Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2104.07320 · IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C)

Modelling for Quantum Error Mitigation

Tom Weber, Matthias Riebisch, K. Borras, Karl Jansen, Dirk Krücker

Published Mar 1, 2021• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

While we expect quantum computers to surpass their classical counterparts in the future, current devices are prone to high error rates and techniques to minimise the impact of these errors are indispensable. There already exists a variety of error mitigation methods addressing this quantum noise that differ in effectiveness, and scalability. But for a more systematic and comprehensible approach we propose the introduction of modelling, in particular for representing cause-effect relations as well as for evaluating methods or combinations thereof with respect to a selection of relevant criteria.

DOI
10.1109/icsa-c52384.2021.00026

Related papers

An overview of quantum error mitigation formulas

Dayue Qin, Xiaosi Xu, Ying Li

Minimizing the effect of noise is essential for quantum computers. The conventional method to protect qubits against noise is through quantum error correction. However, for current quantum hardware in the so-called noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era, noise presents in these systems and is too high for error correction to be beneficial. Quantum error mitigation is a set of alternative methods for minimizing errors, including error extrapolation, probabilistic error cancellation, measurement error mitigation, subspace expansion, symmetry verification, virtual distillation, etc. The requirement for these methods is usually less demanding than error correction. Quantum error mitigation is a promising way of reducing errors on NISQ quantum computers. This paper gives a comprehensive introduction to quantum error mitigation. The state-of-art error mitigation methods are covered and formulated in a general form, which provides a basis for comparing, combining and optimizing different methods in future work.

Chinese Physics B•Jun 22, 2022•26 citations

Enhancing quantum models of stochastic processes with error mitigation

Matthew Ho, Ryuji Takagi, Mile Gu

Error mitigation has been one of the recently sought after methods to reduce the effects of noise when computation is performed on a noisy near-term quantum computer. Interest in simulating stochastic processes with quantum models gained popularity after being proven to require less memory than their classical counterparts. With previous work on quantum models focusing primarily on further compressing memory, this work branches out into the experimental scene; we aim to bridge the gap between theoretical quantum models and practical use with the inclusion of error mitigation methods. It is observed that error mitigation is successful in improving the resultant expectation values. While our results indicate that error mitigation work, we show that its methodology is ultimately constrained by hardware limitations in these quantum computers.

arXiv:2105.06448•May 13, 2021•2 citations

Title: Quantum Error Mitigation with Hybrid Quantum-Classical Techniques

Jincheng Zhang

Quantum error mitigation (QEM) is a crucial step in developing practical quantum algorithms, allowing for the correction of errors introduced during computation. However, the inherent complexity of quantum systems and the need for computationally intensive error correction mechanisms have historically limited the widespread adoption of QEM. This paper proposes a novel hybrid quantum-classical approach to QEM, integrating classical computation for error correction with dynamically adjusting quantum computations to minimize the impact of noise. We demonstrate the efficacy of this strategy through a series of simulations and analysis, showcasing a significant reduction in error rates compared to traditional methods. The core mechanism involves a feedback loop that prioritizes error correction based on real-time error metrics, utilizing classical computation to optimize the quantum circuit's execution. This approach addresses the limitations of existing methods by offering a more efficient and scalable solution for QEM, paving the way for broader quantum computing applications.

•Aug 31, 2026•0 citations

Constructing and Benchmarking Noise Models for Quantum Computing

Tom Weber

Context: The main obstacle of quantum computing on its way to scalability is the noisy nature of current hardware. Various types of errors lead to incorrect computational results,and measures such as quantum error mitigation are needed to counteract these errors. Many error mitigation techniques require a thorough understanding of the noise and its impact on computations. Therefore, accurate noise models are indispensable to facilitate meaningful quantum computing in the near future. They also enable realistic simulations of quantum devices. Since these devices are currently limited and quantum computing is expensive, researchers typically rely on simulations for testing their algorithms.Objective: In this thesis, we aim to construct a realistic noise model for quantum computing and optimise its model parameters. The model construction should build on the underlying physical processes, and the number of parameters should scale well with the system size. We also address the evaluation and comparison of different noise models by benchmarks using quantum circuits specific to real-world applications. Finally, we aim to develop useful graphical representations of noise models based on the existing quantum circuit model.Method: We present a benchmarking framework for quantum computing noise models and evaluate it based on benchmarking quality attributes from the literature. Moreover, we construct a quantum computing noise model and develop a training procedure for its parameters. We analyse the parameters of the trained noise model and the impact ofdifferent types of errors on computations. We benchmark the noise model with the above approach and compare it to a noise model provided by IBM’s software development kit Qiskit. Finally, we develop an extension of the quantum circuit model to represent noise channels.Result: The benchmarks performed in this thesis show that our noise model predicts noisy hardware behaviour of IBM’s ibmq_manila quantum device equally well as the Qiskit model, if not better, based on quantum circuits commonly used for variational quantum algorithms. Within the trained noise model, readout error has the most detrimental impact on computations. Our benchmarking approach satisfies relevant quality criteria by choosing suitable quantum circuits and objective functions to compare model predictionsto hardware data. Moreover, the quantum circuit model can be extended meaningfully by noise channels.Conclusion: Our benchmarking approach is suitable for evaluating and comparing quantum computing noise models. In future work, volumetric benchmarks should be performed for various noise models and application contexts. The parameter optimisation based on learning with training circuits yields accurate noise models and shows the importance of mitigating measurement error. Different optimisation algorithms and quantum circuits should be explored, and more types of noise should be incorporated into the noise model.

