Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2101.02464 · Physical Review Letters

Information-Theoretic Bounds on Quantum Advantage in Machine Learning

Hsin-Yuan Huang, Richard Kueng, John P. Preskill

Published May 14, 2021• 254 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We study the performance of classical and quantum machine learning (ML) models in predicting outcomes of physical experiments. The experiments depend on an input parameter x and involve execution of a (possibly unknown) quantum process E. Our figure of merit is the number of runs of E required to achieve a desired prediction performance. We consider classical ML models that perform a measurement and record the classical outcome after each run of E, and quantum ML models that can access E coherently to acquire quantum data; the classical or quantum data are then used to predict the outcomes of future experiments. We prove that for any input distribution D(x), a classical ML model can provide accurate predictions on average by accessing E a number of times comparable to the optimal quantum ML model. In contrast, for achieving an accurate prediction on all inputs, we prove that the exponential quantum advantage is possible. For example, to predict the expectations of all Pauli observables in an n-qubit system ρ, classical ML models require 2^{Ω(n)} copies of ρ, but we present a quantum ML model using only O(n) copies. Our results clarify where the quantum advantage is possible and highlight the potential for classical ML models to address challenging quantum problems in physics and chemistry.

DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.126.190505

Related papers

Quantum advantage in learning from experiments

Hsin-Yuan Huang, Michael Broughton, Jordan S. Cotler +8 more

Quantum technology promises to revolutionize how we learn about the physical world. An experiment that processes quantum data with a quantum computer could have substantial advantages over conventional experiments in which quantum states are measured and outcomes are processed with a classical computer. We proved that quantum machines could learn from exponentially fewer experiments than the number required by conventional experiments. This exponential advantage is shown for predicting properties of physical systems, performing quantum principal component analysis, and learning about physical dynamics. Furthermore, the quantum resources needed for achieving an exponential advantage are quite modest in some cases. Conducting experiments with 40 superconducting qubits and 1300 quantum gates, we demonstrated that a substantial quantum advantage is possible with today's quantum processors.

arXiv:2112.00778•Science•Jun 9, 2022•516 citations

Limitations of Quantum Advantage in Unsupervised Machine Learning

Apoorva D. Patel

Machine learning models are used for pattern recognition analysis of big data, without direct human intervention. The task of unsupervised learning is to find the probability distribution that would best describe the available data, and then use it to make predictions for observables of interest. Classical models generally fit the data to Boltzmann distribution of Hamiltonians with a large number of tunable parameters. Quantum extensions of these models replace classical probability distributions with quantum density matrices. An advantage can be obtained only when features of density matrices that are absent in classical probability distributions are exploited. Such situations depend on the input data as well as the targeted observables. Explicit examples are discussed that bring out the constraints limiting possible quantum advantage. The problem-dependent extent of quantum advantage has implications for both data analysis and sensing applications.

quant-pharXiv:2511.10709•IEEE International Conference on Quantum Control, Computing and Learning (qCCL)•Nov 14, 2025•0 citations

Exponential quantum advantage in processing massive classical data

Haimeng Zhao, Alexander Zlokapa, Hartmut Neven +4 more

Broadly applicable quantum advantage, particularly in classical data processing and machine learning, has been a fundamental open problem. In this work, we prove that a small quantum computer of polylogarithmic size can perform large-scale classification and dimension reduction on massive classical data by processing samples on the fly, whereas any classical machine achieving the same prediction performance requires exponentially larger size. Furthermore, classical machines that are exponentially larger yet below the required size need superpolynomially more samples and time. We provide evidence for these quantum advantages in real-world applications, including single-cell RNA sequencing and movie review sentiment analysis, demonstrating four to six orders of magnitude reduction in size with fewer than 60 logical qubits. These quantum advantages are enabled by quantum oracle sketching, an algorithm for accessing the classical world in quantum superposition using only random classical data samples. Combined with classical shadows, our algorithm circumvents the data loading and readout bottleneck to construct succinct classical models from massive classical data, a task provably impossible for any classical machine that is not exponentially larger than the quantum machine. These quantum advantages persist even when classical machines are granted unlimited time or if BPP = BQP, and rely only on the correctness of quantum mechanics. Together, our results establish machine learning on classical data as a broad and natural domain of quantum advantage and a fundamental test of quantum mechanics at the complexity frontier.

quant-pharXiv:2604.07639•Apr 10, 2026•0 citations

Exponential quantum advantages in learning quantum observables from classical data

