Quantum computing offers new heuristics for combinatorial problems. With small- and intermediate-scale quantum devices becoming available, it is possible to implement and test these heuristics on small-size problems. A candidate for such combinatorial problems is the heterogeneous vehicle routing problem (HVRP): the problem of finding the optimal set of routes, given a heterogeneous fleet of vehicles with varying loading capacities, to deliver goods to a given set of customers. In this work, we investigate the potential use of a quantum computer to find approximate solutions to the HVRP using the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA). For this purpose we formulate a mapping of the HVRP to an Ising Hamiltonian and simulate the algorithm on problem instances of up to 21 qubits. We show that the number of qubits needed for this mapping scales quadratically with the number of customers. We compare the performance of different classical optimizers in the QAOA for varying problem size of the HVRP, finding a trade-off between optimizer performance and runtime.
Quantum computing offers new heuristics for combinatorial problems. With small- and intermediate-scale quantum devices becoming available, it is possible to implement and test these heuristics on small-size problems. A candidate for such combinatorial problems is the heterogeneous vehicle routing problem (HVRP): the problem of finding the optimal set of routes, given a heterogeneous fleet of vehicles with varying loading capacities, to deliver goods to a given set of customers. In this work, we investigate the potential use of a quantum computer to find approximate solutions to the HVRP using the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA). For this purpose we formulate a mapping of the HVRP to an Ising Hamiltonian and simulate the algorithm on problem instances of up to 21 qubits. We show that the number of qubits needed for this mapping scales quadratically with the number of customers. We compare the performance of different classical optimizers in the QAOA for varying problem size of the HVRP, finding a trade-off between optimizer performance and runtime.
Intelligent transportation systems (ITS) are a critical component of Industry 4.0 and 5.0, particularly having applications in logistic management. One of their crucial utilization is in supply-chain management and scheduling for optimally routing transportation of goods by vehicles at a given set of locations. This paper discusses the broader problem of vehicle traffic management, more popularly known as the Vehicle Routing Problem (VRP), and investigates the possible use of near-term quantum devices for solving it. For this purpose, we give the Ising formulation for VRP and some of its constrained variants. Then, we present a detailed procedure to solve VRP by minimizing its corresponding Ising Hamiltonian using a hybrid quantum-classical heuristic called Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), implemented on the IBM Qiskit platform. We compare the performance of QAOA with classical solvers such as CPLEX on problem instances of up to 15 qubits. We find that performance of QAOA has a multifaceted dependence on the classical optimization routine used, the depth of the ansatz parameterized byp, initialization of variational parameters, and problem instance itself.
The Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP) is a combinatorial optimization problem that can be formulated as a Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problem, making it a potential application for near-term quantum optimization. This paper benchmarks the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA, p = 2) against Google OR-Tools Guided Local Search on a seeded instance with three customers and two vehicles. The study examines the QUBO formulation, energy spectrum, optimization behavior, penalty weights, Hamiltonian scaling, and circuit depths. The experiments show that the tested QAOA configurations do not reliably concentrate probability on optimal solutions. The classical solver identifies the optimal solution for the selected instance. The study provides a reproducible baseline and discusses limitations and future research directions. The findings are limited to the tested instance, formulation, and optimization configurations.
The vehicle routing problem (VRP) is a core NP‐hard combinatorial optimization problem in logistics and supply chain management. Quantum computing, particularly the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), is being explored as a promising heuristic tool for tackling such problems. Therefore, this study employs the QAOA approach to solve the airport cargo VRP. Subsequently, through a concrete airport cargo case study, the paper analyzes the process of solving single‐vehicle TSP and multivehicle VRP problems using QAOA. It compares the performance of different classical optimizers and discusses the impact of parameter settings (e.g., penalty factors, QAOA depth, and number of iterations) on the solution quality and feasibility, especially comparing the convergence speed of dynamic and fixed penalty coefficients. The paper also describes the design principles of QAOA quantum circuits for such VRP problems. Furthermore, the study presents a preliminary benchmark on a real quantum computer, demonstrating that its computation time for the problem’s QUBO matrix (14 ms) is approximately comparable to that of classical algorithms. Finally, it summarizes the current scalability challenges and limitations faced by QAOA in VRP applications concerning qubit count, circuit depth, and classical optimizer performance, and offers an outlook on future development directions. The research indicates that although QAOA demonstrates solution capabilities on specific small‐scale VRP instances, the complexity of parameter tuning and sensitivity to the spatial distribution of aircraft stands are critical considerations before practical application.
