Classically, the causal order of two timelike separated events A and B is fixed-either A before B or B before A. This is no longer true in quantum theory, where it is possible to encounter superpositions of causal orders. The quantum switch is one of the most prominent processes with indefinite causal order. Optical realizations of the quantum switch have been successfully implemented in experiments, but some argue that this merely simulates a process with indefinite causal order and that a superposition of spacetime metrics is required for a true realization. Here, we provide a relativistic definition of causal order between operationally defined events that defines a meaningful observable in both the general relativistic and quantum mechanical sense. Importantly, this observable does not distinguish between the indefinite causal order implemented on an optical bench and the gravitational quantum switch, a gedanken experiment where the indefinite causal order is achieved by a quantum superposition of gravitational fields. Therefore, our results support the thesis that the optical quantum switch is just as much a realization of indefinite causal order as its gravitational counterpart, which makes use of the quantum mechanical behavior of spacetime.
Classically, the causal order of two timelike separated events A and B is fixed-either A before B or B before A. This is no longer true in quantum theory, where it is possible to encounter superpositions of causal orders. The quantum switch is one of the most prominent processes with indefinite causal order. Optical realizations of the quantum switch have been successfully implemented in experiments, but some argue that this merely simulates a process with indefinite causal order and that a superposition of spacetime metrics is required for a true realization. Here, we provide a relativistic definition of causal order between operationally defined events that defines a meaningful observable in both the general relativistic and quantum mechanical sense. Importantly, this observable does not distinguish between the indefinite causal order implemented on an optical bench and the gravitational quantum switch, a gedanken experiment where the indefinite causal order is achieved by a quantum superposition of gravitational fields. Therefore, our results support the thesis that the optical quantum switch is just as much a realization of indefinite causal order as its gravitational counterpart, which makes use of the quantum mechanical behavior of spacetime.
Researchers have long been aiming to understand how the characteristics of Quantum Theory and General Relativity combine to account for regimes in their interface. One reason why this is a hard task is how differently the theories approach time and causality. For instance, causal structure in relativity is determined by the distribution of mass in spacetime while, in the quantum formalism, it is supposed to be fixed and given in advance. In this master's thesis, we discuss the notion of indefinite order, which first appears in an abstract generalization of Quantum Theory [...] where the demand for global causal structure is removed, in principle allowing cases for which the order of operations in protocols is not necessarily well defined. One epitomical example of indefinite order is the quantum switch process, which realizes a quantum superposition of orders of two operations on a target system. The quantum switch probabilities have been reproduced in experimental optical setups that are fully described in principle by quantum mechanics. Since these experiments are compatible with spacetime causal structure, this generated uncertainty about the conclusions that can be drawn from obtaining these results depending on the context. Here, we return to the initial motivations and also present how scenarios involving gravity in low energies could lead to indefinite order. This includes the formulation of a quantum switch in a quantum gravity scenario and of a quantum switch in a classical Schwarzschild metric. The switch then provides a common ground to discuss different kinds of setups. The latter proposal of a quantum switch in a classical metric is an original work that, aside from being an example of indefinite order, proposes the realization of the protocol in Earth's gravity as a test of quantum mechanics on curved spacetimes, a regime which has not yet been explored experimentally.
We study the notion of causal orders for the cases of (classical and quantum) circuits and spacetime events. We show that every circuit can be immersed into a classical spacetime, preserving the compatibility between the two causal structures. Using the process matrix formalism, we analyse the realisations of the quantum switch using 4 and 3 spacetime events in classical spacetimes with fixed causal orders, and the realisation of a gravitational switch with only 2 spacetime events that features superpositions of different gravitational field configurations and their respective causal orders. We show that the current quantum switch experimental implementations do not feature superpositions of causal orders between spacetime events, and that these superpositions can only occur in the context of superposed gravitational fields. We also discuss a recently introduced operational notion of an event, which does allow for superpositions of respective causal orders in flat spacetime quantum switch implementations. We construct two observables that can distinguish between the quantum switch realisations in classical spacetimes, and gravitational switch implementations in superposed spacetimes. Finally, we discuss our results in the light of the modern relational approach to physics.
