Quantum Amplitude Estimation (QAE) -- a technique by which the amplitude of a given quantum state can be estimated with quadratically fewer queries than by standard sampling -- is a key sub-routine in several important quantum algorithms, including Grover search and Quantum Monte-Carlo methods. An obstacle to implementing QAE in near-term noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices has been the need to perform Quantum Phase Estimation (QPE) -- a costly procedure -- as a sub-routine. This impediment was lifted with various QPE-free methods of QAE, wherein Grover queries of varying depths / powers (often according to a "schedule") are followed immediately by measurements and classical post-processing techniques like maximum likelihood estimation (MLE). Existing analyses as to the optimality of various query schedules in these QPE-free QAE schemes have hitherto assumed noise-free systems. In this work, we analyse QPE-free QAE under common noise models that may afflict NISQ devices and report on the optimality of various query schedules in the noisy regime. We demonstrate that, given an accurate noise characterization of one's system, one must choose a schedule that balances the trade-off between the greater ideal performance achieved by higher-depth circuits, and the correspondingly greater accumulation of noise-induced error.
Quantum Amplitude Estimation (QAE) -- a technique by which the amplitude of a given quantum state can be estimated with quadratically fewer queries than by standard sampling -- is a key sub-routine in several important quantum algorithms, including Grover search and Quantum Monte-Carlo methods. An obstacle to implementing QAE in near-term noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices has been the need to perform Quantum Phase Estimation (QPE) -- a costly procedure -- as a sub-routine. This impediment was lifted with various QPE-free methods of QAE, wherein Grover queries of varying depths / powers (often according to a "schedule") are followed immediately by measurements and classical post-processing techniques like maximum likelihood estimation (MLE). Existing analyses as to the optimality of various query schedules in these QPE-free QAE schemes have hitherto assumed noise-free systems. In this work, we analyse QPE-free QAE under common noise models that may afflict NISQ devices and report on the optimality of various query schedules in the noisy regime. We demonstrate that, given an accurate noise characterization of one's system, one must choose a schedule that balances the trade-off between the greater ideal performance achieved by higher-depth circuits, and the correspondingly greater accumulation of noise-induced error.
The Quantum Amplitude Estimation (QAE) algorithm is a major quantum algorithm designed to achieve a quadratic speed-up. Until fault-tolerant quantum computing is achieved, being competitive over classical Monte Carlo (MC) remains elusive. Alternative methods have been developed so as to require fewer resources while maintaining an advantageous theoretical scaling. We compared the standard QAE algorithm with two Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ)-friendly versions of QAE on a numerical integration task, with the Monte Carlo technique of Metropolis–Hastings as a classical benchmark. The algorithms were evaluated in terms of the estimation error as a function of the number of samples, computational time, and length of the quantum circuits required by the solutions, respectively. The effectiveness of the two QAE alternatives was tested on an 11-qubit trapped-ion quantum computer in order to verify which solution can first provide a speed-up in the integral estimation problems. We concluded that an alternative approach is preferable with respect to employing the phase estimation routine. Indeed, the Maximum Likelihood estimation guaranteed the best trade-off between the length of the quantum circuits and the precision in the integral estimation, as well as greater resistance to noise.
Non-adaptive quantum amplitude estimation (QAE) fixes its Grover depths in advance, so every circuit can run in parallel, but it has so far needed more queries than the best adaptive methods. We show that most of this gap comes from two conventional choices: subspace-based post-processing and power-of-two depth ladders. We replace the first by the exact maximum-likelihood estimate, one matrix multiplication per batch of estimates, and the second by a geometric ladder with ratio r≈1.45. The result is a fully parallel, deterministic-schedule estimator with total query complexity 2.8-3.1/ε at 95% confidence for target errors from 3.5×10−3 to 10−6. This matches the average-case complexity of chebAE, the best benchmarked adaptive method, within statistical uncertainty (with the lower point estimate at every scale tested), beats its maximum-observed complexity by 1.6×, and needs a maximum sequential depth of only 0.21/ε against chebAE's 2.9/ε. Relative to csAE, the best non-adaptive benchmark, the constants improve by 30-35% at 95% and 1.5-1.7× at 99% confidence. The optimal ratio has a simple origin. Doubling is the fastest depth growth at which the data can still tell neighboring candidate values apart, so power-of-two ladders sit at the edge of confusion and must buy reliability with extra shots; a slightly denser ladder checks every scale redundantly. An error-probability analysis reproduces the measured failure rates and locates the optimum. The likelihood formulation extends directly to noise-aware estimation, and uniformly scaling the capped ladder covers the depth-limited regime, realizing the optimal trade-off MNtot≈(0.4-0.6)/ε2 within ∼1.1× of the schedule's Cramér-Rao limit.
