Quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a promising hybrid quantum-classical algorithm for solving combinatorial optimization problems. However, it cannot overcome qubit limitation for large-scale problems. Furthermore, the simulation time of QAOA scales poorly with the problem size. We propose a divide-and-conquer QAOA (DC-QAOA) to address the above challenges for graph maximum cut (MaxCut) problem. The algorithm works by recursively partitioning a larger graph into smaller ones whose MaxCut solutions are obtained with small-size noisy intermediate-scale quantum computers. The overall solution is retrieved from the subsolutions by applying the combination policy of measurement distribution reconstruction (MDR). The solution quality depends on the graph partitioning algorithm and MDR policy. Multiple partitioning and reconstruction methods are proposed and compared. Results are evaluated by metrics, such as quantum program runtime, measurement expectation value (EV), and approximation ratio (AR). The results show that DC-QAOA achieves 97.14% AR (20.32% higher than classical counterpart), and 94.79% EV (15.80% higher than quantum annealing). DC-QAOA solves large-scale graph instances with a polynomial rate or returns unsuccessful partition if graph connectivity requirement is not fulfilled otherwise.
Quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a promising hybrid quantum-classical algorithm for solving combinatorial optimization problems. However, it cannot overcome qubit limitation for large-scale problems. Furthermore, the simulation time of QAOA scales poorly with the problem size. We propose a divide-and-conquer QAOA (DC-QAOA) to address the above challenges for graph maximum cut (MaxCut) problem. The algorithm works by recursively partitioning a larger graph into smaller ones whose MaxCut solutions are obtained with small-size noisy intermediate-scale quantum computers. The overall solution is retrieved from the subsolutions by applying the combination policy of measurement distribution reconstruction (MDR). The solution quality depends on the graph partitioning algorithm and MDR policy. Multiple partitioning and reconstruction methods are proposed and compared. Results are evaluated by metrics, such as quantum program runtime, measurement expectation value (EV), and approximation ratio (AR). The results show that DC-QAOA achieves 97.14% AR (20.32% higher than classical counterpart), and 94.79% EV (15.80% higher than quantum annealing). DC-QAOA solves large-scale graph instances with a polynomial rate or returns unsuccessful partition if graph connectivity requirement is not fulfilled otherwise.
Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) has emerged as a promising solution for combinatorial optimization problems using a hybrid quantum-classical framework. Among combinatorial optimization problems, the Maximum Cut (Max-Cut) problem is particularly important due to its broad applicability in various domains. While QAOA-based Max-Cut solvers have been developed, they primarily favor solution accuracy over execution efficiency, which significantly limits their practicality for large-scale problems. To address the limitation, we propose ParaQAOA, a parallel divide-and-conquer QAOA framework that leverages parallel computing hardware to efficiently solve large Max-Cut problems. ParaQAOA significantly reduces runtime by partitioning large problems into subproblems and solving them in parallel while preserving solution quality. This design not only scales to graphs with tens of thousands of vertices but also provides tunable control over accuracy-efficiency trade-offs, making ParaQAOA adaptable to diverse performance requirements. Experimental results demonstrate that ParaQAOA achieves up to 1,600x speedup over state-of-the-art methods on Max-Cut problems with 400 vertices while maintaining solution accuracy within 2% of the best-known solutions. Furthermore, ParaQAOA solves a 16,000-vertex instance in 19 minutes, compared to over 13.6 days required by the best-known approach. These findings establish ParaQAOA as a practical and scalable framework for large-scale Max-Cut problems under stringent time constraints.
Abstract Quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a quantum–classical hybrid algorithm proposed with the goal of approximately solving combinatorial optimization problems such as the MAX-CUT problem. It has been considered a potential candidate for achieving quantum advantage in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum era and has been extensively studied. However, the performance limitations of low-level QAOA have also been demonstrated across various instances. In this work, we first analytically prove the performance limitations of the standard level-1 QAOA in solving the MAX-CUT problem on bipartite graphs. To this end, we derive an upper bound for the approximation ratio based on the average degree of bipartite graphs. Second, we demonstrate that recursive QAOA (RQAOA), which recursively reduces graph size using QAOA as a subroutine, outperforms the standard level-1 QAOA. However, the performance of RQAOA exhibits limitations as the graph size increases. Finally, we show that RQAOA with a restricted parameter regime can fully address these limitations. Surprisingly, this modified RQAOA always finds the exact maximum cut for any bipartite graphs and even for a more general graph with parity-signed weights.
The Quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a leading hybrid classical-quantum algorithm for solving complex combinatorial optimization problems. QAOA-in-QAOA (QAOA2) uses a divide-and-conquer heuristic to solve large-scale Maximum Cut (MaxCut) problems, where many sub-graph problems can be solved in parallel. In this work, an implementation of the QAOA2method for the scalable solution of the MaxCut problem is presented, based on the Classiq platform. The framework is executed on an HPE-Cray EX supercomputer by means of the Message Passing Interface (MPI) and the SLURM workload manager. The limits of the Goemans-Williamson (GW) algorithm as a purely classical alternative to QAOA are investigated to understand if QAOA2could benefit from solving certain sub-graphs classically. Results from large-scale simulations of up to 33 qubits are presented, showing the advantage of QAOA in certain cases and the efficiency of the implementation, as well as the adequacy of the workflow in the preparation of real quantum devices. For the considered graphs, the best choice for the sub-graphs does not significantly improve results and is still outperformed by GW.
The design of fast algorithms for combinatorial optimization greatly contributes to a plethora of domains such as logistics, finance, and chemistry. Quantum approximate optimization algorithms (QAOAs), which utilize the power of quantum machines and inherit the spirit of adiabatic evolution, are approaches to tackle combinatorial problems with potential runtime speedups. However, hurdled by the limited quantum resources nowadays, QAOAs are infeasible to manipulate large-scale problems. To address this issue, here we revisit the MaxCut problem via the divide-and-conquer heuristic: seek the solutions of subgraphs in parallel and then merge these solutions to obtain the global solution. Because of the Z2 symmetry in MaxCut, we prove that the merging process can be further cast into a new MaxCut problem and thus be addressed by QAOAs or other MaxCut solvers. In view of this, we propose QAOA-in-QAOA (QAOA2) to solve arbitrary large-scale MaxCut problems using small quantum machines. We also prove that the performance of QAOA2 is lower bounded with respect to the divide-and-conquer process. Experiment results illustrate that, under different graph settings, QAOA2 attains a competitive or even better performance over classical algorithms when the node count is around 2000. Our method can be seamlessly embedded into other advanced strategies to enhance the capability of QAOAs in large-scale combinatorial optimization problems.
Abstract The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a hybrid quantum–classical algorithm to solve binary-variable optimization problems. Due to the short circuit depth and its expected robustness to systematic errors it is a promising candidate likely to run on near-term quantum devices. We simulate the performance of QAOA applied to the Max-Cut problem and compare it with some of the best classical alternatives. When comparing solvers, their performance is characterized by the computational time taken to achieve a given quality of solution. Since QAOA is based on sampling, we utilize performance metrics based on the probability of observing a sample above a certain quality. In addition, we show that the QAOA performance varies significantly with the graph type. In particular for three-regular random graphs, QAOA performance shows improvement by up to two orders of magnitude compared to previous estimates, strongly reducing the performance gap with classical alternatives. This was possible by reducing the number of function evaluations per iteration and optimizing the variational parameters on small graph instances and transferring to large via training. Because QAOA’s performance guarantees are only known for limited applications and contexts, we utilize a framework for the search for quantum advantage which incorporates a large number of problem instances and all three classical solver modalities: exact, approximate, and heuristic.
Quantum computers are devices, which allow more efficient solutions of problems as compared to their classical counterparts.As the timeline to developing a quantum-error corrected computer is unclear, the quantum computing community has dedicated much attention to developing algorithms for currently available noisy intermediate-scale quantum computers (NISQ).Thus far, within NISQ, optimization problems are one of the most commonly studied and are quite often tackled with the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA).This algorithm is best known for computing graph partitions with a maximal separation of edges (MaxCut), but can easily calculate other problems related to graphs.Here, I present a novel quantum optimization algorithm, which uses exponentially less qubits as compared to the QAOA while requiring a significantly reduced number of quantum operations to solve the MaxCut problem.Such an improved performance allowed me to partition graphs with 32 nodes on publicly available 5 qubit gate-based quantum computers without any preprocessing such as division of the graph into smaller subgraphs.These results represent a 40% increase in graph size as compared to state-of-art experiments on gate-based quantum computers such as Google Sycamore.The obtained lower bound is 54.9% on the solution for actual hardware benchmarks and 77.6% on ideal simulators of quantum computers.Furthermore, large-scale optimization problems represented by graphs of a 128 nodes are tackled with simulators of quantum computers, again without any predivision into smaller subproblems and a lower solution bound of 67.9% is achieved.The study presented here paves way to using powerful genetic optimizer in synergy with quantum computers.