Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2203.04309 · Scientific Reports

Speed-up and slow-down of a quantum particle

X. Gutiérrez de la Cal, M. Ll. Pons, D. Sokolovski

Published Mar 9, 2022• 9 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We study non-relativistic propagation of Gaussian wave packets in one-dimensional Eckart potential, a barrier, or a well. In the picture used, the transmitted wave packet results from interference between the copies of the freely propagating state with different spatial shifts (delays), [Formula: see text], induced by the scattering potential. The Uncertainty Principle precludes relating the particle's final position to the delay experienced in the potential, except in the classical limit. Beyond this limit, even defining an effective range of the delay is shown to be an impracticable task, owing to the oscillatory nature of the corresponding amplitude distribution. Our examples include the classically allowed case, semiclassical tunnelling, delays induced in the presence of a virtual state, and scattering by a low barrier. The properties of the amplitude distribution of the delays, and its pole representation are studied in detail.

DOI
10.1038/s41598-022-07599-1

Related papers

Propagation Of A Spherical Gaussian Wave Packet Through A Double-Barrier Resonant Tunneling Structure

Ralph G. Hay, Thomas B. Bahder, John D. Bruno

In order to better understand the trapping and response time of resonant electron wave packets in a resonant tunneling structure, we examined the time-dependent transport of a spherically symmetric Gaussian wave packet through a model double-barrier potential. Within the effective mass picture, the wave packet is projected onto the complete eigenstates of the model potential. The wave packet is initially localized to the left of the barriers and allowed to propagate through the structure. At wave packet energies corresponding to the resonant energies, the probability transmitted to the right of the barriers exhibits a steplike behavior as a function of time. A computation is made of the quantum mechanical delay time, to~tclass, where to is the packet transit time and tclass is the transit time for a classical particle. An increase in this delay time is observed when the packet energy corresponds to the energy of the resonant levels, and a comparison is made to the decay time of a particle in the first resonant state of the well. The delay time increases with increasing barrier area and decreasing packet energy width.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•Aug 18, 1988•0 citations

From the "paradoxes" of wave packet tunneling to the definition of tunneling times for particles

Nikolay Leonidovich Chuprikov

A new variant of the packet analysis to solve the tunneling time problem for the so-called completed elastic scattering (a potential barrier of an arbitrary form is located in the finite spatial interval) is presented. In particular, we propose an explanation of the "paradoxes" of wave packet tunneling, and elaborate a rule enabling one to extract the tunneling times for a particle from the analysis of tunneling the corresponding wave packet. It is shown that the quantum ensembles of transmitted and reflected particles are statistically independent not only after the scattering but also before this event. We find the corresponding counterparts for the transmitted and reflected packets, which describe separately both scattering channels at early times, and define the expectation values of delay times for each channel. Besides, to describe jointly all particles at the stage when they cannot be divided into two independent subensembles, we find the scattering time taking into account broadening the packets. We derive the condition to be satisfied for the completed scattering. The times above are defined in terms of the well-known quantum-mechanical averages for the position and wave-number operators.

•Jun 23, 2001•0 citations

Evolution of a wave packet scattered by a one-dimensional potential

А. Ж. Хачатрян, Al.G. Alexanyan, V. A. Khoetsyan +1 more

We consider the evolution of a wave packet that is made up of a group of the wave functions describing the stationary scattering process and tunnels through a one-dimensional potential of arbitrary form. As the main characteristics of the time difference of the tunnelling process, use is made of the propagation speed of the wave-packet maximum. We show that the known Hartman formula for the tunnelling time corresponds to the wave packet with a wavenumber-uniform spectral composition in the case, when the phase and transmission coefficient modulus dispersions are taken into account only in the linear approximation. The amplitude of the main peak of the transmitted wave intensity is proven to be independent of the tunnelling time and is determined by the transmission coefficient of the spectral component at the carrier frequency and the spectral width of the wave packet. In the limit of an infinitely wide potential barrier the amplitude of the wave-packet maximum is shown to tend to zero slower than the tunnelling time tends to its asymptotic value, i.e., indeed we deal with the paradox of an infinitely large propagation speed of a wave disturbance through the barrier.

Quantum Electronics•Jun 30, 2013•1 citation

Path-integral analysis of the time delay for wave-packet scattering and the status of complex tunneling times