The approximation of an integral with numerical integration methods is a relevant problem in many fields, from finance to chemistry. Monte Carlo methods are a family of methods widely used for numerical integration but which are not always applicable to industrial tasks. Instead, there are quantum computing methods such as Quantum Amplitude Estimation able to offer a speed-up compared to the Monte Carlo methods for numerical integration which promise a significant impact, especially in finance. The Quantum Amplitude Estimation algorithm is a fundamental quantum algorithm with the potential to achieve a quadratic speed-up. Unfortunately, being competitive over classical Monte Carlo methods would require hardware performances currently not available. Therefore, alternative methods have been developed in order to exploit fewer resources while maintaining an advantageous theoretical scaling. We present a comparison between the standard QAE algorithm and two NISQ-friendly versions of the QAE on a numerical integration task. The Monte Carlo technique of Metropolis-Hastings instead is used as a classical benchmark. The scaling of the different algorithms are evaluated in terms of estimation error as a function of the number of samples, computational time, and length of the quantum circuits required by the quantum solutions. The conclusion highlights that an alternative approach is preferable with respect to employng the phase estimation routine. Indeed, the maximum likelihood estimation guarantees the best trade-off between the length of the quantum circuits and the precision in the integral estimation.
We introduce a variant of Quantum Amplitude Estimation (QAE), called Iterative QAE (IQAE), which does not rely on Quantum Phase Estimation (QPE) but is only based on Grover’s Algorithm, which reduces the required number of qubits and gates. We provide a rigorous analysis of IQAE and prove that it achieves a quadratic speedup up to a double-logarithmic factor compared to classical Monte Carlo simulation with provably small constant overhead. Furthermore, we show with an empirical study that our algorithm outperforms other known QAE variants without QPE, some even by orders of magnitude, i.e., our algorithm requires significantly fewer samples to achieve the same estimation accuracy and confidence level.
Abstract We introduce a variant of Quantum Amplitude Estimation (QAE) , called Iterative QAE (IQAE), which does not rely on Quantum Phase Estimation (QPE) but is only based on Grover’s Algorithm , which reduces the required number of qubits and gates. We provide a rigorous analysis of IQAE and prove that it achieves a quadratic speedup up to a double-logarithmic factor compared to classical Monte Carlo simulation with provably small constant overhead. Furthermore, we show with an empirical study that our algorithm outperforms other known QAE variants without QPE, some even by orders of magnitude, i.e., our algorithm requires significantly fewer samples to achieve the same estimation accuracy and confidence level.
Quantum Amplitude Estimation (QAE) is a key primitive in quantum computing, but its standard implementation using Quantum Phase Estimation is resource-intensive, requiring a large number of coherent qubits in a single circuit block to achieve high precision. This presents a significant challenge for near-term Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices. To address this, we introduce the Adaptive Windowed Quantum Amplitude Estimation (AWQAE) framework, a modular, scalable and adaptive approach that decouples estimation precision from the number of physical qubits required in a single circuit. AWQAE operates by iteratively estimating the phase bits in small, fixed-size chunks, using a number of smaller, independent quantum circuits, which are amenable to parallel processing. A key technical contribution of this work is introduction of a phase resolution circuit and an ancilla-guided mechanism that enables accurate chunk assignment and eigenphase reconstruction in the presence of multiple eigenstates. This design is inherently NISQ-friendly, by lowering circuit depth and qubit count per block to reduce decoherence and noise effects. A key component of our approach is a robust classical post-processing algorithm that resolves measurement ambiguities that arise during the iterative process. This post-processing routine uses a least-significant-bit (LSB)-to-most-significant-bit (MSB) correction to reconstruct the full, high-precision phase estimate, ensuring accuracy. By combining a modular quantum-classical loop with an ambiguity-aware reconstruction method, AWQAE offers a powerful and flexible solution for performing high-precision QAE on resource-constrained quantum hardware. Our approach demonstrates enhanced scalability, and adaptability, making it a promising candidate for practical applications of QAE in the NISQ era.