Variational quantum algorithms are suitable for use on noisy quantum systems. One of the most important use-cases is the quantum simulation of materials, using the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE). To optimize VQE performance, a suitable parameterized quantum circuit (ansatz) must be selected. We investigate a class of ansatze that incorporates knowledge of the quantum hardware, namely the hardware efficient ansatze. The performance of hardware efficient ansatze is affected differently by noise, and our goal is to study the effect of noise on evaluating which ansatz gives more accurate results in practice. First, we study the effect of noise on the different hardware efficient ansatze by benchmarking and ranking the performance of each ansatz family (i) on a chemistry application using VQE and (ii) by the recently established metric of "expressibility". The results demonstrate the ranking of optimal circuits does not remain constant in the presence of noise. Second, we evaluate the suitability of the expressibility measure in this context by performing a correlation study between expressibility and the performance of the same circuits on a chemistry application using VQE. Our simulations reveal a weak correlation and therefore demonstrate that expressibility is not an adequate measure to quantify the effectiveness of parameterized quantum circuits for quantum chemistry. Third, we evaluate the effect of different quantum device noise models on the ordering of which ansatz family is best. Interestingly, we see that to decide which ansatz is optimal for use, one needs to consider the specific hardware used even within the same family of quantum hardware.
Variational quantum algorithms are suitable for use on noisy quantum systems. One of the most important use-cases is the quantum simulation of materials, using the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE). To optimize VQE performance, a suitable parameterized quantum circuit (ansatz) must be selected. We investigate a class of ansatze that incorporates knowledge of the quantum hardware, namely the hardware efficient ansatze. The performance of hardware efficient ansatze is affected differently by noise, and our goal is to study the effect of noise on evaluating which ansatz gives more accurate results in practice. First, we study the effect of noise on the different hardware efficient ansatze by benchmarking and ranking the performance of each ansatz family (i) on a chemistry application using VQE and (ii) by the recently established metric of "expressibility". The results demonstrate the ranking of optimal circuits does not remain constant in the presence of noise. Second, we evaluate the suitability of the expressibility measure in this context by performing a correlation study between expressibility and the performance of the same circuits on a chemistry application using VQE. Our simulations reveal a weak correlation and therefore demonstrate that expressibility is not an adequate measure to quantify the effectiveness of parameterized quantum circuits for quantum chemistry. Third, we evaluate the effect of different quantum device noise models on the ordering of which ansatz family is best. Interestingly, we see that to decide which ansatz is optimal for use, one needs to consider the specific hardware used even within the same family of quantum hardware.
Abstract Quantum computers are expected to be highly beneficial for chemistry simulations, promising significant improvements in accuracy and speed. The most prominent algorithm for chemistry simulations on NISQ devices is the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE). It is a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm which calculates the ground state energy of a Hamiltonian based on parametrized quantum circuits, while a classical optimizer is used to find optimal parameter values. However, quantum hardware is affected by noise, and it needs to be understood to which extent it can degrade the performance of the VQE algorithm. In this paper, we study the impact of noise on the example of the hydrogen molecule. First, we compare the VQE performance for a set of various optimizers, from which we find NFT to be the most suitable one. Next, we quantify the effect of different noise sources by systematically increasing their strength. The noise intensity is varied around values common to superconducting devices of IBM Q, and curve fitting is used to model the relationship between the obtained energy values and the noise magnitude. Since the amount of noise in a circuit highly depends on its architecture, we perform our studies for different ansatzes, including both hardware-efficient and chemistry-inspired ones. Finally, we compare our results from noisy simulations with experiments on different IBM hardware devices.
The variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) is a promising algorithm for near-term quantum chemistry applications, but selecting optimal ansatz circuits remains challenging. Expressibility, a metric quantifying a circuit's ability to explore the Hilbert space, has been proposed as a guide for ansatz selection, but recent work showed it inconsistently predicts VQE performance under realistic noise for H2. We extend this investigation to cover both H2 and H3+ under four execution scenarios: ideal, noisy, and noisy with zero-noise extrapolation (ZNE) or probabilistic error cancellation (PEC). We find that error mitigation does not reliably restore expressibility's predictive power. ZNE reduces error for only 4 of 12 H2 circuits and 4 of 6 H3+ circuits, while PEC actually increases error in 11 of 12 H2 circuits and all 6 H3+ circuits. We reproduce and extend Saib et al.'s key finding that circuit rankings scramble under noise (Spearman ρ≈−0.1 between ideal and noisy rankings), and identify a new result: ZNE largely preserves noisy rankings (ρ=+0.80 for H2) while PEC actively reorders them (ρ=−0.22). Noisy expressibility, computed from density matrix simulations, strongly predicts unmitigated performance for H3+ (Pearson r=+0.91, p=0.01), but this metric is computationally intractable at scale. We demonstrate that zero-cost circuit topology metrics such as two-qubit gate count provide comparable or superior predictive power for PEC degradation (r=+0.96 for H3+), while standard expressibility best predicts noisy and ZNE performance for H2 (r=+0.74 and r=+0.77).
The Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) is a promising quantum algorithm for applications in chemistry within the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era. The ability for a quantum computer to simulate electronic structures with high accuracy would have a profound impact on material and biochemical science with potential applications e.g., to the development of new drugs. However, considering the variety of quantum hardware architectures, it is still uncertain which hardware concept is most suited to execute the VQE for e.g., the simulation of molecules. Aspects to consider here are the required connectivity of the quantum circuit used, the size and the depth and thus the susceptibility to noise effects. Besides theo-retical considerations, empirical studies using available quantum hardware may help to clarify the question of which hardware technology might be better suited for a certain given application and algorithm. Going one step into this direction, within this work, we present results using the VQE for the simulation of the hydrogen molecule, comparing superconducting and ion trap quantum computers. The experiments are carried out with a standardized setup of ansatz and optimizer, selected to reduce the number of required iterations. The findings are analyzed considering different quantum processor types, calibration data as well as the depth and gate counts of the circuits required for the different hardware concepts after transpilation.
Variational quantum algorithms have shown promise in numerous fields due to their versatility in solving problems of scientific and commercial interest. However, leading algorithms for Hamiltonian simulation, such as the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE), use fixed preconstructed ansatzes, limiting their general applicability and accuracy. Thus, variational forms---the quantum circuits that implement ansatzes ---are either crafted heuristically or by encoding domain-specific knowledge. In this paper, we present an Evolutionary Variational Quantum Eigensolver (EVQE), a novel variational algorithm that uses evolutionary programming techniques to minimize the expectation value of a given Hamiltonian by dynamically generating and optimizing an ansatz. The algorithm is equally applicable to optimization problems in all domains, obtaining accurate energy evaluations with hardware-efficient ansatzes. In molecular simulations, the variational forms generated by EVQE are up to 18.6× shallower and use up to 12× fewer CX gates than those obtained by VQE with a unitary coupled cluster ansatz. EVQE demonstrates significant noise-resistance properties, obtaining results in noisy simulation with at least 3.6× less error than VQE using any tested ansatz configuration. We successfully evaluated EVQE on a real 5-qubit IBMQ quantum computer. The experimental results, which we obtained both via simulation and on real quantum hardware, demonstrate the effectiveness of EVQE for general-purpose optimization on the quantum computers of the present and near future.
New approaches into computational quantum chemistry can be developed through the use of quantum computing. While universal, fault-tolerant quantum computers are still not available, and we want to utilize today's noisy quantum processors. One of their flagship applications is the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE)-an algorithm for calculating the minimum energy of a physical Hamiltonian. In this study, we investigate how various types of errors affect the VQE and how to efficiently use the available resources to produce precise computational results. We utilize a simulator of a noisy quantum device, an exact statevector simulator, and physical quantum hardware to study the VQE algorithm for molecular hydrogen. We find that the optimal method of running the hybrid classical-quantum optimization is to: (i) allow some noise in intermediate energy evaluations, using fewer shots per step and fewer optimization iterations, but ensure a high final readout precision; (ii) emphasize efficient problem encoding and ansatz parametrization; and (iii) run all experiments within a short time-frame, avoiding parameter drift with time. Nevertheless, current publicly available quantum resources are still very noisy and scarce/expensive, and even when using them efficiently, it is quite difficult to perform trustworthy calculations of molecular energies.
The hardware requirements of useful quantum algorithms remain unmet by the quantum computers available today. Because it was designed to soften these requirements, the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) has gained popularity as a contender for a chance at quantum advantage with near-term quantum computers. The ansatz, a parameterized circuit that prepares trial states, can dictate the success (or lack thereof) of a VQE. Too deep ansätze can hinder near-term viability, or lead to trainability issues that render the algorithm inefficient. The purpose of this thesis was to analyse different ansätze proposed for quantum chemistry, examining their noise-resilience and viability in state-of-the-art quantum computers. In particular, dynamic ansätze (ADAPT-VQEs) were explored, and the impact of the choice of pool and selection criterion on their performance was analysed.