•Jan 12, 2026•0 citations

Practical Quantum Error Mitigation for Near-Future Applications

Suguru Endo, Simon C. Benjamin, Ying Li

A new analysis of quantum error mitigation, which attempts to limit the effects of errors in near-term quantum computers, shows that two proposed techniques can work in small systems without the need for extra qubits or peripheral devices.

arXiv:1712.09271•Physical Review X•Jul 26, 2018•562 citations

Fictitious Copy Quantum Error Mitigation

Akib Karim, Harish J. Vallury, Muhammad Usman

Errors are arguably the most pressing challenge impeding practical applications of quantum computers, which has instigated vigorous research on the development of quantum error mitigation (QEM) techniques. Existing QEM methods suppress errors with a varying degree of efficacy but importantly demand significant additional quantum and classical computational resources. In this work, we present Fictitious Copy Quantum Error Mitigation (FCQEM) method which corrects quantum errors without requiring any additional quantum resources and purely relies on using classical postprocessing of a joint probability distribution to correct expectation values. The joint probability distribution can be measured ``fictitiously'' by sampling one copy of noisy quantum circuit twice, or classically squaring probabilities from simply one copy. We show that FCQEM can recover eigenvalues even if exact eigenstates are not prepared. Furthermore, our technique can benefit other noise mitigation techniques with no additional quantum resources, which is demonstrated by combining FCQEM with the Quantum Computed Moments (QCM) method. FCQEM can compensate for noise that is pathological to QCM, and QCM allows for FCQEM to recover the ground state energy with a larger variety of trial states. We show that our technique can find the exact ground state energy of molecular and spin models under simulated noise models as well as experiments on a Rigetti 84-qubit superconducting quantum processor. The reported FCQEM method is general purpose for the current generation of quantum devices and is applicable to any problem that measures eigenvalues of operators on sharply peaked distributions.

