We propose a new method for solving binary optimization problems under inequality constraints using a quantum annealer. To deal with inequality constraints, we often use slack variables, as in previous approaches. When we use slack variables, we usually conduct a binary expansion, which requires numerous physical qubits. Therefore, the problem of the current quantum annealer is limited to a small scale. In this study, we employ the alternating direction method of multipliers. This approach allows us to deal with various types using constraints in the current quantum annealer without slack variables. To test the performance of our algorithm, we use quadratic knapsack problems (QKPs). We compared the accuracy obtained by our method with a simulated annealer and the optimization and sampling mode of a D-Wave machine. As a result of our experiments, we found that the sampling mode shows the best accuracy. We also found that the computational time of our method is faster than that of the exact solver when we tackle various QKPs defined on dense graphs.
We propose a new method for solving binary optimization problems under inequality constraints using a quantum annealer. To deal with inequality constraints, we often use slack variables, as in previous approaches. When we use slack variables, we usually conduct a binary expansion, which requires numerous physical qubits. Therefore, the problem of the current quantum annealer is limited to a small scale. In this study, we employ the alternating direction method of multipliers. This approach allows us to deal with various types using constraints in the current quantum annealer without slack variables. To test the performance of our algorithm, we use quadratic knapsack problems (QKPs). We compared the accuracy obtained by our method with a simulated annealer and the optimization and sampling mode of a D-Wave machine. As a result of our experiments, we found that the sampling mode shows the best accuracy. We also found that the computational time of our method is faster than that of the exact solver when we tackle various QKPs defined on dense graphs.
Quantum computing approaches, such as Quantum Annealing (QA) and the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), have emerged as promising candidates for solving combinatorial optimization problems. Since these approaches typically work with Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problems, constraints, when present, are commonly encoded as penalty terms. Conventional approaches to incorporate inequality constraints into QUBO formulations additionally require the introduction of slack variables, increasing the required number of qubits. The Knapsack and Bin Packing problems are optimization problems with such inequality constraints. We show that the number of slack variables required to formulate the Knapsack problem as a QUBO problem can be reduced using certain properties specific to this problem. Moreover, we present two separate strategies for the Knapsack and Bin Packing problems that avoid using the costly slack variables altogether. Instead, both strategies solve several QUBO problems, with varying penalty constants, such that at least one of them is a good representation of the given optimization problem. Numerical simulations of QAOA, as well as experiments on a D-Wave quantum annealer, show that these slack-less approaches can improve performance compared to the conventional slack variable method (in terms of success probability), even when the latter is allowed to vary penalty constants too.
Abstract Solving combinatorial optimization problems of the kind that can be codified by quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) is a promising application of quantum computation. Some problems of this class suitable for practical applications such as the traveling salesman problem (TSP), the bin packing problem (BPP), or the knapsack problem (KP) have inequality constraints that require a particular cost function encoding. The common approach is the use of slack variables to represent the inequality constraints in the cost function. However, the use of slack variables considerably increases the number of qubits and operations required to solve these problems using quantum devices. In this work, we present an alternative method that does not require extra slack variables and consists of using an unbalanced penalization function to represent the inequality constraints in the QUBO. This function is characterized by larger penalization when the inequality constraint is not achieved than when it is. We evaluate our approach on the TSP, BPP, and KP, successfully encoding the optimal solution of the original optimization problem near the ground state cost Hamiltonian. Additionally, we employ D -Wave Advantage and D -Wave hybrid solvers to solve the BPP, surpassing the performance of the slack variables approach by achieving solutions for up to 29 items, whereas the slack variables approach only handles up to 11 items. This new approach can be used to solve combinatorial problems with inequality constraints with a reduced number of resources compared to the slack variables approach using quantum annealing or variational quantum algorithms.
Quantum annealing is a generic solver for combinatorial optimization problems that utilizes quantum fluctuations. Recently, there has been extensive research applying quantum annealers, which are hardware implementations of quantum annealing. Since quantum annealers can only handle quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problems, to solve constrained combinatorial optimization problems using quantum annealers, the constraints must be incorporated into the objective function. One such technique is the Ohzeki method, which employs a Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation to relax equality constraints, and its effectiveness for large-scale problems has been demonstrated numerically. This study applies the Ohzeki method to combinatorial optimization problems with inequality constraints. We show that inequality constraints can be relaxed into a similar objective function through statistical mechanics calculations similar to those for equality constraints. In addition, we evaluate the performance of this method in a typical inequality-constrained combinatorial optimization problem, the quadratic knapsack problem.
Several optimization solvers inspired by quantum annealing have been recently developed, either running on actual quantum hardware or simulating it on traditional digital computers. Industry and academics look at their potential in solving hard combinatorial optimization problems. Formally, they provide heuristic solutions for Ising models, which are equivalent to quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO). Constraints on solutions feasibility need to be properly encoded. We experiment on different ways of performing such an encoding. As benchmark we consider the cardinality constrained quadratic knapsack problem (CQKP), a minimal extension of QUBO with one inequality and one equality constraint. We consider different strategies of constraints penalization and variables encoding. We compare three QUBO solvers: quantum annealing on quantum hardware (D-Wave Advantage), probabilistic algorithms on digital hardware and mathematical programming solvers. We analyze their QUBO resolution quality and time, and the persistence values extracted in the quantum annealing sampling process. Our results show that a linear penalization of CQKP inequality improves current best practice. Furthermore, using such a linear penalization, persistence values produced by quantum hardware in a generic way allow to match a specific CQKP metric from literature. They are therefore suitable for general purpose variable fixing in core algorithms for combinatorial optimization.
Recent advances in quantum computing have shown great potential for solving combinatorial optimization problems. A notable example is the quadratic knapsack problem, a constrained binary optimization problem. However, current quantum-inspired algorithms require Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) formulations. Transforming constrained optimization into QUBO impacts the algorithms' speed and efficiency. In this study, we evaluate five existing transformation methods and propose four novel approaches. We assess them by using Simulated Annealing (SA), and find that three of our approaches outperform existing methods in terms of execution time as well as quality and quantity of feasible solutions found. Also, we tested these transformations on a quantum annealer, which was unable to solve even small instances, due to limitations in connectivity and error rates. In general, our results highlight the advantages of the new approaches, which reduce the number of variables in the QUBO representation.
Quantum annealing (QA) is used to solve combinatorial optimization problems (COPs). When COPs are implemented on quantum annealers, they are typically encoded as quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problems, but constraint encodings often increase the number of qubits and the embedding overhead. This issue is particularly important for COPs with inequality constraints, where standard slack-variable formulations introduce additional binary variables. Unbalanced penalization (UP) avoids slack variables, but the original UP formulation requires tuning two penalty coefficients and contains a squared residual term that can increase the number of quadratic couplings. In this paper, we propose the unbalanced penalization Ohzeki method (UPOM), which combines UP with the Ohzeki method for inequality-constrained COPs. UPOM replaces the two static penalty coefficients of original UP with an auxiliary-variable update and removes the squared residual term from the Hamiltonian used for sampling. We further propose the deep-unfolded unbalanced penalization Ohzeki method (DU-UPOM), which learns the step-size schedule of the UPOM update from training instances. Numerical experiments on random knapsack problems show that UPOM improves over original UP and that DU-UPOM reaches optimal solutions in fewer iterations than fixed-step UPOM and other baseline. These results demonstrate that the proposed framework reduces the tuning and embedding burdens of UP while making the Ohzeki method trainable for inequality constraints.