights into the practical challenges associated with RAE. We achieved a significant reduction in sampling requirements compared to direct measurement techniques. In estimating the ground state energy of the hydrogen molecule, the RAE implementation demonstrated two orders of magnitude better accuracy for the two-qubit experiments and achieved chemical accuracy. These findings reveal its potential to enhance computational efficiencies in quantum chemistry applications despite the inherent limitations posed by hardware noise. We also found that its performance can be adversely impacted by coherent error and device stability and does not always correlate with the average gate error. These results underscore the importance of adapting quantum computational methods to hardware specifics to realize their full potential in practical scenarios.
As quantum processors move into the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era, the central question is no longer whether a quantum algorithm is asymptotically faster than its classical counterpart, but whether it can retain a meaningful speedup under realistic noise, compilation, and measurement constraints. This work develops a quantitative framework for characterizing the noise resilience of quantum advantage. We introduce the advantage robustness function RA(ε), which measures how the asymptotic and concrete performance of an algorithm A degrades with physical error rate ε, and we compute it analytically or numerically for twelve representative algorithm families, including Grover search, amplitude estimation, phase estimation, HHL, VQE/QAOA, Hamiltonian simulation, and sampling algorithms. For each class, we derive critical noise thresholds and depth limits beyond which classical algorithms regain supremacy, explicitly incorporating realistic connectivity and compilation overheads. We show that algorithms based on coherent amplitude amplification are more fragile to coherent errors than depolarizing noise, while variational algorithms display a tradeoff between expressivity and robustness. By combining these algorithm-specific robustness curves with current and projected hardware error rates for superconducting, trapped-ion, neutralatom, and photonic platforms, we map out a phase diagram of practical quantum advantage that links problem size, noise rate, and algorithm type. Our analysis identifies promising near-term application windows in risk analytics, small-molecule chemistry, and structured optimization, and also delineates regions where no advantage is realistic, providing valuable guidance for both algorithm designers and hardware architects.
The Quantum Amplitude Estimation (QAE) algorithm is a major quantum algorithm designed to achieve a quadratic speed-up. Until fault-tolerant quantum computing is achieved, being competitive over classical Monte Carlo (MC) remains elusive. Alternative methods have been developed so as to require fewer resources while maintaining an advantageous theoretical scaling. We compared the standard QAE algorithm with two Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ)-friendly versions of QAE on a numerical integration task, with the Monte Carlo technique of Metropolis–Hastings as a classical benchmark. The algorithms were evaluated in terms of the estimation error as a function of the number of samples, computational time, and length of the quantum circuits required by the solutions, respectively. The effectiveness of the two QAE alternatives was tested on an 11-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer in order to verify which solution can first provide a speed-up in the integral estimation problems. We concluded that an alternative approach is preferable with respect to employing the phase estimation routine. Indeed, the Maximum Likelihood estimation guaranteed the best trade-off between the length of the quantum circuits and the precision in the integral estimation, as well as greater resistance to noise.
Quantum chemistry and materials is one of the most promising applications of quantum computing. Yet much work is still to be done in matching industry-relevant problems in these areas with quantum algorithms that can solve them. Most previous efforts have carried out resource estimations for quantum algorithms run on large-scale fault-tolerant architectures, which include the quantum phase estimation algorithm. In contrast, few have assessed the performance of near-term quantum algorithms, which include the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) algorithm. Recently, a large-scale benchmark study [Gonthier et al. 2020] found evidence that the performance of the variational quantum eigensolver for a set of industry-relevant molecules may be too inefficient to be of practical use. This motivates the need for developing and assessing methods that improve the efficiency of VQE. In this work, we predict the runtime of the energy estimation subroutine of VQE when using robust amplitude estimation (RAE) to estimate Pauli expectation values. Under conservative assumptions, our resource estimation predicts that RAE can reduce the runtime over the standard estimation method in VQE by one to two orders of magnitude. Despite this improvement, we find that the runtimes are still too large to be practical. These findings motivate two complementary efforts towards quantum advantage: 1) the investigation of more efficient near-term methods for ground state energy estimation and 2) the development of problem instances that are of industrial value and classically challenging, but better suited to quantum computation.
Quantum Amplitude Estimation (QAE) -- a technique by which the amplitude of a given quantum state can be estimated with quadratically fewer queries than by standard sampling -- is a key sub-routine in several important quantum algorithms, including Grover search and Quantum Monte-Carlo methods. An obstacle to implementing QAE in near-term noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices has been the need to perform Quantum Phase Estimation (QPE) -- a costly procedure -- as a sub-routine. This impediment was lifted with various QPE-free methods of QAE, wherein Grover queries of varying depths / powers (often according to a "schedule") are followed immediately by measurements and classical post-processing techniques like maximum likelihood estimation (MLE). Existing analyses as to the optimality of various query schedules in these QPE-free QAE schemes have hitherto assumed noise-free systems. In this work, we analyse QPE-free QAE under common noise models that may afflict NISQ devices and report on the optimality of various query schedules in the noisy regime. We demonstrate that, given an accurate noise characterization of one's system, one must choose a schedule that balances the trade-off between the greater ideal performance achieved by higher-depth circuits, and the correspondingly greater accumulation of noise-induced error.