Riccardo Molteni, Casper Gyurik, Vedran Dunjko

Abstract Quantum computers are believed to bring computational advantages in simulating quantum many-body systems. However, recent works have shown that classical machine learning algorithms are able to predict numerous properties of quantum systems with classical data. Despite examples of learning tasks with provable quantum advantages being proposed, they all involve cryptographic functions and do not represent any physical scenarios encountered in laboratory settings. In this paper, we prove quantum advantages for the physically relevant task of learning quantum observables from classical (measured-out) data. We consider two types of observables: first, we prove a learning advantage for linear combinations of Pauli strings, then we extend our results to a broader case of unitarily parametrized observables. For each case, we delineate sharp boundaries separating physically relevant tasks that admit efficient classical learning from those for which a quantum computer remains necessary for data analysis. Unlike previous works, our classical hardness results rely only on the weaker assumption that $$BQP$$ B Q P hard processes cannot be simulated by polynomial-size classical circuits, and we also provide a nontrivial quantum learning algorithm. Our results clarify when quantum resources are useful for learning problems in quantum many-body physics, and suggest practical directions in which quantum learning improvements may emerge.

arXiv:2405.02027•npj Quantum Information•Jan 10, 2026•6 citations

An ML-Based Quantum Advantage Calculator

Miguel Paredes Quiñones, Ítalo Santana, Diego Noble

We developed a quantum-advantage predictor tool which uses machine learning models to determine when and at what cost a computational problem can be feasibly executed on gate-based quantum computers. We trained the models on data from Quantum Resource Estimators. Our ML-based tool aims at demonstrating a more realistic calculation of running times by considering not only QRE results but also the classical computational effort in running circuits into a quantum hardware (e.g., transpilation, algorithm preparation, solution encoding/decoding, etc.). The proposed tool is divided into two main sections: advantage may happen based on by year or by hardware evolutions for a determined problem and hardware specification. In both sections, a user can select a set of input parameters to verify the resulting runtimes and costs of quantum and classical parts to determine if quantum advantage will be achievable. Our application demonstrates that, despite limited information from vendors, we can still obtain accurate predictions to determine the realization of quantum advantage.

IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE)•Aug 30, 2025•0 citations

Machine learning with minimal use of quantum computers: Provable advantages in Learning Under Quantum Privileged Information (LUQPI)

Vasily Bokov, Lisa Kohl, Sebastian Schmitt +1 more

Quantum machine learning (QML) is often listed as a promising candidate for useful applications of quantum computers, in part due to numerous proofs of possible quantum advantages. A central question is how small a role quantum computers can play while still enabling provable learning advantages over classical methods. We study an especially restricted setting in which a quantum computer is used only as a feature extractor: it acts independently on individual data points, without access to labels or global dataset information, is available only to augment the training set, and is not available at deployment. Training and deployment are therefore carried out by fully classical learners on a dataset augmented with quantum-generated features. We formalize this model by adapting the classical framework of Learning Under Privileged Information (LUPI) to the quantum case, which we call Learning Under Quantum Privileged Information (LUQPI). Within this framework, we show that even such minimally involved quantum feature extraction, available only during training, can yield exponential quantum-classical separations for suitable concept classes and data distributions under reasonable computational assumptions. We further situate LUQPI within a taxonomy of related quantum and classical learning settings and show how standard classical machinery, most notably the SVM+ algorithm, can exploit quantum-augmented data. Finally, we present numerical experiments in a physically motivated many-body setting, where privileged quantum features are expectation values of observables on ground states, and observe consistent performance gains for LUQPI-style models over strong classical baselines.

