Abstract Any observable with finite eigenvalue spectrum can be measured using a multiport apparatus realizing an appropriate unitary transformation and an array of detector instruments, where each detector operates as an indicator of one possible value of the observable. The study of this setup in the frame of von Neumann’s quantum mechanical measurement process has a remarkable result: already after the interaction of the measured system with the detector array without collapse, exactly one detector is indicating a detection. Each single detector indicates either 0 or 1 detection, and no superposition can be attributed to it.
Abstract Any observable with finite eigenvalue spectrum can be measured using a multiport apparatus realizing an appropriate unitary transformation and an array of detector instruments, where each detector operates as an indicator of one possible value of the observable. The study of this setup in the frame of von Neumann’s quantum mechanical measurement process has a remarkable result: already after the interaction of the measured system with the detector array without collapse, exactly one detector is indicating a detection. Each single detector indicates either 0 or 1 detection, and no superposition can be attributed to it.
Quantum measurements of physical quantities are often described as ideal measurements. However, only a few measurements fulfil the conditions of ideal measurements. The aim of the present work is to describe real position measurements with detectors that are able to detect single particles. For this purpose, a detector model is developed that can describe the time dependence of the interaction between a non-relativistic particle and a detector. The example of a position measurement shows that this interaction can be described with the methods of quantum mechanics. At the beginning of a position measurement, the detector behaves as a target consisting of a large number of quantum mechanical systems. In the first reaction, the incident particle interacts with a single atom, electron or nucleus, but not with the whole detector. This reaction and all following reactions are quantum mechanical processes. At the end of the measurement, the detector can be considered as a classical apparatus. A detector is neither a quantum mechanical system nor a classical apparatus. The detector model explains why one obtains a well-defined result for each individual position measurement. It further explains that, in general, it is impossible to predict the outcome of an individual measurement.
Extracting information from a quantum system inevitably requires the performance of a measurement, and it is no surprise that the theory of measurement plays a central role in our subject. The physical nature of the measurement process remains one of the great philosophical problems in the formulation of quantum theory. Fortunately, however, it is sufficient for us to take a pragmatic view by asking what measurements are possible and how the theory describes them, without addressing the physical mechanism of the measurement process. This is the approach we shall adopt. We shall find that it leads us to a powerful and general description of both the probabilities associated with measurement outcomes and the manner in which the observation transforms the quantum state of the measured system. The simplest form of measurement was given a mathematical formulation by von Neumann, and we shall refer to measurements of this type as von Neumann measurements or projective measurements. It is this description of measurements that is usually introduced in elementary quantum theory courses. We start with an observable quantity A represented by a Hermitian operator Â, the eigenvalues of which are the possible results of the measurement of A. The relationship between the operator, its eigenstates {|λnñ}, and its (real) eigenvalues {λn} is expressed by the eigenvalue equation . . . Â |λn_ = λn|λn_. (4.1) . . .
The one-time and two-time measurements are studied by employing the idea of Aharonov et al. that the strength of a measurement depends on the state of the measuring device in the context of von Neumann measurement theory. A measurement is classified as either a strong or a weak measurement depending on whether the interaction between the system and the measuring device is infinitely large or negligibly small. A single strong measurement yields one of the eigenvalues of the operator while a single weak measurement, in addition to the eigenvalues, has infinite other possible outcomes. Nevertheless, the expectation values of the strong and the weak one-time measurements are the same. However, the expectation values of the two-time measurements depend on the strength of the first measurement. For the strong case the result is consistent with the conventional result without having to introduce the state collapsing. For the weak case the result is the real part of the expectation value of the time-ordered two-time operator. The fact that this expectation value cannot be factorized indicates that the entanglement between the system and the measuring device introduced by a weak measurement cannot be neglected.
The measuring process of an object system and a detector are studied in the von Neumann model and one of its variants, in which the detector consists of a single particle. If the states of the particle after the interaction with the object system are described partly by coherent states, then the particle can play the role of a detector under certain conditions. The mass (or free Hamiltonian) of the detector does not affect the measuring process at all, while the mass of the object system plays an important role. In the von Neumann model, if the mass of the object system is quite large, the position measurement can be considered, and under certain conditions the statistical operator \ensuremath{\rho} tends to just its mixed-state part, i.e., quantum interference disappears. However, when the time after the interaction becomes very large, interference emerges again. On the other hand, if the mass of the object system is small, we can even consider the momentum measurement and show that \ensuremath{\rho} approaches its mixed-state part when the time becomes very large, i.e., \ensuremath{\rho} is equivalent to its mixed-state part. The momentum can also be measured almost completely in the variant model; the operator \ensuremath{\rho} becomes equivalent to its mixed-state part. The different quantum states distinguish the detectors from the object systems.
Despite being very influential on both foundations and applications of quantum mechanics, weak values are still somewhat controversial. Although there are some indications that weak values are physical properties of a single quantum system, the common way weak values are presented is statistical: it is commonly believed that for measuring weak values one has to perform many weak measurements over a large ensemble of pre- and postselected particles. Other debates surround the anomalous nature of weak value and even their quantumness. To address these issues, we present some preliminary data showing that anomalous weak values can be measured using just a single detection, i.e. with no statistics. In our experiment, a single click of a detector indicates the weak value as a single photon property, which moreover lies well beyond the range of eigenvelues of the measured operator. Importantly, the uncertainty with which the weak values is measured is smaller than the difference between the weak value and the closet eigenvalue. This is the first experimental realization of robust weak measurements.
We consider the problem of improving noisy quantum measurements by suitable preprocessing strategies making many noisy detectors equivalent to a single ideal detector. For observables pertaining to finite-dimensional systems (e.g., qubits or spins) we consider preprocessing strategies that are reminiscent of quantum error correction procedures and allow one to perfectly measure an observable on a single quantum system for increasing number of inefficient detectors. For measurements of observables with an unbounded spectrum (e.g., photon number and homodyne and heterodyne detection), the purification of noisy quantum measurements can be achieved by preamplification as suggested by Yuen [Opt. Lett. 12, 789 (1987)].