Quantum optimization has recently drawn considerable attention as one of the possible applications of noisy intermediate-scale quantum computation, yet the problem of qubit requirement remains a major bottleneck when combinatorial optimization problems are converted into quantum circuits. This issue becomes especially critical in solving the capacitated vehicle routing problem (CVRP) with the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA), since the number of required qubits increases polynomially with respect to the number of nodes. This study investigates whether a heuristic divide-and-conquer strategy can be adapted to the quantum setting so as to improve qubit efficiency while preserving the optimization capability to a reasonable extent. The proposed method decomposes a single CVRP into multiple traveling salesman problems (TSPs) by the sweeping-based clustering method, searches for the sector configuration with the smallest angle sum by Grover’s search algorithm, and then solves each sector-wise TSP with the QAOA aided by the gravitational search algorithm. Experiments on five benchmark datasets show that the proposed approach attains feasible solutions within 3.4 to 12.7% of the reinforcement-learning baseline on the main test set. These results suggest that the proposed approach serves as a plausible quantum heuristic framework for constrained routing optimization, with the advantage of reducing the qubit burden by decomposing the original problem into smaller subproblems.
Vehicle Routing Problem (VRP) is considered one of the most challenging problems with application in several domains, including transportation and logistics distribution. VRP is known to be NP-Hard problem. Several algorithms have been proposed to solve VRP in polynomial time. However, these algorithms are inefficient if the VRP instance increases. Recently, researchers investigated how quantum computing can be used to solve VRP. In particular, two promising variational quantum algorithms have been studied, i.e., Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) and Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). In this paper, we implement both algorithms on IBM Qiskit and compare their evaluation in solving several instances of VRP. We observe that current Noisy-Intermediate Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices cannot solve VRP instances beyond 5 nodes and 2 vehicles. Furthermore, we observe that classical optimizers still provide better results. However, we believe that with the rapid advancement of quantum computing manufacturing, VQE and QAOA can provide better performance as compared to classical computing,
Abstract The Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP) is an NP-optimization problem (NPO) that arises in various fields including transportation and logistics. The CVRP extends from the Vehicle Routing Problem (VRP), aiming to determine the most efficient plan for a fleet of vehicles to deliver goods to a set of customers, subject to the limited carrying capacity of each vehicle. As the number of possible solutions skyrockets when the number of customers increases, finding the optimal solution remains a significant challenge. Recently, the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), a quantum-classical hybrid algorithm, has exhibited enhanced performance in certain combinatorial optimization problems compared to classical heuristics. However, its ability diminishes notably in solving constrained optimization problems including the CVRP. This limitation primarily arises from the typical approach of encoding the given problems as penalty-inclusive binary optimization problems. In this case, the QAOA faces challenges in sampling solutions satisfying all constraints. Addressing this, our work presents a new binary encoding for the CVRP, with an alternative objective function of minimizing the shortest path that bypasses the vehicle capacity constraint of the CVRP. The search space is further restricted by the constraint-preserving mixing operation. We examine and discuss the effectiveness of the proposed encoding under the framework of the variant of the QAOA, Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz (AOA), through its application to several illustrative examples. Compared to the typical QAOA approach, the proposed method not only preserves the feasibility but also achieves a significant enhancement in the probability of measuring optimal solutions.