quant-pharXiv:2603.09302•Mar 11, 2026•0 citations
While we expect quantum computers to surpass their classical counterparts in the future, current devices are prone to high error rates and techniques to minimise the impact of these errors are indispensable. There already exists a variety of error mitigation methods addressing this quantum noise that differ in effectiveness, and scalability. But for a more systematic and comprehensible approach we propose the introduction of modelling, in particular for representing cause-effect relations as well as for evaluating methods or combinations thereof with respect to a selection of relevant criteria.
Minimizing the effect of noise is essential for quantum computers. The conventional method to protect qubits against noise is through quantum error correction. However, for current quantum hardware in the so-called noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era, noise presents in these systems and is too high for error correction to be beneficial. Quantum error mitigation is a set of alternative methods for minimizing errors, including error extrapolation, probabilistic error cancellation, measurement error mitigation, subspace expansion, symmetry verification, virtual distillation, etc. The requirement for these methods is usually less demanding than error correction. Quantum error mitigation is a promising way of reducing errors on NISQ quantum computers. This paper gives a comprehensive introduction to quantum error mitigation. The state-of-art error mitigation methods are covered and formulated in a general form, which provides a basis for comparing, combining and optimizing different methods in future work.
Error mitigation has been one of the recently sought after methods to reduce the effects of noise when computation is performed on a noisy near-term quantum computer. Interest in simulating stochastic processes with quantum models gained popularity after being proven to require less memory than their classical counterparts. With previous work on quantum models focusing primarily on further compressing memory, this work branches out into the experimental scene; we aim to bridge the gap between theoretical quantum models and practical use with the inclusion of error mitigation methods. It is observed that error mitigation is successful in improving the resultant expectation values. While our results indicate that error mitigation work, we show that its methodology is ultimately constrained by hardware limitations in these quantum computers.
Quantum error mitigation (QEM) is a crucial step in developing practical quantum algorithms, allowing for the correction of errors introduced during computation. However, the inherent complexity of quantum systems and the need for computationally intensive error correction mechanisms have historically limited the widespread adoption of QEM. This paper proposes a novel hybrid quantum-classical approach to QEM, integrating classical computation for error correction with dynamically adjusting quantum computations to minimize the impact of noise. We demonstrate the efficacy of this strategy through a series of simulations and analysis, showcasing a significant reduction in error rates compared to traditional methods. The core mechanism involves a feedback loop that prioritizes error correction based on real-time error metrics, utilizing classical computation to optimize the quantum circuit's execution. This approach addresses the limitations of existing methods by offering a more efficient and scalable solution for QEM, paving the way for broader quantum computing applications.
Context: The main obstacle of quantum computing on its way to scalability is the noisy nature of current hardware. Various types of errors lead to incorrect computational results,and measures such as quantum error mitigation are needed to counteract these errors. Many error mitigation techniques require a thorough understanding of the noise and its impact on computations. Therefore, accurate noise models are indispensable to facilitate meaningful quantum computing in the near future. They also enable realistic simulations of quantum devices. Since these devices are currently limited and quantum computing is expensive, researchers typically rely on simulations for testing their algorithms.Objective: In this thesis, we aim to construct a realistic noise model for quantum computing and optimise its model parameters. The model construction should build on the underlying physical processes, and the number of parameters should scale well with the system size. We also address the evaluation and comparison of different noise models by benchmarks using quantum circuits specific to real-world applications. Finally, we aim to develop useful graphical representations of noise models based on the existing quantum circuit model.Method: We present a benchmarking framework for quantum computing noise models and evaluate it based on benchmarking quality attributes from the literature. Moreover, we construct a quantum computing noise model and develop a training procedure for its parameters. We analyse the parameters of the trained noise model and the impact ofdifferent types of errors on computations. We benchmark the noise model with the above approach and compare it to a noise model provided by IBM’s software development kit Qiskit. Finally, we develop an extension of the quantum circuit model to represent noise channels.Result: The benchmarks performed in this thesis show that our noise model predicts noisy hardware behaviour of IBM’s ibmq_manila quantum device equally well as the Qiskit model, if not better, based on quantum circuits commonly used for variational quantum algorithms. Within the trained noise model, readout error has the most detrimental impact on computations. Our benchmarking approach satisfies relevant quality criteria by choosing suitable quantum circuits and objective functions to compare model predictionsto hardware data. Moreover, the quantum circuit model can be extended meaningfully by noise channels.Conclusion: Our benchmarking approach is suitable for evaluating and comparing quantum computing noise models. In future work, volumetric benchmarks should be performed for various noise models and application contexts. The parameter optimisation based on learning with training circuits yields accurate noise models and shows the importance of mitigating measurement error. Different optimisation algorithms and quantum circuits should be explored, and more types of noise should be incorporated into the noise model.
Errors are arguably the most pressing challenge impeding practical applications of quantum computers, which has instigated vigorous research on the development of quantum error mitigation (QEM) techniques. Existing QEM methods suppress errors with a varying degree of efficacy but importantly demand significant additional quantum and classical computational resources. In this work, we present Fictitious Copy Quantum Error Mitigation (FCQEM) method which corrects quantum errors without requiring any additional quantum resources and purely relies on using classical postprocessing of a joint probability distribution to correct expectation values. The joint probability distribution can be measured ``fictitiously'' by sampling one copy of noisy quantum circuit twice, or classically squaring probabilities from simply one copy. We show that FCQEM can recover eigenvalues even if exact eigenstates are not prepared. Furthermore, our technique can benefit other noise mitigation techniques with no additional quantum resources, which is demonstrated by combining FCQEM with the Quantum Computed Moments (QCM) method. FCQEM can compensate for noise that is pathological to QCM, and QCM allows for FCQEM to recover the ground state energy with a larger variety of trial states. We show that our technique can find the exact ground state energy of molecular and spin models under simulated noise models as well as experiments on a Rigetti 84-qubit superconducting quantum processor. The reported FCQEM method is general purpose for the current generation of quantum devices and is applicable to any problem that measures eigenvalues of operators on sharply peaked distributions.