quant-pharXiv:2601.22006•Jan 30, 2026•0 citations
We study the performance of classical and quantum machine learning (ML) models in predicting outcomes of physical experiments. The experiments depend on an input parameter x and involve execution of a (possibly unknown) quantum process E. Our figure of merit is the number of runs of E required to achieve a desired prediction performance. We consider classical ML models that perform a measurement and record the classical outcome after each run of E, and quantum ML models that can access E coherently to acquire quantum data; the classical or quantum data are then used to predict the outcomes of future experiments. We prove that for any input distribution D(x), a classical ML model can provide accurate predictions on average by accessing E a number of times comparable to the optimal quantum ML model. In contrast, for achieving an accurate prediction on all inputs, we prove that the exponential quantum advantage is possible. For example, to predict the expectations of all Pauli observables in an n-qubit system ρ, classical ML models require 2^{Ω(n)} copies of ρ, but we present a quantum ML model using only O(n) copies. Our results clarify where the quantum advantage is possible and highlight the potential for classical ML models to address challenging quantum problems in physics and chemistry.
Quantum technology promises to revolutionize how we learn about the physical world. An experiment that processes quantum data with a quantum computer could have substantial advantages over conventional experiments in which quantum states are measured and outcomes are processed with a classical computer. We proved that quantum machines could learn from exponentially fewer experiments than the number required by conventional experiments. This exponential advantage is shown for predicting properties of physical systems, performing quantum principal component analysis, and learning about physical dynamics. Furthermore, the quantum resources needed for achieving an exponential advantage are quite modest in some cases. Conducting experiments with 40 superconducting qubits and 1300 quantum gates, we demonstrated that a substantial quantum advantage is possible with today's quantum processors.
Machine learning models are used for pattern recognition analysis of big data, without direct human intervention. The task of unsupervised learning is to find the probability distribution that would best describe the available data, and then use it to make predictions for observables of interest. Classical models generally fit the data to Boltzmann distribution of Hamiltonians with a large number of tunable parameters. Quantum extensions of these models replace classical probability distributions with quantum density matrices. An advantage can be obtained only when features of density matrices that are absent in classical probability distributions are exploited. Such situations depend on the input data as well as the targeted observables. Explicit examples are discussed that bring out the constraints limiting possible quantum advantage. The problem-dependent extent of quantum advantage has implications for both data analysis and sensing applications.
Broadly applicable quantum advantage, particularly in classical data processing and machine learning, has been a fundamental open problem. In this work, we prove that a small quantum computer of polylogarithmic size can perform large-scale classification and dimension reduction on massive classical data by processing samples on the fly, whereas any classical machine achieving the same prediction performance requires exponentially larger size. Furthermore, classical machines that are exponentially larger yet below the required size need superpolynomially more samples and time. We provide evidence for these quantum advantages in real-world applications, including single-cell RNA sequencing and movie review sentiment analysis, demonstrating four to six orders of magnitude reduction in size with fewer than 60 logical qubits. These quantum advantages are enabled by quantum oracle sketching, an algorithm for accessing the classical world in quantum superposition using only random classical data samples. Combined with classical shadows, our algorithm circumvents the data loading and readout bottleneck to construct succinct classical models from massive classical data, a task provably impossible for any classical machine that is not exponentially larger than the quantum machine. These quantum advantages persist even when classical machines are granted unlimited time or if BPP = BQP, and rely only on the correctness of quantum mechanics. Together, our results establish machine learning on classical data as a broad and natural domain of quantum advantage and a fundamental test of quantum mechanics at the complexity frontier.
Abstract Quantum computers are believed to bring computational advantages in simulating quantum many-body systems. However, recent works have shown that classical machine learning algorithms are able to predict numerous properties of quantum systems with classical data. Despite examples of learning tasks with provable quantum advantages being proposed, they all involve cryptographic functions and do not represent any physical scenarios encountered in laboratory settings. In this paper, we prove quantum advantages for the physically relevant task of learning quantum observables from classical (measured-out) data. We consider two types of observables: first, we prove a learning advantage for linear combinations of Pauli strings, then we extend our results to a broader case of unitarily parametrized observables. For each case, we delineate sharp boundaries separating physically relevant tasks that admit efficient classical learning from those for which a quantum computer remains necessary for data analysis. Unlike previous works, our classical hardness results rely only on the weaker assumption that BQPBQPBQP B Q P hard processes cannot be simulated by polynomial-size classical circuits, and we also provide a nontrivial quantum learning algorithm. Our results clarify when quantum resources are useful for learning problems in quantum many-body physics, and suggest practical directions in which quantum learning improvements may emerge.
We developed a quantum-advantage predictor tool which uses machine learning models to determine when and at what cost a computational problem can be feasibly executed on gate-based quantum computers. We trained the models on data from Quantum Resource Estimators. Our ML-based tool aims at demonstrating a more realistic calculation of running times by considering not only QRE results but also the classical computational effort in running circuits into a quantum hardware (e.g., transpilation, algorithm preparation, solution encoding/decoding, etc.). The proposed tool is divided into two main sections: advantage may happen based on by year or by hardware evolutions for a determined problem and hardware specification. In both sections, a user can select a set of input parameters to verify the resulting runtimes and costs of quantum and classical parts to determine if quantum advantage will be achievable. Our application demonstrates that, despite limited information from vendors, we can still obtain accurate predictions to determine the realization of quantum advantage.
Quantum machine learning (QML) is often listed as a promising candidate for useful applications of quantum computers, in part due to numerous proofs of possible quantum advantages. A central question is how small a role quantum computers can play while still enabling provable learning advantages over classical methods. We study an especially restricted setting in which a quantum computer is used only as a feature extractor: it acts independently on individual data points, without access to labels or global dataset information, is available only to augment the training set, and is not available at deployment. Training and deployment are therefore carried out by fully classical learners on a dataset augmented with quantum-generated features. We formalize this model by adapting the classical framework of Learning Under Privileged Information (LUPI) to the quantum case, which we call Learning Under Quantum Privileged Information (LUQPI). Within this framework, we show that even such minimally involved quantum feature extraction, available only during training, can yield exponential quantum-classical separations for suitable concept classes and data distributions under reasonable computational assumptions. We further situate LUQPI within a taxonomy of related quantum and classical learning settings and show how standard classical machinery, most notably the SVM+ algorithm, can exploit quantum-augmented data. Finally, we present numerical experiments in a physically motivated many-body setting, where privileged quantum features are expectation values of observables on ground states, and observe consistent performance gains for LUQPI-style models over strong classical baselines.