Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2109.14951 · Universe

Causality in a Qubit-Based Implementation of a Quantum Switch

Carlos Sabín

Published May 4, 2022• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We introduce a qubit-based version of the quantum switch, consisting of a variation of the Fermi problem. Two qubits start in a superposition state in which one qubit is excited and the other is in the ground state. However, it is not defined which is the excited qubit. Then, after some time, if a photon is detected, we know that it must have experienced an emission by one atom and then an absorption and re-emission by the other one, but the ordering of the emission events by both qubits is undefined. While it is tempting to refer to this scenario as one with indefinite causality or a superposition of causal orders, we show that there is still a precise notion of causality: the probability of excitation of each atom is totally independent of the other one when the times are short enough to prevent photon exchange.

DOI
10.3390/universe8050269

Related papers

Indefinite causal orders from superpositions in time

David Felce, Nicetu Tibau Vidal, Vlatko Vedral +1 more

Treating the time of an event as a quantum variable, we derive a scheme in which superpositions in time are used to perform operations in an indefinite causal order. We use some aspects of a recently developed space-time-symmetric formalism of events. We propose a specific implementation of the scheme and recover the quantum switch, where quantum operations are performed in an order which is entangled with the state of a control qubit. Our scheme does not rely on any exotic quantum gravitational effect, but instead on phenomena which are naturally fuzzy in time, such as the decay of an excited atom.

arXiv:2107.08076•Physical Review A•Jun 27, 2022•14 citations

Indefinite Causal Order and Quantum Coordinates

Anne-Catherine de la Hamette, Viktoria Kabel, Marios Christodoulou +1 more

Classically, the causal order of two timelike separated events A and B is fixed-either A before B or B before A. This is no longer true in quantum theory, where it is possible to encounter superpositions of causal orders. The quantum switch is one of the most prominent processes with indefinite causal order. Optical realizations of the quantum switch have been successfully implemented in experiments, but some argue that this merely simulates a process with indefinite causal order and that a superposition of spacetime metrics is required for a true realization. Here, we provide a relativistic definition of causal order between operationally defined events that defines a meaningful observable in both the general relativistic and quantum mechanical sense. Importantly, this observable does not distinguish between the indefinite causal order implemented on an optical bench and the gravitational quantum switch, a gedanken experiment where the indefinite causal order is achieved by a quantum superposition of gravitational fields. Therefore, our results support the thesis that the optical quantum switch is just as much a realization of indefinite causal order as its gravitational counterpart, which makes use of the quantum mechanical behavior of spacetime.

arXiv:2211.15685•Physical Review Letters•Sep 4, 2025•14 citations

Quantum switch of quantum switches

Debarshi Das, Somshubhro Bandyopadhyay

Recent results have shown that quantum theory is compatible with novel causal structures where events happen without a definite causal order. In particular, the quantum switch describes a process in which two quantum channels act in a coherent superposition of their two possible orders. Furthermore, the quantum switch can perform communication tasks that are impossible within the framework of the standard quantum Shannon theory. The present paper considers the scenario of one-shot heralded qubit communication using a higher-order quantum switch constructed from two quantum switches. Specifically, we show that two quantum switches put in a superposition of their alternative causal orders can transmit a qubit, without any error, with a probability strictly higher than that achievable with each quantum switch. We discuss three examples that demonstrate this communication advantage. Notably, a higher-order quantum switch not only can outperform useful quantum switches but also becomes useful as a resource even if the quantum switches making it up are useless.

•Nov 16, 2021•0 citations

Indefinite Causal Order in a Quantum Switch

Kaumudibikash Goswami, Christina Giarmatzi, Michael J. Kewming +4 more

Quantum mechanics allows events to happen with no definite causal order: this can be verified by measuring a causal witness, in the same way that an entanglement witness verifies entanglement. Here, we realize a photonic quantum switch, where two operations A[over ^] and B[over ^] act in a quantum superposition of their two possible orders. The operations are on the transverse spatial mode of the photons; polarization coherently controls their order. Our implementation ensures that the operations cannot be distinguished by spatial or temporal position-further it allows qudit encoding in the target. We confirm our quantum switch has no definite causal order by constructing a causal witness and measuring its value to be 18 standard deviations beyond the definite-order bound.

arXiv:1803.04302•Physical Review Letters•Aug 31, 2018•245 citations

Witnessing causal nonseparability

Mateus Araújo, Cyril Branciard, Fabio Costa +3 more

Our common understanding of the physical world deeply relies on the notion that events are ordered with respect to some time parameter, with past events serving as causes for future ones. Nonetheless, it was recently found that it is possible to formulate quantum mechanics without any reference to a global time or causal structure. The resulting framework includes new kinds of quantum resources that allow performing tasks—in particular, the violation of causal inequalities —which are impossible for events ordered according to a global causal order. However, no physical implementation of such resources is known. Here we show that a recently demonstrated resource for quantum computation—the quantum switch —is a genuine example of ‘indefinite causal order’. We do this by introducing a new tool—the causal witness —which can detect the causal nonseparability of any quantum resource that is incompatible with a definite causal order. We show however that the quantum switch does not violate any causal inequality.

arXiv:1506.03776•New Journal of Physics•Oct 19, 2015•196 citations

Experimental tests of indefinite causal orders

Lee A. Rozema, Giulia Rubino, Adrien Feix +3 more

Summary form only given. A causal order describes the order in which events occur, and how these different events can effect each other. Recently, a description of quantum mechanics making no assumption about the order of events was developed [1]. In this formalism, events are treated in terms of the ability to exchange information between each other. Applying this new formalism to quantum mechanics has shown that processes without a defined causal order can exist. Information can nonetheless be transferred through these processes. Extraordinarily, these processes can accomplish tasks which are not otherwise possible [2-4]. In our group, we have been studying methods to create and characterize one such process: the “quantum SWITCH” [5, 6]. We have shown that, using this process, one can obtain computational advantages [5]. We have also performed a specific sequence of measurements, which we used to determine just how “non-causal” our constructed process is [6].

Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Europe & European Quantum Electronics Conference (CLEO/Europe-EQEC)•Jun 1, 2017•0 citations
We introduce a qubit-based version of the quantum switch, consisting of a variation of the Fermi problem. Two qubits start in a superposition state in which one qubit is excited and the other is in the ground state. However, it is not defined which is the excited qubit. Then, after some time, if a photon is detected, we know that it must have experienced an emission by one atom and then an absorption and re-emission by the other one, but the ordering of the emission events by both qubits is undefined. While it is tempting to refer to this scenario as one with indefinite causality or a superposition of causal orders, we show that there is still a precise notion of causality: the probability of excitation of each atom is totally independent of the other one when the times are short enough to prevent photon exchange.
Treating the time of an event as a quantum variable, we derive a scheme in which superpositions in time are used to perform operations in an indefinite causal order. We use some aspects of a recently developed space-time-symmetric formalism of events. We propose a specific implementation of the scheme and recover the quantum switch, where quantum operations are performed in an order which is entangled with the state of a control qubit. Our scheme does not rely on any exotic quantum gravitational effect, but instead on phenomena which are naturally fuzzy in time, such as the decay of an excited atom.
Classically, the causal order of two timelike separated events A and B is fixed-either A before B or B before A. This is no longer true in quantum theory, where it is possible to encounter superpositions of causal orders. The quantum switch is one of the most prominent processes with indefinite causal order. Optical realizations of the quantum switch have been successfully implemented in experiments, but some argue that this merely simulates a process with indefinite causal order and that a superposition of spacetime metrics is required for a true realization. Here, we provide a relativistic definition of causal order between operationally defined events that defines a meaningful observable in both the general relativistic and quantum mechanical sense. Importantly, this observable does not distinguish between the indefinite causal order implemented on an optical bench and the gravitational quantum switch, a gedanken experiment where the indefinite causal order is achieved by a quantum superposition of gravitational fields. Therefore, our results support the thesis that the optical quantum switch is just as much a realization of indefinite causal order as its gravitational counterpart, which makes use of the quantum mechanical behavior of spacetime.
Recent results have shown that quantum theory is compatible with novel causal structures where events happen without a definite causal order. In particular, the quantum switch describes a process in which two quantum channels act in a coherent superposition of their two possible orders. Furthermore, the quantum switch can perform communication tasks that are impossible within the framework of the standard quantum Shannon theory. The present paper considers the scenario of one-shot heralded qubit communication using a higher-order quantum switch constructed from two quantum switches. Specifically, we show that two quantum switches put in a superposition of their alternative causal orders can transmit a qubit, without any error, with a probability strictly higher than that achievable with each quantum switch. We discuss three examples that demonstrate this communication advantage. Notably, a higher-order quantum switch not only can outperform useful quantum switches but also becomes useful as a resource even if the quantum switches making it up are useless.
Quantum mechanics allows events to happen with no definite causal order: this can be verified by measuring a causal witness, in the same way that an entanglement witness verifies entanglement. Here, we realize a photonic quantum switch, where two operations A[over ^] and B[over ^] act in a quantum superposition of their two possible orders. The operations are on the transverse spatial mode of the photons; polarization coherently controls their order. Our implementation ensures that the operations cannot be distinguished by spatial or temporal position-further it allows qudit encoding in the target. We confirm our quantum switch has no definite causal order by constructing a causal witness and measuring its value to be 18 standard deviations beyond the definite-order bound.
Our common understanding of the physical world deeply relies on the notion that events are ordered with respect to some time parameter, with past events serving as causes for future ones. Nonetheless, it was recently found that it is possible to formulate quantum mechanics without any reference to a global time or causal structure. The resulting framework includes new kinds of quantum resources that allow performing tasks—in particular, the violation of causal inequalities —which are impossible for events ordered according to a global causal order. However, no physical implementation of such resources is known. Here we show that a recently demonstrated resource for quantum computation—the quantum switch —is a genuine example of ‘indefinite causal order’. We do this by introducing a new tool—the causal witness —which can detect the causal nonseparability of any quantum resource that is incompatible with a definite causal order. We show however that the quantum switch does not violate any causal inequality.
Summary form only given. A causal order describes the order in which events occur, and how these different events can effect each other. Recently, a description of quantum mechanics making no assumption about the order of events was developed [1]. In this formalism, events are treated in terms of the ability to exchange information between each other. Applying this new formalism to quantum mechanics has shown that processes without a defined causal order can exist. Information can nonetheless be transferred through these processes. Extraordinarily, these processes can accomplish tasks which are not otherwise possible [2-4]. In our group, we have been studying methods to create and characterize one such process: the “quantum SWITCH” [5, 6]. We have shown that, using this process, one can obtain computational advantages [5]. We have also performed a specific sequence of measurements, which we used to determine just how “non-causal” our constructed process is [6].