Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2012.05212 · Quantum Studies Mathematics and Foundations

Towards a probabilistic foundation of relativistic quantum theory: the one-body Born rule in curved spacetime

Maik Reddiger, Bill Poirier

Published Oct 30, 2024• 4 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Abstract In this work, we establish a novel approach to the foundations of relativistic quantum theory, which is based on generalizing the quantum-mechanical Born rule for determining particle position probabilities to curved spacetime. A principal motivator for this research has been to overcome internal mathematical problems of relativistic quantum field theory (QFT) such as the ‘problem of infinities’ (renormalization), which axiomatic approaches to QFT have shown to be not only of mathematical but also of conceptual nature. The approach presented here is probabilistic by construction, can accommodate a wide array of dynamical models, does not rely on the symmetries of Minkowski spacetime, and respects the general principle of relativity. In the analytical part of this work, we consider the 1-body case under the assumption of smoothness of the mathematical quantities involved. This is identified as a special case of the theory of the general-relativistic continuity equation. While related approaches to the relativistic generalization of the Born rule assume the hypersurfaces of interest to be spacelike and the spacetime to be globally hyperbolic, we employ prior contributions by C. Eckart and J. Ehlers to show that the former condition is naturally replaced by a transversality condition and that the latter one is obsolete. We discuss two distinct formulations of the 1-body case, which, borrowing terminology from the non-relativistic analog, we term the Lagrangian and Eulerian pictures. We provide a comprehensive treatment of both. The main contribution of this work to the mathematical physics literature is the development of the Lagrangian picture. The Langrangian picture shows how one can address the ‘problem of time’ in this approach and, therefore, serves as a blueprint for the generalization to many bodies and the case that the number of bodies is not conserved. We also provide an example to illustrate how this approach can in principle be employed to model particle creation and annihilation.

DOI
10.1007/s40509-024-00349-0

Related papers

Foundations of a spacetime path formalism for relativistic quantum mechanics

Ed Seidewitz

Quantum field theory is the traditional solution to the problems inherent in melding quantum mechanics with special relativity. However, it has also long been known that an alternative first-quantized formulation can be given for relativistic quantum mechanics, based on the parametrized paths of particles in spacetime. Because time is treated similarly to the three space coordinates, rather than as an evolution parameter, such a spacetime approach has proved particularly useful in the study of quantum gravity and cosmology. This paper shows how a spacetime path formalism can be considered to arise naturally from the fundamental principles of the Born probability rule, superposition, and Poincaré invariance. The resulting formalism can be seen as a foundation for a number of previous parametrized approaches in the literature, relating, in particular, “off-shell” theories to traditional on-shell quantum field theory. It reproduces the results of perturbative quantum field theory for free and interacting particles, but provides intriguing possibilities for a natural program for regularization and renormalization. Further, an important consequence of the formalism is that a clear probabilistic interpretation can be maintained throughout, with a natural reduction to nonrelativistic quantum mechanics.

arXiv:quant-ph/0507115•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Nov 1, 2006•11 citations

Comment on "Born's rule for arbitrary Cauchy surfaces"

Maik Reddiger, Bill Poirier

A recent article has treated the question of how to generalize the Born rule from non-relativistic quantum theory to curved spacetimes (Lienert and Tumulka, Lett. Math. Phys. 110, 753 (2019)). The supposed generalization originated in prior works on 'hypersurface Bohm-Dirac models' as well as approaches to relativistic quantum theory developed by Bohm and Hiley. In this comment, we raise three objections to the rule and the broader theory in which it is embedded. In particular, to address the underlying assertion that the Born rule is naturally formulated on a spacelike hypersurface, we provide an analytic example showing that a spacelike hypersurface need not remain spacelike under proper time evolution -- even in the absence of curvature. We finish by proposing an alternative `curved Born rule' for the one-body case, which overcomes these objections, and in this instance indeed generalizes the one Lienert and Tumulka attempted to justify. Our approach can be generalized to the many-body case, and we expect it to be also of relevance for the general case of a varying number of bodies.

•Dec 10, 2020•0 citations

Probability in relativistic quantum mechanics and foliation of spacetime

Nikolic, H

The conserved probability densities (attributed to the conserved currents derived from relativistic wave equations) should be non-negative and the integral of them over an entire hypersurface should be equal to one. To satisfy these requirements in a covariant manner, the foliation of spacetime must be such that each integral curve of the current crosses each hypersurface of the foliation once and only once. In some cases, it is necessary to use hypersurfaces that are not spacelike everywhere. The generalization to the many-particle case is also possible.