D. Sokolovski, J. N. L. Connor

The wave-packet simulation (WPS) method for calculating the time a tunneling particle spends inside a one-dimensional potential barrier is reexamined using the Feynman path-integral technique. Following earlier work by Sokolovski and Baskin [Phys. Rev. A 36, 4604 (1987)], the tunneling (or traversal) time ${\mathit{t}}_{\mathrm{pack}}^{\mathit{T}}$ is defined as a matrix element of a classical nonlocal functional between two states that represent the initial and transmitted wave packets. These states do not lie on the same orbit in Hilbert space; as a result, ${\mathit{t}}_{\mathrm{pack}}^{\mathit{T}}$ is complex-valued. It is shown that Re${\mathit{t}}_{\mathrm{pack}}^{\mathit{T}}$ reduces to the standard WPS result, ${\mathit{t}}_{\mathrm{phase}}^{\mathit{T}}$, for conditions similar to those employed in the conventional WPS analysis. Similarly, Im${\mathit{t}}_{\mathrm{pack}}^{\mathit{T}}$ is shown to contain information about the energy dependence of the transmission probability. Under semiclassical conditions, Im${\mathit{t}}_{\mathrm{pack}}^{\mathit{T}}$ reduces to the well-known Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin expression for the tunneling time. It is shown there are different definitions for the traversal time of a classical moving object, whose size is comparable to the width of the region of interest. In the quantum case, these different definitions correspond to different ways of analyzing the WPS experiment. The path-integral approach demonstrates that the tunneling-time problem is one of understanding the physical significance of complex-valued off-orbit matrix elements of an operator or functional. The physical content of complex-valued tunneling times is discussed. It is emphasized that the use of complex tunneling times includes real-time approaches as a special case. Nevertheless, there is a limitation in the description of tunneling experiments using tunneling times, whether real or complex. The path-integral approach does not supply a universal traversal time, analogous to a classical time, that can be used in quantum situations. It is demonstrated that the often expressed hope of finding a well-defined and universal real tunneling time is erroneous.

Physical Review A•Dec 1, 1990•74 citations

Wave packets, “negative times” and the elephant in the room

D. Sokolovski, A. Matzkin

Controversy surrounding the "tunnelling time problem" stems from the seeming inability of quantum mechanics to provide, in the usual way, a definition of the duration a particle is supposed to spend in a given region of space. For this reason, the problem is often approached from an "operational" angle. One such approach uses the position of the transmitted wave packet in order to infer the duration the particle spends in the barrier. Here we replace the barrier with a tuneable Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI). With this analogy one is able, at least in principle, to achieve any advance or delay of the wave packet sent to the chosen outgoing port. The Uncertainty Principle prevents one from combining the durations spent in each arm of the MZI into a meaningful duration when both arms are engaged. There is no justification for invoking "superluminal" or "negative" times, since the particle is able to arrive at the same position (and with a higher probability) if the same initial state propagates through only one arm of the MZI. The same is true in the case of tunnelling, where the transmitted wave packet results from destructive interference between delayed multiple copies of the free state.

arXiv:2507.19105•Scientific Reports•May 19, 2026•0 citations

Quantum tunneling in the Wigner representation

M. S. Marinov, Bilha Segev

Time dependence for barrier penetration is considered in the phase space. An asymptotic phase-space propagator for nonrelativistic scattering on a one-dimensional barrier is constructed. The propagator has a form universal for various initial state preparations and local potential barriers. It is manifestly causal and includes time-lag effects and quantum spreading. Specific features of quantum dynamics which disappear in the standard semiclassical approximation are revealed. The propagator may be applied to calculation of the final momentum and coordinate distributions, for particles transmitted through or reflected from the potential barrier, as well as for elucidating the tunneling time problem. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.

