Quantum computing approaches, such as Quantum Annealing (QA) and the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), have emerged as promising candidates for solving combinatorial optimization problems. Since these approaches typically work with Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problems, constraints, when present, are commonly encoded as penalty terms. Conventional approaches to incorporate inequality constraints into QUBO formulations additionally require the introduction of slack variables, increasing the required number of qubits. The Knapsack and Bin Packing problems are optimization problems with such inequality constraints. We show that the number of slack variables required to formulate the Knapsack problem as a QUBO problem can be reduced using certain properties specific to this problem. Moreover, we present two separate strategies for the Knapsack and Bin Packing problems that avoid using the costly slack variables altogether. Instead, both strategies solve several QUBO problems, with varying penalty constants, such that at least one of them is a good representation of the given optimization problem. Numerical simulations of QAOA, as well as experiments on a D-Wave quantum annealer, show that these slack-less approaches can improve performance compared to the conventional slack variable method (in terms of success probability), even when the latter is allowed to vary penalty constants too.
Quantum computing approaches, such as Quantum Annealing (QA) and the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), have emerged as promising candidates for solving combinatorial optimization problems. Since these approaches typically work with Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problems, constraints, when present, are commonly encoded as penalty terms. Conventional approaches to incorporate inequality constraints into QUBO formulations additionally require the introduction of slack variables, increasing the required number of qubits. The Knapsack and Bin Packing problems are optimization problems with such inequality constraints. We show that the number of slack variables required to formulate the Knapsack problem as a QUBO problem can be reduced using certain properties specific to this problem. Moreover, we present two separate strategies for the Knapsack and Bin Packing problems that avoid using the costly slack variables altogether. Instead, both strategies solve several QUBO problems, with varying penalty constants, such that at least one of them is a good representation of the given optimization problem. Numerical simulations of QAOA, as well as experiments on a D-Wave quantum annealer, show that these slack-less approaches can improve performance compared to the conventional slack variable method (in terms of success probability), even when the latter is allowed to vary penalty constants too.
Abstract Solving combinatorial optimization problems of the kind that can be codified by quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) is a promising application of quantum computation. Some problems of this class suitable for practical applications such as the traveling salesman problem (TSP), the bin packing problem (BPP), or the knapsack problem (KP) have inequality constraints that require a particular cost function encoding. The common approach is the use of slack variables to represent the inequality constraints in the cost function. However, the use of slack variables considerably increases the number of qubits and operations required to solve these problems using quantum devices. In this work, we present an alternative method that does not require extra slack variables and consists of using an unbalanced penalization function to represent the inequality constraints in the QUBO. This function is characterized by larger penalization when the inequality constraint is not achieved than when it is. We evaluate our approach on the TSP, BPP, and KP, successfully encoding the optimal solution of the original optimization problem near the ground state cost Hamiltonian. Additionally, we employ D -Wave Advantage and D -Wave hybrid solvers to solve the BPP, surpassing the performance of the slack variables approach by achieving solutions for up to 29 items, whereas the slack variables approach only handles up to 11 items. This new approach can be used to solve combinatorial problems with inequality constraints with a reduced number of resources compared to the slack variables approach using quantum annealing or variational quantum algorithms.
Abstract Quantum computers have strict requirements for the problems that they can efficiently solve. One of the principal limiting factor for the performances of noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices is the number of qubits required by the running algorithm. Several combinatorial optimization problems can be solved with NISQ devices once that a corresponding quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) form is derived. Numerous techniques have been proposed to achieve such reformulations and, depending on the method chosen, the number of binary variables required, and therefore of qubits, can vary considerably. The aim of this work is to drastically reduce the variables needed for these QUBO reformulations in order to unlock the possibility to efficiently obtain optimal solutions for a class of optimization problems with NISQ devices. This goal is achieved by introducing novel tools that allow an efficient use of slack variables, even for problems with non-linear constraints, without the need to approximate the starting problem. We divide our new techniques in two independent parts, called the iterative quadratic polynomial and the master-satellite methods. Hence, we show how to apply our techniques in case of an NP-hard optimization problem inspired by a real-world financial scenario called Max-Profit Balance Settlement . We follow by submitting several instances of this problem to two D-wave quantum annealers, comparing the performances of our novel approach with the standard methods used in these scenarios. Moreover, this study allows to appreciate several performance differences between the D-wave Advantage and next-generation Advantage2 quantum annealers. We show that the adoption of our techniques in this context allows to obtain QUBO formulations with significantly fewer slack variables, i.e. around 90% less, and D-wave annealers provide considerably higher correct solution rates, which moreover do not decrease with the input size as fast as when adopting standard techniques.