•Feb 2, 2006•4 citations

On the Born rule in a new quantum approach

Inge S. Helland

In the context of a new approach towards quantum foundation, the Born rule is proved under weak conditions through several steps. Some of the steps turn out to have connections to statistical theory. One step gives a generalized likelihood principle, a result of independent interest. The sole additional assumption behind the Born rule is a consequence of the likelihood principle of statistics. This principle is discussed from several points of view. The whole approach towards quantum foundation advocated here, leads to a simpler and more intuitive pure state concept than the traditional one in quantum mechanics. It also provides links to statistical theory and to Andrei Khrennikov's macroscopical quantum-like models, in particular, models connected to cognition and decisions. Finally, the approach has connections to relativity theory and to quantum field theory. It is a hope that this approach now can be seen as a good alternative to the traditional formal foundation of quantum theory. The approach is here discussed in the case of finite-values parameters, but continuous parameters and parameters taking a countable set of values can be included in the theory by approximating them with finite-valued ones.

quant-pharXiv:2609.24269•Sep 22, 2026•0 citations

Generalization of the Born rule

Bruno Galvan

An alternative formulation of quantum mechanics is proposed based on a principle that can be considered a generalization of the Born rule. The principle is composed of a mathematical expression and an associated interpretation, and establishes a correlation between the positions of a particle at two different times. Under reasonable conditions for the wave function, this correlation implies that the particles follow quasiclassical trajectories. It is also shown that the Born rule is equivalent to a particular case of the evolved principle. These features allow the principle to provide a unified explanation of the results of the statistical experiments and of the quasiclassical macroscopic evolution. There is a strong analogy between the quantum principle and a probabilistic principle which is necessary to derive empirical predictions from the mathematical formalism of probability theory. This principle is referred to by some authors as Cournot's principle, while other authors use the equivalent notion of typicality. In this paper probability theory and quantum mechanics are formulated in such a way as to explicitly include the two principles and to emphasize the very similar conceptual structure of the two theories.

arXiv:0806.4935•Physical Review A•Oct 30, 2008•7 citations

Non Relativistic Quantum Mechanics and Classical Mechanics as Special Cases of the Same Theory.

Johan Noldus

We start by rewriting classical mechanics in a quantum mechanical fashion and point out that the only difference with quantum theory re- sides at one point. There is a classical analogon of the collapse of the wavefunction and an extension of the usual Born rule is proposed which might solve this problem. We work only with algebra’s over the real (com- plex) numbers, general number fields of finite characteristic allowing for finite dimensional representations of the commutation relations are not considered given that such fields are not well ordered and do not give rise to a well defined probability interpretation. Our theory generalizes however to discrete spacetimes and finite dimensional algebra’s. Looking at physics this way, spacetime itself distinguishes itself algebraically by means of well chosen commutation relations and there is further nothing special about it meaning it has also a particle interpretation just like any other dynamical variable. Likewise, there is no reason for the dynamics to be Hamiltonian and therefore we have a nonconservative formulation of quantum physics at hand. The harmonic oscillator (amongst few oth- ers) distinguishes itself because the algebra forms a finite dimensional Lie algebra; the classical and quantum (discrete) harmonic oscillator are stud- ied in a some more generality and examples are given which are neither classical, nor quantum.