arXiv:quant-ph/9602017•Physical Review A•Dec 1, 1996•22 citations
We study non-relativistic propagation of Gaussian wave packets in one-dimensional Eckart potential, a barrier, or a well. In the picture used, the transmitted wave packet results from interference between the copies of the freely propagating state with different spatial shifts (delays), [Formula: see text], induced by the scattering potential. The Uncertainty Principle precludes relating the particle's final position to the delay experienced in the potential, except in the classical limit. Beyond this limit, even defining an effective range of the delay is shown to be an impracticable task, owing to the oscillatory nature of the corresponding amplitude distribution. Our examples include the classically allowed case, semiclassical tunnelling, delays induced in the presence of a virtual state, and scattering by a low barrier. The properties of the amplitude distribution of the delays, and its pole representation are studied in detail.
In order to better understand the trapping and response time of resonant electron wave packets in a resonant tunneling structure, we examined the time-dependent transport of a spherically symmetric Gaussian wave packet through a model double-barrier potential. Within the effective mass picture, the wave packet is projected onto the complete eigenstates of the model potential. The wave packet is initially localized to the left of the barriers and allowed to propagate through the structure. At wave packet energies corresponding to the resonant energies, the probability transmitted to the right of the barriers exhibits a steplike behavior as a function of time. A computation is made of the quantum mechanical delay time, to~tclass, where to is the packet transit time and tclass is the transit time for a classical particle. An increase in this delay time is observed when the packet energy corresponds to the energy of the resonant levels, and a comparison is made to the decay time of a particle in the first resonant state of the well. The delay time increases with increasing barrier area and decreasing packet energy width.
A new variant of the packet analysis to solve the tunneling time problem for the so-called completed elastic scattering (a potential barrier of an arbitrary form is located in the finite spatial interval) is presented. In particular, we propose an explanation of the "paradoxes" of wave packet tunneling, and elaborate a rule enabling one to extract the tunneling times for a particle from the analysis of tunneling the corresponding wave packet. It is shown that the quantum ensembles of transmitted and reflected particles are statistically independent not only after the scattering but also before this event. We find the corresponding counterparts for the transmitted and reflected packets, which describe separately both scattering channels at early times, and define the expectation values of delay times for each channel. Besides, to describe jointly all particles at the stage when they cannot be divided into two independent subensembles, we find the scattering time taking into account broadening the packets. We derive the condition to be satisfied for the completed scattering. The times above are defined in terms of the well-known quantum-mechanical averages for the position and wave-number operators.
We consider the evolution of a wave packet that is made up of a group of the wave functions describing the stationary scattering process and tunnels through a one-dimensional potential of arbitrary form. As the main characteristics of the time difference of the tunnelling process, use is made of the propagation speed of the wave-packet maximum. We show that the known Hartman formula for the tunnelling time corresponds to the wave packet with a wavenumber-uniform spectral composition in the case, when the phase and transmission coefficient modulus dispersions are taken into account only in the linear approximation. The amplitude of the main peak of the transmitted wave intensity is proven to be independent of the tunnelling time and is determined by the transmission coefficient of the spectral component at the carrier frequency and the spectral width of the wave packet. In the limit of an infinitely wide potential barrier the amplitude of the wave-packet maximum is shown to tend to zero slower than the tunnelling time tends to its asymptotic value, i.e., indeed we deal with the paradox of an infinitely large propagation speed of a wave disturbance through the barrier.
The wave-packet simulation (WPS) method for calculating the time a tunneling particle spends inside a one-dimensional potential barrier is reexamined using the Feynman path-integral technique. Following earlier work by Sokolovski and Baskin [Phys. Rev. A 36, 4604 (1987)], the tunneling (or traversal) time tpackT{\mathit{t}}_{\mathrm{pack}}^{\mathit{T}}tpackT​ is defined as a matrix element of a classical nonlocal functional between two states that represent the initial and transmitted wave packets. These states do not lie on the same orbit in Hilbert space; as a result, tpackT{\mathit{t}}_{\mathrm{pack}}^{\mathit{T}}tpackT​ is complex-valued. It is shown that RetpackT{\mathit{t}}_{\mathrm{pack}}^{\mathit{T}}tpackT​ reduces to the standard WPS result, tphaseT{\mathit{t}}_{\mathrm{phase}}^{\mathit{T}}tphaseT​, for conditions similar to those employed in the conventional WPS analysis. Similarly, ImtpackT{\mathit{t}}_{\mathrm{pack}}^{\mathit{T}}tpackT​ is shown to contain information about the energy dependence of the transmission probability. Under semiclassical conditions, ImtpackT{\mathit{t}}_{\mathrm{pack}}^{\mathit{T}}tpackT​ reduces to the well-known Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin expression for the tunneling time. It is shown there are different definitions for the traversal time of a classical moving object, whose size is comparable to the width of the region of interest. In the quantum case, these different definitions correspond to different ways of analyzing the WPS experiment. The path-integral approach demonstrates that the tunneling-time problem is one of understanding the physical significance of complex-valued off-orbit matrix elements of an operator or functional. The physical content of complex-valued tunneling times is discussed. It is emphasized that the use of complex tunneling times includes real-time approaches as a special case. Nevertheless, there is a limitation in the description of tunneling experiments using tunneling times, whether real or complex. The path-integral approach does not supply a universal traversal time, analogous to a classical time, that can be used in quantum situations. It is demonstrated that the often expressed hope of finding a well-defined and universal real tunneling time is erroneous.
Controversy surrounding the "tunnelling time problem" stems from the seeming inability of quantum mechanics to provide, in the usual way, a definition of the duration a particle is supposed to spend in a given region of space. For this reason, the problem is often approached from an "operational" angle. One such approach uses the position of the transmitted wave packet in order to infer the duration the particle spends in the barrier. Here we replace the barrier with a tuneable Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI). With this analogy one is able, at least in principle, to achieve any advance or delay of the wave packet sent to the chosen outgoing port. The Uncertainty Principle prevents one from combining the durations spent in each arm of the MZI into a meaningful duration when both arms are engaged. There is no justification for invoking "superluminal" or "negative" times, since the particle is able to arrive at the same position (and with a higher probability) if the same initial state propagates through only one arm of the MZI. The same is true in the case of tunnelling, where the transmitted wave packet results from destructive interference between delayed multiple copies of the free state.
Time dependence for barrier penetration is considered in the phase space. An asymptotic phase-space propagator for nonrelativistic scattering on a one-dimensional barrier is constructed. The propagator has a form universal for various initial state preparations and local potential barriers. It is manifestly causal and includes time-lag effects and quantum spreading. Specific features of quantum dynamics which disappear in the standard semiclassical approximation are revealed. The propagator may be applied to calculation of the final momentum and coordinate distributions, for particles transmitted through or reflected from the potential barrier, as well as for elucidating the tunneling time problem. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.