Quantum computing has emerged as a promising alternative for solving combinatorial optimization problems. The standard approach for encoding optimization problems on quantum processing units (QPUs) involves transforming them into their Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) representation. However, encoding constraints of optimization problems, particularly inequality constraints, into QUBO requires additional variables, which results in more qubits. Considering the limited availability of qubits in NISQ machines, existing encoding methods fail to scale due to their reliance on large numbers of qubits. We propose a generalized exponential penalty framework for QUBO inequality constraints inspired by a class of exponential functions, which we call exponential penalization. This paper presents an encoding strategy for inequality constraints in combinatorial optimization problems, inspired by a class of exponential functions, which we call exponential penalization. The initial idea of using exponential penalties for QUBO formulation was introduced by Montanez-Barrera et al. by applying a specific exponential function to reduce qubit requirements. In this work, we extend that approach by conducting a comprehensive study on a broader class of exponential functions, analyzing their theoretical properties and empirical performance. Our experimental results demonstrate that an exponential penalization achieves 57%, 83% qubit number reduction for Bin Packing Problem (BPP) and Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP), respectively. And we demonstrate comparable solution quality to classical with a probability of 6% and 21% accuracy for BPP with 8 and TSP with 12 qubits, respectively.
The Multi-Knapsack Problem (MKP) is a fundamental challenge in operations research and combinatorial optimization. Quantum computing introduces new possibilities for solving MKP using Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) models. However, a key challenge in QUBO formulations is the selection of penalty parameters, which directly influence solution feasibility and algorithm performance. In this work, we develop QUBO formulations for two MKP variants—the Multidimensional Knapsack Problem (MDKP) and the Multiple Knapsack Problem (MUKP)—and provide an algebraic characterization of their penalty parameters. We systematically evaluate their impact through quantum simulation experiments and compare the performance of the two leading quantum optimization approaches: Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) and quantum annealing, alongside a state-of-the-art classical solver. Our results indicate that while classical solvers remain superior, careful tuning of penalty parameters has a strong impact on quantum optimization outcomes. QAOA is highly sensitive to parameter choices, whereas quantum annealing produces more stable results on small to mid-sized instances. Further, our results reveal that MDKP instances can maintain feasibility at penalty values below theoretical bounds, while MUKP instances show greater sensitivity to penalty reductions. Finally, we outline directions for future research in solving MKP, including adaptive penalty parameter tuning, hybrid quantum-classical approaches, and practical optimization strategies for QAOA, as well as real-hardware evaluations.
Recent advancements in quantum computing have demonstrated significant potential for solving combinatorial optimization problems, like the quadratic knapsack problem, a constrained binary optimization problem. How- ever, current quantum and quantum-inspired algorithms often require transforming these constrained problems into an unconstrained form, known as Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO). Such transfor- mations can significantly impact the algorithms’ speed and efficiency. In this study, we evaluate five existing transformation methods and propose four novel approaches. We assess all nine methods using Simulated An- nealing and find that three of our approaches outperform existing methods in terms of execution time and the quality and quantity of feasible solutions found. Additionally, we tested these transformations on quantum annealers, which were unable to solve even small problem instances, due to limitations in connectivity and error rates. However, our results highlight the advantages of the new approaches, which reduce the total num- ber of variables in the QUBO representation. This is a critical factor for enhanced performance on emerging quantum hardware, since it also reduces the required number of qubits and the embedding chain lengths.
The bin packing is a well-known NP-Hard problem in the domain of artificial intelligence, posing significant challenges in finding efficient solutions. Conversely, recent advancements in quantum technologies have shown promising potential for achieving substantial computational speedup, particularly in certain problem classes, such as combinatorial optimization. In this study, we introduce QAL-BP, a novel Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) formulation designed specifically for bin packing and suitable for quantum computation. QAL-BP utilizes the Augmented Lagrangian method to incorporate the bin packing constraints into the objective function while also facilitating an analytical estimation of heuristic, but empirically robust, penalty multipliers. This approach leads to a more versatile and generalizable model that eliminates the need for empirically calculating instance-dependent Lagrangian coefficients, a requirement commonly encountered in alternative QUBO formulations for similar problems. To assess the effectiveness of our proposed approach, we conduct experiments on a set of bin packing instances using a real Quantum Annealing device. Additionally, we compare the results with those obtained from two different classical solvers, namely simulated annealing and Gurobi. The experimental findings not only confirm the correctness of the proposed formulation, but also demonstrate the potential of quantum computation in effectively solving the bin packing problem, particularly as more reliable quantum technology becomes available.