We study the notion of causal orders for the cases of (classical and quantum) circuits and spacetime events. We show that every circuit can be immersed into a classical spacetime, preserving the compatibility between the two causal structures. Using the process matrix formalism, we analyse the realisations of the quantum switch using 4 and 3 spacetime events in classical spacetimes with fixed causal orders, and the realisation of a gravitational switch with only 2 spacetime events that features superpositions of different gravitational field configurations and their respective causal orders. We show that the current quantum switch experimental implementations do not feature superpositions of causal orders between spacetime events, and that these superpositions can only occur in the context of superposed gravitational fields. We also discuss a recently introduced operational notion of an event, which does allow for superpositions of respective causal orders in flat spacetime quantum switch implementations. We construct two observables that can distinguish between the quantum switch realisations in classical spacetimes, and gravitational switch implementations in superposed spacetimes. Finally, we discuss our results in the light of the modern relational approach to physics.
Quantum mechanics allows events to happen with no definite causal order: this can be verified by measuring a causal witness, in the same way that an entanglement witness verifies entanglement. Here, we realize a photonic quantum switch, where two operations A[over ^] and B[over ^] act in a quantum superposition of their two possible orders. The operations are on the transverse spatial mode of the photons; polarization coherently controls their order. Our implementation ensures that the operations cannot be distinguished by spatial or temporal position-further it allows qudit encoding in the target. We confirm our quantum switch has no definite causal order by constructing a causal witness and measuring its value to be 18 standard deviations beyond the definite-order bound.
Quantum theory permits processes with no definite order of operations, yet the everyday world has a perfectly definite one that everybody agrees on. This paper explains the gap with the same mechanism physics already uses to explain why the world looks classical at all: the environment quietly monitors a system and, in doing so, singles out a preferred set of stable alternatives and stamps redundant copies of the outcome all around. Applied to the order of operations, this monitoring selects definite orders as the surviving, stable possibilities and drives every process toward having a definite order. Because the order is copied into many parts of the surroundings, it becomes objective, a fact that independent observers each read off separately and agree upon. The paper makes the argument in four steps. First, it lets an environment gently blur the order information of the simplest indefinite process and shows that a certificate of indefiniteness weakens and crosses over to zero at a definite time, after which the process is ordered; the ordered set, once reached, is never left again, which is the mark of a genuine selection rule. Second, it proves a selection theorem for the switchable process: a standard criterion picks out the two definite orders as the stable survivors, and does so for any environment that couples through the physical thing that sets the order, not merely for one specially chosen coupling; the resulting blurring turns the process into a plain mixture of the two definite orders. Third, when many independent fragments of the environment each record the order, the order is broadcast redundantly, so it becomes objective in the precise sense that separate observers reading separate fragments all agree without disturbing the process; the order-coherence the process loses is exactly the order-information the environment gains. Fourth, it computes the blurring rate from concrete physical environments and turns it into a sharp observability threshold in terms of mass, separation, surrounding vacuum, and available time, which for proposed gravitational versions of the experiment becomes a crossover mass above which indefinite order could still be seen. The payoff is a physical account of why the large-scale world is causally definite and why observers agree about the order of events: definite causal order is einselected and then redundantly broadcast, exactly as a classical fact is. The paper is careful about scope, distinguishing the moment a process first becomes ordered from the later, fully settled state in which the order has been completely resolved and copied, and noting that macroscopic order-markers sit far inside the definite regime. By tying the disappearance of indefinite order to a computable environmental rate, it converts a foundational puzzle into a concrete experimental threshold that says when indefinite order should, and should not, be observable.
The notions of events and their localisation fundamentally differ between quantum theory and general relativity, reconciling them becomes even more important and challenging in the context of quantum gravity where a classical spacetime background can no longer be assumed. We therefore propose an operational approach drawing from quantum information, to define events and their localisation relative to a Lab, which in particular includes a choice of physical degree of freedom (the reference) providing a generalised notion of "location". We define a property of the reference, relative measurability, that is sensitive to correlations between the Lab's reference and objects of study. Applying this proposal to analyse the quantum switch (QS), a process widely associated with indefinite causal order, we uncover differences between classical and quantum spacetime realisations of QS, rooted in the relative measurability of the associated references and possibilities for agents' interventions. Our analysis also clarifies a longstanding debate on the interpretation of QS experiments, demonstrating how different conclusions stem from distinct assumptions on the Labs. This provides a foundation for a more unified view of events, localisation, and causality across quantum and relativistic domains.