•Sep 1, 2015•0 citations
Abstract In this work, we establish a novel approach to the foundations of relativistic quantum theory, which is based on generalizing the quantum-mechanical Born rule for determining particle position probabilities to curved spacetime. A principal motivator for this research has been to overcome internal mathematical problems of relativistic quantum field theory (QFT) such as the ‘problem of infinities’ (renormalization), which axiomatic approaches to QFT have shown to be not only of mathematical but also of conceptual nature. The approach presented here is probabilistic by construction, can accommodate a wide array of dynamical models, does not rely on the symmetries of Minkowski spacetime, and respects the general principle of relativity. In the analytical part of this work, we consider the 1-body case under the assumption of smoothness of the mathematical quantities involved. This is identified as a special case of the theory of the general-relativistic continuity equation. While related approaches to the relativistic generalization of the Born rule assume the hypersurfaces of interest to be spacelike and the spacetime to be globally hyperbolic, we employ prior contributions by C. Eckart and J. Ehlers to show that the former condition is naturally replaced by a transversality condition and that the latter one is obsolete. We discuss two distinct formulations of the 1-body case, which, borrowing terminology from the non-relativistic analog, we term the Lagrangian and Eulerian pictures. We provide a comprehensive treatment of both. The main contribution of this work to the mathematical physics literature is the development of the Lagrangian picture. The Langrangian picture shows how one can address the ‘problem of time’ in this approach and, therefore, serves as a blueprint for the generalization to many bodies and the case that the number of bodies is not conserved. We also provide an example to illustrate how this approach can in principle be employed to model particle creation and annihilation.
Quantum field theory is the traditional solution to the problems inherent in melding quantum mechanics with special relativity. However, it has also long been known that an alternative first-quantized formulation can be given for relativistic quantum mechanics, based on the parametrized paths of particles in spacetime. Because time is treated similarly to the three space coordinates, rather than as an evolution parameter, such a spacetime approach has proved particularly useful in the study of quantum gravity and cosmology. This paper shows how a spacetime path formalism can be considered to arise naturally from the fundamental principles of the Born probability rule, superposition, and Poincaré invariance. The resulting formalism can be seen as a foundation for a number of previous parametrized approaches in the literature, relating, in particular, “off-shell” theories to traditional on-shell quantum field theory. It reproduces the results of perturbative quantum field theory for free and interacting particles, but provides intriguing possibilities for a natural program for regularization and renormalization. Further, an important consequence of the formalism is that a clear probabilistic interpretation can be maintained throughout, with a natural reduction to nonrelativistic quantum mechanics.
A recent article has treated the question of how to generalize the Born rule from non-relativistic quantum theory to curved spacetimes (Lienert and Tumulka, Lett. Math. Phys. 110, 753 (2019)). The supposed generalization originated in prior works on 'hypersurface Bohm-Dirac models' as well as approaches to relativistic quantum theory developed by Bohm and Hiley. In this comment, we raise three objections to the rule and the broader theory in which it is embedded. In particular, to address the underlying assertion that the Born rule is naturally formulated on a spacelike hypersurface, we provide an analytic example showing that a spacelike hypersurface need not remain spacelike under proper time evolution -- even in the absence of curvature. We finish by proposing an alternative `curved Born rule' for the one-body case, which overcomes these objections, and in this instance indeed generalizes the one Lienert and Tumulka attempted to justify. Our approach can be generalized to the many-body case, and we expect it to be also of relevance for the general case of a varying number of bodies.
The conserved probability densities (attributed to the conserved currents derived from relativistic wave equations) should be non-negative and the integral of them over an entire hypersurface should be equal to one. To satisfy these requirements in a covariant manner, the foliation of spacetime must be such that each integral curve of the current crosses each hypersurface of the foliation once and only once. In some cases, it is necessary to use hypersurfaces that are not spacelike everywhere. The generalization to the many-particle case is also possible.
In the context of a new approach towards quantum foundation, the Born rule is proved under weak conditions through several steps. Some of the steps turn out to have connections to statistical theory. One step gives a generalized likelihood principle, a result of independent interest. The sole additional assumption behind the Born rule is a consequence of the likelihood principle of statistics. This principle is discussed from several points of view. The whole approach towards quantum foundation advocated here, leads to a simpler and more intuitive pure state concept than the traditional one in quantum mechanics. It also provides links to statistical theory and to Andrei Khrennikov's macroscopical quantum-like models, in particular, models connected to cognition and decisions. Finally, the approach has connections to relativity theory and to quantum field theory. It is a hope that this approach now can be seen as a good alternative to the traditional formal foundation of quantum theory. The approach is here discussed in the case of finite-values parameters, but continuous parameters and parameters taking a countable set of values can be included in the theory by approximating them with finite-valued ones.
An alternative formulation of quantum mechanics is proposed based on a principle that can be considered a generalization of the Born rule. The principle is composed of a mathematical expression and an associated interpretation, and establishes a correlation between the positions of a particle at two different times. Under reasonable conditions for the wave function, this correlation implies that the particles follow quasiclassical trajectories. It is also shown that the Born rule is equivalent to a particular case of the evolved principle. These features allow the principle to provide a unified explanation of the results of the statistical experiments and of the quasiclassical macroscopic evolution. There is a strong analogy between the quantum principle and a probabilistic principle which is necessary to derive empirical predictions from the mathematical formalism of probability theory. This principle is referred to by some authors as Cournot's principle, while other authors use the equivalent notion of typicality. In this paper probability theory and quantum mechanics are formulated in such a way as to explicitly include the two principles and to emphasize the very similar conceptual structure of the two theories.
We start by rewriting classical mechanics in a quantum mechanical fashion and point out that the only difference with quantum theory re- sides at one point. There is a classical analogon of the collapse of the wavefunction and an extension of the usual Born rule is proposed which might solve this problem. We work only with algebra’s over the real (com- plex) numbers, general number fields of finite characteristic allowing for finite dimensional representations of the commutation relations are not considered given that such fields are not well ordered and do not give rise to a well defined probability interpretation. Our theory generalizes however to discrete spacetimes and finite dimensional algebra’s. Looking at physics this way, spacetime itself distinguishes itself algebraically by means of well chosen commutation relations and there is further nothing special about it meaning it has also a particle interpretation just like any other dynamical variable. Likewise, there is no reason for the dynamics to be Hamiltonian and therefore we have a nonconservative formulation of quantum physics at hand. The harmonic oscillator (amongst few oth- ers) distinguishes itself because the algebra forms a finite dimensional Lie algebra; the classical and quantum (discrete) harmonic oscillator are stud- ied in a some more generality and examples are given which are neither classical, nor quantum.