© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

Terms Privacy Legal Notice

arXiv:2201.02468

Reply to the Comment on "Thermal, quantum antibunching and lasing thresholds from single emitters to macroscopic devices"

Mark Anthony Carroll, Giampaolo D’Alessandro, Gian Luca Lippi, Gian‐Luca Oppo, F. Papoff

Published Jan 7, 2022• 0 citations

Abstract

We deconstruct and address a comment to Carroll et al. [Phys Rev Lett 126, 063902 (2021)] (PRL) that has been posted on arXiv appearing as two versions [arXiv:2106.15242v1] and [arXiv:2106.15242v2]. This comment claimed that a term in the model presented in the PRL had been incorrectly omitted and that, hence, the laser threshold predicted by the model in the PRL is unattainable. We show that the term in question was correctly neglected because it represents collective effects that are not observable in the devices modelled in the PRL. Moreover, even if this term were to be included, the laser threshold would still be present, contrary to what was claimed in the comment. We conclude that the model presented in PRL is correct and that its results are innovative and of wide application in laser physics and quantum optics.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2201.02468

Related papers

Carroll et al. reply : [Reply to the comment on "Thermal, quantum antibunching and lasing thresholds from single emitters to macroscopic devices"]

Mark Anthony Carroll, Giampaolo D’Alessandro, Gian Luca Lippi +2 more

Reply to the Comment on "Thermal, quantum antibunching and lasing thresholds from single emitters to macroscopic devices". We deconstruct and address a comment to Carroll et al. [Phys Rev Lett 126, 063902 (2021)]

•Jan 12, 2022•4 citations

Comment on "Thermal, Quantum Antibunching and Lasing Thresholds from Single Emitters to Macroscopic Devices"

Andrey A. Vyshnevyy, Dmitry Yu. Fedyanin

In a recent Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 063902 (2021)], M. A. Carroll et al. derived a model to analytically determine regimes of thermal, collective anti-bunching, and laser emission for emitters in a cavity. According to their model, nanolasers exhibit a distinct threshold at which the coherent laser field emerges from a bifurcation at a finite pump rate. The amplitude of this coherent field increases with a further increase in the pump rate. Such a behavior contrasts the usual view of the transition to lasing in single-mode high-$\beta$ nanolasers, according to which strong spontaneous emission into the lasing mode results in a smooth transformation from the thermal state to the coherent state as the pump rate increases. Here, we demonstrate that the authors have ignored important terms in the equations of their model, which caused the bifurcation and the ideally monochromatic field to emerge at a finite pump rate.

arXiv:2106.15242•Jun 29, 2021•6 citations

Thermal, Quantum Antibunching and Lasing Thresholds from Single Emitters to Macroscopic Devices

Mark Anthony Carroll, Giampaolo D’Alessandro, Gian Luca Lippi +2 more

Starting from a fully quantized Hamiltonian for an ensemble of identical emitters coupled to the modes of an optical cavity, we determine analytically regimes of thermal, collective anti-bunching and laser emission that depend explicitly on the number of emitters. The lasing regime is reached for a number of emitters above a critical number-which depends on the light-matter coupling, detuning, and the dissipation rates-via a universal transition from thermal emission to collective anti-bunching to lasing as the pump increases. Cases where the second order intensity correlation fails to predict laser action are also presented.

arXiv:2011.10805•Physical Review Letters•Feb 10, 2021•30 citations

Reply to "Comment on 'Strong Measurements Give a Better Direct Measurement of the Quantum Wave Function' "

Giuseppe Vallone, Daniele Dequal

This is the reply to [arXiv:1711.00764], in which the authors claim that there is crucial normalization error in PRL 116, 040502 (2016) and that some quantities appearing in the method of PRL 116, 040502 (2016) are not experimentally measurable. We show that the claim of [arXiv:1711.00764] is not correct and that the quantities appearing in PRL 116, 040502 (2016) can be measured.

arXiv:1711.02055•Nov 6, 2017•0 citations

Reply to "Comment on Protocol for Direct Counterfactual Quantum Communication"

Hatim Salih, Li, Zheng-Hong, M. Al-Amri +1 more

In reply to Vaidman's Comment [arXiv:1304.6689], we show that his claim that our Protocol for Direct Counterfactual Quantum Communication [PRL 110, 170502 (2013), arXiv:1206.2042] is counterfactual only for one type of information bit is wrong.

arXiv:1404.5392•Apr 22, 2014•4 citations

Reply to Comment on: "Fluctuation Theorem for Many-Body Pure Quantum States"

Eiki Iyoda, Kazuya Kaneko, Takahiro Sagawa

We reply to Comment by J. Gemmer, L. Knipschild, R. Steinigeweg (arXiv:1712.02128) on our paper Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 100601 (2017).

arXiv:1712.05172•Dec 14, 2017•1 citation

We deconstruct and address a comment to Carroll et al. [Phys Rev Lett 126, 063902 (2021)] (PRL) that has been posted on arXiv appearing as two versions [arXiv:2106.15242v1] and [arXiv:2106.15242v2]. This comment claimed that a term in the model presented in the PRL had been incorrectly omitted and that, hence, the laser threshold predicted by the model in the PRL is unattainable. We show that the term in question was correctly neglected because it represents collective effects that are not observable in the devices modelled in the PRL. Moreover, even if this term were to be included, the laser threshold would still be present, contrary to what was claimed in the comment. We conclude that the model presented in PRL is correct and that its results are innovative and of wide application in laser physics and quantum optics.

In a recent Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 063902 (2021)], M. A. Carroll et al. derived a model to analytically determine regimes of thermal, collective anti-bunching, and laser emission for emitters in a cavity. According to their model, nanolasers exhibit a distinct threshold at which the coherent laser field emerges from a bifurcation at a finite pump rate. The amplitude of this coherent field increases with a further increase in the pump rate. Such a behavior contrasts the usual view of the transition to lasing in single-mode high-

\beta

nanolasers, according to which strong spontaneous emission into the lasing mode results in a smooth transformation from the thermal state to the coherent state as the pump rate increases. Here, we demonstrate that the authors have ignored important terms in the equations of their model, which caused the bifurcation and the ideally monochromatic field to emerge at a finite pump rate.

Starting from a fully quantized Hamiltonian for an ensemble of identical emitters coupled to the modes of an optical cavity, we determine analytically regimes of thermal, collective anti-bunching and laser emission that depend explicitly on the number of emitters. The lasing regime is reached for a number of emitters above a critical number-which depends on the light-matter coupling, detuning, and the dissipation rates-via a universal transition from thermal emission to collective anti-bunching to lasing as the pump increases. Cases where the second order intensity correlation fails to predict laser action are also presented.