Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2204.09150

Entanglement and conserved quantities

Terry Goldman

Published Apr 19, 2022• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox is resolved by reconsidering what entangled state is actually prepared, what physical quantities are conserved and the character of the correlation measurements employed.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2204.09150

Related papers

Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox without entanglement

Ryszard Horodecki, Michał Horodecki, Paweł Horodecki

It is argued that the nonlocality without entanglement discovered quite recently by Bennett et al. [Phys. Rev. A 59, 1070 (1999)] should rather be interpreted as the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox without entanglement. It would be a true demonstration of nonlocality without entanglement if one knew that quantum mechanics provides the best possible means for extracting information from a physical system, i.e., that it is ``informationally complete.''

arXiv:quant-ph/9811004•Physical Review A•Nov 1, 1999•15 citations

Einstein–Podolski–Rosen paradox, non-commuting operator, complete wavefunction and entanglement

Andrew Das Arulsamy

arXiv:1205.2734•Pramana•Feb 25, 2014•7 citations

Quantum correlations from local amplitudes and the resolution of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen nonlocality puzzle

C. S. Unnikrishnan

The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) nonlocality puzzle has been recognized as one of the most important unresolved issues in the foundational aspects of quantum mechanics. We show that the problem is more or less entirely resolved, if the quantum correlations are calculated directly from local quantities, which preserve the phase information in the quantum system. We assume strict locality for the probability amplitudes instead of local realism for the outcomes and calculate an amplitude correlation function. Then the experimentally observed correlation of outcomes is calculated from the square of the amplitude correlation function. Locality of amplitudes implies that measurement on one particle does not collapse the companion particle to a definite state. Apart from resolving the EPR puzzle, this approach shows that the physical interpretation of apparently “nonlocal” effects, such as quantum teleportation and entanglement swapping, are different from what is usually assumed. Bell-type measurements do not change distant states. Yet the correlations are correctly reproduced, when measured, if complex probability amplitudes are treated as the basic local quantities. As examples, we derive the quantum correlations of two-particle maximally entangled states and the three-particle Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger entangled state.

arXiv:quant-ph/0005103•Optics and Spectroscopy•Sep 1, 2001•0 citations

Triplet versus singlet entangled states in teaching the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox

Mark R. A. Shegelski

The Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox is considered using spin- singlet and triplet states prepared in the z-direction, after which measurements are made in a different direction, the x-direction, for example. An unexpected outcome and its usefulness for teaching is reported. The material will be of interest to upper-year undergraduate quantum mechanics instructors and students.

European Journal of Physics•Apr 8, 2013•0 citations

Is the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox Demanded by Quantum Mechanics?

Oreste Piccioni, Peter Bowles, C. Enscoe +2 more

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1985•5 citations

Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Correlations, Entanglement and Quantum Cryptography

M. D. Reid

Springer series on atomic, optical, and plasma physics•Jan 1, 2004•2 citations
The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) nonlocality puzzle has been recognized as one of the most important unresolved issues in the foundational aspects of quantum mechanics. We show that the problem is more or less entirely resolved, if the quantum correlations are calculated directly from local quantities, which preserve the phase information in the quantum system. We assume strict locality for the probability amplitudes instead of local realism for the outcomes and calculate an amplitude correlation function. Then the experimentally observed correlation of outcomes is calculated from the square of the amplitude correlation function. Locality of amplitudes implies that measurement on one particle does not collapse the companion particle to a definite state. Apart from resolving the EPR puzzle, this approach shows that the physical interpretation of apparently “nonlocal” effects, such as quantum teleportation and entanglement swapping, are different from what is usually assumed. Bell-type measurements do not change distant states. Yet the correlations are correctly reproduced, when measured, if complex probability amplitudes are treated as the basic local quantities. As examples, we derive the quantum correlations of two-particle maximally entangled states and the three-particle Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger entangled state.